OK, so she may be a published tattoo model, but what does that mean other than that some damn good tattoo artist has practised his trade on her. Now if a girl claims (and better if she actually is) a published glamour model then you have some kind of idea that she is likely to have what we are looking for when we punt. Surely when we punt we look for something that turns us on - facial features, physical characteristics etc. Surely the fact that a girl has good tattoos, while that may be the icing on the cake for some, is not going to be the determinative factor in choosing a girl? Would you choose a girl who was physically unattractive to you just because she had some good tattoos? I think not
Or perhaps I am talking through my arse.
All I did was post a review of a nice girl that I have seen! How she writes her Profile is up to her, who attracts you and you want to see is up to you. A small correction to your post though. I don't think she claims to be a "...a published glamour model..." just a "...I'm a published tattooed model..."
Now sometimes I am prepared to take a chance if there is no face picture, on this occassion there was no chance involved as I have met Evie before, but I would have done because I like the "Goth" look.
You also say;
"...Would you choose a girl who was physically unattractive to you just because she had some good tattoos? I think not..."
Again from her body pictures on her profile I doubted that I would find her "physically unattractive," that and the thought that even a "...damn good tattoo artist..." would want to show off his work on a good canvas, allows me to take a chance on a meeting with someone.
I will have no more to say on this thread, I understand the reasons for the questions raised and I have no further need to defend my review and I have no need to defend Evie's looks or profile.