Popular media on UKEscorting.com





    Author Topic: MissChloeLove  (Read 1691 times)

    [[Link hidden, login to view]]

    Just came across this profile and it seems Chloe is now called Tina.
    Remember reading a thread about her a while ago -  she was getting alot of negative feedback and she was actually making a bit of an arse of herself by responding. Not long before that thread I had booked with her and when I got to the door I got a text saying her Mum had died or some bullshit excuse.  Having read her current reviews it would seem she is still having some issues. 
    I'm of the opinion she should hang up her boots.  Has anyone been to see her recently?

    Offline kam878

    seen her last year in glasgow, she's very nice chatty girl nice body good services an my appointment overran by some time.. but be prepared for her coupon.. theres a reason she has no face pics.. a wee bit rough

    Can't quite figure out if negative comments from feedback only should be taken seriously.

    I understand feedback only is when a meet was not confirmed on adult-work, but doesn't that mean If I was a WG and I wanted to make a competitor look bad all I would have to do is set up a fake punter account then make a fake booking & leave nasty comment?





    Offline kam878

    aye crunchynuts witever.. wasnt a negative comment (i know it wasn't flattering perhaps) was just saying as the hibbyboy was asking about her. she was great all in just maybe not exactly as you'd expect

    Offline Marmalade

    Can't quite figure out if negative comments from feedback only should be taken seriously.

    I understand feedback only is when a meet was not confirmed on adult-work, but doesn't that mean If I was a WG and I wanted to make a competitor look bad all I would have to do is set up a fake punter account then make a fake booking & leave nasty comment?

    I think it's best to evaluate the reviewer to an extent either way. It's up to you how much you let a review influence your choice of punt.

    I was referring to AW feedback exclusively not your personnel post 878.

    I'm sort of blind to how it works in terms of reviews appearing as FEEDBACK ONLY it is hard to figure out if they are genuine. As opposed to the feedback here where I can judge the character of the reviewer by reading post history etc. although the same can just easily be said for a positive field report on AW "I don't like to go into any detail" ----AGH PISS OFF







      Latest media on UKEscorting.com