Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: 50 shades of Romania. Has anyone seen her??  (Read 5267 times)


No... but for some reason I really like the look/sound of her.

Definitely keeping my eyes out for this... if you visit her I'd be very interested to hear your experiences.

Offline Hansel80

+ 1 on that!

She added to my HL. No doubt i'll spend another couple of days trying to get hold of her to no avail though. So tired of being given the run around by smokin hot romanians..... but it doesnt stop me trying!

Yeah I've been disappointed so often by hot Romanians that deliver crap service that even though this one is smoking hot, I doubt I'll ever bother trying to see her.

Offline Milky911

She has bareback on her list.  :vomit:


Offline mattylondon

She has bareback on her list.  :vomit:
To each their own. A great many of these Romanian profiles aren't written by the girls themselves. As with any profile, what's written and what you'll receive, could be completely different.

Offline abdul

To each their own. A great many of these Romanian profiles aren't written by the girls themselves. As with any profile, what's written and what you'll receive, could be completely different.

Yes agree most of new profiles are written by their receptionist, pimp or maid. And it is also true that many of them are doing bareback and worse of it that some girls will do bareback but not allowing to  cum inside of pussy.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline vorian

Yes agree most of new profiles are written by their receptionist, pimp or maid. And it is also true that many of them are doing bareback and worse of it that some girls will do bareback but not allowing to  cum inside of pussy.

How is that the worst of it, the BB is the bad bit, not the fact if they allow BB they don't let you give them a cream pie. :unknown: The withdrawal method is hardly the best way to protect against STD.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

whats your point Abs?

worse of it that some girls will do bareback but not allowing to  cum inside of pussy.

Offline mattylondon

whats your point Abs?
worse of it that some girls will do bareback but not allowing to  cum inside of pussy.
Lost in translation?! Appears to bemoan the fact some may not allow a punter to spunk inside?  :wacko:

Offline abdul

How is that the worst of it, the BB is the bad bit, not the fact if they allow BB they don't let you give them a cream pie. :unknown: The withdrawal method is hardly the best way to protect against STD.

After having bareback sex

But do you think is it still safe for both sides  just to pull out cock and ejaculate elsewhere.
Banning reason: Troll

have you ever heard of pre-cum? Abdul.

Offline vorian

After having bareback sex

But do you think is it still safe for both sides  just to pull out cock and ejaculate elsewhere.

Yes.... No..... I really don't know, I'm just confused now.

I don't think BB is good for either party, after that where you come doesn't really matter.

Hold on Abdul, you do realise don't you that it is not just the phyical seman that holds the danger.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2014, 10:58:50 AM by vorian »
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline a10

Hold on Abdul, you do realise don't you that it is not just the phyical seman that holds the danger.

Wait, no, what? Now you're confusing me Vorian! You mean there's non physical semen that contains STDs?!?!  :scare:
How the hell do you protect against them? Do you need a priest?

Or is it some kind of ghostly naval thing?

abdul, 12 posts a day but no time for a review.

I smell the runny stuff  :lol:  :bomb:

Offline abdul

Yes.... No..... I really don't know, I'm just confused now.

I don't think BB is good for either party, after that where you come doesn't really matter.

Hold on Abdul, you do realise don't you that it is not just the phyical seman that holds the danger.

Yes absolutely that is I said earlier as they are happy to do bareback but they think if guys cum outside they will be safe then. So it's like we do smoke but we know smoking is dangerous for health.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline vorian

Wait, no, what? Now you're confusing me Vorian! You mean there's non physical semen that contains STDs?!?!  :scare:
How the hell do you protect against them? Do you need a priest?

Or is it some kind of ghostly naval thing?

What, yes but no but yes, the ectoplasm seman you mean.  :D You don't need a priest you need the ghostbusters.  :D
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account


Why is Abdul getting racist jibes thrown at him?

His point from what I can see her is that bareback is bad and girls do it because they think it is fine as long as they don't get cum inside.

1) what part of that means you can poke racist jibes at him? Racist bullshit is retarded, always.
2) if that is what he says I agree. It's stupid to do bareback. It's also stupid if the reason a girl does it is the incorrect assumption that it has no risk as long as there isn't ejaculate in the vagina. It's ignorance.

Offline vorian

Why is Abdul getting racist jibes thrown at him?

His point from what I can see her is that bareback is bad and girls do it because they think it is fine as long as they don't get cum inside.

1) what part of that means you can poke racist jibes at him? Racist bullshit is retarded, always.
2) if that is what he says I agree. It's stupid to do bareback. It's also stupid if the reason a girl does it is the incorrect assumption that it has no risk as long as there isn't ejaculate in the vagina. It's ignorance.

May I suggest if you are going to accuse people of being racist, you are very specific as to who and what you are objecting too. I do not believe I have made any racist jibes, if you think that is not the case them please highlight them.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

and its not curry  :cool:

I did not accuse you, vorian. In my original post, I thought I had quoted this at the top. The quote above is what I refer to. Apologies.

Offline vorian

I did not accuse you, vorian. In my original post, I thought I had quoted this at the top. The quote above is what I refer to. Apologies.

Thank you, I appreciate the reply.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

No problem, my apologies again. I would have written the same. Seeming to be accused of racism, like several types of accusations, leaves a stain. Clarifying that I don't think anything vorian said is racist, and that I have not accused him, is in order.  As is my apology for not making it clear, it was a mistake in the quote not being at the top of my post.

The curry comment from whiterussian needs explaining I feel.

Offline abdul

Why is Abdul getting racist jibes thrown at him?

His point from what I can see her is that bareback is bad and girls do it because they think it is fine as long as they don't get cum inside.

1) what part of that means you can poke racist jibes at him? Racist bullshit is retarded, always.
2) if that is what he says I agree. It's stupid to do bareback. It's also stupid if the reason a girl does it is the incorrect assumption that it has no risk as long as there isn't ejaculate in the vagina. It's ignorance.

 How did you remark it i'm pointing out something racist? It it shocks you I think you got the reply by vorian's earlier post which I shall assume it although you apologized later.
Banning reason: Troll

Abdul, I did not mean you said anything racist. I meant the post I quoted in my reply. I felt someone directed a racist point at you. The comment by White Russian.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)