Author Topic: JohanaXxxX , City of Westminster , London  (Read 9277 times)


9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5379285) (7 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by MrMatrix]
9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6687214) (7 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline Fourtyfive

JohanaXxxX , City of Westminster , London
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Came across her profile few days ago. As usual looked too good to be true. Not being lazy as usual I have decided to look at her video as the photos on her profile looked too professional and photoshopped.
Girl on the video looked absolutely stunning and almost unbelievable so reservations were still there.
Also being Romanian was a major put off, not for any other reasons than me being fed up with seeing some of the most beautiful girls offering most terrible service. Few exceptions of course.
The fact that she just joined the site has given me a hope since I have had few good experiences with a new and fresh SP’s from Romania. Normally over the time service progressively gets worse and I stop seeing them.
Also her rate is slightly higher and that gave me some confidence that service should be above average.
I still didn’t believe that I was in for a treat.
My plan was to see Destiny Sky (which I have seen already once before and reviewed) and have arranged to meet her with the person that answered her phone only to be told 15 minutes later while I was driving towards her that she has to cancel and I was offered different girl. I have declined and turned around. I checked my hot list again and saw that Johana’s green available sign was on and since I was near by I decided to take a plunge.
I texted Johana and after few messages the meet was set.
1h incall £200 extras £50 OWO

Flat is on one of up market side streets next to the Harrods. I think that she works with other girl/girls from the flat. Not the discrete location but ok.

She has opened the door and to my amazement I was standing in front of one of the most beautiful girls I have ever seen. Blond hair, blue eyes, perfect lips, no makeup, absolutely stunning. Her profile professional photos are terrible compared with what was standing in front of me. I couldn’t believe my luck.
On a top of everything, she is friendly, smiley and just lovely.
Body wise she is my type 100%. Small waist, perfect bum and a all around great gym body. Lovely c cup breasts.
She is personal trainer so all the muscles are defined and she is solid where ever you touch her.
Her ass is amazing. I couldn’t take my eyes off her and couldn’t take the smile off my face. She was very pleased with my reaction.
I have questioned how long she has been doing this job, she answered 1 month. We spent another 10 minutes chatting and she was engaging, she has definitely got the head screwed on and knows what she is doing.
I kind of knew then that service will be good.
And what has followed didn’t disappoint in any way. FK to start with light DFK then to very good OWO with attention to shaft but no licking of the balls. I was tempted to give her RO as she is as close to perfection as you will get but I have resisted. A bit of rubbing with her on the top and then condom was out and we wet to Cowgirl with passionate DFK, proper DFK, her tongue in my mouth, etc... It was great.
Changed to doggy and what a sight. At some point I have decided that I really wanted to finish in her mouth. She is probably the one of the most stunning girls I have ever been with and I could not resist in seeing her take a CIM. That was £50 extra but I would have probably paid more at that moment.
She proceeded with great OWO and I have tried to resist but that was not possible. She did slow down but did not stop until the last drop. Got a wet wipe and discretely spited the juice out and immediately cleaned me as well.
I was still in the same position in disbelief and she was sitting next to me with a big grin on her face.
“Was that Good” she questioned. I just shook my head. She definitely made sure that I was satisfied.
 At that point I just wanted to stay longer and questioned if she was free for longer but she had a client straight after me.
She offered me to shower again but I didn’t want to squander any more time and decided to stay with her and talk for the 5 remaining minutes.
Got dressed and she gave me a big kiss on exit.
Great punt. Will definitely return.

Offline MrMatrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 8,076
  • Likes: 41
  •  
  • Reviews: 124
Nice punt OP. But £50 for OWO is a bit steep for me. Pleased you had a good time. :hi:


Offline Fourtyfive

Nice punt OP. But £50 for OWO is a bit steep for me. Pleased you had a good time. :hi:
Thanks. I agree that £50 is a lot and I am not sure if I would pay that much again, but in that moment felt ok so just did it. It was definitely a good punt probably made to feel even better by very low expectations that I have had.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I'm on the fence because of tattoos..
Very interesting this hottie otherwise 🤔🤔🤔👅👅😋😋
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline The Film Director

I'm on the fence

Ditto - now, if she had OWO and CIM included in the £200 that might be a different matter  ;)

Offline Palace123

A Romanian who actually does DFK..now there's a rarity. Despite her obvious glamour, she's having a laugh charging extra for owo - that's a £250 per hr incall -  tbh...I think I'd find it hard to enjoy the shag while knowing I'm being ripped off.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fourtyfive

Owo is included in £200 p/h, Cim was £50 extra

Offline Fourtyfive

A Romanian who actually does DFK..now there's a rarity. Despite her obvious glamour, she's having a laugh charging extra for owo - that's a £250 per hr incall -  tbh...I think I'd find it hard to enjoy the shag while knowing I'm being ripped off.
You are being ripped of when you pay £80 or even £50 and get shit service, not when you pay £250 for the OWO, DFK, CIM, with impeccable service and on the top one of the best looking girls that I have been with.
If she was British you would be paying at least £500 or upwards.
I genuinely don’t mind paying more for a great punt. I have waisted so much money paying 100-120 on a shit punts that I don’t genuinely mind paying a bit more.

Offline winkywanky

Such is her vanity, she appears to have her own face tattooed on her shoulder.

Perhaps so she can boast to her grandkids what she used to look like before age withered her?

She could also tattoo her rates on her arse, and then she could boast to her grandkids what she used to charge  :rolleyes:

Offline winkywanky

She certainly looks pretty hot.

But at £200/hr, charging £50 extra for OWO when she doesn't even state any extras on her profile is typically Rom behaviour, even at this high price for an 'elite girl'. You don't even get to find that out until you rock up at her door.

What a load of bullshit, on that basis I should imagine she charges £200 extra for CIM and Rimming...each  :rolleyes:.

Offline winkywanky

Correction: I have now summoned up the resolve to read the whole review, and CIM is only another £50. So that's an additional £100 for CIM  :wackogirl:.

Bet she still charges £200 to lick your arse though :P

Offline MrMatrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 8,076
  • Likes: 41
  •  
  • Reviews: 124
Ditto - now, if she had OWO and CIM included in the £200 that might be a different matter  ;)
Exactly- I'd book her up then. But services are limited for a top price :unknown:

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Exactly- I'd book her up then. But services are limited for a top price :unknown:

Minus the ridiculous over the top so called body art is a very very high grade beautiful stunning lady.
Certainly diamond sparkling beauty 💐💐
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fourtyfive

Correction: I have now summoned up the resolve to read the whole review, and CIM is only another £50. So that's an additional £100 for CIM  :wackogirl:.

Bet she still charges £200 to lick your arse though :P
I am new to the forum but struggling to understand the negativity towards someone that for change gives excellent service. We all know that 99% of these girls don’t control their profiles. She genuinely seems like a good hard working girl that has really put an effort to make sure that I was happy. Should she put the extras on her profile, definitely. But I don’t think that’s in her hands. Also maybe I was not clear enough but I will spell it out again, it was £200 for all the services OWO, DFK, etc.. with £50 extra for the CIM
The only extra was CIM £50. Is it too much? That’s subjective. Key to this like with everything else in life is it a value for the money? For me it was, for someone else it isn’t. I have had so many shity punts and have decided to start with genuine descriptions of all of my encounters. Good, Bad or Ugly.
I agree about tattoos, they are just ruining the beauty.

Offline The Film Director

I am new to the forum but struggling to understand the negativity towards someone that for change gives excellent service. We all know that 99% of these girls don’t control their profiles. She genuinely seems like a good hard working girl that has really put an effort to make sure that I was happy. Should she put the extras on her profile, definitely. But I don’t think that’s in her hands. Also maybe I was not clear enough but I will spell it out again, it was £200 for all the services OWO, DFK, etc.. with £50 extra for the CIM
The only extra was CIM £50. Is it too much? That’s subjective. Key to this like with everything else in life is it a value for the money? For me it was, for someone else it isn’t. I have had so many shity punts and have decided to start with genuine descriptions of all of my encounters. Good, Bad or Ugly.
I agree about tattoos, they are just ruining the beauty.

I understand exactly where you're coming from.  Just out of interest did she do a proper CIM i.e. take it all?  Is still a little pricey for me.

Offline Fourtyfive

I understand exactly where you're coming from.  Just out of interest did she do a proper CIM i.e. take it all?  Is still a little pricey for me.
Properly, she didn’t take it out of her mouth until every little drop came out. That is why i am still impressed.

Offline The Film Director

Properly, she didn’t take it out of her mouth until every little drop came out. That is why i am still impressed.

Cheers  :hi:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
OP can you clear something up regarding her looks.

The selfies I posted earlier is that a current pic (s) of what the punter can expect as to me they are quite far removed from the glam ones @ FCB posted earlier.

If she delivered you a top punt and you left feeling happy then nobody on here should complain just because she is a Rom and you paid £250. I am from the school that I would rather have 1 outstanding punt at £250 then 2 average punts @ £120/130 a pop
« Last Edit: September 05, 2019, 04:05:18 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Fourtyfive

OP can you clear something up regarding her looks.

The selfies I posted earlier is that a current pic (s) of what the punter can expect as to me they are quite far removed from the glam ones @ FCB posted earlier.

If she delivered you a top punt and you left feeling happy then nobody on here should complain just because she is a Rom and you paid £250. I am from the school that I would rather have 1 outstanding punt at £250 then 2 average punts @ £120/130 a pop
The selfies are the most accurate ones. She doesn’t really look like the pro photos. One photo of the face only with piercing blue eyes is the most accurate. I completely agree with you on rather having 1 great punt for top dollar than 2 average ones.

Offline winkywanky

I am new to the forum but struggling to understand the negativity towards someone that for change gives excellent service. We all know that 99% of these girls don’t control their profiles. She genuinely seems like a good hard working girl that has really put an effort to make sure that I was happy. Should she put the extras on her profile, definitely. But I don’t think that’s in her hands. Also maybe I was not clear enough but I will spell it out again, it was £200 for all the services OWO, DFK, etc.. with £50 extra for the CIM
The only extra was CIM £50. Is it too much? That’s subjective. Key to this like with everything else in life is it a value for the money? For me it was, for someone else it isn’t. I have had so many shity punts and have decided to start with genuine descriptions of all of my encounters. Good, Bad or Ugly.
I agree about tattoos, they are just ruining the beauty.


Firstly, whether the girl controls her own profile is immaterial (assuming she's not coerced or controlled). You're not reviewing her pimp, you're not reviewing the quality of communications between her and her pimp, you're reviewing the girl and her service you received.

Re: the OWO and CIM, you made a mistake in your review then, you're now saying it was £50 extra for the CIM, and that OWO was included in the standard rate? Fair enough.

I don't want to put a downer on your experience, if you were happy with the service you received for the amount you paid then that's fine for you. My comments were based on £200 + £50 OWO + £50 CIM = £300. You've now amended/clarified that. But the fact remains that even for a hot-looking bird, for £250 you did receive very limited services, and it's worth pointing that out to others, lest £250 become the 'norm' for such experiences.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54

Firstly, whether the girl controls her own profile is immaterial (assuming she's not coerced or controlled). You're not reviewing her pimp, you're not reviewing the quality of communications between her and her pimp, you're reviewing the girl and her service you received.

Re: the OWO and CIM, you made a mistake in your review then, you're now saying it was £50 extra for the CIM, and that OWO was included in the standard rate? Fair enough.

I don't want to put a downer on your experience, if you were happy with the service you received for the amount you paid then that's fine for you. My comments were based on £200 + £50 OWO + £50 CIM = £300. You've now amended/clarified that. But the fact remains that even for a hot-looking bird, for £250 you did receive very limited services, and it's worth pointing that out to others, lest £250 become the 'norm' for such experiences.

Dealing with you last para.

This is a real tricky one as it is not easy to convey personality of the SP, the vibe and how OP felt when he was in between her legs or he was unloading the jizz in her pretty little gob.

My best punt of 2019 so far is Miss Seduisante who I have reviewed. Granted I paid £190 so less than OP but the way I felt after the punt had it been £250 I would not have complained. We also have to take into account OP booked @ £200. CIM extra was a spur of the moment decision when he prob thought fuck it get some jizz in her gob and thought to himself he has wasted far more than 50 queens heads on some right ratbags delivering shite services.

We sometimes over analyse what is value on this forum as soon as a punter steps outside the accepted norms of the perceived price range when in reality there is no such thing. It appears to me we are ignoring looks and personality when stating "limited services". Certainly in my book an SP's personality fake or otherwise is part of the service I am paying for. Nothing fucks up a punt like a miserable bitch regardless how hot she is.

Time to think outside of the punting box. #justsaying
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline winkywanky

Dealing with you last para.

This is a real tricky one as it is not easy to convey personality of the SP, the vibe and how OP felt when he was in between her legs or he was unloading the jizz in her pretty little gob.

My best punt of 2019 so far is Miss Seduisante who I have reviewed. Granted I paid £190 so less than OP but the way I felt after the punt had it been £250 I would not have complained. We also have to take into account OP booked @ £200. CIM extra was a spur of the moment decision when he prob thought fuck it get some jizz in her gob and thought to himself he has wasted far more than 50 queens heads on some right ratbags delivering shite services.

We sometimes over analyse what is value on this forum as soon as a punter steps outside the accepted norms of the perceived price range when in reality there is no such thing. It appears to me we are ignoring looks and personality when stating "limited services". Certainly in my book an SP's personality fake or otherwise is part of the service I am paying for. Nothing fucks up a punt like a miserable bitch regardless how hot she is.

Time to think outside of the punting box. #justsaying

It is tricky, and I get what you're saying, to the punter what matters is whether he is happy. And I respect that. YMMV and all that.

But when such an experience is quite a bit more expensive than similar which others have received, in the same city, at a fair amount less, I think that's worth pointing out. And that's including hot looks, which I did mention. And yes, a bit of a connection and a willingness too. The lovely flat is all well and good, but for these prices you're also paying for the Real Estate aspirations of the pimp (and everything about this profile screams pimp to me).

Similarly, at £200/hr you don't really expect to have any surprises as to the limits of the 'standard service', IMO that's milking it somewhat. If CIM is another £50, I'd expect to see that on a profile of that price.

Also worth mentioning, that although UKP is harder for 'casual observers' to view these days, don't for one moment think that pimps and WGs don't have a good handle on what gets posted here, as well as what punters consider reasonable rates. If they think we can be squeezed for more, they'll squeeze that bit harder.

Offline dandoc112

Stunner…..and glad you enjoyed. Out of my price range though, so fair play for TOFTT by all accounts.

DD  :hi:

Offline Fourtyfive

Another similar review to mine posted yesterday for her Diva profile - Uma
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=260732.0
You have to make a judgment is she the value for your money.

Offline Palace123

You are being ripped of when you pay £80 or even £50 and get shit service, not when you pay £250 for the OWO, DFK, CIM, with impeccable service and on the top one of the best looking girls that I have been with.
If she was British you would be paying at least £500 or upwards.
I genuinely don’t mind paying more for a great punt. I have waisted so much money paying 100-120 on a shit punts that I don’t genuinely mind paying a bit more.

If you think you had good value you can walk away happy and I'd be worried if you didn't get a better standard when compared to the 100-120 bracket - obvs!

Personally, I really don't like the fact that she's not open about her extras on her profile, this for me is always contentious and frankly a bit of a passion killer when  being asked to cough up more - even sometimes unexpectedly re-negotiating the shag terms on-site. Tbh...For around the £170-£200 there's a bunch of hotties offering full service in my HL with strong reviews, would I put her in front of them....probably not.....but that's a matter of personal tastes.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fourtyfive

If you think you had good value you can walk away happy and I'd be worried if you didn't get a better standard when compared to the 100-120 bracket - obvs!

Personally, I really don't like the fact that she's not open about her extras on her profile, this for me is always contentious and frankly a bit of a passion killer when  being asked to cough up more - even sometimes unexpectedly re-negotiating the shag terms on-site. Tbh...For around the £170-£200 there's a bunch of hotties offering full service in my HL with strong reviews, would I put her in front of them....probably not.....but that's a matter of personal tastes.

I completely agree with you that she should have her extras clearly shown on the profile. She has them stated on her Diva profile. It is annoying part of the punt when you are being asked for more money without expecting it.

The whole point of this discussion is that every single punt and review is subjective. We all have different experiences with same SP’s. We all find different girls attractive, different services great. I have came across someone that I felt that was physically perfect. 100% my type. I have been punting for a long time and this doesn’t happen very often. On a top of that she gave me excellent service. Usual punt for me is great looking girl that provides mediocre service or ok looking girl that provides excellent service. Once I hit a jackpot I genuinely don’t mind coughing up a bit more.
I was more than happy to pay what I paid which to some people is obviously too much and to some great value for money. This is all subjective. I have given my opinion.
I also feel that is completely pointless scrutinising something if you have not experienced it. The whole comparison is useless to anyone reeding this review unless the person comparing has seen the girl and formed their opinion of the looks and the service they have received.
It’s like saying you are crazy to pay for that dinner £30 when you can have a great meal at any corner for £10.
For me that was one of the best dinners I have had. I know that I can walk into kebab shop and have a great meal but for me it will never be as good. For someone else kebab will be much tastier. The key is to try both and then make your judgment.
That’s he whole point of this form. For as many of us to give our opinions so that anyone reading can make informed decision. Each option makes a decision to see the SP little easier. Saying that something is overpriced without seeing it or trying it doesn’t make any sense.

Offline Palace123

All this banging on about opinions but you don't seem to like it if someone doesn't have the same one as yourself  which produced all the replies.  I don't need to be convincing on her from mate or any other choices you make....you had a good time, good for you.

She's not for me. 

End of.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline popmopcop

Is Divaescort now advertising girls on adult work?

Offline Fourtyfive

All this banging on about opinions but you don't seem to like it if someone doesn't have the same one as yourself  which produced all the replies.  I don't need to be convincing on her from mate or any other choices you make....you had a good time, good for you.

She's not for me. 

End of.
You completely misunderstood me. I was not convincing you to see her at all. It does not make a slightest difference in my life if you see her or not. She may not be your type, doesn’t provide the service that you want or for money that you want. We are all entitled to have opinions and I agree to most of what you have said. I am just saying that all the comments on SP not being worth the money are pointless if the person commenting has not seen the SP. It’s not even regarding this girl, it is general point.

Offline Palace123

No...Those opinions are not pointless...they are just as valid as yours because everyone speaks for themselves. If we lived in a world where the only people who are allowed to have a valid opinion are those who took part...life would be very boring (and football matches would be very quiet places!).
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Happyjose

This is a review and discussion site

Members are free to comment on any post within the rules
« Last Edit: September 07, 2019, 11:41:15 am by Happyjose »

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
I have 3 points to make on what I see as a mild attack on OP's review, price he paid and his subsequent defence of his opinions.

1 OP registered in July this year and has already reviewed 7 pros. That's very good going in my book compared to many on here so we should welcome and encourage new intel and reviews from new members. There are many members on here 2+ years standing with like 7-8 reviews, if that, clearly keeping all the goodies (super honey SPs) to themselves and only inform us of their shit punts n the odd positive.   

2 This forum, OP will learn in due course, does have a problem trying to decipher quite forensic at times the link between price, VFM and  punter experience. To me, some get it, some don't. I am cool with that this after all is a punter Facebook for want of a better phrase so OP will just have to get use to some well thought out responses, some a bit 50/50 and others utter bollicks.

3 Insofar as the review itself I do not read it as a fanboy post or OP trying to convince anyone to take a bite. It is as a far removed review compared to others on here where punters claim they might be in love after paying for 1 hour or if they keep visiting the said SP they might fall in love with a hooker.

Chill Chaps!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
It's like Chinese boxing on this thread 🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fourtyfive

It feels like I am making very bad impression on the members and moderators. I have already been criticised for the poor attitude on the other thread, for disagreeing with members in this thread and for making a cheeky comment about messaging being only for the “special ones”.
I guess I will have to earn some stripes before I am aloud to disagree with the establishment.
For the moment I genuinely thought I was doing a good job. I have been away for 7 weeks since joining the forum and in a short time that I have been in the UK I have reviewed all the SP’s that I have seen since joining.
That is fine as long I don’t disagree with other the options of older members, since I am a newbie.
I have no problems with people having their opinions and disagreeing with me, I just making a point that having informed ones would be more valuables to all the members than just having the opinion.
Needless to say I welcome anyone to disagree with me and to post their opinion on my reviews.
I thought that the whole point of this forum is the debate. 

Offline Happyjose

It feels like I am making very bad impression on the members and moderators. I have already been criticised for the poor attitude on the other thread, for disagreeing with members in this thread and for making a cheeky comment about messaging being only for the “special ones”.
I guess I will have to earn some stripes before I am aloud to disagree with the establishment.
For the moment I genuinely thought I was doing a good job. I have been away for 7 weeks since joining the forum and in a short time that I have been in the UK I have reviewed all the SP’s that I have seen since joining.
That is fine as long I don’t disagree with other the options of older members, since I am a newbie.
I have no problems with people having their opinions and disagreeing with me, I just making a point that having informed ones would be more valuables to all the members than just having the opinion.
Needless to say I welcome anyone to disagree with me and to post their opinion on my reviews.
I thought that the whole point of this forum is the debate.

You're absolutely right, and there's no hierarchy here. We're all subject to the same rules and posting culture

You can disagree with anyone within the rules. It's a broad church, with diversity of opinion

You were trying to suppress other opinions and viewpoints. Which is a different thing

Offline Fourtyfive

You're absolutely right, and there's no hierarchy here. We're all subject to the same rules and posting culture

You can disagree with anyone within the rules. It's a broad church, with diversity of opinion

You were trying to suppress other opinions and viewpoints. Which is a different thing
“trying to suppress other opinions and viewpoints”, seriously? That’s like me complaining that someone is trying to suppress my review.

Offline Fourtyfive

Anyway, I am happy to say I am sorry if that helps. Let’s not waste any more energy on this post. Lesson learned.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
You are being ripped of when you pay £80 or even £50 and get shit service, not when you pay £250 for the OWO, DFK, CIM, with impeccable service and on the top one of the best looking girls that I have been with.
If she was British you would be paying at least £500 or upwards.
I genuinely don’t mind paying more for a great punt. I have waisted so much money paying 100-120 on a shit punts that I don’t genuinely mind paying a bit more.

Stop reviewing "shitty" cheap hookers then and start reviewing 250+ ph girls.   :dash:

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
You completely misunderstood me. I was not convincing you to see her at all. It does not make a slightest difference in my life if you see her or not. She may not be your type, doesn’t provide the service that you want or for money that you want. We are all entitled to have opinions and I agree to most of what you have said. I am just saying that all the comments on SP not being worth the money are pointless if the person commenting has not seen the SP. It’s not even regarding this girl, it is general point.

Read your own statements again very slowly.  You repeatedly tell us that the only way we can form an opinion that's valid in your view is to go and see this girl (or others that have been reviewed but one hasn't seen).
When it comes down to it you have paid 100+ more for the looks alone of this SP, you had a subjectively good punt with a subjectively pretty girl, whoop whoop for you.  Many vocal and silent UKPers have had better service from 80-150 girls (including parlours), that being measured on enthusiasm, demeanour, breadth of services enjoyed.  I recently had a parlour tumble with a lady who, though she professed to not liking RO, permitted me to indulge a little without any complaint or disruptive behaviour whilst I did.  After she continued to enourage the session along with enthusiasm and engagement and showed no hesitation when I went down on her again.  Attitude like that is pretty priceless, regardless of the act requested, and you don't guarantee such service orientation because of the price you pay.  The reason I stopped paying 150+ for a punt was precisely because the extra money was not buying me quality of service with new girls (especially after the vanishing of the Thais and EEs who arrived around 2004).
« Last Edit: September 07, 2019, 06:22:45 pm by LLPunting »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Stop reviewing "shitty" cheap hookers then and start reviewing 250+ ph girls.   :dash:

Eye of the 🐅🥊🥊
To the precise point
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
“trying to suppress other opinions and viewpoints”, seriously? That’s like me complaining that someone is trying to suppress my review.

WRONG!  No one is trying to surpress your review, they are telling you they think you overpaid.
50 for CIM is too much.  CIM+Swallow maybe but only because one might the particular girl to swallow the load. 
That said there are plenty of girls who will offer this service at the 80-150 mark either inclusive or for 20-40 more.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I have 3 points to make on what I see as a mild attack on OP's review, price he paid and his subsequent defence of his opinions.

1 OP registered in July this year and has already reviewed 7 pros. That's very good going in my book compared to many on here so we should welcome and encourage new intel and reviews from new members. There are many members on here 2+ years standing with like 7-8 reviews, if that, clearly keeping all the goodies (super honey SPs) to themselves and only inform us of their shit punts n the odd positive.   

2 This forum, OP will learn in due course, does have a problem trying to decipher quite forensic at times the link between price, VFM and  punter experience. To me, some get it, some don't. I am cool with that this after all is a punter Facebook for want of a better phrase so OP will just have to get use to some well thought out responses, some a bit 50/50 and others utter bollicks.

3 Insofar as the review itself I do not read it as a fanboy post or OP trying to convince anyone to take a bite. It is as a far removed review compared to others on here where punters claim they might be in love after paying for 1 hour or if they keep visiting the said SP they might fall in love with a hooker.

Chill Chaps!

1)  His reviews are welcome as long as they remain reviews, not promotional campaigns brimming with subjectives and prompts to try to see how right he is.

2)+3)  We have no problem deconstructing reviews and pointing out the fluffy statements that may be valuable to the reviewer but have little value to the readers.  A P&D jackhammerer will care fuck all for some of the niceties or sufferings of the girls that GFE punters might mention, they just want to know whether she can take a pounding or an FF.   PSE girls might unite GFE and P&D lovers if the girl is enthusiastic, proactive and blends in (horny) GFE elements.  None of us give a monkey's if the reviewer fell in love.  Read his review again and it is rife with hyperbole that smacks of a fluff piece.  It may not be as blatant of EAS-drenched as others but it, combined with his follow-up statements (poorly worded or not) is not just naively celebratory.
His review has little substance to disect because he did very little with her service-wise, which is particularly why VFM is being argued.
"...I was standing in front of one of the most beautiful girls I have ever seen..."  suggests he hasn't been paying attention to the women out on the streets of this city or any other significant city here or around the world, let alone the many models in fashion, commercial or porn littered across the Web.  Whilst I can safely say I've not seen a prettier girl in say Catford, I am certain I have seen better in Central London, Clapham, Shoreditch, King's Rd, South Ken, Notting Hill and Camden this Summer and none were the most beautiful I have ever seen in RL or in a photo.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2019, 06:55:55 pm by LLPunting »

Offline Fourtyfive

Read your own statements again very slowly.  You repeatedly tell us that the only way we can form an opinion that's valid in your view is to go and see this girl (or others that have been reviewed but one hasn't seen).
When it comes down to it you have paid 100+ more for the looks alone of this SP, you had a subjectively good punt with a subjectively pretty girl, whoop whoop for you.  Many vocal and silent UKPers have had better service from 80-150 girls (including parlours), that being measured on enthusiasm, demeanour, breadth of services enjoyed.  I recently had a parlour tumble with a lady who, though she professed to not liking RO, permitted me to indulge a little without any complaint or disruptive behaviour whilst I did.  After she continued to enourage the session along with enthusiasm and engagement and showed no hesitation when I went down on her again.  Attitude like that is pretty priceless, regardless of the act requested, and you don't guarantee such service orientation because of the price you pay.  The reason I stopped paying 150+ for a punt was precisely because the extra money was not buying me quality of service with new girls (especially after the vanishing of the Thais and EEs who arrived around 2004).
Very grateful for the warm welcome to the forum.
Let me spell it out again.
No, I am not repeatedly telling anyone that in order to form opinion that is valid in “my” view you have to see the SP. I am telling you that the you would be far more informed to make that opinion and would be of more value to all of us if you have seen the SP. Fact.
You are pointing that many punters have had better service from 80-150 girls (including parlours), measured on enthusiasm, demeanour, breadth of services. Really? On what what basis? You have never seen the girl or experienced her service. How can you make this statement? Is it based on my review or her extortionate price?
My opinion is that my SP is much better than any of the ones that you have seen. Surely you understand how pointless and useless this statement to anyone reading. Especially when I have not seen your SP’s. Even if I have my judgement will always be subjective. I may not like the same things as you. But definitely more informed and valuable to anyone reading. Because they will be able to judge our reviews and compare our experiences.

The only conclusion that I can make about your bragging regarding RO and how she has enjoyed it, is that you think that you are very good at it. Again I can adopt your mentality and after reading your statement form my opinion and claim to all the punters the forum that you are shit at it. On what basis do I claim that you are crap at it. I have a right to have opinion. Of course that we all have a right to our opinions.
My point is that my opinion would be more valuable to the readers if I have experienced it. I am really sorry if I am not making my self clear. English is not my mother tongue but I am sure that you now understand my point.

I hope that difference is now clear between forming the opinions after experiencing something and just opinion. Otherwise what’s the point of seeing the SP’s, let’s just write the reviews according to the profiles we see.


Offline Fourtyfive

WRONG!  No one is trying to surpress your review, they are telling you they think you overpaid.
50 for CIM is too much.  CIM+Swallow maybe but only because one might the particular girl to swallow the load. 
That said there are plenty of girls who will offer this service at the 80-150 mark either inclusive or for 20-40 more.
You seem like a very eloquent guy and I have started to doubt my self and my written English. Again, let me explain my self.
I have tried to be sarcastic. Of course that I don’t think that anyone is trying to suppress my review.
If you read my statement again you will hopefully understand that the claim from the other OP that I am trying to suppress others opinions and comments on my review is as ludicrous as me claiming that someone is trying suppress my review.
I am willing to learn and would gladly take a lesson in written English from you as I genuinely admire your vocabulary. I had to google “hyperbole”. I know I have heard the word in the early days of school but completely forgot its meaning. For now I’ll just have to continue explaining my self.
Hopefully we will come to understanding or I will be banned for no justifiable reason.

Offline Fourtyfive

1)  His reviews are welcome as long as they remain reviews, not promotional campaigns brimming with subjectives and prompts to try to see how right he is.

2)+3)  We have no problem deconstructing reviews and pointing out the fluffy statements that may be valuable to the reviewer but have little value to the readers.  A P&D jackhammerer will care fuck all for some of the niceties or sufferings of the girls that GFE punters might mention, they just want to know whether she can take a pounding or an FF.   PSE girls might unite GFE and P&D lovers if the girl is enthusiastic, proactive and blends in (horny) GFE elements.  None of us give a monkey's if the reviewer fell in love.  Read his review again and it is rife with hyperbole that smacks of a fluff piece.  It may not be as blatant of EAS-drenched as others but it, combined with his follow-up statements (poorly worded or not) is not just naively celebratory.
His review has little substance to disect because he did very little with her service-wise, which is particularly why VFM is being argued.
"...I was standing in front of one of the most beautiful girls I have ever seen..."  suggests he hasn't been paying attention to the women out on the streets of this city or any other significant city here or around the world, let alone the many models in fashion, commercial or porn littered across the Web.  Whilst I can safely say I've not seen a prettier girl in say Catford, I am certain I have seen better in Central London, Clapham, Shoreditch, King's Rd, South Ken, Notting Hill and Camden this Summer and none were the most beautiful I have ever seen in RL or in a photo.
Another clarification and my apology. Definitely my fault and thank for bringing it up. When I said one of the most beautiful “girls” I have seen. I meant one of the most beautiful WG’s I have seen. I have to admit she is not far off the all girls that I have seen in real life. Again my subjective opinion.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Very grateful for the warm welcome to the forum.
Let me spell it out again.
No, I am not repeatedly telling anyone that in order to form opinion that is valid in “my” view you have to see the SP. I am telling you that the you would be far more informed to make that opinion and would be of more value to all of us if you have seen the SP. Fact.
You are pointing that many punters have had better service from 80-150 girls (including parlours), measured on enthusiasm, demeanour, breadth of services. Really? On what what basis? You have never seen the girl or experienced her service. How can you make this statement? Is it based on my review or her extortionate price?
My opinion is that my SP is much better than any of the ones that you have seen. Surely you understand how pointless and useless this statement to anyone reading. Especially when I have not seen your SP’s. Even if I have my judgement will always be subjective. I may not like the same things as you. But definitely more informed and valuable to anyone reading. Because they will be able to judge our reviews and compare our experiences.

The only conclusion that I can make about your bragging regarding RO and how she has enjoyed it, is that you think that you are very good at it. Again I can adopt your mentality and after reading your statement form my opinion and claim to all the punters the forum that you are shit at it. On what basis do I claim that you are crap at it. I have a right to have opinion. Of course that we all have a right to our opinions.
My point is that my opinion would be more valuable to the readers if I have experienced it. I am really sorry if I am not making my self clear. English is not my mother tongue but I am sure that you now understand my point.

I hope that difference is now clear between forming the opinions after experiencing something and just opinion. Otherwise what’s the point of seeing the SP’s, let’s just write the reviews according to the profiles we see.

OK, so you're now saying that your original review was meant to convince us that the experience you had with this girl beyond the visual appreciation was (beyond) good?
So let's look at what you described:
kissing which progressed to passionate DFK
"Very good" OWO with no licking of balls
No RO
Cowgirl
Doggy
OWO
CIM to full completion
Spit

Did you miss any other acts out?  Did you miss out any other actions she did to enhance this chain of events?
Do you recognise that this isn't alot of action?

Many reviewers describe how they engaged in such positions, they describe how the girl responded or indeed if she initiated, they describe the state of (faked/convincing) arousal, the techniques she used during said acts.

Your reasoning is that with our lack of personal experience of her services we cannot judge her "properly", this is true in absolute terms but why did you omit the useful details?  You accept the subjectivity of looks so why did you not talk objectively about how good she was at what you were ostensibly paying her to do?  All of this amounts to "I tried a new motor and you guys should take my word for it that you should go try it 'cos it's the best I've ever seen/had, it has wheels, steering, pedals, brakes and a go faster stripe".  Which basically amounts to touting a new talent.  If we all came round to your reasoning that only personal experience will suffice then you've basically undermined the whole point of this site and any other review site (of anything).

By all means append the fully details of your experience in objective terms and we can make our own better informed estimations as to whether what you describe would be something we'd like to try.  Provided you're convinced you've said all you can about how it went that made you feel so good about it.

My point about the cheaper SPs is valid for as long as what you describe is no better service-wise (enthusiasm, demeanour, breadth of service) than what has been described so many times before by other punters about other (cheaper) SPs, corroborated by subsequent reviews from other punters.

My point about the RO was that the SP showed her commitment to service by indulging an act she wasn't that into, i.e. she was doing something to ensure the punter enjoyed the service.  Nothing to do with whether I was any good.  nothing to do with the fact you decided not to do it.  Just an example of an SP doing her job well (better than most). 

Quote
My point is that my opinion would be more valuable to the readers if I have experienced it. I am really sorry if I am not making my self clear. English is not my mother tongue but I am sure that you now understand my point.
This is confusing, you wrote a review, by the rules it has to be of something that you actually did, so the point is that you were always meant to be describing your experience, and we were all expecting and hoping you would describe something that we could form a confident opinion about.  Not about your style of your writing or how good at sex you are but about the SP and how good she is at delivering her services.

This is all critique, not insult.  Your excellent English isn't failing you, it appears to be your reasoning.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
You seem like a very eloquent guy and I have started to doubt my self and my written English. Again, let me explain my self.
I have tried to be sarcastic. Of course that I don’t think that anyone is trying to suppress my review.
If you read my statement again you will hopefully understand that the claim from the other OP that I am trying to suppress others opinions and comments on my review is as ludicrous as me claiming that someone is trying suppress my review.
I am willing to learn and would gladly take a lesson in written English from you as I genuinely admire your vocabulary. I had to google “hyperbole”. I know I have heard the word in the early days of school but completely forgot its meaning. For now I’ll just have to continue explaining my self.
Hopefully we will come to understanding or I will be banned for no justifiable reason.

HJ's point was that the way you were opposing other people's comments/opinions was dismissive.  We are challenging your judgement of value based on what you described.  We may be wrong because we don't appreciate how amazing an experience you had, but that would be because you failed to describe something amazing.

You won't get banned for what you've written so far.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,301
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Another clarification and my apology. Definitely my fault and thank for bringing it up. When I said one of the most beautiful “girls” I have seen. I meant one of the most beautiful WG’s I have seen. I have to admit she is not far off the all girls that I have seen in real life. Again my subjective opinion.

Cool, but this bring's us back to the original challenge by the rest of us which is that you ended up paying mostly for her looks rather than the service.
We all have her pics to assess how we like her looks, we rely on your review to confirm how well she actually measured up to her photos. 
IF you've been paying attention to the other reviews being written you will know that above 150ph we generally expect a girl to look good, be younger, be fitter and everyone is interested in what they did and how well they did it.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 04:37:58 am by LLPunting »