Seeking.com (London)

[Jpmcgee]

Update - I’m getting blue ticks now, but still radio silence.

I wonder if it’s because I picked a hotel with good security? If it’s some sort of scam or robbery setup they’d be dissuaded

I have saved £200 so it’s not all bad. And I did get some explicit videos

if someone isn't invested in you or at the very least respectful, then block her and move onto the next. simple. SA is a great conveyer belt of hot women, focus on someone who actually wants to meet you and values your time and/or resources

[finn5555]

I've had around 15 first dates. Of them around 13 I slept with the first night. I haven't given an allowance nor paid any money.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[HomerC]

As Link said the younger SBs are flakey and much more likely to go cold on you. Did you do a video call/phone call before meeting? It really is a great way to suss each other out and see if you're likely to click or not. I can't comment on hotels as I always host, and I rarely have anyone stand me up having agreed to a plan. I have had a few younger SBs go cold the day before and now I tend to see over 25s.

No, I did ask her to send me a selfie with her holding 4 fingers up. Come to think of it, it took her about 20-30 minutes to do this.

I'd recommend not carrying on trying to contact the lady who ghosted you. Its part of the process, move on.

Yeah, i'll stop now. (Maybe I should even block?)

As she was apparently heading out the door, yesterday evening,  I asked her how old she was. She said 18. I said, strange, your profile says 21? She said it was a mistake. I told her the reception desk are asking people for ID due to the lockdown.

Maybe I will stick to over 25s, as you suggest.

[DeanoDeano]

No, I did ask her to send me a selfie with her holding 4 fingers up. Come to think of it, it took her about 20-30 minutes to do this.

Let’s be honest, that just makes you sound like a weirdo.

[martini2429]

Update - I’m getting blue ticks now, but still radio silence.

I wonder if it’s because I picked a hotel with good security? If it’s some sort of scam or robbery setup they’d be dissuaded

I have saved £200 so it’s not all bad. And I did get some explicit videos

Post the Seeking link as a warning of a potential time waster for others so they can avoid her

 

[Link7]

Respectfully, I disagree.

I've used SA for a while, and also once in that mindset of paying ppm but now only fuck for free. In the past year alone, I've had around 15 first dates. Of them around 13 I slept with the first night. I haven't given an allowance nor paid any money. Some of them were drinks and/or a cool date (not swanky, but not dive and defo no meal) and back to mine, or near the end of the 1st lockdown, just an uber over. Certainly the best sex stories by a mile.

I'll add, all quite pretty and slim, mostly English women. I'm ok looking but defo no chiselled model.

Yes, a lot of the women come onto SA looking for money but there are quite a few who are open to normal dating and there are quite a few who are a mix of the both- for the right guy. There is an art to filtering for these profiles, an art to crafting a certain type of profile and an art to the messages/things you need to say. It starts clicking into place when you understand their mindset.

I'm not here looking for any validation but to say if you approach in a certain way and use emotional intelligence, you can 100% clean up and fuck for free. It really is one of life's hidden sweet shops.

I'm happy to discuss some more. I've made more detailed posts previously, feel free to read.

Haha. I know who you are mate, previously banned a number of times for odd ramblings/obsession with prossies. Not interested.

Lads, btw, I'm fairly sure this guy has narcissistic personality disorder.

[Link7]

As she was apparently heading out the door, yesterday evening,  I asked her how old she was. She said 18. I said, strange, your profile says 21? She said it was a mistake.

Bloody hell, be careful mate. We do not want your next story to be about Her Majesty's Pleasure 

I jest. But in all seriousness, if a so-called 18 year old turns out to be 3 years younger than you thought and you're caught in a hotel room ...must make sure you see ID.

[Link7]

I told her the reception desk are asking people for ID due to the lockdown.

^ FFS, just dawned on me. This might very well explain why she didn't turn up. Reckon you've had a lucky escape.

[Flush]

I just stumbled on this profile, feels like my speed but feels like a pro:

External Link/Members Only

babygrxxl

Location: East London

Any one had the pleasure?

[leicesterstudent]

I just stumbled on this profile, feels like my speed but feels like a pro:

External Link/Members Only

babygrxxl

Location: East London

Any one had the pleasure?

Met her from tinder. Nice girl, gives great head. Slightly bigger than I was expecting, definitely a bbw

[massagepuntingfan]

Haha. I know who you are mate, previously banned a number of times for odd ramblings/obsession with prossies. Not interested.

Lads, btw, I'm fairly sure this guy has narcissistic personality disorder.

I'm assuming he's a fantasist? Was going to ask him how he does it?

[Cunning Punt]

As she was apparently heading out the door, yesterday evening,  I asked her how old she was. She said 18. I said, strange, your profile says 21? She said it was a mistake. I told her the reception desk are asking people for ID due to the lockdown.

So profile says 21, she says she's 18, you tell her staff are checking ID and then she bottles it. Suspicious and, as others have said, sounds like you could have dodged a bullet and should block her.

Either she is a timewaster of 18+ or underage (and a timewaster).

Post the Seeking link as a warning of a potential time waster for others so they can avoid her

 

+1

[exhippy]

Well I finally paid the money as I had about 15 messages and 15 separate favourites. Just one scammer so far who gave me a so story and then asked for 200. But otherwise I have had some good responses from women in their 30s mostly health and care workers. I thought my age might be off putting but perhaps it makes me safer. I hope to post some good results. A few have said they can host....

[Cunning Punt]

Did you do a video call/phone call before meeting? It really is a great way to suss each other out and see if you're likely to click or not.

Video call does make it easier to see if she is a catfish and whether is a connection, plus reduces the chances of a girl not turning up for a hotel meet; you're not quite such as remote person that she won't think twice about flaking on.

However, no substitute for meeting in person for a drink date, I feel, even if it's fairly brief. It's easier to establish a rapport than over the phone, and see if there is chemistry or not, plus makes you even more of a real person for them. As 888's experience shows, they could still flake on you, but, like anything, it's about reducing risk and maximising your chances.

[Flush]

Just chatting with this one

yasminnn_xo

External Link/Members Only


She is really focussed on the ppm, she said she will do 350 ppm and could review it after the first meet. She is very business like.

[Cunning Punt]

I just stumbled on this profile, feels like my speed but feels like a pro:

External Link/Members Only

babygrxxl

Location: East London

Any one had the pleasure?

Met her from tinder. Nice girl, gives great head. Slightly bigger than I was expecting, definitely a bbw

I met her some time ago via SA. Agree with the above. I will send you a pm.

[exhippy]

This feels too good to be true. Has anyone come across MichelleHxxx. A health worker, divorced , self described as ‘triple hole slut’. Only wants ‘dirty old men’. Have reverse image searched her and found her picture as part of the community on ‘motherless’. 8 hours for £200 cos she doesn’t want to be an escort. I might be seeing her tomorrow

[Link7]

I'm assuming he's a fantasist? Was going to ask him how he does it?

He had difficulty getting girls off AW to meet him (and held a grudge about it). Wouldn't give his claims to be a lothario who "fucks for free" the slightest attention.

You'd also have to ask why a man would pay nearly £100/month for SA membership when his mastery of female psychology is such that he doesn't feel it is necessary, and doesn't intend, to spend any money at all on getting them into bed. Insta, tinder, bumble, all the other places to talk to women are free, no? 

I don't deny that there are men who bed women easily and regularly without paying - sure we've all known friends like that. I just can't imagine why they'd be amongst us here 

[Link7]

Just chatting with this one

yasminnn_xo

External Link/Members Only


She is really focussed on the ppm, she said she will do 350 ppm and could review it after the first meet. She is very business like.

My impression was that she is genuine mate. I didn't like the vibe on WhatsApp though - flaky responses and a bit reticent when I tried to explore what she is really down for. Can't advise on price as never got that far 

[Link7]

This feels too good to be true. Has anyone come across MichelleHxxx. A health worker, divorced , self described as ‘triple hole slut’. Only wants ‘dirty old men’. Have reverse image searched her and found her picture as part of the community on ‘motherless’. 8 hours for £200 cos she doesn’t want to be an escort. I might be seeing her tomorrow

Motherless, as you must well know, is an extreme porn site. Proceed with caution.

[exhippy]

Yes I am getting suspicious. She says she does bareback. And wants a hundred in advance. Littlecumslut

[Londonpunter30]

Yes I am getting suspicious. She says she does bareback. And wants a hundred in advance. Littlecumslut

If “she” wants money in advance, for an unbelievable rate you need to think twice.  Have you had a phone conversation/ video call to confirm you are even talking to the SB on the profile ?

[martini2429]

Yes I am getting suspicious. She says she does bareback. And wants a hundred in advance. Littlecumslut

She may well be genuine, but £100 in advance throws up all sorts of red flags 

 

[Cunning Punt]

If “she” wants money in advance, for an unbelievable rate you need to think twice.  Have you had a phone conversation/ video call to confirm you are even talking to the SB on the profile ?

Hardly call 350 an 'unbelievable rate' and either way, that's irrelevant. The fact money is being asked for upfront is indeed suspicious on its own, whatever the ppm, and is likely to be a scammer, possibly male.

And even if she were genuine then that would be irrelevant for many of us because she's a barebacker.

[Kev40ish]

Hardly call 350 an 'unbelievable rate' and either way, that's irrelevant. The fact money is being asked for upfront is indeed suspicious on its own, whatever the ppm, and is likely to be a scammer, possibly male.

And even if she were genuine then that would be irrelevant for many of us because she's a barebacker.

I dubious asking for a deposit and been a member for 1 day....

External Link/Members Only

[Link7]

I dubious asking for a deposit and been a member for 1 day....

External Link/Members Only

It's without doubt a scam. £200 for 8 hours, pictures flagged on a porn site, wants to be paid in advance.

Has anybody ever paid for a meet in advance and it wasn't a scam?

[exhippy]

Yes I have

[Link7]

Yes I have

You've paid a deposit on SA before and the woman still turned up to meet?

On AW, it is their business - so different. They have to think twice about scamming people when repeat custom is how they eat/pay the bills.

[Chattymatty88]

External Link/Members Only Has any met these two

[Chattymatty88]

Has anyone 

[martini2429]

External Link/Members Only Has any met these two

I am guessing you may be new to Seeking, if you are, then welcome, if not apologies, but duo profiles tend throw out lots of red flags, can I suggest that you read through all the open threads on Seeking, if you are new then diving head first in with a duo profile isn't the best bet.  Have fun, but be careful

 

[HomerC]

Let’s be honest, that just makes you sound like a weirdo.

How else do you confirm they’re not using stolen pics? It could be a man using someone’s pics. Do you just blindly believe people on the internet?

[HomerC]

Video call does make it easier to see if she is a catfish and whether is a connection, plus reduces the chances of a girl not turning up for a hotel meet; you're not quite such as remote person that she won't think twice about flaking on.

But what if that video call gets screen recorded? That’s blackmail material that could hinder your career

[HomerC]

Bloody hell, be careful mate. We do not want your next story to be about Her Majesty's Pleasure 

I jest. But in all seriousness, if a so-called 18 year old turns out to be 3 years younger than you thought and you're caught in a hotel room ...must make sure you see ID.

U.K. legal is 16+ right? I personally would insist on at least 18. But if she were 17 then it would still be legal, right? She’d be breaking Seeking’s terms.

I haven’t blocked her yet because, before we arranged the hotel meet, she sent me some cracking videos of her body. I was kind of hoping for more.

I’m reluctant to link her profile here in case it identifies me, somehow. It’s extremely unlikely but she could see this thread and then post my Seeking profile somewhere.

I’ll describe her: flat tummy. Pierced tongue. Mirror selfie in hallway with her tongue out. Large boobs. One selfie with her boobs barely contained by small pink top. Outline of one barbell pierced nipple visible through her pink top. Brown hair (highlights in some photos). Long eyelashes.

There, if you see her profile you’ll definitely know.

[finn5555]

U.K. legal is 16+ right? I personally would insist on at least 18. But if she were 17 then it would still be legal, right? She’d be breaking Seeking’s terms.

I haven’t blocked her yet because, before we arranged the hotel meet, she sent me some cracking videos of her body. I was kind of hoping for more.

I’m reluctant to link her profile here in case it identifies me, somehow. It’s extremely unlikely but she could see this thread and then post my Seeking profile somewhere.

I’ll describe her: flat tummy. Pierced tongue. Mirror selfie in hallway with her tongue out. Large boobs. One selfie with her boobs barely contained by small pink top. Brown hair (highlights in some photos). Long eyelashes.

There, it you see her profile you’ll definitely know.

You sound worryingly infatuated with this potentially underage girl 

[Steve2]

U.K. legal is 16+ right? I personally would insist on at least 18. But if she were 17 then it would still be legal, right? She’d be breaking Seeking’s terms.

16 IS legal but if you are PAYING  her it is 18

[Kev40ish]

You sound worryingly infatuated with this potentially underage girl 

I think he needs to study the law a bit more too..

[HomerC]

You sound worryingly infatuated with this potentially underage girl 

I’m being descriptive so you guys will know her profile if she pops up.
She must surely be 18 at least due to her piercings. I’m not going to link her profile in case it doxxes her or me 

[HomerC]

16 IS legal but if you are PAYING  her it is 18

I think then it is best to go for 25+ 😅
That is a shame because I love early 20s
I think my hard rule will also now be a public platonic meet and greet. No more excuses. One woman claimed that guys like to just have some free company for coffee ; that seems unlikely.

[finn5555]

She must surely be 18 at least due to her piercings.

I wouldn’t be so sure  why don’t you just move on as you come across as a stalker 

[Link7]

She must surely be 18 at least due to her piercings.

Er, I don't think so. None of these assumptions will be good enough in a court of law...

Strongly recommend you block this girl on all platforms and delete all correspondence.

[HomerC]

Er, I don't think so. None of these assumptions will be good enough in a court of law...

Strongly recommend you block this girl on all platforms and delete all correspondence.

Done ✔️
Time to move on.
Thanks all for your advice. Much appreciated

[HomerC]

One SB called “Ba_gira” replied to me on SA saying simply “800ppm”.

External Link/Members Only

I didn’t reply and 24 hours later I’m blocked (or she has deactivated).

Yes, she’s beautiful, but £800? That’s mental.

[HomerC]

I’m finding that a lot of very fat SB are putting themselves down as “curvy”.

[Flush]

One SB called “Ba_gira” replied to me on SA saying simply “800ppm”.

External Link/Members Only

I didn’t reply and 24 hours later I’m blocked (or she has deactivated).

Yes, she’s beautiful, but £800? That’s mental.

She has de-activated her profile, I can't access her profile as well

[PLeisure]

One SB called “Ba_gira” replied to me on SA saying simply “800ppm”.

External Link/Members Only

I didn’t reply and 24 hours later I’m blocked (or she has deactivated).

Yes, she’s beautiful, but £800? That’s mental.

She may have deactivated as I'm also getting no access to the profile. Unless she blocked me for ignoring her, too 

[PLeisure]

I’m finding that a lot of very fat SB are putting themselves down as “curvy”.

Yh, 'curvy' is the new acceptable 

Fair do's - some ppl like that

[DeanoDeano]

How else do you confirm they’re not using stolen pics? It could be a man using someone’s pics. Do you just blindly believe people on the internet?

Suggest a facetime chat?

 

[HomerC]

Suggest a facetime chat?

 

But then they could screen cap it and sell to the papers.

[NightKid]

No, I did ask her to send me a selfie with her holding 4 fingers up. Come to think of it, it took her about 20-30 minutes to do this.

But what if that video call gets screen recorded? That’s blackmail material that could hinder your career

U.K. legal is 16+ right? I personally would insist on at least 18. But if she were 17 then it would still be legal, right?

She must surely be 18 at least due to her piercings.

But then they could screen cap it and sell to the papers.

Loool buddy do yourself a favour, get off SA and stick to normal punting ... seriously, it's the last place oddballs like you should be