For me, £80 for a half hour and £140 (occasionally £150) for an hour is as high as I’m willing to go.
There are many factors which dictate price out with looks. Offering a PSE vs a GFE for example, where the former is probably a more demanding booking both pre, during and post punt for the girl, so warrants a higher fee IMO. Other services such as uncovered oral, CIM, anal, water sports etc also often attract extra fees, so allowing this in a “standard rate” offers the buyer potential value if these are services sought.
Touting on as a working girl that you should be charging more than someone else because you think you’re better looking is both narrow mined and big headed. Value is entirely at the prerogative of the buyer, who may seek services that girl x doesn’t offer, but girl y does, thus girl y offers the better value.
There are plenty of niches to be catered for in the arena of paid for sex and what one man wants differs from another’s.
We are paying money for services, so if those services aren’t as described, expected or are of poor quality then we are entitled to comment on here. It really is the tripadvisor of paid for sex, which is exactly what this forum was set up to be.
For a sex worker to deride another sex worker for charging the same as them as they are in their opinion less attractive is classless. You’re not paying for their services so what right do you have to deride their looks without your competitor having a right of reply. They can charge whatever they want, I suggest you concentrate on your own business model and pricing structure and leave others to do likewise.
Or try posting on SAAFE or UKE about how you should be charging more as in your opinion you’re hotter. I suspect the responses on either of those escort centred sites would make the responses on here seem rather more kind!