I'm sorry, but did IQ's suddenly drop while I been away?
Since when did asking a fucking question or querying an anomaly become white knighting?
There is no proof that this girl is offering Bareback other than a fucking tick on a fucking form. What the fuck.....is this a cause for banning or threatening to ban a member of the forum?
Who knows who ticked the fucking box which also says unprotected sex unticked. Which is it? Is she saying "i'll do bareback but I won't do unprotected sex"? Thank fuck none of you guys are lawyers...you'd fucking starve.
And aren't moderators supposed to be....well..moderate? Am I gonna be banned now for asking questions?
If this girl came to my area I would go see her (fully bagged up of course, I'm not a BB'er)....AND I'd review her too... You will be hard pressed to find a SP that does not BB somebody..What is this credibilty/moral high ground crap ...WE ALL BUY PUSSY ON A FUCKING WEB SITE.
I was brought up...if the line is wrong......don't tow the fucking line....ask questions...It's free....don't fear no man...he has a heart that stops......just as we all..
We are not all sheep-like and follow blindly.....fucking Baaaaaaaa!
Hey Alli Katt I hope you are not seduced by the dark side...and stay fair for fucks sake...
"Help us Obi Katt Kenobi.....you're our only hope"
Once again....ASKING A QUESTION IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING....QUERING SOMETHING IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING.
Please show me the rule and I will gladly shut the fuck up and apologise.
As for others...you know who you are.....I can't even be asked typing for you sheep....a black and white border Collie will be around shortly to herd you back into the pen...until you get a mind and a backbone of your own.
Once again...it's a tick in a box....from people who are still struggling with English.. is NOT proof either way that an SP is a BB'er, therefore questions can be asked..
Debate is always good....but it seems a lot of guys are treating a tick on a "likes list" as Gospel, Quranic or Torah worthy. We all know about SPs and their "likes lists" don't we when you're in the room? Scotch fucking mist..
I have no wish to get into a debate with you about something you know nothing about, the main issue with sall71 is he doesn't know when to stop and this is the second thread he has done it on.
The fact is he is making excuses for this escort, just as he did with her mate the last time. he is asking for'proof' and can't accept the fact that anyone seeking bareback services would be unlikely to post on here. She has bareback listed and even the OP won't go back now.
sall71 made his point very early in the thread instead of leaving it at that he has continued to defend this escort, even another mod, Ali Katt has come on to answer his "what rule have I broken" question, Ali Katt's reply. -
Rule 1. Favouritism, pandering to the escort in other words white knighting.
She advertises bareback, as we know any service can be denied for any reason. Sure maybe her pimp advertised it to get more "bums on seats", but likewise she could be a barebacking skank. Whether an error or not, she advertises it.
Head1 had to step in and tell him to stop on the last thread because he just goes on and on, this thread was heading the same way, so I told him to leave it at 11pm last night, did he? no, I told him again to stop at 11.54, again he took no notice. The reason he was threatened with a ban was because he was told, by a moderator, to stop arguing and to leave it, not because he had asked any questions or put his point of view over.
We are all entitled to ask questions and query anomalies, though we all know AW likes lists are full of them. But when you are repeating the same thing over and over again do you not think it wise to stop when asked.