Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Whats A Fair Price for a Punt  (Read 19671 times)

Sadgit

  • Guest
punting is by it's nature a solitary pastime, how do you suggest we get 100% of punters all together to  make this work,

Are you asking me ??
If so why ask me....

Im only highlighting the PRINCIPLE as explained numerous times 
Never offered to spearhead operation PUNT  :D

But imho you dont need 100% of the punters to make it work.

 

Offline wristjob

Sadgit, I appreciate your economic principle, but isn't the market already setting the price, not some notional cartel of escorts/ agencies?


Well that;s the thing isn't it. I would guess there's no one agency in the UK that controls even 0.1% of the UK market. It's 80% independents all working for themselves, charging what they can relative to others.

I love this talk of all these economics principles. I'd love to know what they are 9other than a clueless man's "supply and demand") but if the market isn't adhering to the principles then clearly the principles are wrong. Not like economists do a great job on the whole is it.

Sadgit

  • Guest
Sadgit

I see you avoided my point about the fact that demand is more in elastic than elastic and how that combined with supply which is currently more elastic than in elastic.

I indeed did avoid your question as I dont feel any obligation what sover to answer every question.
PED if i remember rightly refers to the reactive relationship between price and demand (feel free to correct me if Im wrong as I dont claim to be an economist) PED is used to measure responsiveness of a service or goods in a change to its price.

inelastic goods and services refer to items that changes in prices have relatively small effect on the quantity of goods demanded.
elastic goods are the opposite.

I think WG's are elastic as I believe a drop in price would result in a increase in demand.
If Punts went down to £10 do you not think existing punters would punt more and thos that have never punted might consider it for £10.00

...my point about the fact that demand is more in elastic than elastic..

..... Is that a FACT or an opinion in the market in question.





Sadgit

  • Guest
Sadgit, I appreciate your economic principle, but isn't the market already setting the price, not some notional cartel of escorts/ agencies?

Unfortunately I don't think you will ever be able to form a cartel of punters, so the only mechanism for the market to lower the average strike price is for supply to exceed demand for sufficient time to overcome any price stickiness. More perfect price information for consumers will always help speed the process, this site exists for that purpose as we help each other find the best value for our money.

Interesting subject, thanks for raising it!  :drinks:

Thanks for a direct post that addressed the principle without the need to for personal attack.
Appreciated
Unfortunately I don't think you will ever be able to form a cartel of punters

I would agree with above and quite frankly it was never something I set out to do.
Somehow one person suggested it and everyone else just took the ball and ran without ever looking at my original position.

I said sites like this may be able to have some influence on the market, and whats the harm in trying, it would take support from admin etc.
All these comments where made in debate of how something like this could in theory work.

Someone got confused with terms such as in theory and in principle and thought I was proposing to actually spearhead this movement.
Cmon on now...be real.

I'd rather pay £150 than waste time changing the industry.

 :cool:

Offline smiths

As you two seem to be lacking the identical braincells I'll address both you comments in the same post

Explain to me how my economic argument is flawed please.
Whilst doing so please pay attention that the economic argument I am presenting is NOT my argument.Its is a  based of the basic laws applied in economics taught to economist throughout the world.
If you or your scholar  SMITHS have managed to rebuke this theory and find a flaw in it then we are wasting our time here.
Somebody better get on the phone to the FT or Economist news paper and let them know a member of a UK Punting has crashed your theories that has taken hundreds of years for you to develop.

Oh is this the answer your looking for that I posted ages ago ?
Really sorry but your answer is there and I really dont know how to explain it in more simple terms that are clearly required for you to understand.


Seems that many but especially the both of you  cant grasp the concept of a PRINCPLE and seemed to have not done your home work.
Instead of reading what I actually said you took the replies from others and applied them to me, Unfortunately your sources made tiny mistakes and you built your whole argument on those mistakes and created one huge mistake for yourselves....nice job boys  :lol:

You need to understand although  a principle can be 100% correct  bringing that principle to fruition may not be realistic in reality for various reasons but that doesn't mean the principle is incorrect does it now ??

The road tax scenario someone gave is a perfect example.
In theory you could workout how many vehicles are in London and how many holding centers, car parks , staff, clamps, cost of administration etc are available to the government and come up with a theory that in PRINCIPLE if nobody paid the government couldn't administrate towing and storing all the vehicles.
In PRINCIPLE you would be correct and only an idiot (or maybe two) would try and disprove the PRINCIPLE.
The fact that some people may be happy to pay and others think its good value, or they can afford it etc, or it will never happen has SWEET FA to do with the PRINCIPLE…do you get it now.

 :dash: :dash: :dash:


I have always been putting forward the principle and used kindergarden level economics to try and explain this to you.
Its not my fault that the brain cell you both share couldn't workout I was putting forward a "economic principle" despite me repeatedly saying so.

Nobody has presented an economics answer to a economic problem.
Its a BUSINESS…its as simple as that a BUSINESS that can run on an unskilled workforce force, has no USP in an over crowded market paying staff far more than they could get TAX FREE in any other legitimate employment.

It works for one reason only…MEN think with their dicks so pay above the odds.
If they could control their dicks they could control the market.

It was the beginning of post 18 of this thread posted by you where you in reply to Harry say its £150 that i was talking about, i even mentioned it was post 18 previously.

Still no answer as to how ALL punters would be aware of any decision punters might make on here not to pay over a certain price, AND how anyone would know that ALL punters agreeing to any decision made didnt pay more but not admit doing so, as i said its not unknown that sometimes people lie, FACT.

This post like a number of your previous ones on this thread is just complete rubbish that doesnt address the central points i have made above. What you have been banging on about in this thread is pie in the sky fantasy, with the word IF punters stuck together as its premise, punters dont ALL stick together though as some have their own views on things, and thats of course not including those punters not even aware of this site. Complete and total fantasy in reality.

Online hendrix

This £150....does it include anal, rimming, facial, face fucking and swallow?

Iulia_P

  • Guest
I indeed did avoid your question as I dont feel any obligation what sover to answer every question.
PED if i remember rightly refers to the reactive relationship between price and demand (feel free to correct me if Im wrong as I dont claim to be an economist) PED is used to measure responsiveness of a service or goods in a change to its price.

inelastic goods and services refer to items that changes in prices have relatively small effect on the quantity of goods demanded.
elastic goods are the opposite.

I think WG's are elastic as I believe a drop in price would result in a increase in demand.
If Punts went down to £10 do you not think existing punters would punt more and thos that have never punted might consider it for £10.00

..... Is that a FACT or an opinion in the market in question.

Prices charged by WGs are in my view inelastic : A punter will only pay to see a woman he couldn't see without making direct payment; as distinct from indirect payment such as marriage. A punter won't choose a WG to see who is the same or less attractive than his wife. If he has less money,  he’ll see desired WGs less frequently.

Sadgit

  • Guest
It was the beginning of post 18 of this thread posted by you where you in reply to Harry say its £150 that i was talking about, i even mentioned it was post 18 previously.

SMITHS I have no cllue to what your talking about.
What is your question ... ??

State your question and its relevance and I will answer...unless of course it has no relevance.
In that case Ill just explain why it has no relevance ok.

I believe I have already answered this but for clarity post whatever it is that's causing you so much distress and I promise to answer.
If I have answered previously Ill just copy and paste the old answer with date and time of when it was first answered.

Do you want to back through the post just to check you didnt get carried away reading someone else post on what I apparently said  :D
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 08:25:02 pm by Sadgit »

Offline smiths

SMITHS I have no cllue to what your talking about.
What is your question ... ??

State your question and its relevance and I will answer...unless of course it has no relevance.
In that case Ill just explain why it has no relevance ok.

I believe I have already answered this but for clarity post whatever it is that's causing you so much distress and I promise to answer.
If I have answered previously Ill just copy and paste the old answer with date and time of when it was first answered.

Do you want to back through the post just to check you didnt get carried away reading someone else post on what I apparently said  :D

I note you thanked VT for not personally attacking you but replied to me about lacking brain cells, your a real piece of work.

I have asked you to answer my questions consistently but you refuse to do so, up to you of course. The questions being how would ALL punters know those on here had agreed only to pay up to a certain amount to WGs and how it would be proven ALL had stuck to that. So lets see if you answer these questions now.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 08:31:52 pm by smiths »

HarryRoss

  • Guest

vt

  • Guest
Thanks for a direct post that addressed the principle without the need to for personal attack.
Appreciated
I would agree with above and quite frankly it was never something I set out to do.
Somehow one person suggested it and everyone else just took the ball and ran without ever looking at my original position.

I said sites like this may be able to have some influence on the market, and whats the harm in trying, it would take support from admin etc.
All these comments where made in debate of how something like this could in theory work.

Someone got confused with terms such as in theory and in principle and thought I was proposing to actually spearhead this movement.
Cmon on now...be real.

I'd rather pay £150 than waste time changing the industry.

 :cool:

I agree, this site could help in 2 ways, the first is already operating, the second may have legs:

1. It provides more perfect price information, by punter reviewers pointing out that good service is available at lower pricepoints, driving demand to where there is value and away from where there isn't. Before punter review sites like this existed, punters had very imperfect information, mostly just from their own trial & error experience and poor value could thrive.

2. To organise a buyer's strike to force a price reduction would take a lot of organisation and cooperation. Sites like Groupon do operate on a similar principle by bringing together buyers and bartering a discount. Due to the personal & individual nature of the punting service, I suspect this would be difficult to implement.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 08:45:12 pm by vt »

Offline DJ Fruit Polo

Its a BUSINESS…its as simple as that a BUSINESS that can run on an unskilled workforce force, has no USP in an over crowded market paying staff far more than they could get TAX FREE in any other legitimate employment.


I don't agree that the workforce is unskilled or that the business has no USP.  Every WG's USP is herself: whether it's her age (younger or older), ethnicity, body shape, services offered or just her plain old beauty.  It might be the profile photos that tempt you to her front door in the first place, and there are a lot of good-looking escorts out there, but it's a lady's unique personality and attitude that keep you coming back rather than seeing another girl instead!

In my opinion.   

Offline DJ Fruit Polo

2. To organise a buyer's strike to force a price reduction would take a lot of organisation and cooperation. Sites like Groupon do operate on a similar principle by bringing together buyers and bartering a discount. Due to the personal & individual nature of the punting service, I suspect this would be difficult to implement.

Yep   :lol:

It might work if you're organising a group outing to a European brothel though    :)

Sadgit

  • Guest
Prices charged by WGs are in my view inelastic : A punter will only pay to see a woman he couldn't see without making direct payment; as distinct from indirect payment such as marriage. A punter won't choose a WG to see who is the same or less attractive than his wife. If he has less money,  he’ll see desired WGs less frequently.

If we agree that within Price Elasticity of Demand, the quantity demanded of a service has a responsive relationship related to it price.
Inelastic (no movement) relates to goods and service  that change in price have little to no effect on demand.

If we both agree on the above then its really a case of whether you believe the demand would remain the same regardless of price for a punt.

I believe demand would increase if the price dropped.
Punters would queuing up if £500 WGs dropped to £80.00 and many would stop punting if you couldnt get a punt for less than £500.00.

A relationship exist between price and demand so it is therefore elastic.

But your welcome to disagree.

Sadgit

  • Guest
I note you thanked VT for not personally attacking you but replied to me about lacking brain cells, your a real piece of work.
You have repeatedly attacked me and my response has been based on that.
VT didnt...so yes that just demonstrates I reply as approached.
If your civil to me Im happy to return the curtsey

I have asked you to answer my questions consistently but you refuse to do so, up to you of course. The questions being how would ALL punters know those on here had agreed only to pay up to a certain amount to WGs and how it would be proven ALL had stuck to that. So lets see if you answer these questions now.

I said to you in my last post.....STATE YOUR QUESTION.
Go back and read the last post I made to you before going further.

Im sure your not reading everything.

Offline smiths

You have repeatedly attacked me and my response has been based on that.
VT didnt...so yes that just demonstrates I reply as approached.
If your civil to me Im happy to return the curtsey

I said to you in my last post.....STATE YOUR QUESTION.
Go back and read the last post I made to you before going further.

Im sure your not reading everything.

I have stated my questions time and time again. How would ALL punters know those on here had ALL agreed to paying a maximum price to WGs and no more than that? AND how would it be proved ALL on here would stick to that and not pay more if they decided to?
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 09:14:35 pm by smiths »

Sadgit

  • Guest
I don't agree that the workforce is unskilled or that the business has no USP.  Every WG's USP is herself: whether it's her age (younger or older), ethnicity, body shape, services offered or just her plain old beauty.  It might be the profile photos that tempt you to her front door in the first place, and there are a lot of good-looking escorts out there, but it's a lady's unique personality and attitude that keep you coming back rather than seeing another girl instead!

In my opinion.

Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.
Yes every girl looks different but you could easily find a replacement if she was busy...

Im sure on any given day you would shag at least 50% of the 1000's of working girls available, when there are 1000's of girls that can replace you your not unique.
It not a USP.

Offline smiths

Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.
Yes every girl looks different but you could easily find a replacement if she was busy...

Im sure on any given day you would shag at least 50% of the 1000's of working girls available, when there are 1000's of girls that can replace you your not unique.
It not a USP.

Absolute rubbish, i walked out of a party provider in 2008 because they didnt have the WG advertised on the rota that i wanted to punt with. Some of us wish to punt with specific WGs, for example those that want to punt with a specific pornstar WG because they particularly fancy HER. I have been bait and switched but didnt stay to punt with the switch as she wasnt the WG whose pictures i saw when i booked.

I see you actually think you can speak for other punters, "not to the point where it makes that much difference to the punter". How do you know thats true, in reality you dont, your guessing thats how punters think.

Offline DJ Fruit Polo

Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.

Speak for yourself.


Yes every girl looks different but you could easily find a replacement if she was busy...

It isn't solely about looks and although I agree you could organise an alternate booking, it doesn't necessarily follow that the "replacement" lady would be of equal value (and I don't mean in a monetary sense) to you as your first choice.

Again, in my opinion.  Punters are unique(ish) too   :hi:


Online hendrix

Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.
Yes every girl looks different but you could easily find a replacement if she was busy...

Im sure on any given day you would shag at least 50% of the 1000's of working girls available, when there are 1000's of girls that can replace you your not unique.
It not a USP.

Wrong. It makes a huge difference because of the services offered. Or, do you think a "shag" i.e penetrative vaginal sexual intercourse is all that a punt is?  :)

vorian

  • Guest
Every girl is unique but not to the point that it makes that much difference to a punter.

Sorry I have to disagree with that statement,  makes a massive difference to me personally.

Iulia_P

  • Guest
If we agree that within Price Elasticity of Demand, the quantity demanded of a service has a responsive relationship related to it price.
Inelastic (no movement) relates to goods and service  that change in price have little to no effect on demand.

If we both agree on the above then its really a case of whether you believe the demand would remain the same regardless of price for a punt.

I believe demand would increase if the price dropped.
Punters would queuing up if £500 WGs dropped to £80.00 and many would stop punting if you couldnt get a punt for less than £500.00.

A relationship exist between price and demand so it is therefore elastic.

But your welcome to disagree.

Your points are well taken! The bigger  the price, the less frequently the punter would see the woman,  all else being equal - so yes, demand would fall.

Sadgit

  • Guest
Wrong. It makes a huge difference because of the services offered. Or, do you think a "shag" i.e penetrative vaginal sexual intercourse is all that a punt is?  :)

So are you saying you only punt with one WG's no other interest you or could replace her ?? You wouldnt punt with any other girl ??
If she packed in the game your punting days would stop ??

Have you fallen in love with a BRASS

Would have thought most punters on here may have their type, whether it be Asian, Big boobs, Chubby, FAT long legs...whatever but they arent sold on one girl only and would punt with as many girls that they fancy and can afford.

You might be different...who knows


The uniqueness has to be applied to how it effects the

Rochdull lad

  • Guest
Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.
Yes every girl looks different but you could easily find a replacement if she was busy...

Im sure on any given day you would shag at least 50% of the 1000's of working girls available, when there are 1000's of girls that can replace you your not unique.
It not a USP.

Sorry I have to disagree with that statement,  makes a massive difference to me personally.

And me.  That's why an appointment with, e.g., one Milf goes well for me while another one goes down like a lead balloon.  There's got to be a bit of chemistry involved in all this.

Curious6705

  • Guest
Sorry but IMO, Sadgit - you are a TROLL aren't you?

I applaud other posters' patience and politeness in their responses to you. :drinks:

Sadgit

  • Guest
I have stated my questions time and time again. How would ALL punters know those on here had ALL agreed to paying a maximum price to WGs and no more than that? AND how would it be proved ALL on here would stick to that and not pay more if they decided to?

I never suggested all punters on her came to an agreement to fix price or a marketing campaign to let all punters know about a pricing guide so not sure why you felt I was obligated to do so and therefore required to answer.

However I did reply in line with principle of supply and demand.

Did you not see my earlier response...
It really doesnt matter if somebody pays over the odds, the point Im making is about establishing new odds.

Sadgit

  • Guest
Sorry but IMO, Sadgit - you are a TROLL aren't you?

I applaud other posters' patience and politeness in their responses to you. :drinks:

A Troll
I take offensive to this.
Name one instance where I was rude or impolite in the first instance in any correspondence to any poster...FIRST INSTANCE REMEMBER

I have treated everyone with respect and stuck to the subject up until the point they decide to attack me and make comments outside the realms of the debate such as you are doing now.

Whos the Troll

Offline smiths

I never suggested all punters on her came to an agreement to fix price or a marketing campaign to let all punters know about a pricing guide so not sure why you felt I was obligated to do so and therefore required to answer.

However I did reply in line with principle of supply and demand.

Did you not see my earlier response...

Right so thats clear. Why do you think you speak for other punters as your post 116 shows? As you can see by some replies from punters to it they dont agree with you.

Curious6705

  • Guest
A Troll
I take offensive to this.
Name one instance where I was rude or impolite in the first instance in any correspondence to any poster...FIRST INSTANCE REMEMBER

I have treated everyone with respect and stuck to the subject up until the point they decide to attack me and make comments outside the realms of the debate such as you are doing now.

Whos the Troll

Your first reply to me.

In your first post on the thread you said you are new to this. In my first post on the thread I stated your viewpoint is extremely naive. 

Given that by your own admission you are "new to this" to point out you are extremely naive is entirely reasonable.

In reply, you suggested my post was not valid.  :hi:



 

Online hendrix

So are you saying you only punt with one WG's no other interest you or could replace her ?? You wouldnt punt with any other girl ??
If she packed in the game your punting days would stop ??

Have you fallen in love with a BRASS

Would have thought most punters on here may have their type, whether it be Asian, Big boobs, Chubby, FAT long legs...whatever but they arent sold on one girl only and would punt with as many girls that they fancy and can afford.

You might be different...who knows


The uniqueness has to be applied to how it effects the

Haha!..I notice you refer to type, Asian, big boobs etc...when I specifically referred to services...you've never punted have you? :) ...or do you think that all the BRASS offer the same services? :)

Sadgit

  • Guest
Your first reply to me.

In your first post on the thread you said you are new to this. In my first post on the thread I stated your viewpoint is extremely naive. 

Given that by your own admission you are "new to this" to point out you are extremely naive is entirely reasonable.

In reply, you suggested my post was not valid.  :hi:

Err I think this was the first correspondence between you and I

I think your idea is naive in the extreme.
They weren't  my Ideas as I pointed out

But that's just my opinion, and I applaud other posters who exhibit more patience and politeness in their replies to you.

And you think this is a positive and polite way to start a civil line of communication...REALLY

Curious6705

  • Guest
They weren't  my Ideas as I pointed out

You post about something you don't know about - in your own words you are "new to this"

You post opinions which are not your own - in your own words "they weren't my Ideas as I pointed out"

IMO this is the definition of a TROLL
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 10:59:14 pm by Curious6705 »

Offline wristjob

Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.
Yes every girl looks different but you could easily find a replacement if she was busy...

Im sure on any given day you would shag at least 50% of the 1000's of working girls available, when there are 1000's of girls that can replace you your not unique.
It not a USP.

If you are willing to shag just about any girl you already have your discount and cheaper than teh £75ph you mentioned. list further up the thread of loads of cheap girls.


Sadgit

  • Guest
You post about something you don't know about - in your own words you are "new to this"

You post opinions which are not your own - in your own words "they weren't my Ideas as I pointed out"



Wrong again...I posted about the ECONOMIC PRINCIPLE being applied.
You only have to know school boy level economics to apply this to any business model.

I might be new to punting but you are clearly new to things you should have learned at school

IMO this is the definition of a TROLL

Let me get this right...talking about something you dont know about is YOUR opinion the definition of a TROLL
Its obvious your opinions arent in line with commonly accepted definition of a TROLL



Sadgit

  • Guest
If you are willing to shag just about any girl you already have your discount and cheaper than teh £75ph you mentioned. list further up the thread of loads of cheap girls.

Err where did I state Id shag any girl.

You guys keep adding 1+1 and getting 3.
Absolutely incredible the conclusion you come to in order to make statement that really has no foundation to support its existence other than the one you create.

Somehow youve now concluded I will shag any girl because you cant apply the concept of USP when applied to a service.

FECKIN INCREDIBLE

Offline wristjob

Err where did I state Id shag any girl.


I gave you a clue BY QUOTING YOU

Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter.

Biggest troll we've had on here - and probably lasted the longest too.

Offline Olivia

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 74
  • Likes: 0
Your probably right and I have to respect the fact there is a good chance you have more experience in the punting forum arena than I do.
Punting is a business just like any other so hard to imagine why they wouldnt react the same as any other business in a competitive market that didnt poses any USP whatsoever. 

Quite likely nothing will come of this but no harm in trying....just for fun :-)


What you're suggesting defies logic and ignores what is in fact a far more dynamic economic market than what you assume to form the basis of your proposal. 

I checked out the stats for my own city, illustrating this point explicitly.

Number of escort profiles listed on searching my city: 'Female'/'Escort' = 200 (rounded up)

Number of profiles listing profiles offering 1 hour incall rates between £90 - £100 = 49

Number of profiles listing profiles offering 1 hour incall rates between £120 - £130 = 72

Number of profiles listing profiles offering 1 hour incall rates between £150 - £160 = 65

Therefore the number of girls offering an hourly rate 33% LESS than what you claim to be an 'industry standard' totals one quarter of the total number of workers in this city and there are only (roughly) twenty five percent more prossies providing a 1 hour incall at the 'industry standard' rate of between £150-£160 than do £90-£100.

vorian

  • Guest

What you're suggesting defies logic and ignores what is in fact a far more dynamic economic market than what you assume to form the basis of your proposal. 

I checked out the stats for my own city, illustrating this point explicitly.

Number of escort profiles listed on searching my city: 'Female'/'Escort' = 200 (rounded up)

Number of profiles listing profiles offering 1 hour incall rates between £90 - £100 = 49

Number of profiles listing profiles offering 1 hour incall rates between £120 - £130 = 72

Number of profiles listing profiles offering 1 hour incall rates between £150 - £160 = 65

Therefore the number of girls offering an hourly rate 33% LESS than what you claim to be an 'industry standard' totals one quarter of the total number of workers in this city and there are only (roughly) twenty five percent more prossies providing a 1 hour incall at the 'industry standard' rate of between £150-£160 than do £90-£100.

I must admit I don't know where the OP got this £150 figure came from in the first place. Many factors such as location are involved. So why £150 why not £120 or £100  :unknown:

Curious6705

  • Guest
Wrong again...I posted about the ECONOMIC PRINCIPLE being applied.
You only have to know school boy level economics to apply this to any business model.

It's like you read the first sentence of the Ladybird book of Economics.

If you'd read the second sentence you would know the market for sex cannot be manipulated in the way you are suggesting.

This has now been explained to you over and over again by many posters.

But in response you behave as though you are too arrogant and stupid to understand. Or maybe you are just a troll ...

Offline cunnyhunt

I must admit I don't know where the OP got this £150 figure came from in the first place. Many factors such as location are involved. So why £150 why not £120 or £100  :unknown:

I do not know either, £120 is more probable.

This is a shit thread and the OP is becoming troll like with "his" replies.

Sadgit

  • Guest
I gave you a clue BY QUOTING YOU

Biggest troll we've had on here - and probably lasted the longest too.

So saying "Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter" is the same as saying Id shag any girl.....

YOU ARE TRULY A FOOL.

You friends cringe is silence as they know your wrong but dare not say it as it will embarrass you

vorian

  • Guest
I do not know either, £120 is more probable.

This is a shit thread and the OP is becoming troll like with "his" replies.

I think he may have started off with good intentions,  many newbie punters/members myself included get carried away with the collective nature of the forum at first and think they have a fantastic idea which will improve punting for all. However over time I realised the reality of the situation and changed my opinions to a degree.  I think in the OP's case he backed himself into a corner would not acknowledge what others were saying and has become increasingly troll like. I'm not convinced that was his original intention.


Just reading his last post maybe I was wrong.

Sadgit

  • Guest
What you're suggesting defies logic and ignores what is in fact a far more dynamic economic market than what you assume to form the basis of your proposal

How on earth did you come to the conclusion I am PROPOSING anything.
As stated for the 100th time I am merely putting forward a basic principle of economics and applying it to this business model.
Some of you think there is something unique about WG's the USP you apply could be applied to anything.
Two cleaners are identical but the cleaning business doesnt normally  factor USP in it selling points.
You get good cleaners, bad cleaners, polite cleaners etc.
Personality in this sector is not a USP as thats not what your ultimately paying for.

Your arguments are a kin to Tescos claiming their USP is the checkout girls as everyone of them is unique....




Therefore the number of girls offering an hourly rate 33% LESS than what you claim to be an 'industry standard' totals one quarter of the total number of workers in this city and there are only (roughly) twenty five percent more prossies providing a 1 hour incall at the 'industry standard' rate of between £150-£160 than do £90-£100.

What exactly is the point your trying to make and how does it refute the basic foundations of supply and demand

Sadgit

  • Guest
I must admit I don't know where the OP got this £150 figure came from in the first place. Many factors such as location are involved. So why £150 why not £120 or £100  :unknown:

Err I dont know why you are clinging to the £150 as it really is a moot point.
The price is irrelevant as I have told you many times....Its the principle.

But just to tickle your balls the majority of agencies I have come across in London charge £150 ph in call for any girl id consider.
For every London agency that you find below £150 ph in call  I will find Two that has girls for £150+
and lets see who runs out of agencies first...deal

To be honest I hope you win


Sadgit

  • Guest
Funny how I am being labeled TROLL when in every instance the first derogatory remark is never made by me.

Bullies hate people fighting back so lets call him a TROLL. and act like we are the ones defending ourselves.
Lets forget we actually threw the first stone.

Any poster is welcome to show I was rude or made a derogatory remark to in reply to a respectfully put comment they directed towards or referred to me.


Anyone that's polite to me I thank them and return my reply with the same courtesy they have shown me.
 
« Last Edit: March 25, 2014, 10:38:06 am by Sadgit »

Online hendrix

How on earth did you come to the conclusion I am PROPOSING anything.
As stated for the 100th time I am merely putting forward a basic principle of economics and applying it to this business model.
Some of you think there is something unique about WG's the USP you apply could be applied to anything.
Two cleaners are identical but the cleaning business doesnt normally  factor USP in it selling points.
You get good cleaners, bad cleaners, polite cleaners etc.
Personality in this sector is not a USP as thats not what your ultimately paying for.

Your arguments are a kin to Tescos claiming their USP is the checkout girls as everyone of them is unique....




What exactly is the point your trying to make and how does it refute the basic foundations of supply and demand

They're not though. One only cleans downstairs, the other does upstairs and the basement too. :)

vorian

  • Guest
Err I dont know why you are clinging to the £150 as it really is a moot point.
The price is irrelevant as I have told you many times....Its the principle.

But just to tickle your balls the majority of agencies I have come across in London charge £150 ph in call for any girl id consider.
For every London agency that you find below £150 ph in call  I will find Two that has girls for £150+
and lets see who runs out of agencies first...deal

To be honest I hope you win

I think he may have started off with good intentions,  many newbie punters/members myself included get carried away with the collective nature of the forum at first and think they have a fantastic idea which will improve punting for all. However over time I realised the reality of the situation and changed my opinions to a degree.  I think in the OP's case he backed himself into a corner would not acknowledge what others were saying and has become increasingly troll like. I'm not convinced that was his original intention.


Just reading his last post maybe I was wrong.

It now appears I was indeed wrong.


But just to tickle your balls the majority of agencies I have come across in London charge £150 ph in call for any girl id consider.


As you said that you would consider, you cannot and do not speak for all punters and now you are being rude to people who have never been rude to you, that's up to you of course this is not PN, you can call me a cunt if you wish I could not care less. However this unnecessary rudeness, may be the reason people think you are a troll.

Personally I still do not think that, I just think you are a person who does not listen to the views of others and have entrenched your position so much, that you cannot back down without losing face.

Offline smiths

So saying "Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter" is the same as saying Id shag any girl.....

YOU ARE TRULY A FOOL.

You friends cringe is silence as they know your wrong but dare not say it as it will embarrass you

You cant know that that is true though, you have no idea what makes a difference to a punter you dont know, anymore than i or others do. Yet you clearly believe you do as that sentence showed.

My advice is stick to what YOU think and dont believe you know what other punters think. Up to you of course, but you made yourself look very foolish stating something that you cant possibly know. A number of other punters picked you up on that sentence, it was that stupid a thing to post.

Offline smiths

So saying "Every girl is unique but not to the point hat it makes that much difference to a punter" is the same as saying Id shag any girl.....

YOU ARE TRULY A FOOL.

You friends cringe is silence as they know your wrong but dare not say it as it will embarrass you

Weird, so you now think you know what Wristjobs friends think of him. You are clearly deluded and believe you know something its impossible for you to know unless you know Wristjob and his friends, and there is no indication from him that you do.

Offline cunnyhunt

The OP is not as smart as he thinks he is.
It would be better if he forgot this thread and reviewed the £150 girls he has seen as that would be more useful.  :hi: