Author Topic: FunAndBustySarah - Durham  (Read 3509 times)


15 review(s) for FunSarah (13 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Ricco

Coms, great all on AW mail

15min, incall £40, just a quickie, OWO, protected mish & doggie.

Sarah is a great young lass, willing to please & bursting with energy.

I will gladly visit again.

 External Link/Members Only

Offline waynekerr600

Isn't this the one that outed a punter?

Offline roboeggman

Glad you had a good punt. This is Lorna8x, a blacklisted WG.

The thread where OldAdmin showed the allegations and blacklisted:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=107220.msg1257870#msg1257870

Thread from earlier this year where she was noticed by a member and some of us did some digging:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=235537.msg2405347#msg2405347

As far as anything concrete goes all I can say for definite is that she is the same lass as External Link/Members Only and that she's not 18, more likely 20+.

edit: There was a linked UKE thread but unless someone saved offline copies of that particular thread I'm afraid it's probably lost the the aether.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2019, 09:29:43 pm by roboeggman »

Offline datwabbit

I recognize the photos and definitely her.

I remember that her rates were incredible - £150+ regularly. She's returned for a while at this rate.

She's a blacklisted escort who seems to be getting good reviews. I wonder how many members have seen her with no problems but feel unable to review because of her past (I'd hope they tell us of any issues) and as a punters forum, should we encourage those reviews.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2019, 10:10:41 pm by datwabbit »

Offline roboeggman

I recognize the photos and definitely her.

I remember that her rates were incredible - £150+ regularly. She's returned for a while at this rate.

She's a blacklisted escort who seems to be getting good reviews. I wonder how many members have seen her with no problems but feel unable to review because of her past (I'd hope they tell us of any issues) and as a punters forum, should we encourage those reviews.

I planned on seeing her recently tbh, knowing who she was. She's unbelievably fit imo and potential outing doesn't really scare me.

Offline The Outsider

I planned on seeing her recently tbh, knowing who she was. She's unbelievably fit imo and potential outing doesn't really scare me.

It probably should!  What about her history of bare backing?

Offline roboeggman

It probably should!  What about her history of bare backing?

Possibly, but it doesn't. The barebacking I can't actually find proof of, profile linked in that thread is gone and I couldn't find an archive.

edit: though just the allegation is enough to make me think twice. I know there are escorts who would blacklist you for seeing someone like her who allegedly once barebacked.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2019, 12:46:07 am by roboeggman »

Offline hec123

I planned on seeing her recently tbh, knowing who she was. She's unbelievably fit imo and potential outing doesn't really scare me.

av seen her 2-3 times in the last year nothing but a great service, mind i never new about what had gone on with her
cheers hec123

Offline datwabbit

av seen her 2-3 times in the last year nothing but a great service, mind i never new about what had gone on with her
cheers hec123

Have you reviewed her? If not, what's the reason?

Offline hec123

must be honest i thought i had but i see i have not i will review her friday when am free from work
cheers

Offline datwabbit

It probably should!  What about her history of bare backing?

History or allegations? Yes, a risk analysis is required but I've seen a few posts on different sp's mentioning BB allegations but no messages supporting offering it etc. My point being, some of these allegations could be malicious.

Offline hec123

never offerd or even mentioned when i have seen her

Offline The Outsider

History or allegations? Yes, a risk analysis is required but I've seen a few posts on different sp's mentioning BB allegations but no messages supporting offering it etc. My point being, some of these allegations could be malicious.

On the thread from earlier this year it was noted that she had "unprotected sex" ticked.  Actually for me that is a secondary concern compared to the malicious way she outed a punter when she was "Lorna8x".  From what I can remember he simply walked away from a booking and she was so angry she posted his details on Twitter.  Sadly we've lost the UKE thread which also covered this subject. 

You're right that a malicious bareback allegation is enough to sully somebody's reputation and we should be careful, but in this case the SP is of previously bad character. 

Offline datwabbit

On the thread from earlier this year it was noted that she had "unprotected sex" ticked.  Actually for me that is a secondary concern compared to the malicious way she outed a punter when she was "Lorna8x".  From what I can remember he simply walked away from a booking and she was so angry she posted his details on Twitter.  Sadly we've lost the UKE thread which also covered this subject. 

You're right that a malicious bareback allegation is enough to sully somebody's reputation and we should be careful, but in this case the SP is of previously bad character.

She went onto UKE afterwards and got into trouble for blaming him. Then banned and returned maybe twice more because her new accounts were a variation of the first.

Offline Happynerd

I recognize the photos and definitely her.

I remember that her rates were incredible - £150+ regularly. She's returned for a while at this rate.

She's a blacklisted escort who seems to be getting good reviews. I wonder how many members have seen her with no problems but feel unable to review because of her past (I'd hope they tell us of any issues) and as a punters forum, should we encourage those reviews.

The bottom half rings true for me. Saw her regularly on and off for 2017 but didn't feel like a review would be well received and just be the standard slagging match. 0 issues and offered a service that was unique and hard to find with typical WGS.