Anna with love - Colchester

[oneeyesnake]

Comms: easy and efficient via text and she asks you to call her, at least she did me as i queried about her services. Only extra was Anal +30, everything else was in 1 hour session.

Cost: 100 for 1 hour

Services: FK, OWO, RO, fingers and AP

Link:
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Service:
Started with light kissing, which was a disappointment. Kissed down the body, which was toned - as per pictures. Realised that she had bolt on's, not mentioned on profile. Proceeded into RO and fingers which she seemed to enjoy. She indicated that it was her turn and went in for OWO which was good, giving attention to sac area. When i stopped her as I was nearing release, she immediately reached out for the coat and jumped on where i came not long after.
Still had 30 mins to go, so took on offer of massage - not professionally so okay. Turned tables and began with kissing nect and back area. Eventually ended up in AP which she enjoyed. Asked for another coat, then onto doggie, where i continued with fingers up the starfish, in fact she encouraged fur the play when i removed my fingers half way through. This encouraged me to pop.
Have to admit at this stage she was driving, which raises this from negative to neutral. The move from being mechanical onto more of a GFE.

Pros: all services stated and provided. 2nd half of session was more interactive. VFM
Cons: mechanical initially, bolt on's not a fan

Would I visit again? Yes, on the basis that the service is better as she gets to know you better.

BTW yes I have read other reviews and had to make my own mind up. So therefore a neutral for now.

[winkywanky]

Regarding her tits, to be fair she does state 'Enhanced' in her AW Interview.

[Bogof60]

Sorry to show my ignorance.
What is AP?

[winkywanky]

Anal Play.

[oneeyesnake]

WW just looked through the profile and yes she does. Missed that, my bad.

[Bogof60]

Thanks WW
 

[George South]

I see that she offers Annal
At first I thought it was a typo.
But then  realised it was anal with Anna

[randyandy1174]

Was swallow on offer / mentioned?

[oneeyesnake]

Andy, start to actively contribute to the site and maybe you may get some positive response...

[marion70]

Comms: easy and efficient via text and she asks you to call her, at least she did me as i queried about her services. Only extra was Anal +30, everything else was in 1 hour session.

Cost: 100 for 1 hour

Services: FK, OWO, RO, fingers and AP

Link:
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Service:
Started with light kissing, which was a disappointment. Kissed down the body, which was toned - as per pictures. Realised that she had bolt on's, not mentioned on profile. Proceeded into RO and fingers which she seemed to enjoy. She indicated that it was her turn and went in for OWO which was good, giving attention to sac area. When i stopped her as I was nearing release, she immediately reached out for the coat and jumped on where i came not long after.
Still had 30 mins to go, so took on offer of massage - not professionally so okay. Turned tables and began with kissing nect and back area. Eventually ended up in AP which she enjoyed. Asked for another coat, then onto doggie, where i continued with fingers up the starfish, in fact she encouraged fur the play when i removed my fingers half way through. This encouraged me to pop.
Have to admit at this stage she was driving, which raises this from negative to neutral. The move from being mechanical onto more of a GFE.

Pros: all services stated and provided. 2nd half of session was more interactive. VFM
Cons: mechanical initially, bolt on's not a fan

Would I visit again? Yes, on the basis that the service is better as she gets to know you better.

BTW yes I have read other reviews and had to make my own mind up. So therefore a neutral for now.

How would u rate her on looks ?

[oneeyesnake]

I know this is the normal white knight statement. But I would say better than the photos. She is toned, no fat that i can remember.
The neutral was because the service started mechanically, she did warm up towards the end. That's why I will see again to see if it is any different as she knows me...will write another review if I visit.

[marion70]

 Visited the wg recently. Big big disappointment !!! Pics are inaccurate probably about 10 years old. Medium service but age is way past 40. How does AW verify the pictures is atrocious. I could have walked away but did not want to be rude. Despite effort, I could not get a erection and had to finish with a hand job. Hate being deceived, the pictures potray a mid 20s woman.

[Naughtyboyuk]

Visited the wg recently. Big big disappointment !!! Pics are inaccurate probably about 10 years old. Medium service but age is way past 40. How does AW verify the pictures is atrocious. I could have walked away but did not want to be rude. Despite effort, I could not get a erection and had to finish with a hand job. Hate being deceived, the pictures potray a mid 20s woman.

That’s a real shame to hear as I had her on my HL for when in Colchester....won’t bother now

[oneeyesnake]

Marion,

I would raise a negative review if you haven't already. This will provide clarity to all.

Thanks in advance.

OES

[Bornslippy]

So profile states 35 when in fact she is more like 45? Is this correct?

[marion70]

So profile states 35 when in fact she is more like 45? Is this correct?

 Pictures potray a mid 20s woman or late 20s if you look. They have been heavily photo shopped. I would probably put correct age around 40.

 Point is when you meet her in person, you will be surprised as I was. Not an ageist but prefer young wgs as most people would. Review will be coming soon !! 🙂