StaceyEnglish - Heathrow

[SZR1989]

AW Link: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Location: One of the many hotels in Heathrow.

Comms: Call then Text

Review:

Booked 1hour £180

activities: OW, RO, Missionary, doggy

This was a few months back.

It's the girl in the pictures but they're flattering. Age is probably closer to 30 than 24. This is mostly negative but will say she was friendly and her arse was cracking!
Got there and she was friendly and smiley but that probably because of half the wine bottle on her table she started on. She is a little bigger than her pictures but not by a lot. To get things started I thought I would start with some RO as she didn't seem that interested as she kept the telly on and seemed more interested in Eastenders. I regretted going down there it was clear she had showered and wasn't the freshiest. OW was teethy. At this point I just wanted to bust a nut and get out so switched her to missionary before turning her around for doggy and popping in the bag. this was maybe about 30 mins in, she didn't seem interested in round 2 and was still watching eastenders and messaging on her phone. I decided to just clean up in the shower and get changed when i came out she was on the phone, i picked up my stuff and walked out as she smiled and waved from the bed having a full on conversation on the phone. She is quite chavvy but I don't really mind this, as sometimes this can be a turn on for me.

Anyway to summarise this was a waste of my time in a WG who was lazy and did not give two shits about providing a good service. Lesson learnt. Never book an hour without having met a girl beforehand.


Would I see again? No

[king tarzan]

Watching EastEnders sums her up!

[SZR1989]

Watching EastEnders sums her up!

 You paid a visit before kt?

[king tarzan]

You paid a visit before kt?

Nope... I don't like chavvy council estate type women, I like beautiful classy elegant ladies..

[SZR1989]

Nope... I don't like chavvy council estate type women, I like beautiful classy elegant ladies..

Lol fair play,   

Depends on my mood, sometimes I want it classy sometimes i want it dirty

[Muff licker]

£180 for 30 mins WTF?

[SZR1989]

£180 for 30 mins WTF?

Was meant to be an hour. And yes waste of time and money, but this was a while ago. Just noticed she was back in the area so was reminded to drop a review and maybe save another punter from making the same mistake.

[Stealthmode]

Judging by her current profile, she is only about the money. One to avoid

[EnglishRebecca121]

"looking for a sugardaddy to take me to tiffanys to buy me diamonds"

ugh just fuck off

[sensualencounter]

"looking for a sugardaddy to take me to tiffanys to buy me diamonds"

ugh just fuck off

So you’re now slagging off those not even in your area.

Why don’t you just fuck off?

[EnglishRebecca121]

So you’re now slagging off those not even in your area.

Why don’t you just fuck off?

Still stalking my post huh

[cotton]

So you’re now slagging off those not even in your area.

Why don’t you just fuck off?

Why dont you just fuck off you rude cunt

[James999]

Why dont you just fuck off you rude cunt

I doubt you understand Irony 

You will now get a PM from Englishrebecca to discuss a booking with her 

[cotton]

I doubt you understand Irony 

You will now get a PM from Englishrebecca to discuss a booking with her 

Ok well if thweres something i missed then i take everything back 

[EnglishRebecca121]

Ok well if thweres something i missed then i take everything back 

You missed nothing just my stalker club

[James999]

just my stalker club

Just her attempt to silence those who mention her touting, she's a compulsive liar and doesn't like it when her lies are exposed (which is quite often) 

(will probably get another near death / hospital story soon)

[sensualencounter]

You missed nothing just my stalker club

As I said on the other thread:

“It’s not a case of following you or stalking you but it’s really hard to get away from your constant touting and slagging off the opposition. Every time I see you do it, I’ll point it out. If you don’t want me to comment then don’t do it. But you can’t help yourself.

There’s no need for you to do it. You’ve got plenty of positives, so why do it?”

As for cotton 

[cotton]

As I said on the other thread:

“It’s not a case of following you or stalking you but it’s really hard to get away from your constant touting and slagging off the opposition. Every time I see you do it, I’ll point it out. If you don’t want me to comment then don’t do it. But you can’t help yourself.

There’s no need for you to do it. You’ve got plenty of positives, so why do it?”

As for cotton 

Whats wrong with her slagging off the opposition ?
""looking for a sugardaddy to take me to tiffanys to buy me diamonds"
ugh just fuck off" seems fair comment to me.
Shes not broken any rules so whats your problem ?

[Cellular40]

Whats wrong with her slagging off the opposition ?
""looking for a sugardaddy to take me to tiffanys to buy me diamonds"
ugh just fuck off" seems fair comment to me.
Shes not broken any rules so whats your problem ?

I agree.

If a punter had said what she said, those objecting to her comments would be agreeing with him.
Which shows the problem isn’t with the comment or “slagging off” the problem they have is with Rebecca.

Strange.

[sensualencounter]

I agree.

If a punter had said what she said, those objecting to her comments would be agreeing with him.
Which shows the problem isn’t with the comment or “slagging off” the problem they have is with Rebecca.

Strange.

Absolutely I have a problem with her because she’s an escort. And has a vested interest in a) getting her name out there everywhere for publicity and b) for slagging off the opposition to make her look better.

A punter doesn’t have that conflict.

Simple really.

[LLPunting]

Absolutely I have a problem with her because she’s an escort. And has a vested interest in a) getting her name out there everywhere for publicity and b) for slagging off the opposition to make her look better.

A punter doesn’t have that conflict.

Simple really.

So if you don't like escorts fuck off out of this hobby.
There is fair comment as opposed to victimisation, you don't understand the former and thus resort to the latter.  Fortunately you don't need much of a mind or reasoning to get along in the world or indeed fuck it up for the rest of us.

[Cellular40]

Absolutely I have a problem with her because she’s an escort. And has a vested interest in a) getting her name out there everywhere for publicity and b) for slagging off the opposition to make her look better.

A punter doesn’t have that conflict.

Simple really.

You have a problem with someone because they are an escort?
So are you saying you don’t like escorts? Why spend money on them then?

If she has done anything against the rules why don’t you report her? If not, ignoring usually works really well. Or maybe you’re one of those who doesn’t have that self control?

I don’t think she needs to make herself “look better” since she isn’t short of reviews or bookings clearly, so in this instance any publicity is good publicity.

If she’s not breaking any rules she’s within her rights to post as she sees fit, just as you are. She’s certainly got your back up though.

[sensualencounter]

Quick to jump you two. I should have said I have a problem because she’s an escort on this forum. But thought that was obvious. Clearly not for you two.
Make sense now?

[LLPunting]

You have a problem with someone because they are an escort?
So are you saying you don’t like escorts? Why spend money on them then?

If she has done anything against the rules why don’t you report her? If not, ignoring usually works really well. Or maybe you’re one of those who doesn’t have that self control?

I don’t think she needs to make herself “look better” since she isn’t short of reviews or bookings clearly, so in this instance any publicity is good publicity.

If she’s not breaking any rules she’s within her rights to post as she sees fit, just as you are. She’s certainly got your back up though.

Fortunately for her it's the only thing of his she can get up.  He'd be in a right stew if she tented his pants.  Oh the self-loathing.

[sensualencounter]

Fortunately for her it's the only thing of his she can get up.  He'd be in a right stew if she tented his pants.  Oh the self-loathing.

What? No idea what you’re saying.

[Cellular40]

Fortunately for her it's the only thing of his she can get up.  He'd be in a right stew if she tented his pants.  Oh the self-loathing.

[Cellular40]

Quick to jump you two. I should have said I have a problem because she’s an escort on this forum. But thought that was obvious. Clearly not for you two.
Make sense now?

Escorts are allowed on this forum providing they follow the rules.

If she’s not breaking any, then she has as much right to post as you do within the rules.

[JonasG]

What a joke she is and at that pricing?

Everything that's wrong with punting.

Cheers for the review.

[cotton]

So if you don't like escorts fuck off out of this hobby.
There is fair comment as opposed to victimisation, you don't understand the former and thus resort to the latter.  Fortunately you don't need much of a mind or reasoning to get along in the world or indeed fuck it up for the rest of us.

+1
I know some forum members (james and finn spring to mind) like to keep Rebecca honest cos shes lied in the past and thats fair enough and its always done with a degree of wit and good humour, but being gratuitously rude like sensualencounters was is just moronic

[SZR1989]

What a joke she is and at that pricing?

Everything that's wrong with punting.

Cheers for the review.

No worries - thanks for staying on topic! Lol everyone else here seems to have gone on a tangent   

[DeanoDeano]

"looking for a sugardaddy to take me to tiffanys to buy me diamonds"

ugh just fuck off

Are you not on SA looking for a sugar daddy any more then...?

 

[EnglishRebecca121]

Are you not on SA looking for a sugar daddy any more then...?

 

nope as all bloody timewasters on there i deleted my profile months ago

[finn5555]

Are you not on SA looking for a sugar daddy any more then...?

 

She's an infamous pro$sie so can't pretend she hasn't sucked over a thousand cocks on SA, that's probably the real reason she deleted her profile 

[Cellular40]

She's an infamous pro$sie so can't pretend she hasn't sucked over a thousand cocks on SA, that's probably the real reason she deleted her profile 

I thought that word was banned on here now? And I’m sure admin made a post about stopping finding ways to go around the ban.
Do you not respect admins decisions?

[finn5555]

I thought that word was banned on here now? And I’m sure admin made a post about stopping finding ways to go around the ban.
Do you not respect admins decisions?

Haven't seen the post so cannot comment, you can report my post if it offends you 

[LLPunting]

She's an infamous pro$sie so can't pretend she hasn't sucked over a thousand cocks on SA, that's probably the real reason she deleted her profile 

That doesn't make sense, if she's a known SP then SDs will not have to guess that they can pay their way into her pants.  None of the faffing with silent profiles, deluded girls who over-price or deny what they're actually doing.
I understand her reasoning as it's highly likely that wannabe SDs who refuse to admit to themselves they are paying for sex/intimacy will faff her about with dick pics, professions of wanting feelings, endless chat for no money, flighty behaviour and bailing on meets.

[finn5555]

That doesn't make sense, if she's a known SP then SDs will not have to guess that they can pay their way into her pants. 

I think most SDs prefer women who have had less cock, well that's my opinion 

[Cellular40]

Haven't seen the post so cannot comment, you can report my post if it offends you 

And yet you posted on this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=257886.150

So you are aware.

[Cellular40]

I think most SDs prefer women who have had less cock, well that's my opinion 

I think most SDs couldn’t give a fuck how much cock a woman is taking as long as she’s clean.

Well, those of us who aren’t insecure or delusional atleast. 

[Cellular40]

That doesn't make sense, if she's a known SP then SDs will not have to guess that they can pay their way into her pants.  None of the faffing with silent profiles, deluded girls who over-price or deny what they're actually doing.
I understand her reasoning as it's highly likely that wannabe SDs who refuse to admit to themselves they are paying for sex/intimacy will faff her about with dick pics, professions of wanting feelings, endless chat for no money, flighty behaviour and bailing on meets.

+1

[finn5555]

And yet you posted on this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=257886.150

So you are aware.

Well done snowflake I don’t recall all my posts anyway as I said if it’s upset you report it 

[finn5555]

I think most SDs couldn’t give a fuck how much cock a woman is taking as long as she’s clean.

Well, those of us who aren’t insecure or delusional atleast. 

I beg to differ but then again we all like different things don’t we

[king tarzan]

She's an infamous pro$sie so can't pretend she hasn't sucked over a thousand cocks on SA, that's probably the real reason she deleted her profile 

Possible she could reach BMW/AUDI/MERCEDES mileage in terms of dick mileage ? 

[Cellular40]

Well done snowflake I don’t recall all my posts anyway as I said if it’s upset you report it 

“Snowflake” very 2019 of you.
You surely recall that you read this thread and posted on it more than once, including this one. The irony of it ;

Good post I always used the word but recognise the new owner, for whatever reason, doesn't like it. Seeing as this is his site he dictates the rules and we either abide by these or fuck off!

 

Or are you telling porkies? 

[finn5555]

“Snowflake” very 2019 of you.
You surely recall that you read this thread and posted on it more than once, including this one. The irony of it ;

Or are you telling porkies? 

Clearly I did post on it but I don’t recall all my posts and yes snowflake sums you up nicely judging by your posts on other threads 

[Cellular40]

Clearly I did post on it but I don’t recall all my posts and yes snowflake sums you up nicely judging by your posts on other threads 

I’d rather be a “snowflake” than a blatant liar and hypocrite, you call Rebecca one but you’re lying now. 

[finn5555]

I’d rather be a “snowflake” than a blatant liar and hypocrite, you call Rebecca one but you’re lying now. 

ER don’t need anymore white knights fella so give up 

[Cellular40]

ER don’t need anymore white knights fella so give up 

I’m not white knighting.

What I am doing, is calling out your lies and hypocrisy on the use of a certain word of which you previously said...

Good post I always used the word but recognise the new owner, for whatever reason, doesn't like it. Seeing as this is his site he dictates the rules and we either abide by these or fuck off!

 

 

[finn5555]

I’m not white knighting.

What I am doing, is calling out your lies and hypocrisy on the use of a certain word of which you previously said...



 

If it makes you feel like you have won crack on, and you are defending ER on another thread, she won’t fuck you for free for defending her but 10 out of 10 for trying 

[Cellular40]

If it makes you feel like you have won crack on, and you are defending ER on another thread, she won’t fuck you for free for defending her but 10 out of 10 for trying 

Won what? This wasn’t a competition. I’m just calling out your lies.

I doubt the SB’s that you so desperately want to have less cock wouldn’t fuck you for free either. Your point?

I don’t need to defend her, from what I’ve read she’s capable of doing so herself. However I do find the obsession some have with her in my short time amusing. Especially you.