Author Topic: Suki Chinese liverpool  (Read 2668 times)

Offline T13

This was a flat attached to a cafe near china town gates in Liverpool city centre. So when I got there I thought great I’m in china town so good start.
Booked for 30 mins for 70 was told owo and dfk was extra 20 and 10. So when I got there it definitely wasn’t the girl on the pics but more like a 40 year old Thai. However dressed in a short little numbe and steaming I thought o wtf. So in I go and this is where it starts getting weird.
I explained that I would pay the 110 but I want the extras owo and dfk for one hour. She agrees and goes away to stash money then comes back so I reiterate 1 hour owo dfk etc etc. She then says no 30 mins. I tell her to fuckoff and go get my money back. She tells me she don’t deal with calls and txts so don’t know what has/ hasn’t been agreed prior(which was irrelevant anyway as I’d agreed with her). In the end we agreed 45 mins. So she goes down owo was great. Then bit of 69 (horrible hairy gash  lol)
Then she tried to sit on my dick I tell her get a condom wtf. So she does we fuck  various positions until I want more owo. So off with the condom again and she does give amazing head to be fair. Then she says fuck me fuck me and tries again to go bareback I can’t believe it I say nooo and just opt to finish in her mouth. She then spits on the floor I leave prompt.

External Link/Members Only

Offline Twotall

Google image search brings up Mingfah, a Playboy Playmate from Thailand. Sounds like she’s brought her NaN over to stand in for her.

External Link/Members Only




Offline T13


goldwing1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
At least your cock got a Suki

Offline T13

Why has he been banned he’s a regular

Offline Drayki

Why has he been banned he’s a regular

Daviemac explains it quite clearly  :lol:

Offline T13


Offline Licking Lizard

Why has he been banned he’s a regular

It was the comment in reply #63 on the thread in the link below which was deemed unacceptable:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=255686.50


Offline NigelF

Why has he been banned he’s a regular

He was absolutely useless though. I (and others) have posted demonstrating that numerous times, most recently here:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=244782.msg2506701#msg2506701

Not only was he a massive fluffy but he often subtly defended WGs for no good reason and undermined the value of this site (especially denigrating reviews on here and praising AW feedback) - something he'd done many times, most recently his posts in this thread:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=255022

Where can I see that

You can see his last posts on his profile:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=104039

It was the comment in reply #63 on the thread in the link below which was deemed unacceptable:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=255686.50

Indeed. He also dug himself into a hole even further with reply #71 (his last ever post). He also made this pointless and deliberately antagonising post, despite being being explicitly warned not to and threatened with a ban:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=255594.msg2610330#msg2610330

Given all the above he was clearly on his last legs and to be honest the banning was well overdue.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2019, 10:15:50 pm by NigelF »

Offline frankc

Why has he been banned he’s a regular

I can articulate it a little more succinctly than Nigel.......he was banned because he was a fluffy, bareback shagging, attention seeking fucking dimwit

Offline T13

That sums it up lol. Thanks guys

Offline JRWK

I can articulate it a little more succinctly than Nigel.......he was banned because he was a fluffy, bareback shagging, attention seeking fucking dimwit

I must be sailing close to the wind myself then, with one of the above 3 - preferring fluffy - as well as having been accused of being a white knight (now proudly using it as my avatar) in defending a WG that I'd just given a positive review to, against 2 contributors neither of which had seen her (one in fact having no reviews to his name).




Offline frankc

I must be sailing close to the wind myself then, with one of the above 3 - preferring fluffy - as well as having been accused of being a white knight (now proudly using it as my avatar) in defending a WG that I'd just given a positive review to, against 2 contributors neither of which had seen her (one in fact having no reviews to his name).

 I can't comment on your posts as I haven't read many but, using a White Knight as a badge of honor and proudly defending WG's then I'd say yes.....your sailing pretty close to the wind