Author Topic: Victoria.Sensual_ in Maidstone - waste of time so walked  (Read 1157 times)


6 review(s) for Victoria.Sensual_ (3 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by DrConners]

Offline CockMonster

 External Link/Members Only

TLDR:  Pimped strumpet, bad attitude and run around the houses by her or her pimp...

Price(s): £70 for 30 mins, £100 for 45 mins, £120 for 60 mins.

Logistics: The worst I've ever encountered.  Tried to contact and make a booking but it took over 3 days and 4 different numbers - apparently if you enquire but don't make a booking for THAT MOMENT you are blocked.  FINALLY got a booking only to be left waiting 20 mins (even after I put back time at her request en route). 

Asked about my ethnicity ("where you form..." - not had that in a while!) and then paraded in front of the apartment block so they could take a good look before telling me apartment number to buzz.  On a busy road in the middle of the day? Ridiculous.

Location: Apartment blocks just outside centre of Maidstone. I've seen other touring girls here and be aware there are plenty of CCTV cameras inside and out, as well as some nosey neighbours.

Looks: . Not as nice in the pics, but then she wouldn't let me turn the lights on to have a look.  Costume request via text was news to her, and wasn't possible (like everything on her likes list when I asked). 

Attitude & Service: She clearly hates her job and is doing punters back to back.  I was told to wait for over 20 mins for 'shower' but she clearly hadn't showered and I'm pretty sure I saw the previous punter leave.

I don't really want to encourage a girl who is clearly pimped and not happy, so I walked.  I'm sure it would have been typical mechanical Romanian service anyway.  I can only hope that I wasted as much of the pimp's time (and money) as they did of mine...

Conclusion: The No Roms rule is there for a reason, I don't know why flattering profile pics keep tempting me to break it  :dash:

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Conclusion: The No Roms rule is there for a reason, I don't know why flattering profile pics keep tempting me to break it  :dash:

You aren't the first & won't be the last  ;)

I'm not going to bang on about Romanian WG's because you're far more seasoned than me in this game but yeah, hardly surprising to hear this.

You walked & at least you took the time to write this up & let others know : AVOID, AVOID - AVOID

Cheers  :hi:
« Last Edit: June 21, 2019, 12:20:23 pm by DrConners »

Offline Bornslippy

sorry to read this mate. yeah. only roms with decent UKP feedback will be entertained (sandracurly was ace). I agree I'm a sucker for a tight looking young whore, but deep down know the service will be poor. would book this one in an instant External Link/Members Only if she offered good service and obviously didn't bb (although even bb won't be on the cards lol)

Offline CockMonster

So true guys, so true....

I ended up going to a girl I've seen before who was cracking and more than made up for it. Review to come shortly...

Offline CockMonster

sorry to read this mate. yeah. only roms with decent UKP feedback will be entertained (sandracurly was ace). I agree I'm a sucker for a tight looking young whore, but deep down know the service will be poor. would book this one in an instant External Link/Members Only if she offered good service and obviously didn't bb (although even bb won't be on the cards lol)

So true mate - I have BB blocked on all my searches so I'm not even disappointed to see a cracking girl I wouldn't touch, although it scares me when they have it listed then realise what a rookie mistake it is and appear on my searches - the BB avoidance thread on here is a god-send