Author Topic: Pakistani girl (Roxy) - Glasgow  (Read 5544 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5315341) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline sempervivum

Met at her place in Maryhill (nice enough part of the area and easy to find)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

New to adultwork, but not to being professional I think.

Spent 30 mins for £60

Her pics on the adultwork page make her look a little bit rough, but she certainly isn't in person. Nice local accent and a gentle enough manner as well - though she says does like to be mean but as it was my first visit with her that could left til next time.

Very keen to find out what I wanted so good communication.

I opted for giving her oral which she enjoyed (twice she said), she has a bit of pubic hair which I enjoyed, and she accepted fingers inside her pussy as well.

Then covered oral with a finger of hers suitably covered in my arse at the same time (something I asked for) - might not be everybody's idea of fun but I thought it was wonderful.

Kisses are without tongues, Mummy tummy, lovely breasts though. She was quite keen I come back, as am I it has to be said.

The cuffs from the hook in the ceiling are real enough, next time perphaps. And next time perhaps for the various toys she showed me as well - BDSM giving is a big thing for her, something she really enjoys, so I think I may well indulge next time.

All good fun, and if my own circumstance allow, hopefully the start of something regular.

Offline Glesgaboy

Thanks for the review.
But a few details missing..
Dress size.
Is the age of 38 accurate?
Her profile says ow at discretion- did u request ow..?
Did u bang her or just pop in the bag in her gob?
What did she wear ( I wonder if traditional clothing is an option)?
« Last Edit: July 18, 2019, 07:55:00 am by Glesgaboy »

Offline Dogbreath

profile seems to have disappeared already - pity, I was quite interested. She looked like a size 14-16 with a pretty face.

Offline J_H

profile seems to have disappeared already - pity, I was quite interested. She looked like a size 14-16 with a pretty face.

Me too.

Offline Glesgaboy

However on reflection I think it was self promotion.

The review appeared on same day as she registered on AW.
From a first time reviewer with no other posts.
Let’s all just relax and wait for the next Pakistani.
As you were troops... :hi:

Offline J_H

Yes, but if it was the girl who was promoting herself, why immediately take down the ad?

Offline timmy1

Damn, late to the party it again, shame as pakistani wg's are hard to come by :(

Offline Glesgaboy

Yeh I know.
I used to visit one just off Victoria rd on south side but she has retired long ago I think.
It’s a niche in need of a SP...!

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,704
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
Yeh I know.
I used to visit one just off Victoria rd on south side but she has retired long ago I think.
It’s a niche in need of a SP...!

If your talking about 15-20 years ago...I know the one you mean...bit chunky, but great tits :cool:

Offline J_H

I met this one a few times, a long while ago:

 External Link/Members Only

Very limited likes and outcalls only, but as I recall her, a really nice girl.

Offline Glesgaboy

Met her way back. For a car meet.
Young but a bit boyish back then.
Maybe bigger tits now as I have a hunch ( I heard on the grapevine) she’s had a wean.

Offline Slicksta

There the profile, a new one is created same pic, but no verification,  External Link/Members Only

Offline myothernameis


Offline myothernameis

Yes, but if it was the girl who was promoting herself, why immediately take down the ad?

She now has a new profile, which begs the question, is the op touting her

Offline J_H

She now has a new profile, which begs the question, is the op touting her
And the 'new' profile is now gone!


Offline J_H

If we were all being honest, we've probably shagged worse! I know I have.

The question is probably 'Would you pay to shag it?'!

Offline nike

Why would anyone shag that?

I thought that is one ugly package but again horses for courses, as they say, or in this case a pygmy shrek. :lol:

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline rowdee1

The wallpaper is over the skirting board . . . . . in more ways than one.

Genuinely made me laugh out loud. I'm in the office too.

Well done.

Rowdee.

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,704
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
The wallpaper is over the skirting board . . . . . in more ways than one.

 :lol: Quality.

Offline J_H


Offline Batpunt

Met her way back. For a car meet.
Young but a bit boyish back then.
Maybe bigger tits now as I have a hunch ( I heard on the grapevine) she’s had a wean.

I’ve spoke with her before but the car meet thing just put me right off. I must just be a total shitebag, when I messaged her she wanted picked up in Partick somewhere to go for a meet in an lane near St. George’s Cross and I just felt too much of a scaredy to do it 😂😂😂

Offline andymars19

The wallpaper is over the skirting board . . . . . in more ways than one.

Belter...   :lol: :D

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
The wallpaper is over the skirting board . . . . . in more ways than one.
:lol:.. I know looks are subjective n all of that, but I think 'Seeker'  nailed it on another thread (and I rarely agree with him  :sarcastic:) "I know looks are subjective, but good looking girls are good looking girls,and munters are munters"  Know which I'm going for here...  :D

Offline FBman78

+1.

Das günt!

Gunt! That's the perfect descriptor for this munter.

Offline seeker

I think with  her looking like that,
 it would just be too cruel...
So I'm saying nothing . :cool:

Chromedome

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She does  look like she has just seen a mirror right enough.