Author Topic: JohanaXxxX , City of Westminster , London  (Read 9278 times)


9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5379285) (7 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by MrMatrix]
9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6687214) (7 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline cotton

I completely agree with you that she should have her extras clearly shown on the profile. She has them stated on her Diva profile. It is annoying part of the punt when you are being asked for more money without expecting it.

The whole point of this discussion is that every single punt and review is subjective. We all have different experiences with same SP’s. We all find different girls attractive, different services great. I have came across someone that I felt that was physically perfect. 100% my type. I have been punting for a long time and this doesn’t happen very often. On a top of that she gave me excellent service. Usual punt for me is great looking girl that provides mediocre service or ok looking girl that provides excellent service. Once I hit a jackpot I genuinely don’t mind coughing up a bit more.
I was more than happy to pay what I paid which to some people is obviously too much and to some great value for money. This is all subjective. I have given my opinion.
I also feel that is completely pointless scrutinising something if you have not experienced it. The whole comparison is useless to anyone reeding this review unless the person comparing has seen the girl and formed their opinion of the looks and the service they have received.
It’s like saying you are crazy to pay for that dinner £30 when you can have a great meal at any corner for £10.
For me that was one of the best dinners I have had. I know that I can walk into kebab shop and have a great meal but for me it will never be as good. For someone else kebab will be much tastier. The key is to try both and then make your judgment.
That’s he whole point of this form. For as many of us to give our opinions so that anyone reading can make informed decision. Each option makes a decision to see the SP little easier. Saying that something is overpriced without seeing it or trying it doesn’t make any sense.
No its like you saying youve had a few £10 meals that you havnt liked so its therefore worth paying £30 to have a good meal and its value for money.
Its not value for money , value for money is the £10 meal , as advertised , of good quality and enjoyable. There are no guarantees , you may have a bad meal at £10 or £30 , this time you were fortunate , next time may be a different story , what then £350.
Arguing that its worth paying a premium simply to receive a good service because youve had prior bad experiences is skewed logic and simply validates hookers to put their prices up.
There may be reasons for paying premium prices in certain instances like for specialist services or high profile escorts but your girl is essentially a romanian conveyor belt whore , simply being attractive and giving a good service are not of themselves reasons to justify a price premium. The value for money obviously translates as lower priced hookers (£150 and below) who are beautiful and give a phenomenal service , they do exist and thats the beauty of the forum separating the wheat from the chaff and identifying the real good value for money service providers.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
No its like you saying youve had a few £10 meals that you havnt liked so its therefore worth paying £30 to have a good meal and its value for money.
Its not value for money , value for money is the £10 meal , as advertised , of good quality and enjoyable. There are no guarantees , you may have a bad meal at £10 or £30 , this time you were fortunate , next time may be a different story , what then £350.
Arguing that its worth paying a premium simply to receive a good service because youve had prior bad experiences is skewed logic and simply validates hookers to put their prices up.
There may be reasons for paying premium prices in certain instances like for specialist services or high profile escorts but your girl is essentially a romanian conveyor belt whore , simply being attractive and giving a good service are not of themselves reasons to justify a price premium. The value for money obviously translates as lower priced hookers (£150 and below) who are beautiful and give a phenomenal service , they do exist and thats the beauty of the forum separating the wheat from the chaff and identifying the real good value for money service providers.

You get what you pay for is as true in the pussy market as it is any other my friend. Like everything one will find gems sub £150 and even at times sub £100. However on this very forum it is rare to see negatives post say circa £200 upwards. Those are facts and they cannot be challenged.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
1)  His reviews are welcome as long as they remain reviews, not promotional campaigns brimming with subjectives and prompts to try to see how right he is.

2)+3)  We have no problem deconstructing reviews and pointing out the fluffy statements that may be valuable to the reviewer but have little value to the readers.  A P&D jackhammerer will care fuck all for some of the niceties or sufferings of the girls that GFE punters might mention, they just want to know whether she can take a pounding or an FF.   PSE girls might unite GFE and P&D lovers if the girl is enthusiastic, proactive and blends in (horny) GFE elements.  None of us give a monkey's if the reviewer fell in love.  Read his review again and it is rife with hyperbole that smacks of a fluff piece.  It may not be as blatant of EAS-drenched as others but it, combined with his follow-up statements (poorly worded or not) is not just naively celebratory.
His review has little substance to disect because he did very little with her service-wise, which is particularly why VFM is being argued.
"...I was standing in front of one of the most beautiful girls I have ever seen..."  suggests he hasn't been paying attention to the women out on the streets of this city or any other significant city here or around the world, let alone the many models in fashion, commercial or porn littered across the Web.  Whilst I can safely say I've not seen a prettier girl in say Catford, I am certain I have seen better in Central London, Clapham, Shoreditch, King's Rd, South Ken, Notting Hill and Camden this Summer and none were the most beautiful I have ever seen in RL or in a photo.

Sorry mate I fundamentally disagree this review reads as a promotional fluffy. To me he called it as he saw it.

Further I also disagree with you trying to compare why a P&D would have any interest in this market. You are comparing say a Man City with say a Leyton Orient :dash: The two markets are stratospheres apart.

Looks are subjective and the male mind even more so; in a forum like this should not seek to approach it in some make believe scientific way to justify who is a hottie. We cannot. Many of the SPs on here where a few say is a stunner is 100% not to me simply coz I don't fancy that type of woman or her look.

This pro has 2 reviews now both positive. I repeat we cannot put a value on personality and vibe of a meet. How many times have you read punters saying the SP was a moody bitch or quiet or mechanical or going through the motions but did what it said on the tin. Some punters  want more than a hole(s) n tits. Take that into account with your barbed attacks on OP which, to me, are unjustified! 
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 08:39:59 am by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Fourtyfive

No its like you saying youve had a few £10 meals that you havnt liked so its therefore worth paying £30 to have a good meal and its value for money.
Its not value for money , value for money is the £10 meal , as advertised , of good quality and enjoyable. There are no guarantees , you may have a bad meal at £10 or £30 , this time you were fortunate , next time may be a different story , what then £350.
Arguing that its worth paying a premium simply to receive a good service because youve had prior bad experiences is skewed logic and simply validates hookers to put their prices up.
There may be reasons for paying premium prices in certain instances like for specialist services or high profile escorts but your girl is essentially a romanian conveyor belt whore , simply being attractive and giving a good service are not of themselves reasons to justify a price premium. The value for money obviously translates as lower priced hookers (£150 and below) who are beautiful and give a phenomenal service , they do exist and thats the beauty of the forum separating the wheat from the chaff and identifying the real good value for money service providers.
Again my point missed. I am arguing that just because something is expensive is shouldn’t be snubbed. To me it’s a value to you it isn’t. Who is right is again subjective. My opinion has obviously more value as I have seen the girl and your opinion is based on what? On the on your belief that there are girls that offer better service at lower cost?
“The value for money obviously translates as lower priced hookers (£150 and below) who are beautiful and give a phenomenal service , they do exist”. Absolutely right. But you are disregarded the fact that I found this girl to be prettier than all the sub 150 girls that I have seen and she offered me a great service. I also pointed that I rarely come across this combination of stunning looks and great service.
Still struggling to understand what is wrong with my assessments.
Also your point and description of the girl as Romanian conveyor belt whore is simply brainless considering that you have never met the girl and you surely regret that comment.
My whole argument is that this kind of comments and statements are pointless. Of course you have a right to have this opinion but it is of no value to anyone reading this.
I am sure that most of us would find your opinion much more valuable if you have seen the girl and then presented your opinion to this forum rather than making a judgment that someone is Rom conveyer belt whore just because you don’t like her photo or the fact or her that she is charging a bit more than what is acceptable to you and some others.

winterssong

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
JohanaXxxX , City of Westminster , London
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Pity she.does not do anal, that ass looks so tight and ripe for it. Suspect that might push her price up to 400 an hour though. Some girls start doing anal as a boyfriend they really liked wanted it even if they're not keen some start really liking to receive a strong deep rimming and start to see their asshole as a pleasure point. I wonder where she is in the process as her ass is.going to get a lot of attention. Some.girls even develop an ass fetish themselves like lady crystal who'll dig your asshole out with her tongue like its her last meal and grabs your ass cheeks open really firmly. In the end i don't think this girl will be able to sustain these prices without more services offered unless she sees it solely as a part time income top up. So let's hope her boyfriend is messing with her ass and shes well on her way to offering anal. She might already be taking it up the ass in her private life but can't handle the recovery time the soreness takes to go away. We've all been with partners who tell you their ass is still a bit sore from the previous evening, a gentleman would offer her gentle soothing rimming with his tongue to replace anal pain with gentle soothing pleasure. So.here's to hoping her man is a gentleman and isn't taking advantage of her tight young ass. Suspect he's older judging by her prices but hopefully is gentle with her if he's wanting to break her in anally. That's some ass!

Offline Fourtyfive

Let’s come of our high horses and review some girls. This school ground bully attitude and intellectual snobbery adopted by some members that are sitting on the sidelines and watching is not helpful to anyone. Try putting some effort into seeing the girl, sitting down and writing the review so we can rightfully judge the girl. The more members do this, less discussions like this we will have.

Offline Fourtyfive

Pity she.does not do anal, that ass looks so tight and ripe for it. Suspect that might push her price up to 400 an hour though. Some girls start doing anal as a boyfriend they really liked wanted it even if they're not keen some start really liking to receive a strong deep rimming and start to see their asshole as a pleasure point. I wonder where she is in the process as her ass is.going to get a lot of attention. Some.girls even develop an ass fetish themselves like lady crystal who'll dig your asshole out with her tongue like its her last meal and grabs your ass cheeks open really firmly. In the end i don't think this girl will be able to sustain these prices without more services offered unless she sees it solely as a part time income top up. So let's hope her boyfriend is messing with her ass and shes well on her way to offering anal. She might already be taking it up the ass in her private life but can't handle the recovery time the soreness takes to go away. We've all been with partners who tell you their ass is still a bit sore from the previous evening, a gentleman would offer her gentle soothing rimming with his tongue to replace anal pain with gentle soothing pleasure. So.here's to hoping her man is a gentleman and isn't taking advantage of her tight young ass. Suspect he's older judging by her prices but hopefully is gentle with her if he's wanting to break her in anally. That's some ass!
Hahahah. I hope her boyfriend is read this.

Offline cotton

Again my point missed. I am arguing that just because something is expensive is shouldn’t be snubbed. To me it’s a value to you it isn’t. Who is right is again subjective. My opinion has obviously more value as I have seen the girl and your opinion is based on what? On the on your belief that there are girls that offer better service at lower cost?
“The value for money obviously translates as lower priced hookers (£150 and below) who are beautiful and give a phenomenal service , they do exist”. Absolutely right. But you are disregarded the fact that I found this girl to be prettier than all the sub 150 girls that I have seen and she offered me a great service. I also pointed that I rarely come across this combination of stunning looks and great service.
Still struggling to understand what is wrong with my assessments.
Also your point and description of the girl as Romanian conveyor belt whore is simply brainless considering that you have never met the girl and you surely regret that comment.
My whole argument is that this kind of comments and statements are pointless. Of course you have a right to have this opinion but it is of no value to anyone reading this.
I am sure that most of us would find your opinion much more valuable if you have seen the girl and then presented your opinion to this forum rather than making a judgment that someone is Rom conveyer belt whore just because you don’t like her photo or the fact or her that she is charging a bit more than what is acceptable to you and some others.
You sound like your taking it all to personally. She is Romanian , she is a whore and based on your own review where you describe her kicking you out cos she had another punter straight after you , she is running a conveyor belt operation. Nothing wrong with that , not sure what your objection is to the description.

Offline manorf

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 65
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
JohanaXxxX , City of Westminster , London
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I was tempted to give her RO as she is as close to perfection as you will get but I have resisted.

was this because she was unwilling or she avoided RO - or too many other 'delights' to sample?

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Oh for fucks sake such a tedious ridiculous thread..
Handbags galore over a whore!! :dash: :dash: :dash:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Oh for fucks sake such a tedious ridiculous thread..
Handbags galore over a whore!! :dash: :dash: :dash:

Have you not noticed as soon as a punter post a 250/300 queens heads punt this forum dissects the review as if they were back in their biology class at school with the scalpel over the rat!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Happyjose

Have you not noticed as soon as a punter post a 250/300 queens heads punt this forum dissects the review as if they were back in their biology class at school with the scalpel over the rat!

I don’t know

Is this post available in English?

 :rolleyes:

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
You get what you pay for is as true in the pussy market as it is any other my friend. Like everything one will find gems sub £150 and even at times sub £100. However on this very forum it is rare to see negatives post say circa £200 upwards. Those are facts and they cannot be challenged.

Are you really saying money buys quality of service or just looks?

Reviews of the 200+ market aren't the majority.  The more expensive the punt beyond that the less we see here.  (Sadly high-rollers who have popped in their pennyworth have been knocked about a bit, sometimes for good reason.) That said there have been negatives, particularly when punters have strayed from the popular, reputable agencies and their generally well behaved ladies (until they burn out). 
Just because they're "facts" doesn't mean it's true, you've just inferred from a limited sample.  The 300+ girls mentioned in the thread about hotel girls, it wouldn't be at all surprising if many/most of those encounters were clips with shorting on time and services or poor service, if we were to include those in the sample then this may skew the result the other way, which might be in opposition to the numerous "good" but unsung SPs who could put truth to your belief.  We need reviews...  So all the more reason for OP to go review the pricey broads.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Sorry mate I fundamentally disagree this review reads as a promotional fluffy. To me he called it as he saw it.

Further I also disagree with you trying to compare why a P&D would have any interest in this market. You are comparing say a Man City with say a Leyton Orient :dash: The two markets are stratospheres apart.

Looks are subjective and the male mind even more so; in a forum like this should not seek to approach it in some make believe scientific way to justify who is a hottie. We cannot. Many of the SPs on here where a few say is a stunner is 100% not to me simply coz I don't fancy that type of woman or her look.

This pro has 2 reviews now both positive. I repeat we cannot put a value on personality and vibe of a meet. How many times have you read punters saying the SP was a moody bitch or quiet or mechanical or going through the motions but did what it said on the tin. Some punters  want more than a hole(s) n tits. Take that into account with your barbed attacks on OP which, to me, are unjustified!

The original review was just fluffy.  His subsequent bleating about "you must experience to have a valid opinion" is what starts colouring his comments as (unintentionally) promotional.  If he'd just walked away with a "pricey but I got my money's worth" it would've been fine.

P&D guys aren't just cheap fuckers.  P&D guys are one's who don't need GFE, emotional shit.  They might very well want to drop a ton or two banging a babe shitless (perhaps literally in the A) or FF her or just jack-hammer her prone-bone until the bed breaks.

I already said looks are subjective, read my other posts again about that.  By scientific do you mean describing technique, her enthusiasm, her pro-active participation, her response to acts?  I think you would find the majority of punters are VERY interested in how well an SP "takes the D", uses the "D", pleasures the "D" and GFEers will want to know how she behaves and how convincing her engagement is.

I think you got lost up your own fundament with your final statement.  I'm a confirmed GFEer which you would know if you paid attention to my posting and reviews, deduction being your strong point and all.  EVERYTHING I've been advising OP to do to enhance his review has been in service of GFEers and those others wanting to understand what was so special +100 about this girl.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Pity she.does not do anal, that ass looks so tight and ripe for it. Suspect that might push her price up to 400 an hour though. Some girls start doing anal as a boyfriend they really liked wanted it even if they're not keen some start really liking to receive a strong deep rimming and start to see their asshole as a pleasure point. I wonder where she is in the process as her ass is.going to get a lot of attention. Some.girls even develop an ass fetish themselves like lady crystal who'll dig your asshole out with her tongue like its her last meal and grabs your ass cheeks open really firmly. In the end i don't think this girl will be able to sustain these prices without more services offered unless she sees it solely as a part time income top up. So let's hope her boyfriend is messing with her ass and shes well on her way to offering anal. She might already be taking it up the ass in her private life but can't handle the recovery time the soreness takes to go away. We've all been with partners who tell you their ass is still a bit sore from the previous evening, a gentleman would offer her gentle soothing rimming with his tongue to replace anal pain with gentle soothing pleasure. So.here's to hoping her man is a gentleman and isn't taking advantage of her tight young ass. Suspect he's older judging by her prices but hopefully is gentle with her if he's wanting to break her in anally. That's some ass!

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Great deflection.  Just what a stiff knob needs to get in her A.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Have you not noticed as soon as a punter post a 250/300 queens heads punt this forum dissects the review as if they were back in their biology class at school with the scalpel over the rat!

Wrong, this happens to overly fluffy, self-justification postings, I'm talking about past ones, not specifically this one.

Just did a search on "200" and "250" and got more than a few reviews where the posting went without challenge.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
JohanaXxxX , City of Westminster , London
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I was tempted to give her RO as she is as close to perfection as you will get but I have resisted.
was this because she was unwilling or she avoided RO - or too many other 'delights' to sample?

Hope OP answers you  :hi:, because he isn't getting the message from me.

Offline Fourtyfive

was this because she was unwilling or she avoided RO - or too many other 'delights' to sample?


Hope OP answers you  :hi:, because he isn't getting the message from me.

Messages received loud and clear. You seem to be missing my messages. I will quote my previous post from above so you don’t have to scroll up. Read between the lines.
The only conclusion that I can make about your bragging regarding RO and how she has enjoyed it, is that you think that you are very good at it. Again I can adopt your mentality and after reading your statement form my opinion and claim to all the punters the forum that you are shit at it. On what basis do I claim that you are crap at it. I have a right to have opinion. Of course that we all have a right to our opinions.
My point is that my opinion would be more valuable to the readers if I have experienced it. I am really sorry if I am not making my self clear.“

 As Mark Twain said in English “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
I give up.

Apologies to the OP for not answering the question.
I have stopped giving RO while back and have not attempted it with SP. I am fairly confident that she would be willing. She did allow clit rubbing with my d...

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Messages received loud and clear. You seem to be missing my messages. I will quote my previous post from above so you don’t have to scroll up. Read between the lines.
The only conclusion that I can make about your bragging regarding RO and how she has enjoyed it, is that you think that you are very good at it. Again I can adopt your mentality and after reading your statement form my opinion and claim to all the punters the forum that you are shit at it. On what basis do I claim that you are crap at it. I have a right to have opinion. Of course that we all have a right to our opinions.
My point is that my opinion would be more valuable to the readers if I have experienced it. I am really sorry if I am not making my self clear.“

 As Mark Twain said in English “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
I give up.

Apologies to the OP for not answering the question.
I have stopped giving RO while back and have not attempted it with SP. I am fairly confident that she would be willing. She did allow clit rubbing with my d...

All you've proven is that any idiot can quote Mark Twain.

I specifically told you the context of my reference to RO.  Read it again, move your lips, say it out loud to yourself if you need to.  There is nothing wrong with your English that would lead me to believe you cannot read and understand the "idiot's words" that I have used to explain what I've been trying to explain.  We are either at a genuinely inexplicable misinterpretation or you are wilfully misunderstanding to keep banging your "personal experience" drum.

Thanks for explaining your non-indulgence of RO.
Good of you to add the detail about rubbing her clit with your bare dick.  Was that shaft or knob?

Please go ahead and answer the questions of others instead. We can make progress that way.


Offline cotton

You get what you pay for is as true in the pussy market as it is any other my friend. Like everything one will find gems sub £150 and even at times sub £100. However on this very forum it is rare to see negatives post say circa £200 upwards. Those are facts and they cannot be challenged.
Obviously you merely stating something is fact dosnt make it fact and the number of negative £200+ punt reviews clearly contradicts your assumption. 
But ignoring that , talking specifically of value for money , in simple terms which constitutes better value for money a pretty £150 romanian conveyorbelt whore giving a good vanilla service or a pretty £250 romanian conveyorbelt whore giving a good vanilla service.
By all means the OP can say everything was great , it was a great punt and she was the most beautiful woman hes seen in his life but dont try and tell us it was good value for money when in relative terms it clearly wasnt. 
For the OP to insist such a vanilla conveyor belt romanian service was good value logically implies that all comparable £150 hookers are £100 underpriced which obviously isnt correct , this hooker was £100 overpriced.
By all means he can pay over the odds in the deluded belief that it guarantees a good punt but it dosnt , the next punt might be good or bad , there is no guarantee at any price point , indeed even this punt could have been shit as the OP himself acknowledges in his own initial apprehension.

Offline Colston36

Cool, but this bring's us back to the original challenge by the rest of us which is that you ended up paying mostly for her looks rather than the service.
We all have her pics to assess how we like her looks, we rely on your review to confirm how well she actually measured up to her photos. 
IF you've been paying attention to the other reviews being written you will know that above 150ph we generally expect a girl to look good, be younger, be fitter and everyone is interested in what they did and how well they did it.

Sweet Jesus! The poor guy says he had a great time and everyone jumps down his throat! Wtf is wrong with everyone? If it was good for him, it was good for him. If he liked tattoos, that's his privilege. I like them even more. If he can afford £200, he can afford it. What skin is that off your hypercritical noses?

I know of one guy who regularly pays £400 to have something nasty with 4 girls that I wouldn't pay £100 for. Two of the best times I have ever had cost me £200 for the hour, and I'd be back again in the morning if the woman wasn't at the ends of the earth from where I am. Apparently most of you wouldn't fancy the girl at that price. So bloody what? I can't be bothered with 90% of the girls on here. This carping, critical stuff defeats the whole purpose of this site.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Sweet Jesus! The poor guy says he had a great time and everyone jumps down his throat! Wtf is wrong with everyone? If it was good for him, it was good for him. If he liked tattoos, that's his privilege. I like them even more. If he can afford £200, he can afford it. What skin is that off your hypercritical noses?

I know of one guy who regularly pays £400 to have something nasty with 4 girls that I wouldn't pay £100 for. Two of the best times I have ever had cost me £200 for the hour, and I'd be back again in the morning if the woman wasn't at the ends of the earth from where I am. Apparently most of you wouldn't fancy the girl at that price. So bloody what? I can't be bothered with 90% of the girls on here. This carping, critical stuff defeats the whole purpose of this site.

We aren't disputing his good time.  We are disputing the value given the limited services indulged.  OP acknowledged that he overpaid but still asserts the value (and that he'd have paid more) so we wanted to know what made it so valuable.  His only clarification for most of the thread has been "you'd have to go see for yourself".

We've all had memorable encounters, maybe it was looks, maybe it was chemistry, maybe it was performance or any combination of these, and many of us can probably say we've had that at most price points up to our maximums.

This "carping" has been about the lack of objective detail in his review that would give us all better insight into why he liked it so much (despite the price).   All we got was "great" OWO and that she kept bobbing until he finished coming.  Then after all the "bullying" he finally coughed up that he rubbed her clit BB but hasn't said with what part of his dick.  Which begs the question: "So what would he have got if he offered another 100?"

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Obviously you merely stating something is fact dosnt make it fact and the number of negative £200+ punt reviews clearly contradicts your assumption. 
But ignoring that , talking specifically of value for money , in simple terms which constitutes better value for money a pretty £150 romanian conveyorbelt whore giving a good vanilla service or a pretty £250 romanian conveyorbelt whore giving a good vanilla service.
By all means the OP can say everything was great , it was a great punt and she was the most beautiful woman hes seen in his life but dont try and tell us it was good value for money when in relative terms it clearly wasnt. 
For the OP to insist such a vanilla conveyor belt romanian service was good value logically implies that all comparable £150 hookers are £100 underpriced which obviously isnt correct , this hooker was £100 overpriced.
By all means he can pay over the odds in the deluded belief that it guarantees a good punt but it dosnt , the next punt might be good or bad , there is no guarantee at any price point , indeed even this punt could have been shit as the OP himself acknowledges in his own initial apprehension.

Why don't you read my posts on this thread properly. I have reketeadky stated VFM is difficult because we can't put a price on personality and the vibe of the punt. To a GFE guy this is crucial.

So why you are quoting the diff between a £150 n a £250 is beyond me.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Fourtyfive

We aren't disputing his good time.  We are disputing the value given the limited services indulged.  OP acknowledged that he overpaid but still asserts the value (and that he'd have paid more) so we wanted to know what made it so valuable.  His only clarification for most of the thread has been "you'd have to go see for yourself".

We've all had memorable encounters, maybe it was looks, maybe it was chemistry, maybe it was performance or any combination of these, and many of us can probably say we've had that at most price points up to our maximums.

This "carping" has been about the lack of objective detail in his review that would give us all better insight into why he liked it so much (despite the price).   All we got was "great" OWO and that she kept bobbing until he finished coming.  Then after all the "bullying" he finally coughed up that he rubbed her clit BB but hasn't said with what part of his dick.  Which begs the question: "So what would he have got if he offered another 100?"
This is complete bullshit. This “carping” has nothing to do with a lack of objective detail in my review. This is you, self indulging in your psychological wank. Trying to get off by pointlessly criticising others in order to appear clever. Typical bully mentality. All bullies receive mental gratification from theirs act of aggression and you are hoping to receive one here.
This might have worked in the past but now, you are farting in the wind. There will be no “happy ending” for you.
I am sorry that my review has not satisfied your need for Shakespearian narrative. But for most of us, average Joes, I have covered most of the important points considering that girl didn’t have any reviews.
My lack of detail may be due to many different reasons. If the lack of details was your issue, you could have politely asked, Mate could you elaborate on this or that. I would have obliged very happily and answered all your questions like I have with other members.
I genuinely didn’t need a lesson from the self righteous prick on how to formulate my reviews.
In the attempt to clarify my position I have indulged in this discussion and here we are. You have made two things very clear. One that your little brain can not grasp what you are being told in many polite ways, and second that you quite enjoy running around and behaving like a school ground bully eager to win the argument that make sense in your head.
It seems that I have given you too much credit when I genuinely believed that you will able to understand what I was trying to communicate. On numerous occasions I have tried to paraphrase my explanations in a simpler way so you can understand but clearly had no luck.
I hope that I will not have to resort to drawing as I never thought of my self as an artist.
You are clearly a valuable member with over 100 reviews to your name but you have to re examine your attitude. Your attitude will just discourage people to write anything and I am sure that is not in the interest of the forum. If you want us to write in a different way go back to the drawing board and find a way to encourage the change.
I also hope that other honourable members will forgive me for sinking so low and engaging in this discussion.
And the answer to you question is “the tip of my d...”.

Offline cotton

Why don't you read my posts on this thread properly. I have reketeadky stated VFM is difficult because we can't put a price on personality and the vibe of the punt. To a GFE guy this is crucial.

So why you are quoting the diff between a £150 n a £250 is beyond me.
But decent personality and good vibe should come as standard on all punts , admittedly they sometimes dont but they should , its not something you should be paying a premium for.
VFMs not that hard to assess if you stop thinking that you should be paying extra for things that should come as standard.
You yourself have acknowledged there are great SPs at £150 and below , its these reasonably priced SPs who are attractive with decent personality and good vibe that are VFM , the OPs girl may be fantastic but if you strip away the fluffy BS and just examine the bare facts at £250 she is relatively overpriced aka not good value for money.
Some higher priced SPs see a limited number of clients per day and that alters the VFM as thats a tangible benefit , but in this case going by the OPs own review that isnt the case , she is a romanian conveyor belt back to backer charging inflated prices.
The point remains its not value for money but if you can afford it who cares , in that instance value for money wont be your main concern , but theres no need to relentlessly defend her and say shes VFM when the facts clearly indicate she isnt.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
But decent personality and good vibe should come as standard on all punts , admittedly they sometimes dont but they should , its not something you should be paying a premium for.
VFMs not that hard to assess if you stop thinking that you should be paying extra for things that should come as standard.
You yourself have acknowledged there are great SPs at £150 and below , its these reasonably priced SPs who are attractive with decent personality and good vibe that are VFM , the OPs girl may be fantastic but if you strip away the fluffy BS and just examine the bare facts at £250 she is relatively overpriced aka not good value for money.
Some higher priced SPs see a limited number of clients per day and that alters the VFM as thats a tangible benefit , but in this case going by the OPs own review that isnt the case , she is a romanian conveyor belt back to backer charging inflated prices.
The point remains its not value for money but if you can afford it who cares , in that instance value for money wont be your main concern , but theres no need to relentlessly defend her and say shes VFM when the facts clearly indicate she isnt.

My friend ... the truth is top vibe and personality should be standard but the mere fact that I am bringing it your attention is because it is not. Simply read the reviews on here and the salient points and you will have your answer.

Yes there are some amazing punts sub £100/150 I have had a few myself but trust me they are hard to find and many punks on here when they do find them keep them to themselves so you n I wil never get to fuck them.

I wil say all day long OP's review is not fluffy at all. I saw it for what it was a top punt and he left mega happy. I further repeat I would rather spend post £200/250 on a fantastic punt then 2 x £120 or 3 x £80 on an average punt but others may disagree with the mantra a hole is a hole.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Fourtyfive

Why don't you read my posts on this thread properly. I have reketeadky stated VFM is difficult because we can't put a price on personality and the vibe of the punt. To a GFE guy this is crucial.

So why you are quoting the diff between a £150 n a £250 is beyond me.
He is not reading anyone’s post properly. He has already confirmed that his he doesn’t see the 150+ SP’s. Some people have clearly made conscious decision not to see those girls as they do not see them as a value for their money. I respect that. But to go down ripping apart anyone else’s positive experience of those girls is pointless.
Mere suggestion that whole this debate is born out of my lack of description and fluffiness of my review is complete nonsense. He is clearly trying to justify his decision not to see more expensive girls in order to reinforce his conviction that they are not value for money.
The only other option for such a obstructive behaviour that I can possibly think off after all of his comments is that he has came up with a cunning plan to drive the price down of 150+ SP’s by convincing other OP’s that it’s not worth seeing those girls. This is as cunning as any other plan that  Boldrick has suggested to Blackadder.
He continues to argue that since I am not in a position to write an essay on the direction and the pressure of the SP’s tongue while she is licking my cock, or the tone of her voice while I am taking her from the back my review is full of fluff.
I find the value in every single review and wish that more punters write down their experiences even if they are fluffy in my opinion. There is valuable information in every review.
Maybe the OP doesn’t have a time to write an ode, or he doesn’t find the same service important.
If I need more info I will ask.
This attitude just makes me want to sit on a sideline and collect information that seems to be the case with lots of other members or not bother at all and continue with what I have been doing for a long time without the UKP.
I have just noticed that he is a forum helper. Surly this is the right person to encourage all of us to write more and not making me feel from now on that I am treading on the eggshells every time I write a review.
I genuinely regret taking a bait.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
OP I encourage you to ignore the attacks as hard as it may be and continue to post your reviews.

This after all is FF. "Fuck Facebook". Keyboard warriors seeking to dismantle and destroy posts that does not sit with their psyche. Not all are like this but the most vociferous tend to have those tendencies.

It cannot be accident that as soon as a poster posts above the perceived price value level he gets hammered on here . Laughable but it is what it is. Those same posters attempt to hide behind it is fluff o or BS or you paid on your credit card or you spent 4 hours with a WG but paid X or a £20 increase is obscene. Seasoned reviewers will know which WGs/reviews I am referring to that have been challenged.

Repeating myself keep posting we don't want lurkers who contribute fuck all but real punters who share their experiences warts'n'all. I for one benefit from reviews like OP's.

I know this thread has gone on too long now but we have to break the bully boy mentality of some on here so this forum can continue to thrive with new members feeling confident that they can write a review as they see it. Constructive challenge is encouraged. Keyboard bullying, I am sure you wil all agree is distasteful and frankly turns punters into a lurker. Bullies check yourselves and the tone of your challenges!!!
« Last Edit: September 09, 2019, 02:21:54 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline MrMatrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 8,076
  • Likes: 41
  •  
  • Reviews: 124
OP I encourage you to ignore the attacks as hard as it may be and continue to post your reviews.

This after all is FF. "Fuck Facebook". Keyboard warriors seeking to dismantle and destroy posts that does not sit with their psyche. Not all are like this but the most vociferous tend to have those tendencies.

It cannot be accident that as soon as a poster posts above the perceived price value level he gets hammered on here . Laughable but it is what it is. Those same posters attempt to hide behind it is fluff o or BS or you paid on your credit card or you spent 4 hours with a WG but paid X or a £20 increase is obscene. Seasoned reviewers will know which WGs/reviews I am referring to that have been challenged.

Repeating myself keep posting we don't want lurkers who contribute fuck all but real punters who share their experiences warts'n'all. I for one benefit from reviews like OP's.

I know this thread has gone on too long now but we have to break the bully boy mentality of some on here so this forum can continue to thrive with new members feeling confident that they can write a review as they see it. Constructive challenge is encouraged. Keyboard bullying, I am sure you wil all agree is distasteful and frankly turns punters into a lurker. Bullies check yourselves and the tone of your challenges!!!
Agreed. OP continue as you have done, doing reviews. Give some thought as to whats been said perhaps. At the end of the day this is your review. For what its worth I've had the odd review critizised but that the nature of the forum. At least any one reviewing this SP has got something to go on and draw their own conclusion.

Its unfortuneate that many lurkers will be put off by this thread and who can blame them.

Hopefully this is the end of this thread.

Offline cotton

My friend ... the truth is top vibe and personality should be standard but the mere fact that I am bringing it your attention is because it is not. Simply read the reviews on here and the salient points and you will have your answer.

Yes there are some amazing punts sub £100/150 I have had a few myself but trust me they are hard to find and many punks on here when they do find them keep them to themselves so you n I wil never get to fuck them.

I wil say all day long OP's review is not fluffy at all. I saw it for what it was a top punt and he left mega happy. I further repeat I would rather spend post £200/250 on a fantastic punt then 2 x £120 or 3 x £80 on an average punt but others may disagree with the mantra a hole is a hole.
Yeh i agree if the choice is between £250 for a fantastic punt and 2 x £120 or £ x £80 average punts then the fantastic punt is obviously the best option.
And we agree there are fantastic punts available at lower price levels , and it obviously follows that the value for money decreases proportionally the more you pay , thats just common sense , but in the real world if thats the price and you can afford it then go for it , however its not in anyones best interest to start blabbering about value for money being £250 when its a vanilla service and it just sounds like the OP was overcome how pretty she was , and especially , in the spirit of keeping it real we're talking about a Romanian back to backer.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
This is complete bullshit. This “carping” has nothing to do with a lack of objective detail in my review. This is you, self indulging in your psychological wank. Trying to get off by pointlessly criticising others in order to appear clever. Typical bully mentality. All bullies receive mental gratification from theirs act of aggression and you are hoping to receive one here.
This might have worked in the past but now, you are farting in the wind. There will be no “happy ending” for you.
I am sorry that my review has not satisfied your need for Shakespearian narrative. But for most of us, average Joes, I have covered most of the important points considering that girl didn’t have any reviews.
My lack of detail may be due to many different reasons. If the lack of details was your issue, you could have politely asked, Mate could you elaborate on this or that. I would have obliged very happily and answered all your questions like I have with other members.
I genuinely didn’t need a lesson from the self righteous prick on how to formulate my reviews.
In the attempt to clarify my position I have indulged in this discussion and here we are. You have made two things very clear. One that your little brain can not grasp what you are being told in many polite ways, and second that you quite enjoy running around and behaving like a school ground bully eager to win the argument that make sense in your head.
It seems that I have given you too much credit when I genuinely believed that you will able to understand what I was trying to communicate. On numerous occasions I have tried to paraphrase my explanations in a simpler way so you can understand but clearly had no luck.
I hope that I will not have to resort to drawing as I never thought of my self as an artist.
You are clearly a valuable member with over 100 reviews to your name but you have to re examine your attitude. Your attitude will just discourage people to write anything and I am sure that is not in the interest of the forum. If you want us to write in a different way go back to the drawing board and find a way to encourage the change.
I also hope that other honourable members will forgive me for sinking so low and engaging in this discussion.
And the answer to you question is “the tip of my d...”.

Blather, blather, whine...
Yup, you are an emotional snowflake imploding.   The reason you got so much response out of me was because you kept insisting on a ridiculous premise which every vet here knows to be irrelevant to the reason for reviewing.

I thank you finally for answering the more apposite question  :hi:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
At last ... I hope this thread is now closed  :D
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
He is not reading anyone’s post properly. He has already confirmed that his he doesn’t see the 150+ SP’s. Some people have clearly made conscious decision not to see those girls as they do not see them as a value for their money. I respect that. But to go down ripping apart anyone else’s positive experience of those girls is pointless.
Mere suggestion that whole this debate is born out of my lack of description and fluffiness of my review is complete nonsense. He is clearly trying to justify his decision not to see more expensive girls in order to reinforce his conviction that they are not value for money.
The only other option for such a obstructive behaviour that I can possibly think off after all of his comments is that he has came up with a cunning plan to drive the price down of 150+ SP’s by convincing other OP’s that it’s not worth seeing those girls. This is as cunning as any other plan that  Boldrick has suggested to Blackadder.
He continues to argue that since I am not in a position to write an essay on the direction and the pressure of the SP’s tongue while she is licking my cock, or the tone of her voice while I am taking her from the back my review is full of fluff.
I find the value in every single review and wish that more punters write down their experiences even if they are fluffy in my opinion. There is valuable information in every review.
Maybe the OP doesn’t have a time to write an ode, or he doesn’t find the same service important.
If I need more info I will ask.
This attitude just makes me want to sit on a sideline and collect information that seems to be the case with lots of other members or not bother at all and continue with what I have been doing for a long time without the UKP.
I have just noticed that he is a forum helper. Surly this is the right person to encourage all of us to write more and not making me feel from now on that I am treading on the eggshells every time I write a review.
I genuinely regret taking a bait.

You're confusing Cotton with me perhaps.
A shame for Cotton.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
@ LL Punting ... chil bro, don't take everything so personal. You're not the UKP police or judge or jury ... relax  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
@ LL Punting ... chil bro, don't take everything so personal. You're not the UKP police or judge or jury ... relax  :thumbsup:

Am totally chill thanks.
I don't enjoy blood from a stone work but it has to be done sometimes, especially when crucial info is revealed by the scratching.
It is this specific review and his associated postings that are being challenged, his other review https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=258600.msg2638291#msg2638291 is briefer, more to the point and less smitten.
He could learn plenty by using your review structure as a framework.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2019, 07:58:00 pm by LLPunting »

Offline The Film Director


He could learn plenty by using your review structure as a framework.

Hear, hear.  Well said, that man.   :thumbsup:

Offline cotton

@ LL Punting ... chil bro, don't take everything so personal. You're not the UKP police or judge or jury ... relax  :thumbsup:
To be fair JK everyone seems to be chilled , except maybe the OP if his irate tone accurately reflects how he genuinely is. Theres nothing wrong with scrutinising reviews , indeed the impression i have is that its a vital part of how the forum operates and stays on point.

Offline Fourtyfive

To be fair JK everyone seems to be chilled , except maybe the OP if his irate tone accurately reflects how he genuinely is. Theres nothing wrong with scrutinising reviews , indeed the impression i have is that its a vital part of how the forum operates and stays on point.
Mate, I am completely chilled. There will always be things that will bother me, and to be honest some of the language I find very distasteful, like “Romanian Conveyer belt whore”, but I realise if I am not prepared to hear it I should not be here. I am new and slowly learning. All good.

Offline cotton

Mate, I am completely chilled. There will always be things that will bother me, and to be honest some of the language I find very distasteful, like “Romanian Conveyer belt whore”, but I realise if I am not prepared to hear it I should not be here. I am new and slowly learning. All good.
You do make her sound good and fair play you had a good experience but for me £250+ is the price bracket where you can get independant young chiks who see a limited number of customers and who wont be kicking you out the door spot on or before your times up cos theres another guy waiting. Essentially your girl is a “Romanian Conveyer belt whore” and even accepting your subjective assesment of her beauty and personality £250 is still expensive for what she is.
Im wondering was the fact that she see clients back to back a consideration in you not doing RO on her , what was her hygeine like , did you smell her pussy, what put you off doing RO ?

Offline Fourtyfive

You do make her sound good and fair play you had a good experience but for me £250+ is the price bracket where you can get independant young chiks who see a limited number of customers and who wont be kicking you out the door spot on or before your times up cos theres another guy waiting. Essentially your girl is a “Romanian Conveyer belt whore” and even accepting your subjective assesment of her beauty and personality £250 is still expensive for what she is.
Im wondering was the fact that she see clients back to back a consideration in you not doing RO on her , what was her hygeine like , did you smell her pussy, what put you off doing RO ?
She was perfectly clean but I have stopped going down on WG’s while back. I don’t get much pleasure from RO.

Offline Fourtyfive

You do make her sound good and fair play you had a good experience but for me £250+ is the price bracket where you can get independant young chiks who see a limited number of customers and who wont be kicking you out the door spot on or before your times up cos theres another guy waiting. Essentially your girl is a “Romanian Conveyer belt whore” and even accepting your subjective assesment of her beauty and personality £250 is still expensive for what she is.
Im wondering was the fact that she see clients back to back a consideration in you not doing RO on her , what was her hygeine like , did you smell her pussy, what put you off doing RO ?
BTW I am not sure if she will be around next year

Offline Raven

Wow epic read from start  :P :lol: :D

Cheers for the review op  :drinks: don’t ever be put off with putting up a review.

 Pennnies worth - At the end of the day we all have our own views and opinions and the search goes on for the next holy grail punt  :angelgirl:

Via la Ukpunting!  :yahoo:

Offline Fourtyfive

Wow epic read from start  :P :lol: :D

Cheers for the review op  :drinks: don’t ever be put off with putting up a review.

 Pennnies worth - At the end of the day we all have our own views and opinions and the search goes on for the next holy grail punt  :angelgirl:

Via la Ukpunting!  :yahoo:
Thanks. I will try to re visit next week. Just curious to see I will feel as enthusiastic as I did the first time.
Reviews will keep coming.

Online ollielon

Hello how did you book her ? usual SMS / phone call ? or through AW ... she seems to be difficult to get hold of ... :-(

Offline Fourtyfive

Hello how did you book her ? usual SMS / phone call ? or through AW ... she seems to be difficult to get hold of ... :-(
Phone call followed by text.