Subjectively this was positive punt for me, but objectively it's a negative, because it wasn't the lady in the profile pictures. I met her while she was working in a London hotel. She's probably a nomadic WG who plies her trade in various hotels around England.
Booked 15 minutes for £40.Positive:
Good looking lady, with a nice slim body - what's baffling about this bait and switch was the WG is actually attractive, facially and body wise. She's approximately 5'5" tall, a slender size 8 body, jet black hair, natural tanned skin colour and has a sort of Mediterranean facial look. She doesn't actually need to use bogus pictures to sell herself. If she's concerned about her anonymity, she's got a nice enough body to show, without having to show her face.Positive:
Personality wise, she was quite pleasant, made me feel relaxed.Positive:
Sex was surprisingly enthusiastic with her. At the start of the session, she pulled me towards the position of the hotel mirror and told me to fuck her doggy-style, while we both looked at each other in the mirror. Sex in cowgirl and missionary was also satisfying - came in missionary.Neutral:
Her OW blowjob was alright, did the job of making me hard at the start. No French kissing or OWO though. She said she only does those services, plus anal, in 30 minutes or 1 hour above bookings.Negative:
She's not the woman in the profile pictures, which makes this a bait and switch. A cardinal sin in punting.
I enjoyed myself in the 15 minutes I had with this WG; she gave a good service and I found her attractive. However, in principle this will be marked down as negative for not being lady in the profile pictures a.k.a. bait and switch.
Happy punting © panel999