giulya romanian tourer bradford

[haggis007]

External Link/Members Only

unfortunately after my last review yesterday of "kim romanian tourer bradford" it was pointed out both kim and her stablemate giulya both have a barebacking video online, i would like to confirm i am not a bare backer and there was never a hint or offer that bare back was available,if i would have known i would never have visited either sp.  i am still going to do a positive review on giulya as she was an excellent sp and after all this is an information sharing site .thanks to mr ff for bringing this to my/our attention.....

 sp name. giulya ...visible number 07776 816472

 location  small terrace house .bd3 area of bradford, bedroom very clean and tidy, permit only parking on street, but a couple of parking places at end of street before permit zone.

comms .
very good english , confirmed services ,kissing ,owo, sex in diferrent positions, post code sent ...all good

the girl.
guilya is a slim .attractive romania lady probably mid 30,s but body of 20 yr old, big fake boobs, she has mixed reviews on here but her attitude towards me was very friendly, bubbly and nothing was too much trouble, all good

the meet. £60/30mins
usual hide behind the door routine, in to room, i was very happy, dressed in a short black sexy nighty , very slim ,very bubbly,big boobs ,lots of tattoos,smelt nice and fresh, what followed was a full on 30 mins of passionate kissing ,licking ,sucking, fucking in all positions, excellent owo, ro, cg, mish her pulling me in for fk(not deep), mish, doggie , then prone bone where i blew both barrels in to the bag    bit of  a clean up while chatting, got dressed and left with a nice smile on my face.checked the clock and i had  been inside 33 mins so not a clock watcher.

conclusion.
if it wasnt for the bb issue which i found out about after the meet,  i would have definitely gone back to see giulya , but unfortunately not now....

           


Hidden Image/Members Only

[Bum Lovin Criminal]

Hey Mr H,.

Nice review..  Must admit I didn't know about that BB issue either......Due diligence right?  Still, I knew she'd be a damned good shag, glad

you had a good'un after so many bad'uns..

It's a shame about the BB thing but I guess you can never really know 100% who's going coatless.  As long as your bagged up and didn't

know, that's all one can do......I guess most Rom SPs  bareback their Sergei after work hours anyway....

[smartieshouse]

I've not seen any bb evidence? The 2 vids posted before didn't show bb did they?

[Bum Lovin Criminal]

I think in one vid there is some coat-less action going on....

However,  as a savvy punter, one should doubt all fannies, and bag up according.....suspect all.....even the missus...

[Sexmadsteve1]

where do we see this vid is what I'd like to know?

I had a session with Kim before I joined this site, very nice I have to say but did get a weird feeling whilst I was in the house.

[haggis007]

where do we see this vid is what I'd like to know?

I had a session with Kim before I joined this site, very nice I have to say but did get a weird feeling whilst I was in the house.

 a few after comments were started on kims review here....

    https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=247592.0

[Bum Lovin Criminal]

I really wanted to book her and as I'm climaxing, get her to say "Finish"  in that cute voice of hers, just like in the vid....

[Bum Lovin Criminal]

where do we see this vid is what I'd like to know?

I had a session with Kim before I joined this site, very nice I have to say but did get a weird feeling whilst I was in the house.

That was probably me in the next room shagging her cute skinny stablemate....

Was it in Bradford last year?..

[wolfiesmith69]

I really wanted to book her and as I'm climaxing, get her to say "Finish"  in that cute voice of hers, just like in the vid....

External Link/Members Only

[smartieshouse]

Anyone know if she's still in Bradford?

[Bigtone]

Shes just popped up in Hounslow under a different name though!

External Link/Members Only

I’m on it as soon as shes available, had my eye on her for a while.

[sall71]

Saw this lady last year a couple of times last year, well worth a visit if you get chance.

[haggis007]

Saw this lady last year a couple of times last year, well worth a visit if you get chance.

 yes she is a good podge 

[smartieshouse]

yes she is a good podge 

Don't rub it in!! :-)

[covertlook]

Don't rub it in!! :-)

I thought that was the whole point...

[mrfishyfoo]

Now openly offering bareback.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=2760606;topic=200656.0

[sall71]

Now openly offering bareback.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=2760606;topic=200656.0

To be fair yes it says 'bareback' in her list of likes, but it also say 'penetration (protected)' instead of saying 'unprotected sex'. I think like in a lot of these cases, it's probably more an issue of the lass not paying attention when filling out the page that actually offering the service, unless we have some reviewers that have been offered b/b in person?

[mrfishyfoo]

To be fair yes it says 'bareback' in her list of likes, but it also say 'penetration (protected)' instead of saying 'unprotected sex'. I think like in a lot of these cases, it's probably more an issue of the lass not paying attention when filling out the page that actually offering the service, unless we have some reviewers that have been offered b/b in person?

Same as all the other barebacking scumbags that are listed as blatantly offering it on here.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=141499.0

Were they too also mistaken when they ticked the box ??

[sall71]

Same as all the other barebacking scumbags that are listed as blatantly offering it on here.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=141499.0

Were they too also mistaken when they ticked the box ??

I've no idea as I can't be arsed going through your list.

My point was that yes it says b/b on her likes, but it also says protected penetration on there and doesn't say unprotected sex.

Unless someone has some info to the contrary, and lets be fair plenty of us on here have podged her, I think it's more likely to be a typo.

We're aware you don't like the lass after that video of her, but until someone confirms that they were actually offered or had b/b with her, there's not really anything to discuss.

[mrfishyfoo]

I've no idea as I can't be arsed going through your list.

My point was that yes it says b/b on her likes, but it also says protected penetration on there and doesn't say unprotected sex.

Unless someone has some info to the contrary, and lets be fair plenty of us on here have podged her, I think it's more likely to be a typo.

We're aware you don't like the lass after that video of her, but until someone confirms that they were actually offered or had b/b with her, there's not really anything to discuss.

I have no reason to like or dislike her MrS. I've never met her and never would do. 

As for her being a barebacker....she's now blatantly offering bareback on her AWank which is enough to earn her place in the BB list. 

[sall71]

I have no reason to like or dislike her MrS. I've never met her and never would do. 

As for her being a barebacker....she's now blatantly offering bareback on her AWank which is enough to earn her place in the BB list. 

You don't learn do you 

How many times have you failed to listen and rushed to pull out the 'barebacker' red card, only to be proved wrong and end up looking stupid.

Several reviews of her on here, unless I've missed something not one of them even hints at b/b being offered.

So aside from what is probably a typo where someone has most likely clicked the wrong box, what other evidence do you present to show she offers unprotected sex and is therefor worthy of being added to your barebackers list?

[mrfishyfoo]

You don't learn do you 

How many times have you failed to listen and rushed to pull out the 'barebacker' red card, only to be proved wrong and end up looking stupid.

Several reviews of her on here, unless I've missed something not one of them even hints at b/b being offered.

So aside from what is probably a typo where someone has most likely clicked the wrong box what other evidence do you present to show she offers unprotected sex and is therefor worthy of being added to your barebackers list?

It's not my list MrS I just happened to start it. 

What evidence do you present that it's a typo MrS ??

[mrfishyfoo]

Now openly offering bareback.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=2760606;topic=200656.0

Here's a link that works....

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=200656.msg2760606#msg2760606

.....and a profile grab.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Interesting that she's removed anything anal, CIM and fingering but not bareback.

[Avg_Joe]

To be fair yes it says 'bareback' in her list of likes, but it also say 'penetration (protected)' instead of saying 'unprotected sex'. I think like in a lot of these cases, it's probably more an issue of the lass not paying attention when filling out the page that actually offering the service, unless we have some reviewers that have been offered b/b in person?

by the same argument you could claim everyone that ticks Oral and then Oral Without or Oral Without (at discretion) doesn't actually offer OWO

[mrfishyfoo]

You don't learn do you 

How many times have you failed to listen and rushed to pull out the 'barebacker' red card, only to be proved wrong and end up looking stupid.

Several reviews of her on here, unless I've missed something not one of them even hints at b/b being offered.

So aside from what is probably a typo where someone has most likely clicked the wrong box, what other evidence do you present to show she offers unprotected sex and is therefor worthy of being added to your barebackers list?

Please do show us all how many times I've fucked up playing the barebacker card and made myself look stupid as I'm struggling to find the many times that is claimed.

[mrfishyfoo]

by the same argument you could claim everyone that ticks Oral and then Oral Without or Oral Without (at discretion) doesn't actually offer OWO

True but ticking the BB box is IMHO playing with fire given the stigma that's attached with that service.

[Avg_Joe]

True but ticking the BB box is IMHO playing with fire given the stigma that's attached with that service.

agreed... but my comment was aimed at Sall's weak excuse 


Edit:
Editted above post to clarify 

[daviemac]

You don't learn do you 

Nor does it seem do you.   

She advertises bareback on her profile and even the OP of this review would not return because of it. 

if it wasnt for the bb issue which i found out about after the meet,  i would have definitely gone back to see giulya , but unfortunately not now.... 

As far as I'm concerned no further evidence is needed. You can white knight her all you want, there'll be loads of punters crossing her off their lists and you have no idea if she actually barebacks or not. Like the OP I would err on the side of caution.

[sall71]

It's not my list MrS I just happened to start it. 

What evidence do you present that it's a typo MrS ??

I don't know for definite it is a typo, much the same as you don't know for definite she offers bareback.

Look at her list of likes, she ticked 'bareback' but did not tick 'unprotected sex' which is odd if she was offering it. All the boxes are ticked for oral, aside from CIM which she did last time I saw her.

To me it looks like someone has wizzed through the setup page not really paying attention to what they are clicking, something we've seen many times before.

Maybe hold fire until someone comes back with a review?


 

[mrfishyfoo]

I don't know for definite it is a typo, much the same as you don't know for definite she offers bareback.

Look at her list of likes, she ticked 'bareback' but did not tick 'unprotected sex' which is odd if she was offering it. All the boxes are ticked for oral, aside from CIM which she did last time I saw her.

To me it looks like someone has wizzed through the setup page not really paying attention to what they are clicking, something we've seen many times before.

Maybe hold fire until someone comes back with a review?

 

It's blatantly on offer in her likes list.

 

[daviemac]

I don't know for definite it is a typo, much the same as you don't know for definite she offers bareback.

Look at her list of likes, she ticked 'bareback' but did not tick 'unprotected sex' which is odd if she was offering it. All the boxes are ticked for oral, aside from CIM which she did last time I saw her.

To me it looks like someone has wizzed through the setup page not really paying attention to what they are clicking, something we've seen many times before.

Maybe hold fire until someone comes back with a review?

Do you know the old saying "when you're in a hole stop digging". You are not doing yourself any favours continuing to white knight her. She offers bareback on her profile, she is the one advertising her services, if she doesn't offer it she should make sure it isn't there. Unless of course she's under the control of a pimp who sorts all that out for her and tells her what to offer.

Do you really think the bareback hunters are members here knowing that those who partake in or condone bareback, quite rightly, get a hard time. 

[sall71]

Nor does it seem do you.   

She advertises bareback on her profile and even the OP of this review would not return because of it. 
As far as I'm concerned no further evidence is needed. You can white knight her all you want, there'll be loads of punters crossing her off their lists and you have no idea if she actually barebacks or not. Like the OP I would err on the side of caution.

I'm not white knighting anyone, I saw her once maybe 18 months ago.

What ''bareback issue'' is being reffered to? All I know about is that video.

[daviemac]

I'm not white knighting anyone, I saw her once maybe 18 months ago.

What ''bareback issue'' is being reffered to? All I know about is that video.

What do you call your 4 posts on this thread all defending or making excuses for the fact she has bareback listed on her likes. Looks like white knighting to me.

The only bareback issue I need to know about is the fact it's on her likes list, the thing you keep making excuses for.

[sall71]

What do you call your 4 posts on this thread all defending or making excuses for the fact she has bareback listed on her likes. Looks like white knighting to me.

The only bareback issue I need to know about is the fact it's on her likes list, the thing you keep making excuses for.

If you check my posts you'll see you I've asked if there is any other evidence of barebacking.

There's two videos online, one she is giving the guy oral without, the second she is riding him but you can't see whether he is rubbered up or not.

Aside from that there has been on other mention of barebacking, no mention of anyone being offered it, no mention of anyone knowing someone who has fucked her raw. The basis of this discussion is a 'like' list that doesn't add up.

We've seen several instances on her where girls have been called out as barebackers with no proof, the last one I recall it turned out the guy was stalking the lass.

I appreciate Mr Foo is well thought of and puts a lot into the this site, I was simply asking if there was any thing to back up the b/b claim. That is not white knighting, that is asking a sensible question.

[daviemac]

If you check my posts you'll see you I've asked if there is any other evidence of barebacking.

There's two videos online, one she is giving the guy oral without, the second she is riding him but you can't see whether he is rubbered up or not.

Aside from that there has been on other mention of barebacking, no mention of anyone being offered it, no mention of anyone knowing someone who has fucked her raw. The basis of this discussion is a 'like' list that doesn't add up.

We've seen several instances on her where girls have been called out as barebackers with no proof, the last one I recall it turned out the guy was stalking the lass.

I appreciate Mr Foo is well thought of and puts a lot into the this site, I was simply asking if there was any thing to back up the b/b claim. That is not white knighting, that is asking a sensible question.

FFS you really are an idiot aren't you. She has BAREBACK listed on her profile, you are insisting on defending the fact she has BAREBACK listed on her profile, the whole point is she's advertising BAREBACK.

Did you read what I posted before about bareback hunters not posting on here, it's for the same reason you are getting a hard time, you are defending the fact she is advertising an extremely irresponsible act.

The evidence of bareback is written on here profile, she offers it, it's there in print.   

Edit

You forget this from the OP of this review. - "if it wasnt for the bb issue which i found out about after the meet,  i would have definitely gone back to see giulya , but unfortunately not now.... "

Even he doesn't want to risk it.

[sall71]

FFS you really are an idiot aren't you. She has BAREBACK listed on her profile, you are insisting on defending the fact she has BAREBACK listed on her profile, the whole point is she's advertising BAREBACK.

Did you read what I posted before about bareback hunters not posting on here, it's for the same reason you are getting a hard time, you are defending the fact she is advertising an extremely irresponsible act.

The evidence of bareback is written on here profile, she offers it, it's there in print.   

Edit

You forget this from the OP of this review. - "if it wasnt for the bb issue which i found out about after the meet,  i would have definitely gone back to see giulya , but unfortunately not now.... "

Even he doesn't want to risk it.

So now you call me an idiot? Thank you mr moderator for setting such a good example.

You once again mention ‘’the bb issue’’ without actually adding anything bar the entry on the like list.

Her profile has bareback in her likes, but it doesn’t have ‘’unprotected sex’’, or CIM (which those who have seen her know she does). It also, as Mr Foo kindly pointed out, doesn’t have fingering or anal listed in her likes, anal used to be offered as an extra.

So by taking her like list as gospel and dismissing that it might be a typo, we’re saying she has decided to stop letting people cum in her mouth (reasonable safe), stop letting people put a finger inside her (fairly safe), and stopped doing anal (safe if protected). And instead has started doing the extremely risking option of offering bareback? Does that make sense to you?

I saw her last year, what I remember was a fun booking with a lass who was clearly professional. Like Mr Haggis, if I had known she was barebacking I probably wouldn’t have seen her but a bit of corroborating proof wouldn’t go a miss.

And or the record this is not white knighting or any of that crap, it is simply looking at a situation dispassionately. I read something that seemed odd so I spoke up, and still no one has come back with anything to back up or confirm the bb claim.

Happy new year all   

[Avg_Joe]

or the pimp has decided that she will do bareback, and thus has put it on her profile, in which case, she will be doing it

[daviemac]

So now you call me an idiot? Thank you mr moderator for setting such a good example.

You once again mention ‘’the bb issue’’ without actually adding anything bar the entry on the like list.

Her profile has bareback in her likes, but it doesn’t have ‘’unprotected sex’’, or CIM (which those who have seen her know she does). It also, as Mr Foo kindly pointed out, doesn’t have fingering or anal listed in her likes, anal used to be offered as an extra.

So by taking her like list as gospel and dismissing that it might be a typo, we’re saying she has decided to stop letting people cum in her mouth (reasonable safe), stop letting people put a finger inside her (fairly safe), and stopped doing anal (safe if protected). And instead has started doing the extremely risking option of offering bareback? Does that make sense to you?

I saw her last year, what I remember was a fun booking with a lass who was clearly professional. Like Mr Haggis, if I had known she was barebacking I probably wouldn’t have seen her but a bit of corroborating proof wouldn’t go a miss.

And or the record this is not white knighting or any of that crap, it is simply looking at a situation dispassionately. I read something that seemed odd so I spoke up, and still no one has come back with anything to back up or confirm the bb claim.

Happy new year all   

You have a history of defending those where bareback is mentioned, this isn't the first time. I wonder why. (Rhetorical question BTW)     White knighting barebackers is never going to go down well on here.

How many times do I have to say it, you aren't going to get those who seek out barebackers posting on here so you aren't going to get proof. The only proof anybody needs is the fact she advertises bareback on her profile and that is the only issue.

If you act like an idiot what do you suggest I call you,  I can look out of a window and see it's raining you must have to go outside and get wet before you believe it.

If you want to go and see barebackers that's up to you.

Now I'm telling you stop the arguing and white knighting, she has bareback listed, there is nothing more to add and that's the end of it. This thread is not going to drag on any further.

[sall71]

You have a history of defending those where bareback is mentioned, this isn't the first time. I wonder why. (Rhetorical question BTW)     White knighting barebackers is never going to go down well on here.

How many times do I have to say it, you aren't going to get those who seek out barebackers posting on here so you aren't going to get proof. The only proof anybody needs is the fact she advertises bareback on her profile and that is the only issue.

If you act like an idiot what do you suggest I call you,  I can look out of a window and see it's raining you must have to go outside and get wet before you believe it.

If you want to go and see barebackers that's up to you.

Now I'm telling you stop the arguing and white knighting, she has bareback listed, there is nothing more to add and that's the end of it. This thread is not going to drag on any further.

If you’re going to quote things get them right, I have only spoken up about two girls that have been accused of barebacking. Not exactly a history of defending people.


The first was a regular punt of mine and the review in question was that far out of character is was comical, and supporting evidence that should have been there was non existent.

The second was after some idiot on here said he’d been offered bareback. After a drawn out discussion, and after viewing the screen shots of texts, even Mr Foo (hats off to him) was humble enough to reverse his opinion and agree the reviewer was talking shit. It actually turned out he’d been stalking the lass.

On this topic I’ll agree to disagree, after weighing up the evidence personally I think it is a typo by either her or the pimp if she has one.

In terms of raining, as with anything I’d check it out for myself. 

And as for the white knighting crap, I speak my mind and view things dispassionately. Sometimes that may appear to chastise a girl or defend her, I couldn’t really care less, I call things how I see them.

Conversation over 

[daviemac]

If you’re going to quote things get them right, I have only spoken up about two girls that have been accused of barebacking. Not exactly a history of defending people.


The first was a regular punt of mine and the review in question was that far out of character is was comical, and supporting evidence that should have been there was non existent.

The second was after some idiot on here said he’d been offered bareback. After a drawn out discussion, and after viewing the screen shots of texts, even Mr Foo (hats off to him) was humble enough to reverse his opinion and agree the reviewer was talking shit. It actually turned out he’d been stalking the lass.

On this topic I’ll agree to disagree, after weighing up the evidence personally I think it is a typo by either her or the pimp if she has one.

In terms of raining, as with anything I’d check it out for myself. 

And as for the white knighting crap, I speak my mind and view things dispassionately. Sometimes that may appear to chastise a girl or defend her, I couldn’t really care less, I call things how I see them.

Conversation over 

You are treading on very thin ice, you have a history of white knighting barebackers and dragging threads on when you can't accept you are in the wrong. This escort has BAREBACK advertised, yet you insist it's a 'typo', out of the 80 + options on AW she has only ticked 34 and one of those is bareback. This is you white knighting.

Now I'm telling you this stops here and now, you are wrong in what you say, accept it.  Try engaging your brain before speaking your mind, this is your last chance.

[sall71]

‘Treading on thin ice’, ‘last chance’ wtf? I spoke up about two girls and was right both times, all explained above.

‘Out of the 80 + options on AW she has only ticked 34 and one of those is bareback’, that was the point I was making and explained above that you haven’t picked up on, it doesn’t add up!

It’s quite comical that you are immediately accused of white knighting whenever you speak up or question something.

I’m done, bed is calling.

Happy new year 

[daviemac]

‘Treading on thin ice’, ‘last chance’ wtf? I spoke up about two girls and was right both times, all explained above.

‘Out of the 80 + options on AW she has only ticked 34 and one of those is bareback’, that was the point I was making and explained above that you haven’t picked up on, it doesn’t add up!

It’s quite comical that you are immediately accused of white knighting whenever you speak up or question something.

I’m done, bed is calling.

Happy new year 

Do you really want to be banned, you are white knighting barebackers. She has chosen to tick bareback that's what you can't accept, there's 50 or so she hasn't ticked. 

[sall71]

Do you really want to be banned, you are white knighting barebackers. She has chosen to tick bareback that's what you can't accept, there's 50 or so she hasn't ticked.

I have no desire to be banned, nor do I wish to be threatened with being banned.

Questioning something is not white knighting, applying logic and probability to something is not white knighting. Yes she has ticked the bareback box, I’ve not disputed that, what I have said is her like list doesn’t make any sense (explained above) and without any other info it is hard to call.

For what it is worth that is just my opinion, and like they say, opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one, that is what makes life interesting.

Joys of a well run forum, opinions vary, people can read all the info and form their own conclusions.

I’m knackered so I’m off to bed.

Good night, no hard feelings 

[daviemac]

I have no desire to be banned, nor do I wish to be threatened with being banned.

Questioning something is not white knighting, applying logic and probability to something is not white knighting. Yes she has ticked the bareback box, I’ve not disputed that, what I have said is her like list doesn’t make any sense (explained above) and without any other info it is hard to call.

For what it is worth that is just my opinion, and like they say, opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one, that is what makes life interesting.

Joys of a well run forum, opinions vary, people can read all the info and form their own conclusions.

I’m knackered so I’m off to bed.

Good night, no hard feelings 

I'll give you one last chance, god know why, you are making excuses for this escort to have bareback on her likes, that is white knighting. bareback is listed that is her choice, she chose not to tick the other 50 odd that she could have ticked. You continue to argue your point despite being told to stop, you have done the same on another thread, you just don't learn.   

Stop making excuses for the inexcusable, that is not an opinion. 

[sall71]

I'll give you one last chance, god know why, you are making excuses for this escort to have bareback on her likes, that is white knighting. bareback is listed that is her choice, she chose not to tick the other 50 odd that she could have ticked. You continue to argue your point despite being told to stop, you have done the same on another thread, you just don't learn.   

Stop making excuses for the inexcusable, that is not an opinion.

Another threat to ban me? If I report these threats to a moderator does it come to you?

In plain English, I am not defending the escort, but nor am I in the line waiting to chastise her yet. All I have said is I’m not sold on her offering bareback based on the haphazard way her likes list has been edited, and in my opinion it is more likely an error by her or whoever updated the account.

In terms of the ongoing accusation of white knighting, this time you have said ‘’you are making excuses for this escort to have bareback on her likes, that is white knighting’’
I haven’t made excuses, I have said it doesn’t add up. And the only rule I can find about barebacking is ‘’Rule 12 Bareback / Unprotected sex - Allowed, but other members have the right to express disapproval of such activities’’ so I'm not sure exactly what rule i'm supposed to have broken.

[Ali Katt]

Another threat to ban me? If I report these threats to a moderator does it come to you?

In plain English, I am not defending the escort, but nor am I in the line waiting to chastise her yet. All I have said is I’m not sold on her offering bareback based on the haphazard way her likes list has been edited, and in my opinion it is more likely an error by her or whoever updated the account.

In terms of the ongoing accusation of white knighting, this time you have said ‘’you are making excuses for this escort to have bareback on her likes, that is white knighting’’
I haven’t made excuses, I have said it doesn’t add up. And the only rule I can find about barebacking is ‘’Rule 12 Bareback / Unprotected sex - Allowed, but other members have the right to express disapproval of such activities’’ so I'm not sure exactly what rule i'm supposed to have broken.

Rule 1. Favouritism, pandering to the escort in other words white knighting.

She advertises bareback, as we know any service can be denied for any reason. Sure maybe her pimp advertised it to get more "bums on seats", but likewise she could be a barebacking skank. Whether an error or not, she advertises it.

[Stifler]

Flippin heck,

Here we goes again.

Before the match resumes,  fishy pass the popcorn please pal. Oh and while your at it a cold drink would be nice.

A question about white knighting. What does one gain from it? Apart from an ear full from the rest of ukp.

Does the working girl provide free sessions? Extra time for free? How does this work sall71?

[sall71]

I’ll make this my last comment on this thread, I’m sure everyone has better things to do.

Ali Katt... Thank you, that is all I was trying to get across, the advert likes and previous history of her don’t marry up. The girl has been around for years, lots of reviews on here, but all of a sudden she starts offering b/b? Might be the pimp, might be a typo, might be she has actually changed her services. All I have said is I personally would wait for a bit more feedback before I vilified someone as the like list doesn’t add up.

Stifler... Questioning things doesn't make you a white knight, I know you like to follow the crowd but maybe one day you will develop you own opinions.

Life is too short, plenty of girls out there to entertain us 

[Avg_Joe]

Flippin heck,

Here we goes again.

Before the match resumes,  fishy pass the popcorn please pal. Oh and while your at it a cold drink would be nice.

easy......

Hidden Image/Members Only

A question about white knighting. What does one gain from it? Apart from an ear full from the rest of ukp.

Does the working girl provide free sessions? Extra time for free? How does this work sall71?

not so easy.......

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Hed Master]

I'm sorry, but did IQ's suddenly drop while I been away?
Since when did asking a fucking question or querying an anomaly become white knighting?

There is no proof that this girl is offering Bareback other than a fucking tick on a fucking form.  What the fuck.....is this a cause for banning or threatening to ban a member of the forum?
Who knows who ticked the fucking box which also says unprotected sex unticked.  Which is it?  Is she saying "i'll do bareback but I won't do unprotected sex"?  Thank fuck none of you guys are lawyers...you'd fucking starve.

And aren't moderators supposed to be....well..moderate?  Am I gonna be banned now for asking questions?
If this girl came to my area I would go see her (fully bagged up of course, I'm not a BB'er)....AND I'd review her too... You will be hard pressed to find a SP that does not BB somebody..What is this credibilty/moral high ground crap ...WE ALL BUY PUSSY ON A FUCKING WEB SITE.
I was brought up...if the line is wrong......don't tow the fucking line....ask questions...It's free....don't fear no man...he has a heart that stops......just as we all..

We are not all sheep-like and follow blindly.....fucking Baaaaaaaa!

Hey Alli Katt I hope you are not seduced by the dark side...and stay fair  for fucks sake...
"Help us Obi Katt Kenobi.....you're our only hope"

Once again....ASKING A QUESTION IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING....QUERING SOMETHING IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING.
Please show me the rule and I will gladly shut the fuck up and apologise.

As for others...you know who you are.....I can't even be asked typing for you sheep....a black and white border Collie will be around shortly to herd you back into the pen...until you get a mind and a backbone of your own.

Once again...it's a tick in a box....from people who are still struggling with English.. is NOT proof either way that an SP is a BB'er, therefore questions can be asked..
Debate is always good....but it seems a lot of guys are treating a tick on a "likes list" as Gospel, Quranic or Torah worthy.  We all know about SPs and their "likes lists" don't we when you're in the room?  Scotch fucking mist..