My views are:
1. WGs do have a choice in whom they want to see, and they're entitled to that choice
2. If they're going to turn down business, they'll not do it without good reason
My opinion has changed on some of this. I hear the first line parroted a lot on here. Would your opinion be the same for a landlord in a pub or the proprietor of a Guest House, who decided that he didn't want to have disabled, gay couples or Irish people in his house? All of those things were perfectly acceptable at one time until a change in the law.
Let's take this a little further and look at something such as a massage. Does your opinion still apply and what would the law say about this, whether you agreed with the law or not. For example, an official massage establishment, as opposed to those carried out by a prostitute, who isn't subject to the law? I'd be interested to know from somebody who genuinely appears to know the law, like Silverado, where it stands on this difference.
Isn't it widely established that the punting experience is just an 'act' and that attractiveness and real emotion isn't the issue? Well if that's the case, does it really matter who a prostitute services? Shouldn't she be able to detach herself mentally? If prostitution was legal, would the equality legislation kick in or would there be an exemption? And do not tell me that a young prossie of 19 fancies a 60 plus year old guy generally or that she'd go for such a person in real life!
Your second comment is based on your predisposition to know why a prossie would make that choice. Based on what facts? Of course, you have no idea. Her choice could be for genuine reasons or simply a subjective one that she doesn't like a certain type.
As things stand, the prossie doesn't need a good reason to discriminate against anybody.