Author Topic: english_chantelle - English WG seen on tour in Southampton  (Read 4960 times)


11 review(s) for British Chantelle (6 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by DrConners]

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
english_chantelle

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I saw 'chantelle' when she was last touring in Southampton at a hotel near the city center - £160 for 1 hour GFE (Her rates then)

Comms all by AW messaging, was given instructions to confirm on the day.

I got to the hotel 5 minutes before & rang her, no answer - I texted her I was outside but didn't receive a response until the exact time of the start of the meeting we had scheduled - Ok I know this isn't that much of a big deal but it did immediately cheese me off slightly as I had to get into the hotel and find her room, so it was a least 5 minutes off my hour, like I say it's not that much of a problem but I could have been outside the door on time - Prostitute logic  :unknown:

When I got into the room we sorted the paperwork, I thought she was very attractive facially but this is subjective obviously, she had made loads of effort on her appearance, make up & wearing some sexy lingerie -  body is a tale of two cities in the fact she has quite wide hips & a great arse but a surprisingly small chest & boobs. No hygiene issues, kissing is fine, very chatty, has travelled (as have I) so conversation was interesting, although I wasn't there to chat but it is a part of a GFE for me personally.

I took a quick shower - When I came back she was laid on the bed, the atmosphere in the room was uncomfortable, don't know how else to explain it - I instigated some foreplay, she was ok to be played with but during RO she was giggling & writhing around in a wierd way - hardly the response you're expecting (or wanting ?) so I didn't pursue this activity for long.

OWO is on the cards but I'm sticking with OW now due to hygiene concerns. Her oral skills are okay, but I have to say the bj was ............ awkward ? I think she was going for 'sexy porn star eye-contact' but I interpretated this as 'crazy starry eyes'. Freaked me out slightly.

We started to have sex, protected, in CG, she was pretty enthusiastic & it's one of my favourite positions but she didn't want to sustain this from the way things progessed, I sat up with her still on my cock so I could suck her tits which was great but again she wouldn't stay in this position for very long - Then out of nowhere she utterd this quasi-unrealistic porn scripted comment which was something like "Why don't you fuck me from behind so you can watch my sexy ass"

............................. erm, right  :unknown:

I banged her pretty hard in doggy but to be honest she had failed her acting audition IMO, I wasn't convinced either of us were having a good time so I called it a day.

We clicked conversationally but not sexually, zero chemistry between us, she was too eager to move into positions she presumed I would cum quicker.

Maybe I over thought this one - It's not complicated, find em & fuck em, end of.

Others might have a better time with her, it was a negative experience for me but I can't blame her really as I guess she thought the routine she normally follows with a punter works on us all - She has a great personality from what I could tell in the brief time we chatted but the sex was like a good looking but unreliable car - You like looking at it but you don't enjoy driving it.

I'd take her out for dinner but I wouldn't want to fuck her again  :sarcastic:





Offline sensualencounter

You said it's a negative experience and it certainly sounds like it but you've put neutral. Is that a mistake?

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,606
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Thanks for the review, DrC. She's sounds pretty hit and miss. Did you not pop at all?

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Thanks for the review, DrC. She's sounds pretty hit and miss. Did you not pop at all?

Nope, she's got a pretty tight pussy, had I continued in doggy it would have happened - the mood evaporated I would say & I just didn't want to continue.

Sometimes I think I'm too highly strung for this hobby  :rolleyes:  :sarcastic:

You said it's a negative experience and it certainly sounds like it but you've put neutral. Is that a mistake?

No, can't really be a negative IMO as she was clean, friendly & attempted services - I think if you read the review fully I've explained why - I had zero sexual chemistry with her, others may have a better experience.

Judging by her fb she has plenty of clients suckers  :hi:

Offline Derrick101

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,569
  • Likes: 9
  •  
  • Reviews: 24

Judging by her fb she has plenty of clients suckees  :hi:

Corrected it for you  :D

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,606
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 133

Sometimes I think I'm too highly strung for this hobby  :rolleyes:  :sarcastic:


 :lol: sounds like you need to take matters into your own hands!

Offline aronteo

Thank you for the (as always) very useful review!  :drinks:

I actually was going to book a meeting with her as well, but after your review I won't bother. I can sympathise 300% with what you say, and that is something I have experienced before with other wgs.

To be honest, when that happens is really frustrating and becomes a major turn off. I think that chemistry was not an issue in your case (as you 'clicked' in terms of conversation). It looks more like a bad/fake attitude problem imo.

 :hi:

Offline ReginaldPerrin

Thanks OP for the review. It can be a tricky hobby sometimes.  :angry:

Offline aronteo

Just found the following on here - it seems to reiterate DrConners' views....., clearly one to avoid.....

 :hi:


External Link/Members Only

Summary – Bossy, a stickler for the ‘rules’, mechanical

Comms and Location – comms were reasonably good, though (again) very ‘thorough’ (shouldn’t complain I suppose  :lol:).  Booked day ahead, a bit annoying it took her 90 mins to respond to my on the day confirmation.  Large hotel off TCR, busy with tourists, no problem anonymously getting in to take the lift.  Room perfectly adequate.

The Girl – Not a stunner but not ugly (6 or 7/10).  Age (24) about right.  The ‘larger’ photos on her profile are most accurate – the slimmer ones maybe 2-3 years old.  The one in the pink dress is totally unrecognisable.  My feeling was that if she had a reasonable (and more flexible) attitude could make for a decent punt.

The Meet – 1 hour, £160 (+£40 for swallow) (I know  :dash:) – all refunded.  The breaking point for the punt was on (her) distinction between what is ‘GFE’ vs. ‘PSE’.  She constantly reminded me that she was 'GFE'.  Her GFE includes sitting down in the armchairs at the start to chat about how my day was( :dash:).  I just said let’s get on with it.  Shower is mandatory (fair enough, but no surprise there  :lol:).  After some OK (but not deep or passionate) DFK, she got on her knees for a bit of OWO – OK but no eye contact.  After 5 mins when nothing (literally) was happening for me I requested downgrading the meet to just 30 mins, to which her response was ‘well, I can’t refund any of your money’ ( :thumbsdown:).  After I expressed my surprise she then offered to end it there and then and refund the full fee – reminding me (again) that I was really after PSE and not her service (I suspect she needs to do this quite frequently).  Given that her profile specifies DFK, DT, CIM and swallow, plus she tells us she has a ‘tight, wet pussy’ ( :lol:) I guess I was expecting something a little more adventurous/full-on. At one point I actually asked her ‘Do you actually like doing this?’  Answer 'Yes'  :unknown:

If you’re after watered down vanilla GFE with a scripted routine then maybe, otherwise  :thumbsdown: