Author Topic: - Vivien Maxes Angels - past her prime! - High Street Kensington  (Read 1837 times)

Offline Iz88

This is my fourth time seeing Vivien from maxes angels. Probably one of the most consistent WGs ive encountered in a sense of service, looks etc.

First time was a duo with one of the other angels from the site, cant remember her name but she was Russian and a little meaty. Service was superb and Vivien just oozes sex appeal. Sort of that Asian submissive girl youd wanna rags all night.

2nd/3rd time was the same type of service. Shes good at OWO and can take a pounding. Pretty much open to every position and takes a cheeky finger up the bum here and there.

Yesterday was my 4th time with her and her first client of the day.

Meet

Rang up the agency and booked for 745. But turned out to be 10 mins later and the agency rescheduled the booking for 8pm which was nice of them. Met at a small flat in High Street Kent and opened the door and she was dressed in a nice nightie with the nipples exposed. Sorted the paperwork and popped in for a quick shower and went on to the bed, not our first rodeo.

Had her on the bed with OWO and gently face fucked her but not really full on DT, but she was making good gagging noises. Went on and fucked her and came after 20 mins. Doggie, cowgirl to name a few. But i felt the service was repetitive and that ive gotten bored of her as i believe her services cannot go above and beyond what is pretty much on written on the tin. sometimes it can get quite mechanical and she just seems very disinterested in escorting and feels like shes ready to give it up.

Maxes are know to overwork their workers hence the huge turnover of Rota so i believe that seeing these angels when they have just started would be more exciting than seeing an

 escort whos been on the clock pretty much everyday over the last 2 years.

still a very good WG for those who are interested in seeing her but personally i think ive scratched my Vivien itch off and wont be seeing her again anytime soon.

External Link/Members Only


Offline Brand242

Good review, I had a similar service last month. She was fit, very pretty and good service but doubt I’d see her again. Didn’t review as I’m playing catch up. But yours would be how I’d rate and describe mine.


Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,632
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
Iz88

From your comments, rating this as a positive would seem misleading. Was this a mistake? If so, it can be changed at your request

Offline Iz88

Iz88

From your comments, rating this as a positive would seem misleading. Was this a mistake? If so, it can be changed at your request


no id leave it at a positive because it wasnt bad. just a personal reason. shes still a very good WG.

Offline Spc07

What accent does Vivienne have? Thanks

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Perhaps it's a case of familiarity breeding contempt for the both of you.

After the 4th visit, it's either it is going to get better or as in this case worse as I think of the Coolidge Sexual Effect.

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Brand242

What accent does Vivienne have? Thanks

Good question as they don’t make clear on website. So she’s Thai, must have been in U.K. for a good few years and she’s fluent in English. But accent is Thai, so not UK born of Thai origin.

NotThePrimeMinister

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I saw her at 200,then she went to 250, now she's back at 200.
A decent experience, I rated her positive, but there's a lot of choice in that price range, which is why I have never gone back.

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,632
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125

no id leave it at a positive because it wasnt bad. just a personal reason. shes still a very good WG.

Based on what you wrote in the review I think you're being unduly generous, but its your review..

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,613
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Based on what you wrote in the review I think you're being unduly generous, but its your review..

I tend to agree, and personally I wouldn't have put down the exact time and date I saw anyone. Unless I didn't care that the agency could identify me.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Good review, I had a similar service last month. She was fit, very pretty and good service but doubt I’d see her again. Didn’t review as I’m playing catch up. But yours would be how I’d rate and describe mine.

nice but certainly not 26yrs.. add maybe 10 yrs on...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Brand242

nice but certainly not 26yrs.. add maybe 10 yrs on...

Agree, she seemed and acted older than stated when I saw her. Early to mid thirties for sure. But that body is super fit...