Author Topic: Strawberryblonde - Merseyside Tour Summer 2019 - 1hr incall @£170  (Read 5404 times)


7 review(s) for Strawberryblonde (6 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Gordon Bennett

External Link/Members Only

Short Version

Friendly and obliging lady but didn't feel any connection or genuine warmth. Business-like would be best description.
Was not ready at agreed time.
Room and breath had strong aroma of fish.

Long Version (sorry, really loooonnnngggg version!)

Wanted to see Ruth for years. I love slim, athletic, toned and muscular ladies and Ruth fits the bill. She announced a tour to Liverpool in the Summer on UKE so I messaged her and was soon setting a time and date two months ahead and dispatching her a deposit, think it was £50/£70 can't quite remember, towards 1hr fee of £170.
I had no qualms about sending her a deposit as her presence on UKP and UKE over the years clearly indicate she is discreet, trustworthy and professional. I did it via bank transfer and reckoned that would reveal my real name, but again, that didn't bother me. Thereafter, our comms moved to texting via my personal phone, no point maintaining Gordon persona anymore. Not much more to say at that point, just sit back and wait for the day.

I complied with Ruth's request to ring her on morning to confirm our appointment later that afternoon. During that call she told me she would text me her hotel room number when she checked in which she envisaged would be an hour or two before our scheduled time. She then told me to go straight to room at agreed time.... no need to call to tell her I was there or check she was ready. I gently queried this as it seemed an unusual approach and maybe I'd misunderstood. She just reiterated there was no need to faff about calling/texting, just head on up at the alloted time.
I duly got her text at lunchtime telling me her room number and I replied with okay, see you at 2:30.
I should say that she was actually staying in Bromborough, not Liverpool, but I'd become aware of that weeks before and it didn't make much difference. The hotel in Bromborough is great for punting: car park, gym, conferences, coffee shop.. free to come and go and wander about as you please.

I ended up arriving at hotel just after 2:15. Circled car park, pottered about getting cash ready, chucked bag into boot. Final check of phone - no messages so at 2:20 I chucked phone in glovebox and headed to main entrance just carrying keys, cash and water bottle. Had a reccy of open reception, went to loo and sat in coffee shop for 5 mins before heading to her room. Tapped the door bang on 2:30.

Door ajar, hiding thing with just Ruth's head showing. Was looking forward to a smiley warm greeting but just got "oh, didn't you get my message?". I was a bit flummoxed and stammered errrr... no. Ruth said she'd sent a message a short while ago asking for a few extra minutes to get ready. I explained I'd left my phone in the car 10 mins ago. Bit of a pregnant pause and then she suggested I could come in and wait whilst she got ready so in I went and sat in chair out the way in corner. Ruth swiftly bustled about clearing a multitude of unpacking off the bed, finished a couple of mouthfuls of lunch, cleaned away Tupperware and nipped to loo to clean her teeth. All this barely took 3 mins - now we're good to go. I can't help noticing a very overpowering stench of the fish (tuna?) lunch she's just scoffed permeating the room though. I hand her cash for balance of fee.

Off we go then.... hugging, kissing, feeling her muscles. She very obliging and indulgent but I'm getting a whiff of half mouthwash and half fish off her breath. She's otherwise fresh and clean with a lovely pussy to go down on. Ruth's very natural.... no fake bits, fake tan, perfumes - just a classically feminine pale skinned beauty.
Now this muscle worship and RO went on for some while. My shit RO was achieving sod all reaction from Ruth so she asked if I'd mind if she brought herself to orgasm. Ummmm o....kay go on then, and she duly fiddled with and flicked her sizeable clit until she came, well I think she did - it wasn't the most demonstrative "moment" and I presume ladies don't fake their own self induced orgasms??? Felt quite nice and intimate being present through this, cradling her head though.
Through out all this I'd been struggling to stay hard - getting a right boner but then wilting. Now this doesn't actually bother me and its becoming pretty much standard for me so hence I barely punt anymore. When it happens I can normally finish myself wanking over them with a bit of encouragement.

Anyway, we ended up lying there loosely cuddling but I've gotta be honest, I was deeply unimpressed with Ruth's lack of initiative in gently or subtlety taking it up a notch, y'know..... stroke my cock, my inner thigh, say some nice complimentary ego boosting things, nibble my ear, I dunno.... you're the sexworker aren't you? She seemed happy to lie there politely chatting apparently oblivious to me fiddling with her nipples or caressing her.
Don't get me wrong, things were relaxed and pleasant enough but everything just felt cordial, not sexy. Hour was soon gonna be up so I initiated end, got dressed had a quick wash and went.

I haven't gone into too much detail about the muscle worship but that was brilliant - really enjoyed myself. Ruth very content extensively flexing and posing and I was lucky enough to catch her in optimum condition. The rest just never "took off" or escalated. I believe that the botched start did not help, certainly didn't set the right tone and took the wind out of my sails but it shouldn't have completely stymied things. I left with the impression Ruth had a busy packed itinerary for her weekend and I'd sort of been shoehorned into it and she had not sufficiently prepared or readied herself to receive and entertain me. Whether this was actually the case or not I cannot say for sure but, like I say, that was how it felt.

I reckon the service warrants a neutral but the delayed start and fishy smelling room kick it into the red. Oh, btw.... She sent the message asking me to hang fire 8 mins before kick off and just after I'd left my phone in car. Remember, she was the one who wanted to forego the "I'm here" comms and wanted me to just head straight to the room number given to me an hour or so earlier.

I've sat on this review for a good few months. Ummmmed and ahhhhhed about the rating and also felt a bit weird negging a lady I've admired (and frankly still do admire) and casually interacted with online for a few years and who posts on here too. I did actually enjoy meeting Ruth on a personal level, it's just that the punt was disappointing. Therefore: disappointed client = negative review.

Offline Gordon Bennett

Ooops! Meant to be negative. Can a mod or helper change please? Ta.

Offline wearegreat

You're probably not aware of this Gordon,but you have actually rated this review as a positive.
Maybe it could be changed to a negative by one of the mods.Obviously with your permission.
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline freeze44

Cheers for the review and the detail. Fair neg that and as you say disappointed client and lack of prep etc not great esp at them rates and deposit taking etc.

Offline BobAJobMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 47
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
I think I'd be pretty disappointed if I'd paid 170 for that - sorry she didnt live up to your expectations.
Banned reason: Claiming this site condones paedophilia, it doesn't
Banned by: daviemac

Offline RandomGuy99

Did you discuss your concerns with Ruth?

Offline Rack Admirer

I think I'd be pretty disappointed if I'd paid 170 for that - sorry she didnt live up to your expectations.

I find it mind-boggling that he paid £170 in the first place. I know it's each to their own, but bloody hell.

Offline massivejohnson

She's been on AW for years, and used to be on my HL until she moved to the Lakes and her prices went up and up...could have gone for a walk round the docks for a smell of fish  :scare:

Offline Doc Holliday

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,066
  • Likes: 301
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
Did you discuss your concerns with Ruth?

Not sure how that is relevant?

Online Strawberry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,834
  • Likes: 127
  •  
Gordon

Thank you for this yes my diet is heavily fish based, I need to think about this when travelling. That day I did travel down and check in with what should have been enough time to be ready to see you, however deciding to try and eat before hand did delay my start so not a great decision. I do use a candle in the room but the remedy is far simpler, switch to turkey or chicken and don't try to squeeze it in beforehand.

You've also given me plenty to think about regards approach and service, I'm sorry we had such a bad start/finish. I really enjoyed the physique appreciation, but understand the surrounding issues knocked the gloss off the whole booking.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2019, 01:07:17 pm by Strawberry »

Offline Gordon Bennett

Fair do's Ruth. I kind of surmised you'd be reasonable and reflective about my review and there'd be no drama or whatnot. I'm pleased and grateful for your candid and honest reply.

Offline finn5555

She should give you a refund or a hefty discount as that meeting sounds shit especially from a seasoned pros$ie who should know better  :rolleyes:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I get a feel a feel of a "peace protestor / hippie" who could do with a fucking good wash  :music:
« Last Edit: October 26, 2019, 04:30:52 pm by James999 »

Offline BobAJobMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 47
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
I find it mind-boggling that he paid £170 in the first place. I know it's each to their own, but bloody hell.

Im struggling to see how she can justify it for an incall tbh.
Banned reason: Claiming this site condones paedophilia, it doesn't
Banned by: daviemac

Offline finn5555

Im struggling to see how she can justify it for an incall tbh.

She is going to charge as much as she can  :hi: sadly to many are prepared to pay it for a lacklustre performance  :dash:

billygreen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I get a feel a feel of a "peace protestor / hippie" who could do with a fucking good wash  :music:

"I get a feel a feel"🤣Have you ever had "a feel" of anything?

Offline Availableinlarge

Delay my start so not a great decision.
You've also given me plenty to think about regards approach and service, I'm sorry.

But you’re holding on to all of the £170 right?
Why don’t you suggest to the fella that he should come back and see you and you’ll make it up to him?

Offline Scholes74

At £170 an hour everything should be perfect. Never mind agreeing with the op. Eating a fishy meal is the kind of thing you might expect from a newbie and not an experienced lady. I wouldn't feel happy going up to a room without a last minute call to check all was well. Perhaps anybody with this lady on their to do list might give it a second thought. There are a lot of good people out there at much lower cost.

Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,803
  • Likes: 64
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
But you’re holding on to all of the £170 right?
Why don’t you suggest to the fella that he should come back and see you and you’ll make it up to him?

+1

Offline CheeseBoard

She cod give him some money back. £170 is a lot to pay for a less than premium service.

At £170 that's tuna much for me  :D

Offline Moby Dick

She cod give him some money back. £170 is a lot to pay for a less than premium service.

At £170 that's tuna much for me  :D
Pilchard

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm sorry

But not sorry enough to do anything about it or offer him a refund / partial refund  :sarcastic:

Offline GorillaWarfare

Gordon

Thank you for this yes my diet is heavily fish based, I need to think about this when travelling. That day I did travel down and check in with what should have been enough time to be ready to see you, however deciding to try and eat before hand did delay my start so not a great decision. I do use a candle in the room but the remedy is far simpler, switch to turkey or chicken and don't try to squeeze it in beforehand.

You've also given me plenty to think about regards approach and service, I'm sorry we had such a bad start/finish. I really enjoyed the physique appreciation, but understand the surrounding issues knocked the gloss off the whole booking.

An apology on here is all well and good, but sorry doesn't put £170 back into his bank account. You should definitely consider giving either a refund (at the very least a partial one) and/or another session for a heavy discount but I'm going to guess that's not happening.

Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,803
  • Likes: 64
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
She cod give him some money back. £170 is a lot to pay for a less than premium service.

At £170 that's tuna much for me  :D

She's definitely trout of order on this one

Offline Scholes74

He could Perch here all day and wait for an apology. The smell probably came from all the mussels. Wouldn't have taken much for her to have apologised and tunad the situation around but now eel probably never see her again. Time to skate away and stop carping on. Plenty more fish in the sea.

Offline finn5555

But not sorry enough to do anything about it or offer him a refund / partial refund  :sarcastic:

She’s a pro$sie they don’t believe in refunds  :rolleyes:

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,678
  • Likes: 539
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
He could Perch here all day and wait for an apology. The smell probably came from all the mussels. Wouldn't have taken much for her to have apologised and tunad the situation around but now eel probably never see her again. Time to skate away and stop carping on. Plenty more fish in the sea.

You cod have done batter than that!

Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,803
  • Likes: 64
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
He could Perch here all day and wait for an apology. The smell probably came from all the mussels. Wouldn't have taken much for her to have apologised and tunad the situation around but now eel probably never see her again. Time to skate away and stop carping on. Plenty more fish in the sea.

 :lol:

Offline Scholes74

Think we are all watching with interest to see if she has anymore to say on the subject or perhaps she has to mullet over.

Offline Gordon Bennett

Blimey guys, enough already! Laugh.... I nearly did! Alright, some of these marine-based quips are a bit funny I'll admit that.

Anyway, I was personally happy with Ruth's response above and there really is no need for anyone to be aggrieved on my behalf or suggest restorative actions Ruth might like to offer. I should clarify that Ruth separately messaged me overnight via PM offering monetary refund or another meet on favourable terms. She also gave me some insight and background to things relating to our meet that would not be appropriate for the wider board. None of that stuff was about her trying to exonerate herself or make excuses, it was simply a fuller and more personal explanation and apology to myself. I stand by the review, I accept Ruth's response, along with her apology and offer to make things right. It would seem that Ruth is a lady that polarises opinion but my view is that she's remained classy and dignified in response to my critical review. Bottom line is I feel that we've cleared the air and I'd happily visit her again if the opportunity arose.

Offline finn5555

Blimey guys, enough already! Laugh.... I nearly did! Alright, some of these marine-based quips are a bit funny I'll admit that.

Anyway, I was personally happy with Ruth's response above and there really is no need for anyone to be aggrieved on my behalf or suggest restorative actions Ruth might like to offer. I should clarify that Ruth separately messaged me overnight via PM offering monetary refund or another meet on favourable terms. She also gave me some insight and background to things relating to our meet that would not be appropriate for the wider board. None of that stuff was about her trying to exonerate herself or make excuses, it was simply a fuller and more personal explanation and apology to myself. I stand by the review, I accept Ruth's response, along with her apology and offer to make things right. It would seem that Ruth is a lady that polarises opinion but my view is that she's remained classy and dignified in response to my critical review. Bottom line is I feel that we've cleared the air and I'd happily visit her again if the opportunity arose.

If you visit again  :rolleyes: I hope the bank transfer happens

Offline RandomGuy99

Blimey guys, enough already! Laugh.... I nearly did! Alright, some of these marine-based quips are a bit funny I'll admit that.

Anyway, I was personally happy with Ruth's response above and there really is no need for anyone to be aggrieved on my behalf or suggest restorative actions Ruth might like to offer. I should clarify that Ruth separately messaged me overnight via PM offering monetary refund or another meet on favourable terms. She also gave me some insight and background to things relating to our meet that would not be appropriate for the wider board. None of that stuff was about her trying to exonerate herself or make excuses, it was simply a fuller and more personal explanation and apology to myself. I stand by the review, I accept Ruth's response, along with her apology and offer to make things right. It would seem that Ruth is a lady that polarises opinion but my view is that she's remained classy and dignified in response to my critical review. Bottom line is I feel that we've cleared the air and I'd happily visit her again if the opportunity arose.
I am glad to hear that this has been resolved in private. It's always much better to resolve this type of thing privately.

I hope you enjoy your future booking with Ruth.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's always much better to resolve this type of thing privately.

Only if you have something to hide and don't want the truth out there, the review and her response showed she offered a poor service and poor value for money (as well as stinking of fish) ............................... so what'e her offer to resolve?

Online nightbot

Only if you have something to hide and don't want the truth out there, the review and her response showed she offered a poor service and poor value for money (as well as stinking of fish) ............................... so what'e her offer to resolve?
The OP has already mentioned what was offered i.e. a refund or a meet on more favourable terms. I don't believe we need to know more than that or the details of their conversation.

Offline wilburs horse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 364
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
The report is there for everyone to read and then make your own mind up. In this game you pay your money you takes your choice. Pleased to hear the issue sorted.
Banned reason: Bypassing rules to name another forum.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline hungrypunt

Horses for courses but my opinion of her is she sup her own arse, looking at her posts on UKE, then deposits, then q and a, "are you really 44"  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

well in my eyes she looks about 50 +, but well toned/fit but with too low of subcutaneous fat.

not for me, and seems shes got you round her little finger.
The OP has already mentioned what was offered i.e. a refund or a meet on more favourable terms. I don't believe we need to know more than that or the details of their conversation.
and @nightbot it would BE interesting to know if she sent the pm about refund or whatever AFTER seeing these messages here. Cos if so its damage limitation and not punters feelings she was thinking about.

BE careful
oh and ging  :crazy:
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 01:24:42 pm by hungrypunt »

Offline RandomGuy99

Well I am glad to see the situation has been resolved.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 01:41:46 pm by RandomGuy99 »

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

well in my eyes she looks about 50 +,

If you look at her hands and her arms they are more like those of a late 50's / early 60's, from the images I'd say she's nearer 64  than 44  :hi:

Offline Drayki

If you look at her hands and her arms they are more like those of a late 50's / early 60's, from the images I'd say she's nearer 64  than 44  :hi:

+1 look at her free vid, she’s definitely not 44  :lol:

On another note... does her minge smell fishy as well

Offline finn5555

Well I am glad to see the situation has been resolved.

Only after being reported here as a shit meeting she probably thought she had got away with it  :dash:

Online nightbot

Horses for courses but my opinion of her is she sup her own arse, looking at her posts on UKE, then deposits, then q and a, "are you really 44"  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

well in my eyes she looks about 50 +, but well toned/fit but with too low of subcutaneous fat.

not for me, and seems shes got you round her little finger. and @nightbot it would BE interesting to know if she sent the pm about refund or whatever AFTER seeing these messages here. Cos if so its damage limitation and not punters feelings she was thinking about.

BE careful
oh and ging  :crazy:
Well I'd think it'd be self evident that she did it after reading the message since the OP wrote the review 2 days ago and she messaged yesterday, while the booking took place months ago.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 04:11:10 pm by nightbot »

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well I'd think it'd be self evident that she did it after reading the message since the OP wrote the review 2 days ago and she messaged yesterday, while the booking took place months ago.

Which means she's clearly happy with a poor level of service and getting away with treating clients poorly and has only reacted for "Damage limitation" and her head up her arse attitude does her no favours  :thumbsdown:

Also note she's VERY opinionated about other girls / reviews / problems, yet surprisingly quiet when it comes to her own service failings  :unknown:

Offline Rack Admirer

The report is there for everyone to read and then make your own mind up. In this game you pay your money you takes your choice. Pleased to hear the issue sorted.

+1

Credit to the OP for posting his review.  :thumbsup:

Offline Romeo Sensini

Horses for courses but my opinion of her is she sup her own arse, looking at her posts on UKE, then deposits, then q and a, "are you really 44"  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

well in my eyes she looks about 50 +, but well toned/fit but with too low of subcutaneous fat.

not for me, and seems shes got you round her little finger. and @nightbot it would BE interesting to know if she sent the pm about refund or whatever AFTER seeing these messages here. Cos if so its damage limitation and not punters feelings she was thinking about.

BE careful
oh and ging  :crazy:

LOL at this

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Also note she's VERY opinionated about other girls / reviews / problems, yet surprisingly quiet when it comes to her own service failings

And she's reading this topic again this morning..... :thumbsdown:

Offline Availableinlarge

She’s not alone though is she?
At the bottom of page 1 in the NW review section, 70% of the reviews I can see on my mobile page are negative.
That’s some score.
On other sections / pages, it’s not so low, granted. But if you’re in that streak and you’re paying £150 a punt, you’d be shelling out almost £500 at that rate for a decent shag.
Which is why I’ve pretty much given up trying find one.

Offline Moby Dick

She’s not alone though is she?
At the bottom of page 1 in the NW review section, 70% of the reviews I can see on my mobile page are negative.
That’s some score.
On other sections / pages, it’s not so low, granted. But if you’re in that streak and you’re paying £150 a punt, you’d be shelling out almost £500 at that rate for a decent shag.
Which is why I’ve pretty much given up trying find one.

 ??
Just stick to the green uns or see a reg?

Offline cat1144

yeah plenty of bad punts out there.

seems to be a higher % of bad ones than there were a few years back in my opinion

reason why i'll be keeping to regs for a while (even though i'm the kinda bloke that gets bored with the same women )

Offline BobAJobMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 47
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
She’s not alone though is she?
At the bottom of page 1 in the NW review section, 70% of the reviews I can see on my mobile page are negative.
That’s some score.
On other sections / pages, it’s not so low, granted. But if you’re in that streak and you’re paying £150 a punt, you’d be shelling out almost £500 at that rate for a decent shag.
Which is why I’ve pretty much given up trying find one.

Do you think price is always correlated 100% with service though? Surely this review shows that it's not - plenty of positives nearer the £120 mark.
Banned reason: Claiming this site condones paedophilia, it doesn't
Banned by: daviemac

Offline hungrypunt

Do you think price is always correlated 100% with service though? Surely this review shows that it's not - plenty of positives nearer the £120 mark.

Never