Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.






Author Topic: Chloe Kisses - Milton Keynes - WTF The cheeky bitch used a wet-wipe on my cock  (Read 23773 times)


2 review(s) for Chloe Kisses (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Jimmyredcab

Why on earth did  you go to see that old crone in the first place? :wackogirl:

As they say oop North, there's nowt as queer as folk, I am totally amazed.    :crazy:

As they say oop North, there's nowt as queer as folk, I am totally amazed.    :crazy:

For research purposes Jimmy, research purposes!  :hi:

Offline mattylondon

For research purposes Jimmy, research purposes!  :hi:
Yes, but I wouldn't rule out her 'research purposes' on you either! Oh how they love to get info on UKP members.  :P

Offline rubric

I think they pay her lip service on punting conversations but whenever she ventured into Off Topic chats she got completely destroyed by all the punters. Sort of like, stick to conversations about whoring and keep out of stuff that requires a brain! Very amusing to watch.

The thing is - in my brief interactions with her - she didn't seem to have the self awareness to realise when she was completely wrong.  So it was kind of like arguing with a robot.  I assumed she was a lot younger than she is as a result - and this coupled with the reviews she seemed to get had me investigate her for a punt ... imagine my surprise when I saw her gallery.

I can only conclude that a lot of guys are pathetically grateful for very low levels of service (and seriously why are 80% of the females on the other side, fat slack and above 40? Sorry .. I meant mature BBW  :rolleyes:)

Offline mattylondon

The thing is - in my brief interactions with her - she didn't seem to have the self awareness to realise when she was completely wrong. 

I can only conclude that a lot of guys are pathetically grateful for very low levels of service (and seriously why are 80% of the females on the other side, fat slack and above 40? Sorry .. I meant mature BBW  :rolleyes:)
I agree and quickly came to the conclusion on auto-censored that you couldn't reason with the woman. She appeared to genuinely believe she was always right.  :crazy: No humility. High time she retired and was put out of her misery.  :thumbsdown:

Fortunately, there are plenty of young and fit prossies around, so she's no more than a pantomime clown and a source of amusement.  :wacko:


Offline Ali Katt

I agree and quickly came to the conclusion on auto-censored that you couldn't reason with the woman. She appeared to genuinely believe she was always right.  :crazy: No humility. High time she retired and was put out of her misery.  :thumbsdown:

Fortunately, there are plenty of young and fit prossies around, so she's no more than a pantomime clown and a source of amusement
:wacko:
But you would struggle to get one of her in a car.

Offline Nimrod

I'm probably not going to be popular here but this thread seems to me be little more than a thinly veiled excuse for character assassination. I will stand behind my record of posts and reviews here when it comes to readers assessing my objectivity and I will say that I have long since left auto-censored behind as a primary source of discourse because in the main, I dislike all the same fluffy aspects of it as the rest of you. But with that said, Chloe deserves defending. I have not seen her as a customer but I have met her many times as a madam and have debated her from opposite sides of the table on auto-censored, too. I've always found her friendly, engaging, intelligent, and good fun whether we agreeing or disagreeing on something. Combative, yes, but one of the people in this industry that I've met and like a great deal. Criticise her objectively if you will but wanton excoriation makes some of you look far worse than it does her. Sorry, but that's my $0.02s worth. She's a really nice lady in my book.

Offline vorian

I'm probably not going to be popular here but this thread seems to me be little more than a thinly veiled excuse for character assassination. I will stand behind my record of posts and reviews here when it comes to readers assessing my objectivity and I will say that I have long since left auto-censored behind as a primary source of discourse because in the main, I dislike all the same fluffy aspects of it as the rest of you. But with that said, Chloe deserves defending. I have not seen her as a customer but I have met her many times as a madam and have debated her from opposite sides of the table on auto-censored, too. I've always found her friendly, engaging, intelligent, and good fun whether we agreeing or disagreeing on something. Combative, yes, but one of the people in this industry that I've met and like a great deal. Criticise her objectively if you will but wanton excoriation makes some of you look far worse than it does her. Sorry, but that's my $0.02s worth. She's a really nice lady in my book.

I respect you for raising an opinion which as you said, may be criticised. At least you have an option to do that on UKP unlike PN where censorship is the norm. I do not personally have an issue with CK as I have never punted with her and never will. However she does lie about her age on her profile and her pictures are very out of date. When she has been challenged on this, then punters are censored or erased. That I don't like, and her silence on the matter is part of the problem.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
She's a nasty malicious cunt who's been going around claiming I posted things like being 'banned by all prossies in Manchester' which I never did, as well as trying to spread the laughable accusation that I am James999.

She also posts on other sites using names like "just a girl" and was outed as posting on the punter-hating auto-censored using a false name slagging off her punters.

From her punter-hating personality online, it's not surprising to find out she's shit at being a prossie.

Offline Nimrod

I respect you for raising an opinion which as you said, may be criticised. At least you have an option to do that on UKP unlike PN where censorship is the norm. I do not personally have an issue with CK as I have never punted with her and never will. However she does lie about her age on her profile and her pictures are very out of date. When she has been challenged on this, then punters are censored or erased. That I don't like, and her silence on the matter is part of the problem.

Totally agree with your point about censorship. 100% right.

Viz Chloe, all I will say is that I take people as I personally find them. I do think some of the criticisms made on a general level (not of Chloe specifically) are often valid but with that said, many tar large classes of people with the same brush and don't take into account individuality. If I was judged only on my posting persona, for instance, I'd soon be in trouble! But hopefully, there is more to me than just what you read here. But if the points you make are correct about accuracy (I don't know) then fair enough, those criticisms are justified. You made them without malice, too, so no complaint from me. I defend Chloe because I have personally known her and I like her and I found it uncomfortable to read this thread about someone I like and to not have the balls to in some way defend them. I am not providing a sweeping excuse for all wrongdoings or saying she is perfect but I am saying the Chloe I have known does not fit the nasty caricature presented in this thread. I don't know what else to say; far from being a tired old reverse-misogynist, I think she's witty, clever, good company and almost as cynical as I am. Anyway, I've said my $0.02s worth about her and I hope it at least gives some balance to this thread.

Offline vt

Totally agree with your point about censorship. 100% right.

Viz Chloe, all I will say is that I take people as I personally find them. I do think some of the criticisms made on a general level (not of Chloe specifically) are often valid but with that said, many tar large classes of people with the same brush and don't take into account individuality. If I was judged only on my posting persona, for instance, I'd soon be in trouble! But hopefully, there is more to me than just what you read here. But if the points you make are correct about accuracy (I don't know) then fair enough, those criticisms are justified. You made them without malice, too, so no complaint from me. I defend Chloe because I have personally known her and I like her and I found it uncomfortable to read this thread about someone I like and to not have the balls to in some way defend them. I am not providing a sweeping excuse for all wrongdoings or saying she is perfect but I am saying the Chloe I have known does not fit the nasty caricature presented in this thread. I don't know what else to say; far from being a tired old reverse-misogynist, I think she's witty, clever, good company and almost as cynical as I am. Anyway, I've said my $0.02s worth about her and I hope it at least gives some balance to this thread.

I respect your opinion Nimrod and I have already declared I don't hate her either, at one time I could probably say I was fond of her. I do dislike her deceptions and the way she tried to defame & discredit me with lies when I pointed the truth out. She really believes auto-censored is her personal domain and hates this place because it has grown to eclipse auto-censored but she has no access to it since her ban when UKP was in its infancy. She tars every member here with the same brush, no doubt once she discovers you are a member here, you will be lower in her esteem too.

I also met her a few times as a madam and in person she wasn't as abrasive as her online persona, but then she admitted she only pretended to like me, presumably only because I was a paying customer at her establishment. Online we don't always get her facade of politesse, the real man-hating Chloe seeps out...I doubt if she can contain it during an intimate booking either, I certainly won't be wasting my hard-earned finding out.

I suppose the key questions you really need to answer re Chloe is...although you were once betrothed to her, did you ever consummate the union...and was it for a fee? If not, why not?? Could you hand-on-heart recommend her to a paying punter if you've never felt inclined yourself?

Offline mattylondon

I'm probably not going to be popular here but this thread seems to me be little more than a thinly veiled excuse for character assassination. I will stand behind my record of posts and reviews here when it comes to readers assessing my objectivity and I will say that I have long since left auto-censored behind as a primary source of discourse because in the main, I dislike all the same fluffy aspects of it as the rest of you. But with that said, Chloe deserves defending. I have not seen her as a customer but I have met her many times as a madam and have debated her from opposite sides of the table on auto-censored, too. I've always found her friendly, engaging, intelligent, and good fun whether we agreeing or disagreeing on something. Combative, yes, but one of the people in this industry that I've met and like a great deal. Criticise her objectively if you will but wanton excoriation makes some of you look far worse than it does her. Sorry, but that's my $0.02s worth. She's a really nice lady in my book.
I respect your many reviews and posts. However, they have zip to do with assessing an individual's forum persona and don't give you any more kudos than the next poster in my book.

Fair enough about what you've said re having a dig but I too have had many dealings with her on the auto-censored, both on the public board and privately. Although I haven't met her, I know many punters who have whilst she was a madam/pimp in both MK and London. And they do not hold your opinion, even though others will agree with you too. I'd even go as far as to say you're clueless as to the real character of this woman, at least with her online persona. Are you aware that she posts on other forums, in addition to auto-censored and SAAFE and is far from pleasant.

On the open board I found her perhaps the most obnoxious individual I've ever known on any forum, male or female, punting or non punting. She is most certainly not friendly. I've no idea what threads you've been reading?! She is indulged simply because she pays, as do many MK women. Whenever she ventured into off topic , she was trashed by the other punters for her ignorance and lack of knowledge. And she isn't any different privately via PM either. What you see is what you get with her, as she readily admits herself.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2014, 07:39:20 PM by mattylondon »

Offline mattylondon

She's a nasty malicious cunt who's been going around claiming I posted things like being 'banned by all prossies in Manchester' which I never did, as well as trying to spread the laughable accusation that I am James999.

She also posts on other sites using names like "just a girl" and was outed as posting on the punter-hating auto-censored using a false name slagging off her punters.

From her punter-hating personality online, it's not surprising to find out she's shit at being a prossie.
Indeed. I remember her and fat Claire on auto-censored. And yes, she currently posts on ilovepussy's forum, in cognito as just a girl. She's a nasty and malicious little cunt.

Offline cunnyhunt

I have not seen her as a customer

I have seen her* and she is not the person you think she is.

There are many issues going on with her, but she mainly hates men. There are many tell tales that she cannot cover although she does try on a punt.
*It was a boring unspectacular punt, a waste of an hour. :hi:

Offline vt

Indeed. I remember her and fat Claire on auto-censored. And yes, she currently posts on ilovepussy's forum, in cognito as just a girl. She's a nasty and malicious little cunt.

Oh really...and to think she denigrated me for using a different (abbreviated) username on here!  :rolleyes:

Typical though...it's always one rule for Chloe and a different one for everyone else...

Everyone else must be polite & respectful to her, but she can spout filth & lies as she takes the fancy, because she's a self-confessed 'gobby bitch' and can't help it! Everyone else must be open & transparent, but she's allowed to hide behind multiple aliases! If a punter criticises a prossie, it's misogyny, but her many unkind misandrist comments are always justified in her own mind!  :wackogirl:

Offline mattylondon

Oh really...and to think she denigrated me for using a different (abbreviated) username on here!  :rolleyes:
It isn't so much that she uses different nics. I used a different nic on auto-censored or I wouldn't have lasted a nano second! Other punters do it too. :D

It's that she uses 'secret' nics, to be even more unpleasant than she already is as 'Chloe Kisses'. In other words, so she can reveal her real opinions, which sometimes leak out on auto-censored but she tries hard to mask. I have a very long memory of that woman on forums and some others. A classic misandrist, but as you say, one rule for that gobby woman and another rule for others.  :cool:
I have seen her* and she is not the person you think she is.

You ought to have a UK Punting medal of merit for punting her. Bravery and danger, if ultimately dull!  :cool:
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 12:56:51 AM by mattylondon »

I fell foul of Chloe. I booked a Sunday appointment for 12 o clock, confirm before 10 she says, I text to confirm before 10 and received a confirmation that it is still on. 11 o clock she cancels on me claiming she is sick.

Offline vorian

I fell foul of Chloe. I booked a Sunday appointment for 12 o clock, confirm before 10 she says, I text to confirm before 10 and received a confirmation that it is still on. 11 o clock she cancels on me claiming she is sick.

Think of it this way, you had a lucky escape and saved your money to punt another day.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Think of it this way, you had a lucky escape and saved your money to punt another day.
lol cheers, does anyone know how/have any ideas how she ended up in such a bad state?

Offline vorian

lol cheers, does anyone know how/have any ideas how she ended up in such a bad state?

I heard somewhere that she used to run/maid at a brothel after being a WG. I think after this she had to go back to the "Shop Floor as it was raided and shut down.  I don't know if this contributed to her current mental state or if she has always been this unstable. :unknown:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline finn5555

I heard somewhere that she used to run/maid at a brothel after being a WG. I think after this she had to go back to the "Shop Floor as it was raided and shut down.  I don't know if this contributed to her current mental state or if she has always been this unstable. :unknown:

Maybe when she was arrested she went off the rails  :unknown:

Offline vorian

Maybe when she was arrested she went off the rails  :unknown:

I wasn't sure of the full story,  I assume that she had perceived power over punters and WG's so when she lost this power, perhaps she tried to fill the void through an Internet persona. I'm surprised she doesn't do a ParisB and join mumsnet to use her knowledge to out punters. That would give her feeling of power and the false admiration of other women. It would fit in well with her schizophrenic  psychological make up.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline finn5555

The reality is she tried running a brothel and ended up being arrested. I have it from reliable sources she is hardly getting any bookings these days hence her prolific posting / touting on pro$$ienet  :wackogirl:

Offline mattylondon

The reality is she tried running a brothel and ended up being arrested. I have it from reliable sources she is hardly getting any bookings these days hence her prolific posting / touting on pro$$ienet  :wackogirl:
Sick? Yes, sick in head. He probably clashed with the sister skank's posting time.11000 posts of verbal diarrhea and counting, suggests the old bint ain't that busy. How can she ever have any customers? She posts so much.  Not unless she's perfected the art of sucking cock whilst making keystrokes!  :sarcastic:

Yes, arrested for being a pimp wasn't she? Can't mention that on auto-censored! And was a pimp in London and MK. She was kicked off UKP for hijacking threads and flooding them with shite, just like shes does on auto-censored, in addition to her hatred of men. And she really thinks that if JRC was in charge she'd still be here? !  Deluded cunt.  :rolleyes:

Offline Prostitooter

She was a decent shag when I met her about 5 years ago at Annabellas. Must have gone downhill since then.






Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)