Author Topic: BoredLonelyHOUSEWIFE - Hackney E8 - Utterly Hideous, Avoid at all costs  (Read 2092 times)


1 review(s) for BoredLonelyHOUSEWIFE (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline xfg423

Link: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Comms: speedy responses, all by AW email (she only offers this means of communicating)
Duration: 30 minutes
Fee: £80
Location: modern but poorly kept house in Hackney, not far from London Fields.

Arranging: she'd asked me if I'd looked at her pictures. I said only her public ones. She wanted to check if I was okay with her size (she says she's a BBW at size 20-22). I looked at her face pictures and my imagination told me (a) a bored housewife would be a good shag and (b) that she might be one of these voluptuous, curvy, wide-hipped ones, rather than a saggy, wrinkly mess. Regrettably, I was wrong on the second thing and, thankfully, I didn't stick around to find out if I was right or not about the first.

The meet: arrived on time. Let in by her friend. Was told to go upstairs. Went upstairs. What greeted me was significantly older and less pretty than the public pictures. Followed her into the room. She asked me what I wanted. I reconfirmed what I'd said in my messages (which was squirting and cum on her tits). I get my clothes off, thinking "fuck, I don't know if I can even go through with this", then she takes her clothes off too, and by this point I KNOW I can't. There's not enough viagra in the world.

Hideous beyond belief.

I made up some bullshit about being nervous and guilty and got dressed promptly. I basically ran out of the house. I shuddered the whole way back to my office and almost threw up once or twice.

Truly, truly unattractive in every conceivable way.

However, there is one positive: she was very understanding of my story as to why I had to leave (but I doubt she's an idiot - my disappointment and disgust must have been written all over my face, and it won't be the first time she's been met with that).

Thank God I left this one with my money, as I'd not handed it over before I left. Was probably in the house less than four minutes.

Offline woiczeck

What was her mate like?? Is she in the game and would you have slipped her one or two???? 🤨🤨🤨

Offline xfg423

What was her mate like?? Is she in the game and would you have slipped her one or two???? 🤨🤨🤨

Mate was rough as houses too, though not as rough as this one. Wouldn't have banged her either though. Felt like washing myself down with a hosepipe and investing in cutting edge memory-erasing technology stocks on the way back to work. :scare:

Offline Foxtail17

She has bid on my RB in the past, and her profile used to ask for a deposit for outcalls I seem to recall.
Thanks for the warning

Offline xfg423

She has bid on my RB in the past, and her profile used to ask for a deposit for outcalls I seem to recall.
Thanks for the warning

You're welcome. I consider this one a public service.

Offline francescototti

I have not  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic: at a review so much as this review  :sarcastic:

Offline Raven


niftyfiftydave

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have not  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic: at a review so much as this review  :sarcastic:

def +1 amazed you got as far as getting your clothes off lol.

Offline xfg423

def +1 amazed you got as far as getting your clothes off lol.

Honestly, me too. I'm kind of new to this, and something inside me is reticent to just flat out walk out. It's almost like some unconscious part of my lizard brain was like "oh well, you've come this far, now you're obligated to do it". Then the rest of me caught up and was like "Wait a minute, what the fuck are you doing? Have some fucking self respect." What's worse, I'm only 35 and in good shape, but kind of wanted to fulfil a 'hot milf' sort of fantasy, hence going on the punt at all. But trust me, this fantasy was never going to be fulfilled by her, not in a million years. *Shudders*

I felt revolting for most of the rest of the day.

Offline gash bash

Sorry it didn't work out for you but what did you expect from a size 22 woman when she takes her clothes off. I can understand if she smelt bad or had other issues, but running away from a big woman isnt really fair on the SP especially as its clearly listed on her profile.

I would have taken it as a challenge and given her a good workout.

Offline xfg423

Sorry it didn't work out for you but what did you expect from a size 22 woman when she takes her clothes off. I can understand if she smelt bad or had other issues, but running away from a big woman isnt really fair on the SP especially as its clearly listed on her profile.

I would have taken it as a challenge and given her a good workout.

It was age and upkeep, not size, that was the issue.

niftyfiftydave

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sorry it didn't work out for you but what did you expect from a size 22 woman when she takes her clothes off. I can understand if she smelt bad or had other issues, but running away from a big woman isnt really fair on the SP especially as its clearly listed on her profile.

I would have taken it as a challenge and given her a good workout.

Running away from any working girl who is not as described seems fair enough to me, you can,t take her back for a refund like a pair of shoes. It is like internet shopping without the returns label. You read the blurb look at the pictures and take a chance. Not what you were expecting, no refunds, don,t part up.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
  •  
op you knew she was going to be big and looking at her limited pics not overly glam so to walk seems a little bit of a piss take, esp when she had  the decency to  ask if you were ok with her size before the meet.

Im all for leaving if not as described but seems she was a discribed :unknown:

Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
op you knew she was going to be big and looking at her limited pics not overly glam so to walk seems a little bit of a piss take, esp when she had  the decency to  ask if you were ok with her size before the meet.

Im all for leaving if not as described but seems she was a discribed :unknown:

To be fair to the OP, it is clear there is an error of judgement on his part.


Arranging: she'd asked me if I'd looked at her pictures. I said only her public ones. She wanted to check if I was okay with her size (she says she's a BBW at size 20-22). I looked at her face pictures and my imagination told me (a) a bored housewife would be a good shag and (b) that she might be one of these voluptuous, curvy, wide-hipped ones, rather than a saggy, wrinkly mess. Regrettably, I was wrong on the second thing and, thankfully, I didn't stick around to find out if I was right or not about the first.



Although from the SP side time is money and there is an opportunity cost she may have lost a booking as a result of the action of the OP

Nonetheless, ultimately punters cannot pay for something that deep down in their heart they are truly unhappy with. Punter's Alienation  :(  :dash: The world of business as mentioned by niftyfiftydave does not work this way.

Running away from any working girl who is not as described seems fair enough to me, you can,t take her back for a refund like a pair of shoes. It is like internet shopping without the returns label. You read the blurb look at the pictures and take a chance. Not what you were expecting, no refunds, don,t part up.

It's just one of those punting glitches!!
« Last Edit: May 24, 2019, 02:30:04 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline xfg423

op you knew she was going to be big and looking at her limited pics not overly glam so to walk seems a little bit of a piss take, esp when she had  the decency to  ask if you were ok with her size before the meet.

Im all for leaving if not as described but seems she was a discribed :unknown:

As mentioned before, it was a matter of upkeep and maintenance, not size. Besides, I'm not 'guilt fuck' somebody who is repugnant to me. If you're not feeling it, you're not feeling it. You owe someone nothing until you've seen the goods.

As I keep saying, it wasn't her SIZE that was the issue, it was the state of her upkeep. Which I called out in my review.

Offline xfg423

Running away from any working girl who is not as described seems fair enough to me, you can,t take her back for a refund like a pair of shoes. It is like internet shopping without the returns label. You read the blurb look at the pictures and take a chance. Not what you were expecting, no refunds, don,t part up.

I agree with this 100%

Offline xfg423

op you knew she was going to be big and looking at her limited pics not overly glam so to walk seems a little bit of a piss take, esp when she had  the decency to  ask if you were ok with her size before the meet.

Im all for leaving if not as described but seems she was a discribed :unknown:

And was she really 'as described'? Is being (or at least looking) 15-20 years older than the pics being honest about what you're going to be met with? Is mentioning size as the only concern, and omitting the age, balding, and wrinkly-gut-sag really being 'as described'? Size is used as a euphemism for "I'm fat, old and ugly", rather than just "I'm fat", which is what it should be used as.

Almost none of these birds are actually as described anyway. They always look worse in the flesh, due to the wonders of post-production photo processing. There's an argument to say that even that is not being true to your 'as described'. All SPs will almost always look worse in the flesh. The question, then, is what degree of misrepresentation each punter is prepared to accept when the moment comes. Most of the time the deviation isn't sufficient to warrant a walk out, even when it's a different girl, judging by many of the reviews on here, but in this case, it was.

And while SPs can misrepresent themselves to greater and lesser degrees with impunity, all my £20 notes are entirely fungible and worth exactly the same no matter how scruffy they look. And I don't get to see any of them again the second I've handed them over either, no matter what happens from that point on.

So who's at the real disadvantage? Seems clear to me.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2019, 02:55:12 pm by xfg423 »

Offline fudi_maar

This thread is heading into a "Did he or didn't he do the right thing" debate. In fairness to OP, the AW photos of her are seriously snap-chat filtered to remove blemishes and wrinkles. She probably bears little resemblance to what her profile shows.
Having been in a similar situation (but being too polite to walk), I think OP did the right thing. Maybe he could have left
her a £20 as a sign of good-will for wasted time/effort, but that's totally his discretion.

On the point of her losing revenue, firstly, I doubt if there is a queue of guys lining up for her, secondly, it works both ways -
just this week, I got silenced and double-booked by 2 WG's on the same day (both reviewed) - I got to see neither
even though both had confirmed - it effectively wasted the best part of my day. And various reviews here - even positive ones-
show the girls often messing punters around with times/bookings/no-shows.

It's just that kind of industry.

If only there was a "Pussies and Punters Ombudsman".


« Last Edit: May 24, 2019, 03:04:21 pm by fudi_maar »

John2K

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have not  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic:  :sarcastic: at a review so much as this review  :sarcastic:
I was about the say the same thing, you made my day OP!
Thanks a lot man, your life is very exciting. Cheers.

Offline xfg423

I was about the say the same thing, you made my day OP!
Thanks a lot man, your life is very exciting. Cheers.

You're welcome!

niftyfiftydave

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This thread is heading into a "Did he or didn't he do the right thing" debate. In fairness to OP, the AW photos of her are seriously snap-chat filtered to remove blemishes and wrinkles. She probably bears little resemblance to what her profile shows.
Having been in a similar situation (but being too polite to walk), I think OP did the right thing. Maybe he could have left
her a £20 as a sign of good-will for wasted time/effort, but that's totally his discretion.

On the point of her losing revenue, firstly, I doubt if there is a queue of guys lining up for her, secondly, it works both ways -
just this week, I got silenced and double-booked by 2 WG's on the same day (both reviewed) - I got to see neither
even though both had confirmed - it effectively wasted the best part of my day. And various reviews here - even positive ones-
show the girls often messing punters around with times/bookings/no-shows.

It's just that kind of industry.

If only there was a "Pussies and Punters Ombudsman".

i,ll start the debate with right thing, and not leaving 20 quid was right too. if the goods are not what you are led to believe and you can,t get your head round what you are presented with walk. She could really save herself time by answering the door herself. that maid or friend opening the door always sets off alarms.Got caught with that before and too polite to leave, though i did enjoy the big bird it wasn,t what i was expecting or nowhere near like the slim short skirted stockinged young thing that lead me up the stairs lol.