xx Katalina xx (GFE, DFK, OWO, RO, Penetration) in NW4 (Hendon)

[smiths]

So a woman who is happily willing to work while she's risking herself and her clients with a highly infectious communicable disease that has a high lethality rate to at least certain groups is excusable because she's pretty fit and cheap for a fuck?  This is nothing to do with the immediate risk to herself and clients it's about the wider communicable risk to "innocents".  In "peacetime" we all here fuck about with these scarlet ladies subject to the personal health risk we're comfortable with but that's because we/most of us don't wish to present an onward risk to any others, known or unknown, of STIs.
If you're saying that you condemn her now during lockdown why should you not continue to condemn her after lockdown is lifted, she remains a high risk punt because of her disregard for anyone's safety.  Lockdown is in place because the health system can't cope with the volume of infection and there are no known (partially) effective anti-virals, the lethality isn't prevented by lockdown it is reduced to an arbitrarily judged acceptable amount i.e. an acceptable casualty rate during a retreat to try to save the bulk of the community.
Most of us here condemn BBers regardless of the health alert status of the country and avoid their services regardless of looks, performance and cheapness.  Most of us take precautions to prevent infection of ourselves and presumably in many cases also about onward infection of others (even if it's for the selfish reason of not being found out).  Most of us are refraining now because of the particular consequences of this infection.  You claim to be one of this "most".   Why do you think she should continue to be given trade after the emergency is lifted?  When would this be appropriate; when we're allowed to go back to work; when social distancing is lifted; when a proven anti-virus is available?
This isn't a case of the Nuremberg defence as there's no evidence she's being coerced or controlled and for which there would be other reasons not to give her trade.

Thanks for the lecture. I will do what suits me not you, simple you avoid her like the plague, I will fill my boots when I decide to.

[LLPunting]

Thanks for the lecture. I will do what suits me not you, simple you avoid her like the plague, I will fill my boots when I decide to.

Not a lecture, asking you to clarify your reasoning.
Boils down to birds of a feather.

[smiths]

Not a lecture, asking you to clarify your reasoning.
Boils down to birds of a feather.

Thanks for the chuckle, feeling the need to post a snide dig now, what you think is a matter for you.

[Meursault]

So a woman who is happily willing to work while she's risking herself and her clients with a highly infectious communicable disease that has a high lethality rate to at least certain groups is excusable because she's pretty fit and cheap for a fuck?  This is nothing to do with the immediate risk to herself and clients it's about the wider communicable risk to "innocents".  In "peacetime" we all here fuck about with these scarlet ladies subject to the personal health risk we're comfortable with but that's because we/most of us don't wish to present an onward risk to any others, known or unknown, of STIs.
If you're saying that you condemn her now during lockdown why should you not continue to condemn her after lockdown is lifted, she remains a high risk punt because of her disregard for anyone's safety.  Lockdown is in place because the health system can't cope with the volume of infection and there are no known (partially) effective anti-virals, the lethality isn't prevented by lockdown it is reduced to an arbitrarily judged acceptable amount i.e. an acceptable casualty rate during a retreat to try to save the bulk of the community.
Most of us here condemn BBers regardless of the health alert status of the country and avoid their services regardless of looks, performance and cheapness.  Most of us take precautions to prevent infection of ourselves and presumably in many cases also about onward infection of others (even if it's for the selfish reason of not being found out).  Most of us are refraining now because of the particular consequences of this infection.  You claim to be one of this "most".   Why do you think she should continue to be given trade after the emergency is lifted?  When would this be appropriate; when we're allowed to go back to work; when social distancing is lifted; when a proven anti-virus is available?
This isn't a case of the Nuremberg defence as there's no evidence she's being coerced or controlled and for which there would be other reasons not to give her trade.

This is all well and good and pretty much common knowledge. However, ultimately some people are risk takers and/or selfish individuals generally.
People drive cars whilst pissed; drive at ridiculous speeds in built up areas; take class A's knowing the abuse and death that involves globally; smoke cigarettes knowing they will be a drain on the NHS etc.
Sadly, this course of events won't change that either.
I will definitely see her again, after all this, when the mood takes me, simply knowing she is a selfish like the people above. No doubt people will still see Brazillian Mia, Earls Court Megan and others who are still working too. This world has always been pretty seedy, what's changed?
The other thing that some people seem to be forgetting is that these girls are self employed workers. If customers still want their services, some of them will take the risk as many will have little recourse to other income and some will simply be desperate. My only surpise, is that those still working haven't tried put their prices up, due to the decrease in supply. As sure as eggs are eggs there WILL be demand out there from the selfish and irresponsible population this side of the fence. Hopefully, the demand has shrunk dramatically too but I guess we'll never know, for certain, as it's the girls who are having to advertise their activity, not the punters.

[unus669]

This is all well and good and pretty much common knowledge. However, ultimately some people are risk takers and/or selfish individuals generally.
People drive cars whilst pissed; drive at ridiculous speeds in built up areas; take class A's knowing the abuse and death that involves globally; smoke cigarettes knowing they will be a drain on the NHS etc.
Sadly, this course of events won't change that either.
I will definitely see her again, after all this, when the mood takes me, simply knowing she is a selfish like the people above. No doubt people will still see Brazillian Mia, Earls Court Megan and others who are still working too. This world has always been pretty seedy, what's changed?
The other thing that some people seem to be forgetting is that these girls are self employed workers. If customers still want their services, some of them will take the risk as many will have little recourse to other income and some will simply be desperate. My only surpise, is that those still working haven't tried put their prices up, due to the decrease in supply. As sure as eggs are eggs there WILL be demand out there from the selfish and irresponsible population this side of the fence. Hopefully, the demand has shrunk dramatically too but I guess we'll never know, for certain, as it's the girls who are having to advertise their activity, not the punters.

But has supply decreased though Are we assuming that because everyone here claims to, not be punting and the number of green lights off? I guess supply may have gone down a tad. However there is still enough demand, for the suppliers available at the moment, hence the unchanged pricing

[Meursault]

But has supply decreased though Are we assuming that because everyone here claims to, not be punting and the number of green lights off? I guess supply may have gone down a tad. However there is still enough demand, for the suppliers available at the moment, hence the unchanged pricing

You could be right 

Two things are certain though: The girls do need an income (some are perhaps quite desperate for one), but men do NOT need sex.

Therefore, I know who I predominantly blame.

[unus669]

You could be right 

Two things are certain though: The girls do need an income (some are perhaps quite desperate for one), but men do NOT need sex.

Therefore, I know who I predominantly blame.

Men don’t need sex? Men don’t need to pay for sex?

[smiths]

This is all well and good and pretty much common knowledge. However, ultimately some people are risk takers and/or selfish individuals generally.
People drive cars whilst pissed; drive at ridiculous speeds in built up areas; take class A's knowing the abuse and death that involves globally; smoke cigarettes knowing they will be a drain on the NHS etc.
Sadly, this course of events won't change that either.
I will definitely see her again, after all this, when the mood takes me, simply knowing she is a selfish like the people above. No doubt people will still see Brazillian Mia, Earls Court Megan and others who are still working too. This world has always been pretty seedy, what's changed?
The other thing that some people seem to be forgetting is that these girls are self employed workers. If customers still want their services, some of them will take the risk as many will have little recourse to other income and some will simply be desperate. My only surpise, is that those still working haven't tried put their prices up, due to the decrease in supply. As sure as eggs are eggs there WILL be demand out there from the selfish and irresponsible population this side of the fence. Hopefully, the demand has shrunk dramatically too but I guess we'll never know, for certain, as it's the girls who are having to advertise their activity, not the punters.

So another punter who says he will see Kat again after all this, I wonder how many punters on here will see her after all this but wont post they will in case someone like LLPunting jumps on them for simply being honest enough to post so. As though I was ever going to deprive myself of a WG who has always offered me a good service who is in a good area for me to punt in, get real.

I am far from convinced supply of punters is less now than it was before this virus, it could be the case WGs like Kat are getting more punters than before as there are less WGs about servicing the punters in the area. Though I have noticed a number of new A/W profiles spring up in my area since the virus as well as some profiles being deleted or stating the WG is no longer working. Also no one knows how many WGs are still working but only seeing regulars, such WGs might have deleted their profiles. Yes Kat has definitely been working and shouldn't of been as her punters shouldn't of been booking her, I blame both myself but that wont stop me booking her if she is still about post this shit. Ultimately its called my money, my choice, if someone or others don't like it tough shit.

[LLPunting]

This is all well and good and pretty much common knowledge. However, ultimately some people are risk takers and/or selfish individuals generally.
People drive cars whilst pissed; drive at ridiculous speeds in built up areas; take class A's knowing the abuse and death that involves globally; smoke cigarettes knowing they will be a drain on the NHS etc.
Sadly, this course of events won't change that either.
I will definitely see her again, after all this, when the mood takes me, simply knowing she is a selfish like the people above. No doubt people will still see Brazillian Mia, Earls Court Megan and others who are still working too. This world has always been pretty seedy, what's changed?
The other thing that some people seem to be forgetting is that these girls are self employed workers. If customers still want their services, some of them will take the risk as many will have little recourse to other income and some will simply be desperate. My only surpise, is that those still working haven't tried put their prices up, due to the decrease in supply. As sure as eggs are eggs there WILL be demand out there from the selfish and irresponsible population this side of the fence. Hopefully, the demand has shrunk dramatically too but I guess we'll never know, for certain, as it's the girls who are having to advertise their activity, not the punters.

The only particular example you mention that is similar is drunk driving and any consequent maiming/killing of victims (not perpetrator).
The point is not about the general, pervasive selfishness of the many but this particular disregard for the very real, invisible threat they perpetrate and perpetuate on others not even aware of the danger, unlike a careening car heading towards them.
This mentality is quite singularly more callous than our everyday selfishness of punting between consenting adults at risk of almost entirely personal consequences.  More extreme than perhaps the callousness of those who punt/have affairs whilst risking the welfare/integrity of a family unit that is otherwise loving and attentive to them i.e. not culpable.

[Meursault]

So another punter who says he will see Kat again after all this, I wonder how many punters on here will see her after all this but wont post they will in case someone like LLPunting jumps on them for simply being honest enough to post so. As though I was ever going to deprive myself of a WG who has always offered me a good service who is in a good area for me to punt in, get real.

I am far from convinced supply of punters is less now than it was before this virus, it could be the case WGs like Kat are getting more punters than before as there are less WGs about servicing the punters in the area. Though I have noticed a number of new A/W profiles spring up in my area since the virus as well as some profiles being deleted or stating the WG is no longer working. Also no one knows how many WGs are still working but only seeing regulars, such WGs might have deleted their profiles. Yes Kat has definitely been working and shouldn't of been as her punters shouldn't of been booking her, I blame both myself but that wont stop me booking her if she is still about post this shit. Ultimately its called my money, my choice, if someone or others don't like it tough shit.

+1
Personally, I won't be punting until people are back at work normally however, I certainly don't need moral guidance from fellow punters. Infact, I resent being judged by complete strangers generally. 

[jeanphillipe]

I have punted with her about 40 times in all I reckon over many years and never seen any evidence of her taking drugs, and certainly never obviously out of it on them, or i would of walked and done a negative review. Of course that doesn't mean she doesn't take any drugs when I am not their but that goes for any WG.

What Kat has always offered me is an excellent tip-top service, great DFK, great OWO with a good attitude, £90 for the hour. She also has a knock-out for me lovely lithe fit body, a near six-pack stomach, small tits with big nipples, great arse and is ideal for a vanilla punt. She doesn't offer things like rimming, fingering her, anal but is great at what she does offer in my experiences.

fackin ell smiths, there are men out there that haven't shagged their wives that number ! just had a quick look at your reviews you truly r a UKP legend. 

[Kaluuu276]

Now her third week showing Green Light Availability.

Clearly punters are still fucking around. 

[Jerk Chicken]

Now her third week showing Green Light Availability.

Clearly punters are still fucking around. 

What's the obsession with this WG's green light???

Yes there are plenty of WG still working despite the pandemic.

Yes there are punters who still want to fuck despite the pandemic.

Both parties know the risk. Some will still grab a punt with her post Covid-19 and won't give two hoots that she carried on fucking during the pandemic.

It is what it is.

[Manutd007]

Perhaps also, this working girl cannot catch a flight back to Hungary, I'm aware of at least one from that part of the world who wants to come back to work but cannot due to lack of commercial flights!?

[Xtro]

She may not be able to get out, but we are still letting every other cunt in (reported last week, not sure about now).

External Link/Members Only

[winkywanky]

Bizarre, isn't it?

Just let a load of people in who probably have no interest in observing our Lockdown 

[tantraman]

In spite of all the argument above, I'm just happy that Katalina is providing us with new photos ...

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

[Meursault]

In spite of all the argument above, I'm just happy that Katalina is providing us with new photos ...

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

You could receive a backlash. Not from me 

[tantraman]

You could receive a backlash.

I’m not that kinky!

[HighlyMotivated]

Also find it hard to believe she’s on drugs from several punts I had with her over the years. Seems too much of a health and fitness freak

Have to say the idea of king Tarzan greeting Katalina with the mango/yummmy yum yum! chat is laugh out loud funny. Can’t see her finding it too amusing 

[winkywanky]

Yes, I saw her a couple of times many years ago, any behaviour like that would certainly turn her into Miss Frosty-Knickers.

[king tarzan]

Also find it hard to believe she’s on drugs from several punts I had with her over the years. Seems too much of a health and fitness freak

Have to say the idea of king Tarzan greeting Katalina with the mango/yummmy yum yum! chat is laugh out loud funny. Can’t see her finding it too amusing 

that is my evaluation from my experience with her.. also a racist too (not my experience but another punters experience )

Anyways she has her clientele base, good luck to them with her...

[Bigballs00]

that is my evaluation from my experience with her.. also a racist too (not my experience but another punters experience )

To the average Western European standards most Hungarians are racist. From their perspective their opinions arent racist

[Meursault]

To the average Western European standards most Hungarians are racist. From their perspective their opinions arent racist

So they're racist then!
Ther'e no standard/scale to racism. One race thinking they are superior to another and displaying this in any way is racism. Although, some may wrongly think the way they display/signal this defines wether they are racist or not.

[Kev40ish]

So they're racist then!
Ther'e no standard/scale to racism. One race thinking they are superior to another and displaying this in any way is racism. Although, some may wrongly think the way they display/signal this defines wether they are racist or not.

Or selective??

[Meursault]

Or selective??

In what way selective? I don't follow you.

[Kev40ish]

In what way selective? I don't follow you.

Selective as to who they want to see and who they don’t.. their body their choice..

I pick and choose who I’m comfortable with, does that make me racist? Ageist? I don’t think so.

[Meursault]

Selective as to who they want to see and who they don’t.. their body their choice..

Of course it's their choice. However if they refuse to see the complete black race it's hard not to brand them racist.
Obviously, prostitution is not regulated in the same way as the rest of all service industries. However, in any other line of business, selecting not to see any black customers would be seen as racist. Do you not agree?

[Kev40ish]

Of course it's their choice. However if they refuse to see the complete black race it's hard not to brand them racist.
Obviously, prostitution is not regulated in the same way as the rest of all service industries. However, in any other line of business, selecting not to see any black customers would be seen as racist. Do you not agree?

Not necessarily true. I am fortunate and can chose what countries I work in based on how comfortable I’ll feel working there.
Certain countries I have turned down in the past for personal reasons, as I would not feel safe there. These have been African and a couple of Far East countries. Does the fact I refused the contracts based on this make me racist or cautious?

[unus669]

Prejudice, discrimination whatever you wanna call it, because of ones’ race is racism. You can try and dress it up how you like, it just is.

Nobody is saying we don’t have choice, but if your choice discriminates against a race, it’s call racism

[Meursault]

Prejudice, discrimination whatever you wanna call it, because of ones’ race is racism. You can try and dress it up how you like, it just is.

Nobody is saying we don’t have choice, but if your choice discriminates against a race, it’s call racism

+1

[Meursault]

Not necessarily true. I am fortunate and can chose what countries I work in based on how comfortable I’ll feel working there.
Certain countries I have turned down in the past for personal reasons, as I would not feel safe there. These have been African and a couple of Far East countries. Does the fact I refused the contracts based on this make me racist or cautious?

A complete non sequitor, I'm afraid.

[Gambitman92]

So this thread went from her being a drug addict to now a full blown racist. The girl isn't a drug addict or a racist. KT saw her once years ago and she may have been on drugs that day, since then there hasnt been a single post or review about any drug use, Smiths has seen her 40 times. You don't get to label someone you saw once 3 years ago a drug addict, talk about staying bitter.

So they're racist then!
Ther'e no standard/scale to racism. One race thinking they are superior to another and displaying this in any way is racism. Although, some may wrongly think the way they display/signal this defines wether they are racist or not.

I'm black and every wg I have seen except 2 have been Hungarian, in my personal life I've been with 5 Hungarian girls. None of them have been racist, they've been blunt and straight to the point, theyve made comments which may seem suspect, but they never mean to put down others and they don't see others as below them.

She isn't racist, she made one comment in the past to an Indian punter about the Indian people smelling bad (not at him but other Indians she met), she still went on to give him a 2nd round with plenty of kissing. Nothing to do with thinking her race is superior, she was being blunt and didn't see her comment as racist.

Prejudice, discrimination whatever you wanna call it, because of ones’ race is racism. You can try and dress it up how you like, it just is.

Nobody is saying we don’t have choice, but if your choice discriminates against a race, it’s call racism

I don't know why Kev brought up choice and choosing who they see and don't see (he's done this a lot in the past when it comes to wgs turning down black punters, Katalina actually sees black men). None of this applies to her, Katalina see's all races.

I booked with her before the lockdown but cancelled due to illness that day, she had a positive review recently here from someone called tallblackguy, you can guess his race.


Labelling someone racist is something big imo, so you better have actual evidence. (This last comment wasnt at you but to anyone labelling others racist).

[unus669]

So this thread went from her being a drug addict to now a full blown racist. The girl isn't a drug addict or a racist. KT saw her once years ago and she may have been on drugs that day, since then there hasnt been a single post or review about any drug use, Smiths has seen her 40 times. You don't get to label someone you saw once 3 years ago a drug addict, talk about staying bitter.

I'm black and every wg I have seen except 2 have been Hungarian, in my personal life I've been with 5 Hungarian girls. None of them have been racist, they've been blunt and straight to the point, theyve made comments which may seem suspect, but they never mean to put down others and they don't see others as below them.

She isn't racist, she made one comment in the past to an Indian punter about the Indian people smelling bad (not at him but other Indians she met), she still went on to give him a 2nd round with plenty of kissing. Nothing to do with thinking her race is superior, she was being blunt and didn't see her comment as racist.

I don't know why Kev brought up choice and choosing who they see and don't see (he's done this a lot in the past when it comes to wgs turning down black punters, Katalina actually sees black men). None of this applies to her, Katalina see's all races.

I booked with her before the lockdown but cancelled due to illness that day, she had a positive review recently here from someone called tallblackguy, you can guess his race.


Labelling someone racist is something big imo, so you better have actual evidence. (This last comment wasnt at you but to anyone labelling others racist).

I was focused on the definition of racism and trying to debunk, the it’s her choice red herring that is used, incessantly to deflect from racism. Didn’t know if she had a NBA policy or not.

[Kev40ish]

I was focused on the definition of racism and trying to debunk, the it’s her choice red herring that is used, incessantly to deflect from racism. Didn’t know if she had a NBA policy or not.

Or the red herring that it is always racist???

But obviously I’m not black so what would I know anyway..

[unus669]

Or the red herring that it is always racist???

But obviously I’m not black so what would I know anyway..

In English Law racism is 2 fold. A racist statement and a racist act. If one makes a racist statement, it doesn’t mean they are a racist, just like I can make a sexist statement and not actually be sexist. When your actions is based on race, such as selecting your clientele, that’s racial discrimination aka racism

Yes you don’t agree. Good for you

[LLPunting]

In English Law racism is 2 fold. A racist statement and a racist act. If one makes a racist statement, it doesn’t mean they are a racist, just like I can make a sexist statement and not actually be sexist. When your actions is based on race, such as selecting your clientele, that’s racial discrimination aka racism

Yes you don’t agree. Good for you

An SP may not see British black punters after a majority of poor experiences with them as an SP.  She might be happy to see Dutch Blacks or Swedish ones or Trinidadians in their respective home nations were she working there.  She's being (unjustly) discriminating not necessarily racist about her service policy, she may well have black friends.  She's no worse than punters avoiding Roms or any other group of SPs, including "just the ugly ones".

Just clarifying the context, not excusing any particular SP.

[unus669]

An SP may not see British black punters after a majority of poor experiences with them as an SP.  She might be happy to see Dutch Blacks or Swedish ones or Trinidadians in their respective home nations were she working there.  She's being (unjustly) discriminating not necessarily racist about her service policy, she may well have black friends.  She's no worse than punters avoiding Roms or any other group of SPs, including "just the ugly ones".

Just clarifying the context, not excusing any particular SP.

You sir, always intrigue me with your posts. You make a very good point. The test is one of disproportion. If my mind serves me there was an employment tribunal case, where a Rastafarian claimed discrimination on grounds of race and religion. The tribunal decided that Rastafarianism isn’t a religion and I think that it isn’t a race. The tribunal I believe explained not all black people are Rastafarians, so race wouldn’t apply. So applying your example, if a SP said I only black punters of XYZ nationality or heritage, my learned guess would be it’s not racist. As if doesn’t disproportionately exclude black punters.

[LLPunting]

You sir, always intrigue me with your posts. You make a very good point. The test is one of disproportion. If my mind serves me there was an employment tribunal case, where a Rastafarian claimed discrimination on grounds of race and religion. The tribunal decided that Rastafarianism isn’t a religion and I think that it isn’t a race. The tribunal I believe explained not all black people are Rastafarians, so race wouldn’t apply. So applying your example, if a SP said I only black punters of XYZ nationality or heritage, my learned guess would be it’s not racist. As if doesn’t disproportionately exclude black punters.

Further clarification, she may not see London Blacks but the friendlier brothers from around Winchester may get a podging.

[Xtro]

Further clarification, she may not see London Blacks but the friendlier brothers from around Winchester may get a podging.

This heated debate has been raging all day. I'm glad it's finally concluded. 

[unus669]

Further clarification, she may not see London Blacks but the friendlier brothers from around Winchester may get a podging.

 

[smiths]

So this thread went from her being a drug addict to now a full blown racist. The girl isn't a drug addict or a racist. KT saw her once years ago and she may have been on drugs that day, since then there hasnt been a single post or review about any drug use, Smiths has seen her 40 times. You don't get to label someone you saw once 3 years ago a drug addict, talk about staying bitter.

I'm black and every wg I have seen except 2 have been Hungarian, in my personal life I've been with 5 Hungarian girls. None of them have been racist, they've been blunt and straight to the point, theyve made comments which may seem suspect, but they never mean to put down others and they don't see others as below them.

She isn't racist, she made one comment in the past to an Indian punter about the Indian people smelling bad (not at him but other Indians she met), she still went on to give him a 2nd round with plenty of kissing. Nothing to do with thinking her race is superior, she was being blunt and didn't see her comment as racist.

I don't know why Kev brought up choice and choosing who they see and don't see (he's done this a lot in the past when it comes to wgs turning down black punters, Katalina actually sees black men). None of this applies to her, Katalina see's all races.

I booked with her before the lockdown but cancelled due to illness that day, she had a positive review recently here from someone called tallblackguy, you can guess his race.


Labelling someone racist is something big imo, so you better have actual evidence. (This last comment wasnt at you but to anyone labelling others racist).

Obviously I can only comment on when I have been punting with her, what she does or doesn't do, or what she really thinks I don't know. What I do know is having worked with druggies she never came across as one to me, and certainly never clearly off her head in all those times I have punted with her. Her comms were always excellent, her service was always excellent, her attitude was always good with me which is why I kept seeing her. A good price in a then good area for me, I see her profile now says Baker Street, never seen her work in that area before.

[Meursault]

This heated debate has been raging all day. I'm glad it's finally concluded. 

I don't think it's been any sort of debate. A forum member who either doesn't understand racism or wants to redefine it to suit his own beliefs, has been alerted to a few facts. A debate requires a credible arguement which, in this case, he didn't have. 

[Kev40ish]

I don't think it's been any sort of debate. A forum member who either doesn't understand racism or wants to redefine it to suit his own beliefs, has been alerted to a few facts. A debate requires a credible arguement which, in this case, he didn't have.

Thanks for your insightful review of the discussion we have had.
Obviously we both have different views, you have ones that obviously suit your own beliefs/agenda.. obviously they are tainted by a chip on your shoulder that you must be right and everyone else wrong..

But if it makes you sleep easier so be it.. I’ll let you think what you like..

[unus669]

I don't think it's been any sort of debate. A forum member who either doesn't understand racism or wants to redefine it to suit his own beliefs, has been alerted to a few facts. A debate requires a credible arguement which, in this case, he didn't have.

There will always be ignorant people, that refuse to be enlightened. Sometimes in life, you cannot stop people making a fool of themselves, which happens on fora a lot, I guess due to the anonymity people have on them.

[Xtro]

I don't think it's been any sort of debate. A forum member who either doesn't understand racism or wants to redefine it to suit his own beliefs, has been alerted to a few facts. A debate requires a credible arguement which, in this case, he didn't have.

It was a tongue in cheek comment. 

Depending on someone's perspective, beliefs and interpretations of a said matter, then that person can have an equally credible argument/debate. Take religion for example..... Actually, fuck that!
You see what I mean?      

[tantraman]

Also featured on video: External Link/Members Only

I'm afraid that is wrong, JimmySW. The mistake orginates from the Comments, kicked off by some jokers ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

It might be hard to compare faces when made-up and when au naturel, but these video stills of this bareback episode ...

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

... do allow comparison with Katalina's tight bodyform ...

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

... and you can see the size difference in tits, you can see the differences in moles - Katalina's characteristic midriff mole directly above her belly button versus the video girl's mole to the right of her labia. Although body adornments can be changed, they both also have different belly button piercings, plus Katalina has a clit-ring to boot.

I rest my case (good video though!)

[smiths]

I'm afraid that is wrong, JimmySW. The mistake orginates from the Comments, kicked off by some jokers ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

It might be hard to compare faces when made-up and when au naturel, but these video stills of this bareback episode ...

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

... do allow comparison with Katalina's tight bodyform ...

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

... and you can see the size difference in tits, you can see the differences in moles - Katalina's characteristic midriff mole directly above her belly button versus the video girl's mole to the right of her labia. Although body adornments can be changed, they both also have different belly button piercings, plus Katalina has a clit-ring to boot.

I rest my case (good video though!)

Looking at Katalinas many pics on here, many you have posted up would of told that poster it wasn't Kat, as you say the tits are entirely different. Kat doesn't have much tit on her as well as the rest you mention here. If it was me I would of compared the pics before posting it was Kat, but that's up to that poster.

[jasonbourne]

yeah def not her in the vid

[smiths]

I see this was the thread where LLPunting had a snide dig at me for daring to post I would punt with Kat post-lockdown when I was ready to punt again even though at the time she was still working. She stopped working in May in the end and parked her profile in Birmingham deleting her number, her usual routine. Another punter on this thread said the same as me about maybe seeing her in the future. If about she would be 1 of the first WGs I booked when I decide to punt again.

It makes me chuckle that I have seen LLPunting post on a recent up to date review by Rockharders which he said the punt has just occurred so during lockdown and not a word from LL about that punter ACTUALLY punting with a WG still working. You couldn't make it up, I got a dig for posting I would punt with a WG when ready to do post-lockdown who had worked during some of it but didn't punt during lockdown myself with her, but a punter who did punt doesn't get a word or dig off LL. No consistency their that's for sure. As it happens I still haven't punted since March but a number of London punters have now as their reviews show, is LL having a dig at all them, not seen it as of yet but may of missed it of course.