Author Topic: Arabella AW - central London  (Read 3264 times)


21 review(s) for Arabella_AW (15 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline Awfc888

External Link/Members Only

1 hour £220 incall

Spur of the moment text and agreed a meet a few hours later. I was running late but kept Arabella informed and it was not an issue.

Nice flat in central London.

Arabella was dressed in matching black underwear and looked amazing. No face pics but very attractive with great body def a head turner.

Had a shower then got to action. DFK before OWO. Almost burst my load so switched to some reverse oral. Nice, clean and tasty. More OWO before CIM and she swallowed the lot - very sexy.

Quick chit chat then round two. More OWO and 69 before I came in CG position.

Time was running out and she asked if I could come again.... this time I was on top facefucking her as she was deepthroating me before another CIM and swallow. Not often I come 3 times in an hour!

Highly recommended and I will return again. Not cheap but IMO worthwhile.

Also she has a dog but it was kept in another room

Offline tantraman

... No face pics but very attractive with great body def a head turner.

Click here to have your head turned! :wacko:

Online mrbang123

She gives great bjs and those lips are made for that!  :cool:

Offline stuart.

She gives great bjs and those lips are made for that!  :cool:

If there's one thing I remember form seeing her, it is how good it feels to fuck her face, and the DT

Offline sigmalinking

Hmmm now that she’s back on more reasonable rates, I may have to pay her a visit again

Online DMC

Her AW profile now saying she's away until 'very late August / September'  :dash:

Offline Cellular40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 401
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 2
I saw this girl last year in October when I was on business, wasn’t the greatest experience to be honest.

If I had to rate it would be a neutral/negative, I wasn’t very attracted to her and I expected her to be much more pretty, maybe that’s my own fault for looking at the photos and expecting more.

Also her boob job isn’t the best and her nipples look strange. She seemed quite “offish” in the booking and I didn’t feel like money well spent after at all. Rather the opposite.

I may do a review but as it was around 9 months ago, I don’t know whether it’d be relevant.
Banned reason: Shit stirring troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daddycool

I saw this girl last year in October when I was on business, wasn’t the greatest experience to be honest.

If I had to rate it would be a neutral/negative, I wasn’t very attracted to her and I expected her to be much more pretty, maybe that’s my own fault for looking at the photos and expecting more.

Also her boob job isn’t the best and her nipples look strange. She seemed quite “offish” in the booking and I didn’t feel like money well spent after at all. Rather the opposite.

I may do a review but as it was around 9 months ago, I don’t know whether it’d be relevant.

I think you can post a review up to 12 months after.

It's still worth reviewing so that punters have as much info to make a decision from.

Offline tantraman

I think you can post a review up to 12 months after.

It's still worth reviewing so that punters have as much info to make a decision from.

Nope, 6 months is now the cut-off ...

There's been an update to the forum rules, reviews now have to be posted within 6 months of the booking.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only criteria is that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months after the event(positive or negative)

Offline daddycool


Offline Cellular40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 401
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 2
Nope, 6 months is now the cut-off ...

Saw that earlier and commented on it.

As I cannot do a review I will say, If I had reviewed it would’ve been a negative.
Banned reason: Shit stirring troll.
Banned by: daviemac