Author Topic: Seeking.com (London)  (Read 1950072 times)


Offline kutch


Offline kutch

Layla)82

External Link/Members Only

A total timewaster

Wanted £300 for 3/4 hours.  Arranged for her to visit me but has cancelled three times. Twice it was “the time of the month” and this happened within 3 weeks of each other.   Other lame excuses thrn I just got fed up.  Don’t waste your time

Offline bigden40

My time waster radar failed me today. 🙄

External Link/Members Only

Comms had been decent, meet arranged today.  As the appointed time approached ….

Me - on my way, be there in 10 mins.

She - I’m running late

Me - no problem, when do you expect to be there?  I’ll get a coffee, text me when you’re near.

Me an hour later - are you on your way? Would be useful to get an update. I’ll now be at … informs of new location 2 mins away.

She blocks me 🤷‍♂️

Thankfully hadn’t booked hotel yet, tend to do this last minute for a first meet.

But FFS, what’s the point?

Offline NightKid

Me an hour later - are you on your way? Would be useful to get an update. I’ll now be at … informs of new location 2 mins away.

That was your mistake right there, waiting an hour to check if she's coming lol

If they're not there within 30 mins max, move on or cut your losses.

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,628
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
During my short time on seeking I met 2 women from the site. One was a meet and greet

Another one I met and had sex with her the first day - enjoyable sex but it was more like an overpriced escort, and it may have even been a "bait and switch"

The point is you post a lot, "telling" forum members how it apparently is, and advised people whose main interest is to get a SB into bed to "stick to escorts" when your experience of Seeking and sexual-based arrangements via SA is limited to one who was a pro.

The ulterior motive of virtually every SD on here is to a girl into bed, with varying degrees of interest in the more dating-type experience. Some just want to fuck and can seal the deal and get a far superior sexual experience to escorts, while adopting fairly minimal charm and effort.

Yes because this is UKPunting and we're all used to paying for sex.

Similarly, neither I nor anyone else needs telling what this site's about, thanks.  :rolleyes:

Offline bigden40

That was your mistake right there, waiting an hour to check if she's coming lol

If they're not there within 30 mins max, move on or cut your losses.

I was having a coffee and reading the paper so wasn’t that fussed. 

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

I was having a coffee and reading the paper so wasn’t that fussed.

Fucking punctuality !!!!

The ones who piss about with punctuality issues etc …. I find eventually let you down in other ways too.  It’s a small thing, being on time, but shows a level of disrespect and that they’re not really into you.

I don’t believe all girls are “purposefully” fashionably late.   :D  nor do I find it charming.  :mad:

Good girls that are on time tend to do what they say they do and deliver in other ways too.

I had a double header recently.

Friday night the girl came straight from uni looking a million dollars … made a huge effort with her appearance and to be there when she said she would … plus she kept me posted.  She also invited me over to her flat on Sunday morning.  Good girl.

Saturday night a different lady arrived so very late we nearly missed the show and continued to piss me off with small thoughtless acts all night.  I treated her exactly as I did the first girl but she seemed unable to reciprocate.  I marked her cards immediately, never to be seen again.  Bad lady.

Just imagine if we arranged to meet someone and left them waiting with no updates?  :D
« Last Edit: October 27, 2021, 10:32:44 pm by Prifessionallondinguy »

Offline NightKid

I was having a coffee and reading the paper so wasn’t that fussed.

That's not the point  :dash:

Fucking punctuality !!!!

The ones who piss about with punctuality issues etc …. I find eventually let you down in other ways too.  It’s a small thing, being on time, but shows a level of disrespect and that they’re not really into you.

I don’t believe all girls are “purposefully” fashionably late.   :D  nor do I find it charming.  :mad:

Good girls that are on time tend to do what they say they do and deliver in other ways too.

I had a double header recently.

Friday night the girl came straight from uni looking a million dollars … made a huge effort with her appearance and to be there when she said she would … plus she kept me posted.  She also invited me over to her flat on Sunday morning.  Good girl.

Saturday night a different lady arrived so very late we nearly missed the show and continued to piss me off with small thoughtless acts all night.  I treated her exactly as I did the first girl but she seemed unable to reciprocate.  I marked her cards immediately, never to be seen again.  Bad lady.

What he said.

Offline bigden40

Fucking punctuality !!!!

The ones who piss about with punctuality issues etc …. I find eventually let you down in other ways too.  It’s a small thing, being on time, but shows a level of disrespect and that they’re not really into you.

I don’t believe all girls are “purposefully” fashionably late.   :D  nor do I find it charming.  :mad:

Good girls that are on time tend to do what they say they do and deliver in other ways too.

I had a double header recently.

Friday night the girl came straight from uni looking a million dollars … made a huge effort with her appearance and to be there when she said she would … plus she kept me posted.  She also invited me over to her flat on Sunday morning.  Good girl.

Saturday night a different lady arrived so very late we nearly missed the show and continued to piss me off with small thoughtless acts all night.  I treated her exactly as I did the first girl but she seemed unable to reciprocate.  I marked her cards immediately, never to be seen again.  Bad lady.

Just imagine if we arranged to meet someone and left them waiting with no updates?  :D

Yep, I’m with you. I normally have a better TWOT (total waste of time) detector.

The only reason I didn’t text her earlier was because I was occupied, but that was irrelevant.  Even if she turned up at that point she would have been binned.

Offline stampjones

That's not the point  :dash:
Why do you have to be such an obnoxious prick about everything? It totally is the point. If he wants to sit around for 3 days waiting for someone to show up its his his life and his choice. As it happens I more or less agree with your 30 minute rule but others can make different decisions and the world will go on turning.

Offline bigden40

Why do you have to be such an obnoxious prick about everything? It totally is the point. If he wants to sit around for 3 days waiting for someone to show up its his his life and his choice. As it happens I more or less agree with your 30 minute rule but others can make different decisions and the world will go on turning.

Indeed. 

As a rule I would go for 30 mins too.  But as I said it was nearly an hour in this case because I was doing something at my own pace.  Waiting for 30 or 60 yesterday was no skin off my nose, I messaged her when I was done what I was doing.

In hindsight I shouldn’t have messaged at all.  If she had later sent me an I'm here I could have replied with “you are xx mins late and gave me no update, why do you still expect me to be there?” 

The point was that the girl in question was a time waster, this should be useful info for this forum.

I’ve moved on and I’m on to the next one, the thing that irked me the most was that there were several others I could have met yesterday and put off.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2021, 10:20:31 am by bigden40 »

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

Yep, I’m with you. I normally have a better TWOT (total waste of time) detector.

The only reason I didn’t text her earlier was because I was occupied, but that was irrelevant.  Even if she turned up at that point she would have been binned.

Good man. I’ve no time for time wasters.  :thumbsup:

Offline NightKid

Why do you have to be such an obnoxious prick about everything? It totally is the point. If he wants to sit around for 3 days waiting for someone to show up its his his life and his choice. As it happens I more or less agree with your 30 minute rule but others can make different decisions and the world will go on turning.

It's not the point I was making, you dumb fuck.

How's that for being a prick? Since you can't seem to listen when I'm trying to be nice  :rolleyes:

Offline NightKid

The only reason I didn’t text her earlier was because I was occupied, but that was irrelevant.  Even if she turned up at that point she would have been binned.

It doesn't read like that when you first broke the story - you even said you texted her a new location when you finally decided to check in an hour later so the expectation to meet was still there.

Regardless, this has gone past the point of me caring whatsoever and I'm simply giving general advice to others in avoiding such situations.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2021, 06:12:36 pm by NightKid »

Online southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,073
  • Likes: 161
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
It's not the point I was making, you dumb fuck.

How's that for being a prick? Since you can't seem to listen when I'm trying to be nice  :rolleyes:

well yet again you demonstrate
Why on earth would I want to be friendly or respectful


and it does read that you are making that point!

 Lets all try to be at least civil to each other otherwise it gets a bit boring for the other guys.

Offline NightKid

Lets all try to be at least civil to each other otherwise it gets a bit boring for the other guys.

Did someone die and made you moderator of the thread, snowflake? Or do you just not get the irony of you being the boring one here?  :sarcastic:

Offline Mr_Shins


The ulterior motive of virtually every SD on here is to a girl into bed, with varying degrees of interest in the more dating-type experience.


and mine too.

I had an "arrangement" for 4 months. For those who are new and looking for one on the site, I am perhaps giving my experience and to some extent skepticism of what it was really like - not saying don't do it, but be sure it is what you are really looking for, and consider alternatives.

It is true, however, that because I get a thrill from my fetish, there are many women where it may be thrill enough for me simply if they meet me and stick their boot into me but we don't end up having sex.

In the meantime, I am quite happy with my current "arrangement" which has no actual sex, and I pay her an allowance but only 75ppm. But she's attractive to me, wears boots I like (dressy knee-length), is good company and one I can be seen with by people I know without me feeling embarrassed, and we have done some great things together. She's somewhat younger than me but in her late 30s while I'm in my mid 50s, and there's no relationship baggage involved at all. I can still get sex from someone else if I want ,too.

Offline lightsout

Mia290196, WhatsApp comes up as London. Pro/scammer. Offered a threesome all of a sudden
External Link/Members Only

Offline lightsout

EllaEllaElla, goes by Laureen, says she’s American and from Sierra Leone. Seemed open to anything same day for 400 but flaky and I got suspicious
External Link/Members Only

Offline lightsout

Gym baby, scammy conversation with her previous profile and and back with a new one today
External Link/Members Only

Offline Mr_Shins

Gym baby, scammy conversation with her previous profile and and back with a new one today
External Link/Members Only

already gone.

Offline Lfc4life

Another eventful say on seeking; looking to negotiate a ppm, SB begins with 300, I counter with 200 and it goes as follows:

SB: if we do 200 then it will be a date followed by intimacy; as im not an escort
Me: sure, but to be clear not looking for solely social meets
SB: yes, im not expecting ppm if no intimacy; for intimacy i expect ppm

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 :hi:

Offline DeanoDeano

Another eventful say on seeking; looking to negotiate a ppm, SB begins with 300, I counter with 200 and it goes as follows:

SB: if we do 200 then it will be a date followed by intimacy; as im not an escort
Me: sure, but to be clear not looking for solely social meets
SB: yes, im not expecting ppm if no intimacy; for intimacy i expect ppm

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 :hi:

What’s the problem with this?

 :unknown:


Offline Link7

What’s the problem with this?

 :unknown:

Well, nobody said it was a "problem" as such. It just is what it is - cognitive dissonance. She is charging for sex. Whether he buys her dinner first is neither here nor there.

Never quite understood why people would choose SA for dating (as it seems to me the least suitable available platform), but since she suggested it, he could of course just date her for free and see if she eventually chooses to have sex with him. Equally, they could of course both be doing that on Tinder without paying £95/month.

Offline Alexmck

Trying Seeking although poor

External Link/Members Only

Wants £350 for 2 hours of drinking and 1 hour in bedroom with no kissing, no anal, no oral

Offline Lfc4life

What’s the problem with this?

 :unknown:

Didn't say there was a problem per se. More the fact she stated she isn't an escort but then said for intimacy she wanted payment. Again not an issue with me, have had numerous meets via SA.

:hi:

Offline theHappyLondonPigeon

Trying Seeking although poor

External Link/Members Only

Wants £350 for 2 hours of drinking and 1 hour in bedroom with no kissing, no anal, no oral

Wanted £500 for a 3 hour 'date' when I chatted to her. Came across as a bit professional, at least the price is moving in the right direction.

Offline Mr_Shins

Well, nobody said it was a "problem" as such. It just is what it is - cognitive dissonance. She is charging for sex. Whether he buys her dinner first is neither here nor there.

Never quite understood why people would choose SA for dating (as it seems to me the least suitable available platform), but since she suggested it, he could of course just date her for free and see if she eventually chooses to have sex with him. Equally, they could of course both be doing that on Tinder without paying £95/month.

It's a mindset, but she may decide to "pull out" and say "Sorry I don't want to have sex with you, so don't bother giving me the money". Of course an escort can do that but that because the primary purpose for the meeting, whereas I guess here you could say there is no prior agreement that sex is going to take place.

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

What’s the problem with this?

 :unknown:

I think he was referring to her “arse about face‘ replies.  Some SB’s really are unable or unwilling to grasp the basics  :D
« Last Edit: October 30, 2021, 08:43:03 pm by Prifessionallondinguy »

Offline bigden40

Well, nobody said it was a "problem" as such. It just is what it is - cognitive dissonance. She is charging for sex. Whether he buys her dinner first is neither here nor there.

Never quite understood why people would choose SA for dating (as it seems to me the least suitable available platform), but since she suggested it, he could of course just date her for free and see if she eventually chooses to have sex with him. Equally, they could of course both be doing that on Tinder without paying £95/month.

It is cognitive dissonance, and that’s part of the fun of it. I’ve often really successfully exploited that to get freebies and/or fairly cheap dates.


Offline Mr_Shins

Well, nobody said it was a "problem" as such. It just is what it is - cognitive dissonance. She is charging for sex. Whether he buys her dinner first is neither here nor there.

Never quite understood why people would choose SA for dating (as it seems to me the least suitable available platform), but since she suggested it, he could of course just date her for free and see if she eventually chooses to have sex with him. Equally, they could of course both be doing that on Tinder without paying £95/month.

Whilst if I try hard enough I could probably find a date on Tinder
 - It's not that easy to get a date at all. On WhatsYourPrice I have no problems finding dates.
 - If I did find a date, it would probably be someone close to my own age, not significantly younger. And the woman I'm currently seeing is late 30s so not that young, but still two-thirds of my age. We haven't had sex but it's a massive thrill for me just taking her out, and we are beginning to "bond" a bit.

If I do "connect" with the 51-year-old woman on Secret Benefits who put a "like" on me the condition would be no allowance. To me that would be "normal" dating. So I wouldn't have lost anything other than paying a few credits to open the conversation.


Offline Link7

Whilst if I try hard enough I could probably find a date on Tinder
 - It's not that easy to get a date at all. On WhatsYourPrice I have no problems finding dates.
 - If I did find a date, it would probably be someone close to my own age, not significantly younger. And the woman I'm currently seeing is late 30s so not that young, but still two-thirds of my age. We haven't had sex but it's a massive thrill for me just taking her out, and we are beginning to "bond" a bit.

If I do "connect" with the 51-year-old woman on Secret Benefits who put a "like" on me the condition would be no allowance. To me that would be "normal" dating. So I wouldn't have lost anything other than paying a few credits to open the conversation.

Can't comment on WYP, but as to why SA isn't really suitable for traditional dating:

On SA:

1. the woman you are seeing is likely accepting money to sleep with other men;
2. the likelihood that you even know their real name is the lowest of any platform (in my experience);
3. vast majority of women are not looking for traditional dating, so you will waste a huge amount of time and money on subscription fees before finding even one person. At which point, for reasons 1 and 2 above, it will be more difficult establishing trust than on any other platform.

If you want non-paid romantic encounters with women, SA isn't set up for that. The fact people occasionally get away with a shag without paying a fee doesn't change this. One of the commonest complaints I hear from SBs is guys "not understanding" what an arrangement is and essentially wanting a gf.

None of this means that Tinder is "easy" for everyone, but there is also Bumble, Badoo etc etc with literally millions of women on them who don't ask to be paid (compared to the thousands on SA, who mostly do). All of the aforementioned are a better time investment for a person looking for normal dating.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2021, 11:36:29 am by Link7 »

Offline mrflash

Can't comment on WYP, but as to why SA isn't really suitable for traditional dating:

On SA:

1. the woman you are seeing is likely accepting money to sleep with other men;
2. the likelihood that you even know their real name is the lowest of any platform (in my experience);
3. vast majority of women are not looking for traditional dating, so you will waste a huge amount of time and money on subscription fees before finding even one person. At which point, for reasons 1 and 2 above, it will be more difficult establishing trust than on any other platform.

If you want non-paid romantic encounters with women, SA isn't set up for that. The fact people occasionally get away with a shag without paying a fee doesn't change this. One of the commonest complaints I hear from SBs is guys "not understanding" what an arrangement is and essentially wanting a gf.

None of this means that Tinder is "easy" for everyone, but there is also Bumble, Badoo etc etc with literally millions of women on them who don't ask to be paid (compared to the thousands on SA, who mostly do). All of the aforementioned are a better time investment for a person looking for normal dating.
No matter how many millions of women are there in these dating apps, it is hard for some men in all these apps especially if you are looking to punch above your weight(read looking for women out of your league).

I am not looking for traditional dating on SA. But I can very well understand why some men would like to do that. But before that, traditional dating could mean two different things.

It could be just meeting regularly on platonic dates without any expectations on sex. For example, some men in their 40s who would just like the company of younger women while going out would be attracted to the idea. Of course, I am talking about rich men here. They won't have much success getting dates with good looking younger women on vanilla dating apps. With SA, they will reach an arrangement with monthly allowance and regular meets at parties, theaters or even travel. Many of these men just want a way out of their loneliness.

Then there is really traditional dating with a long term relationship in mind. I agree with you that SA isn't designed specifically for that. But it does support it. Men and women can add "Marriage-Minded" as an interest in their list.

If you search for women who have mentioned they are "Marriage-minded" the number of profiles which have that is very less. But you can see understand what they are looking for. They like to be in a traditional married relationship. But they want to do that with someone who is rich so that they can spend the rest of their life in luxury. It's hard for these women to mention it openly in traditional apps without receiving judgemental comments on being a gold digger. They can openly say so in Seeking and also have a better chance of meeting men matching their needs on Seeking. This works for the rich men who want good looking women even if they are attracted to the money in the first place.

The above possibly answers points 1 and 3 you raised. Point 2 is not common all around. I have had 3 regular SBs so far and 3 I have just met once. All my regular SBs eventually opened up about their real names after 3/4 meets. They know mine too. I agree it's risky. But it does happen.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2021, 12:06:57 pm by mrflash »

Offline Link7

^If you are paying, that's an arrangement in my book. In terms of people's motives for paying, agree that wanting someone really attractive or just being lonely are among the possible motives. People have their own reasons though. I think one of the commonest ones is married men just wanting to cheat in private - you can't do that on Tinder.

Call me a cynic, but I don't buy the "marriage minded" thing on SA for one second. Obviously, for legal reasons, SA wants to appear to be a legit dating site. But most of the profiles I see with the "marriage minded" tag are transactional Russians who want ppm. Of course, if they strike lucky and find a millionaire with more money than sense, they will be more than happy to marry him (and take half following the divorce).

Offline mrflash

^If you are paying, that's an arrangement in my book. In terms of people's motives for paying, agree that wanting someone really attractive or just being lonely are among the possible motives. People have their own reasons though. I think one of the commonest ones is married men just wanting to cheat in private - you can't do that on Tinder.

Call me a cynic, but I don't buy the "marriage minded" thing on SA for one second. Obviously, for legal reasons, SA wants to appear to be a legit dating site. But most of the profiles I see with the "marriage minded" tag are transactional Russians who want ppm. Of course, if they strike lucky and find a millionaire with more money than sense, they will be more than happy to marry him (and take half following the divorce).
On whether you call a paid arrangement as traditional dating is a matter of semantics. But many who say they are looking for traditional dates are just looking for some company with a good looking women even if it means paying them because they don't have that luck outside of SA.

On marriage-minded tag, I understand your cynicism. Many of these women are risky choices for long term relationships. But it's a fact that some men and women still look for such relationships. My regular's friend in her late 20s recently moved in with her SD in his early 40s after seeing each other for two years. There are men with lot of money to burn for whom the only thing missing from their life is an eye candy to come home to. So the marriage-minded tag could indeed be useful for them. Whether it's a rational approach is a whole different matter.


Offline Budgiesmuggler

Any intel on this lovely lady?:

Vane0903
External Link/Members Only

I knew i recognised her from somewhere - had a legit massage from her several months ago. Really friendly, looks like the pictures and good deep tissue massage. No hint of extras.  :angelgirl: See below.

External Link/Members Only

Thinking about booking a massage and somehow trying to get the conversation onto SD/SBs and see if she bites  :cool:

Online kuck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,148
  • Likes: 44
  •  
  • Reviews: 38
Any intel on this lovely lady?:

Vane0903
External Link/Members Only

I knew i recognised her from somewhere - had a legit massage from her several months ago. Really friendly, looks like the pictures and good deep tissue massage. No hint of extras.  :angelgirl: See below.

External Link/Members Only

Thinking about booking a massage and somehow trying to get the conversation onto SD/SBs and see if she bites  :cool:

The number on gumtree leads to
External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 31, 2021, 03:20:27 pm by kuck »

Offline samsmith_1231

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 842
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Banned reason: Piss taking troll
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,628
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
On whether you call a paid arrangement as traditional dating is a matter of semantics.

Well it's not semantics, it isn't traditional dating - at least for 95+ % of people who have some sort of sense of reality. Guys who think that paying a girl a financial allowance for their company is somehow 'traditional dating' is probably living some sort of delusion.

Where the lines can be blurred is when no actual money is involved, but experiences/gifts, which can range from the girl being with him just because he splashes the cash to a situation where she doesn't particularly care because she really likes him and the guy is just generous because he wants to be.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2021, 03:59:09 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline Mr_Shins

Don't confuse "dating" and "relationship".

I am "dating" the woman I met on WYP because we go out regularly on dates. I sense she is enjoying the experience, including my company, not just the financial "tribute" I give her. And yes, I enjoy the experience a lot, which is why I am going along with it.

I am not "in a relationship" with her. Perhaps it is better that way.


Offline Prifessionallondinguy

Don't confuse "dating" and "relationship".

I am "dating" the woman I met on WYP because we go out regularly on dates. I sense she is enjoying the experience, including my company, not just the financial "tribute" I give her. And yes, I enjoy the experience a lot, which is why I am going along with it.

I am not "in a relationship" with her. Perhaps it is better that way.
You’re in a financial relationship Mr_Shin  :D enjoy the ride.  :hi:
« Last Edit: October 31, 2021, 05:33:25 pm by Prifessionallondinguy »

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,628
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
Don't confuse "dating" and "relationship".


No-one is. The quoted expression above was 'traditional dating' which a paid arrangement certainly isn't.

Offline Mr_Shins

You’re in a financial relationship Mr_Shin  :D enjoy the ride.  :hi:

I am not in a relationship of any kind with this woman. I am taking her out on dates. And yes, I will enjoy the ride, far more than I did with "LittleMissSavvy" 2 years ago.

Offline Budgiesmuggler

Looks decent.

Never thought of that…search the phone number on awork. That's definitely her…she said she was visiting a friend this weekend in Wycombe but I guess it was a working trip…knowing she’s a pro kills the appeal for me.
Shame as she is really sweet.

Offline Reallytired86

  • Olivia-rose, an escort from the north, visits London occasionally, happy to do overnight at £500, quite a bargain considering her overnight rate on AW: External Link/Members Only

Anyone have her AW? Found an Olivia-Rose from search but not this one.


Offline lightsout


Offline lightsout

Amber, goes by Laura. Definitely a pro and I recognise her from before this profile was made, so warning signal if she was previously banned.
External Link/Members Only