ParisB on Mumsnet helping wives catch their husbands

[Tony Montana]

I agree with the banning of ParisB, but the only information she gave was how Adultwork works. This is information that a mumsnetter can get by reading this site or other internet research. I don’t see any outing of punters.
This xTightYoungTeen is clearly an idiot. And should have been banned. But not threatened.
We need to keep this in perspective.

Good Evening

+1  This is becoming a witchhunt now.  Who has Paris outed?  No one to our knowledge, so despite her stupid actions on mumsnet she should not be accused of this.

[cornbeefinspector]

+1  This is becoming a witchhunt now.  Who has Paris outed?  No one to our knowledge, so despite her stupid actions on mumsnet she should not be accused of this.

last I heard, we are still trying people for attempted murder

[GeeWiz]

Madness.  What a day to find this site.

I'm single but still find it offensive.  I hope for her sake that she has had good financial planning as it seems she may have to retire earlier than she planned.

Random question - has a WG ever stated on their AW profile that they will not see married men (just as some say they will not see certain ages/races)?

[vorian]

+1  This is becoming a witchhunt now.  Who has Paris outed?  No one to our knowledge, so despite her stupid actions on mumsnet she should not be accused of this.

Lex I do see what you are saying but the point is her intentions are the issue not the results of her actions. She broken the number one rule, then lied and we don't know if she outed punters or not that will be impossible to prove unless someone posts which they probably won't.

What have been proven is she offered to use her skills and knowledge gained by working as a WG and the knowledge she gained on this site to wives who were trying to find out punting information on there husbands/partners. To me that is completely unacceptable and hence my venom.

[Whitebeer]

If people are stupid enough to leave personal details then perhaps they will learn the hard way. I'm sure, given the circumstances, anyone would offer advice to crack certain codes.
Given the situation, a lot of WGs are also coming out on the top of the moral standing. Prossies are prossies. I for one couldn't trust them with a bar of soap.

[Riot Doll]

Random question - has a WG ever stated on their AW profile that they will not see married men (just as some say they will not see certain ages/races)?

Don't be silly!   

[vorian]

If people are stupid enough to leave personal details then perhaps they will learn the hard way. I'm sure, given the circumstances, anyone would offer advice to crack certain codes.
Given the situation, a lot of WGs are also coming out on the top of the moral standing. Pros dies are prossies. I for one couldn't trust them with a bar of soap.

Oh so it is the stupid punters fault then, hmm that sounds like the sort of crap you see on SAAFE and %%%. Of course no one is saying give trust and you should protect yourself but this is a site for punters and it is not just experienced punters who know everything.

How are prossies coming out on the top of the morale standing then, the ones who have been praised are merely doing what they should all be doing including the ones on SAAFE and %%%, who will be saying things like "If people are stupid enough to leave personal details then perhaps they will learn the hard way"

[Nickp]

Lex I do see what you are saying but the point is her intentions are the issue not the results of her actions. She broken the number one rule, then lied and we don't know if she outed punters or not that will be impossible to prove unless someone posts which they probably won't.

What have been proven is she offered to use her skills and knowledge gained by working as a WG and the knowledge she gained on this site to wives who were trying to find out punting information on there husbands/partners. To me that is completely unacceptable and hence my venom.

Agree 100%

[msmith85]

if you're not interested in punting, how did you find this site? or are you a student doing social sciences ,and you have a project on sex workers?

 for someone not interested you seem to know a lot !!!!

Was just on her Twitter (which, by the way, is months and months of her getting into endless, pointless arguments with both sexes) and Google'd her username, and subsequently one of the first results was this site.

[AnthG]

+1  This is becoming a witchhunt now.  Who has Paris outed?  No one to our knowledge, so despite her stupid actions on mumsnet she should not be accused of this.

The problem is she shouldn't have deleted all her posts on Mumsnet.

She posted this first of all here

I have not used that account on mumsnet for over a year at least my last post was I think march 2013 and I had all my post deleted back then due to other reasons

I have no problems with this thread staying up on here as its a valuable post

She has deleted all the posts on mumsnet within the last fortnight, possibly even last week, not back in early 2013 as she claims there above.

And because she has actually deleted all her posts on Mumsnet it has actually went against her as people just coming to this, or people who have not been really following this, don't actually know what exactly she did. And as a response people will naturally think the worst and start panicking.

The damage was done, she should have left the posts up. As now everyone who has previously seen her is justifiably panicking over what she has and has not done due to the lack of information. The other problem with her is she also happens to have been Ms Touring escort so she has probably seen more people all around the country than most others combined so therefore most punters may be missing the topics/warnings in the Bristol section as they seen her in totally other cities.

[Hogan]

Who knows how far she went in trying to help wives find out if their husbands were punters.
She may be even sent them her personal list of punter phone numbers and email addresses.

[GeeWiz]

Don't be silly!   

Thanks.  So an SP cannot then take the moral high ground.

[vorian]

Thanks.  So an SP cannot then take the moral high ground.

They can try but they will fail.

[Riot Doll]

Thanks.  So an SP cannot then take the moral high ground.

It would be something akin to a drug dealer who has a problem with the fact some people enjoy taking drugs...

[CatBBW]

it was'nt me,  any ideas who it was

Why would you think people would have suspected you in Dani's blogpost removal?

[CatBBW]

It was already on the home page though
The standard generic, your blog has been reported as having content outside our rules and regulations and it might be one of the below reasons none of which it was. new one now up though a hypothetical one saying people should search google for a certain search term to protect against being outed

If it was already on the home page then it was reported.

Good for you to post it again Dani

[smiths]

If people are stupid enough to leave personal details then perhaps they will learn the hard way. I'm sure, given the circumstances, anyone would offer advice to crack certain codes.
Given the situation, a lot of WGs are also coming out on the top of the moral standing. Prossies are prossies. I for one couldn't trust them with a bar of soap.

Some punters sadly are naive and too trusting. Up to us on here to give advice to such punters and they either take it or not, but at least they were given it if they read the forum.

[sarahjayneleeds]

If it was already on the home page then it was reported.

Good for you to post it again Dani

Well according to AW's help article on Blogs, to appear on the home page it has to of been checked by their team this copied from the "Why has my blog been removed" help article on AW 


Blogging is not about getting exposure on the home page. If you desire this, you should subscribe to one of the Member of the Week or Featured schemes.

The Latest Tab only shows the most recent 10 posts (in full).

The blog ticker on the home page only shows blogs that the Team have checked contain nothing libellous or that contravene the Terms of Use in some other way. Depending on when posts are checked and the frequency at which they are being made, will determine whether your blog appears on the home page. The most recent, checked 20 are shown.

[Rochdull lad]

Some punters sadly are naive and too trusting. Up to us on here to give advice to such punters and they either take it or not, but at least they were given it if they read the forum.

It's taught me a lesson about my naivety.

Although I don't think I've anybody to be "outed" to, I always email a WG I'm seeing for the 1st time before I see her so she knows about my disability.  Never again!

[vorian]

Well according to AW's help article on Blogs, to appear on the home page it has to of been checked by their team this copied from the "Why has my blog been removed" help article on AW 


Blogging is not about getting exposure on the home page. If you desire this, you should subscribe to one of the Member of the Week or Featured schemes.

The Latest Tab only shows the most recent 10 posts (in full).

The blog ticker on the home page only shows blogs that the Team have checked contain nothing libellous or that contravene the Terms of Use in some other way. Depending on when posts are checked and the frequency at which they are being made, will determine whether your blog appears on the home page. The most recent, checked 20 are shown.

Thing is Dani's blog was deleted totally twice, but it contained no links and gave no names, so I am assuming that someone complained to AW about it. Funny how they do very little or at least action very slowly my complaints about fake profiles or PG scams but then managed to remove the blog within a few minutes. Also strange how Dee's blog is still up and that is more detailed than Dani's one.

The only thing I can see is she used the phrase UK Punting, AW might have it tagged to flag up. It seems even the mighty AW is worried about UKP.

[mattylondon]

Evening Gents,

As late to the feast as always but i'm sure there are still some bones left of what was Paris..

I felt compelled to return and give my 2 cents on this as I have always been a big Paris fan. Her contributions to the forum have been fantastic but of course that's all changed now with this outing which has quite frankly surprised me more than I care to admit.

The biggest lesson to learn from this is also the most simplest one and it's something a couple of experienced heads on here have been saying for years...'Never trust a prossie'. Perhaps now more than ever that message should really sink in.

And yes this includes the Strawberry's, Dani's of this forum... If Paris of all people could turncoat then so could they, perhaps they are already playing the same dangerous 'double-agent' game she was but just haven't slipped up yet.

Anyway that's it, no bad words needed. Stay frosty, stay neanderthal.

Welcome back sucky. Wise words written, as ever. 

[CatBBW]

Well according to AW's help article on Blogs, to appear on the home page it has to of been checked by their team this copied from the "Why has my blog been removed" help article on AW 


Blogging is not about getting exposure on the home page. If you desire this, you should subscribe to one of the Member of the Week or Featured schemes.

The Latest Tab only shows the most recent 10 posts (in full).

The blog ticker on the home page only shows blogs that the Team have checked contain nothing libellous or that contravene the Terms of Use in some other way. Depending on when posts are checked and the frequency at which they are being made, will determine whether your blog appears on the home page. The most recent, checked 20 are shown.

Yes, exactly. So her blog post was APPROVED by the mods and contained "nothing libellous or that contravene the Terms of Use in some other way." So it MUST have been reported by a member.

[mattylondon]

+1  This is becoming a witchhunt now.  Who has Paris outed?  No one to our knowledge, so despite her stupid actions on mumsnet she should not be accused of this.

I can see what you're trying to say too Lex but I think you've missed a crucial point.

The reason why so many people are angry is because her intentions were malicious. In helping these women to gather information, she increased the chances of these men being found out by their wives. This would most likely have terminal implications for their marriage and even effect their employment, if the scorned wife was angry enough. There are the potential financial implications of a divorce and if the man had children, it's most likely his access to them would be restricted. His children would also then grow up without a father in the house. And for what?

The other point I want to make is that she is an active service provider, currently receiving money from punters for her services. She's no babe in the wood or a former prostitute who has undergone a sudden conversion on the way to Damascus and seen the 'error of her ways'. She was also a member of UKP and many people, including myself rated her, at least for her work ethic.

She now takes her place with the other low life cunts, in the hall of shame. Let this be a lesson to all those punters who spill their guts to women who they do not know and potentially risk all. If I'm considered a Neanderthal, then so be it. It keeps me sharp and risk free.

[Cornish sub]

Fuck me, what an epic read this thread's been. If ever there was a story Cameron could use to 'bury bad news', this is it. 

[CurvyKinkyVixen]

Bring it on, I'm sure James and Jimmy can handle them 

Lol , ill be getting my popcorn n feet up for that !!    ( 10,000 angry feminazis descending onto UKP )

Got in from "normal job" 3.30am  , and really  i should be asleep by now ...But I simply HAD  to have a full read of the 30+ pages of this thread.

Really in shock still . The evidence doesnt look good. ( is putting it politely)  I recall Paris used to call MN'er's the "boden crew" ( or some similar put -down  ) over on SAAFE. I always got the feeling she disliked MN as I do. But she has posted a hell of a lot on there......  Odd.
"IF" ( big if) , it was the druggy SW sis , why would this sis not have her own AW..WHy is druggy stil working streets when she has excellent knowledge of how AW works - Nah.

 Plus a bad druggy is concerned with the next fix , and posting on the net is prob low on the lsit of prioritys . It doesnt add up.

So Bloody Shocked !! I wouldnt have thought she was like that. As others have said , she was very well liked and respected by both punters and fellow prossies. Its a funny old world isnt it.

Outing guys n sucking up to MumsNetters = Urghh , no thanks. Not good

Just goes to show we must all be very careful.

[CurvyKinkyVixen]

The pathetic dried up cunts have as much chance of closing UKP down as does Harriet fucking Harman of stopping paid sex. 

MN have deleted it already.

Harriet Harman  , disgusting old bag . The same who backed "pie" , pedo info  exchange . ( it ws in news other day )

[skidrow]

Finally been mentioned on saafe
External Link/Members Only

"That's not despicable I mean, it's not like you outed him to his wife, or anything ;D"

wonder how long it takes for the thread to be deleted.

[Tony Montana]

I can see what you're trying to say too Lex but I think you've missed a crucial point.

The reason why so many people are angry is because her intentions were malicious. In helping these women to gather information, she increased the chances of these men being found out by their wives. This would most likely have terminal implications for their marriage and even effect their employment, if the scorned wife was angry enough. There are the potential financial implications of a divorce and if the man had children, it's most likely his access to them would be restricted. His children would also then grow up without a father in the house. And for what?

The other point I want to make is that she is an active service provider, currently receiving money from punters for her services. She's no babe in the wood or a former prostitute who has undergone a sudden conversion on the way to Damascus and seen the 'error of her ways'. She was also a member of UKP and many people, including myself rated her, at least for her work ethic.

She now takes her place with the other low life cunts, in the hall of shame. Let this be a lesson to all those punters who spill their guts to women who they do not know and potentially risk all. If I'm considered a Neanderthal, then so be it. It keeps me sharp and risk free.

Yes I agree with most of that Matty and those  points were made by the original "detective" that found the evidence.  Punters have every right to be angry.  But I don't think it was done with malicious intent.  Like you say, we all rated her for her helpful and informative posts on here, auto-censored, %%%, saafe etc and I think she just got carried away being helpful to the community she was posting on, even if it did shit on her own business.  Some distraught mum asked about a topic she knew all about and she was compelled to help by a need to be liked or accepted.  She did a "Ratner".  Who knows?  Maybe she has a split personality and considers Charlea and Paris to be different people.  Perhaps this "sister" of hers is really her once she has had a fix.

I'm not excusing what she did, but the fact is, she has not directly outed anyone, so people should only blog/post what they know to be the truth.

Anyway, anyone find it ironic that mumsnet have a Charlies Angels logo, but the real detectives are on UKP 

[JB1969]

I think the point that everyone is trying to make is that we go to prossies for their "supposed" discretion and the fact that we can have senseless sex for the princely sum of £120 or whatever without it coming back to bite us on the arse.

For prossies like Paris to go on a site filled with bored housewives with nothing better to do than to complain about their lives and to help them on getting the info they need to rinse the ex husband during a divorce is what every one is trying to make.

The only repurcusion that Paris will suffer in all of this might be the down turn in her business, unfortunately although most assume we are nothing but a bunch of heartless horny cunts, I doubt any of us would physically threaten or harm a woman.  It is just not worth our time and definately not worth the police interest.

As it has been proven and shown is that Paris is not the only prossie out there who is willing to do this, we have situations where prossies will lure unsuspecting horny men to their apartments and have them robbed etc.  Unlike them we are unable to run to the police or report them to a scheme such as Ugly Mugs, the only place we have are forums and UKP is and has become the only place to do so.  Good or bad

[SirPhilipXX]

I am closely monitoring ParisB's AW profile for any changes just the AW FR hidden for now and also her SAAFE account nothing so far. Of course nothing on PN or SAAFE about this. The Mumsnet post from last night has been deleted but still viewable on this thread.

I am sure ParisB is hoping that keeping her head down and her mouth shut will result is people getting bored and forgetting this.

No chance. ParisB has blogged today but if you are expecting any expression of remorse from her you will be disappointed.

Says she's lost 10 lbs due the stress and is chuffed to bits about that! "I'm ecstatic"

Also: "I'm thinking of marketing the whole episode if I can think of a good name for it"

Anyone like to help her and suggest a title?

[SirFrank]

No chance. ParisB has blogged today but if you are expecting any expression of remorse from her you will be disappointed.

Says she's lost 10 lbs due the stress and is chuffed to bits about that! "I'm ecstatic"

Also: "I'm thinking of marketing the whole episode if I can think of a good name for it"

Anyone like to help her and suggest a title?

All by myself? I hope that's the end point for her.

As above she hasn't killed anyone and it appears that she hasn't personally outed one of her clients as such. However, as in excellent post by JB, she has essentially provided the enemy with inside information. However you dress this up in punting terms she has comitted what I regard as sacrilege - in this game discretion and reputation is everything. Without it the girl has nothing. She was on my hot list but she's not anymore and I will never book her and would actively seek to inform other punters what she has done.

The fact that she is making light of it all is for me another nail in her coffin. Whether that's just putting on a front or not, who knows. She might do well to just lie low and STFU for a while. However what I will say is that  you cannot lose 10lb in 1-2 days unless you've had a leg cut off!

I'm not in favour of outing her or TYT - that would make us as bad as them - but I do believe that all punters should be aware of them - if they want to see them they can at least then make an informed decision

[vorian]

I see from her AW blog ParisB does not have the courage to mention or try to address any of the issues that have been raise.  She is just trying to gain sympathy over the stress she is putting up with, what about the stress of the punters whose wives she offered to help out.

AW blogs are not interactive so no one can ask questions of her on it.  A pathetic attempt at humour on her behalf as I said she will try to keep her head down and ignore this problem hoping it will go away.as she cannot post on here anymore why doesn't she post on SAAFE or on her blog say sorry , explain herself and then move on.

Why not,  because she does not want anyone reading the evidence on UKP which will damn her, hence the reason she complained about Dani's AW blog and had it removed which did mention UKP.  She is obviously a clever woman and no doubt we will see more blog entries from her about how beastly people have been to her and how she is being made ill over the stress.

[vorian]

Finally been mentioned on saafe
External Link/Members Only

"That's not despicable I mean, it's not like you outed him to his wife, or anything ;D"

wonder how long it takes for the thread to be deleted.

So it seems some SAAFE prossies are aware of what's going on but are to scarred to openly mention it rather sad really that they feel they have to write in code,  do they not realise that people like ParisB not only affect the punter but also the whole business it is in their own personal interest to out people like ParisB but they would rather close ranks and protect her,  well done ladies, well done indeed.

[James999]

The more you read ParisB's version of events the more bullshit you smell, the  post below allegedly by her "druggie" sister on her account also apart from using ect instead of etc as Parisb does it also uses a very odd form of punctuation

"-" just as ParisB uses in her posts

Thank you Dani - You

I had it done 3 years ago in December -  I wen

Daffodil- I have

And also the line "I would bet you all the money "and I'm not skint by anymeans)" hardly a boast that a Junkie would use, but exactly the line Parisb would use.



Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

[Tony Montana]

No chance. ParisB has blogged today but if you are expecting any expression of remorse from her you will be disappointed.

Says she's lost 10 lbs due the stress and is chuffed to bits about that! "I'm ecstatic"

Not only lost weight but lost years too.  She is now 27.  Quite a feat for someone with 14 years of PN reports.

[vorian]

The more you read ParisB's version of events the more bullshit you smell, the  post below allegedly by her "druggie" sister on her account also apart from using ect instead of etc as Parisb does it also uses a very odd form of punctuation

"-" just as ParisB uses in her posts

And also the line "I would bet you all the money "and I'm not skint by anymeans)" hardly a boast that a Junkie would use, but exactly the line Parisb would use.



Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

I must say James you have done a fantastic job on this, Thank you for the effort you have put in, it was your evidence regarding her writing style that convinced even the most fluffy punter and now I see on top of her lies she is reducing her age on AW,  just keeps getting better and better.

[vorian]

Not only lost weight but lost years too.  She is now 27.  Quite a feat for someone with 14 years of PN reports.

She must be getting desperate to knock years off her profile age,  business slowing down is it Paris.

[cherry-delight]

Well i hope things are slow,what she has done is despicable,sprouting all that Mother Teresa crap on SAAFE.What comes around goes around.

[Tony Montana]

I see the subject has now been discreetly raised on %%% under the subject "Discretion?"

[cornbeefinspector]

she is a very naughty girl, shame on her

[Tony Montana]

I see the subject has now been discreetly raised on %%% under the subject "Discretion?"

...and the thread has been deleted - boy that was quick!

I never had a problem with PN before but to see they are condoning ParisB's behaviour by covering up any mention of it is disgraceful.

[vorian]

I see from her AW blog ParisB does not have the courage to mention or try to address any of the issues that have been raise.  She is just trying to gain sympathy over the stress she is putting up with, what about the stress of the punters whose wives she offered to help out.

AW blogs are not interactive so no one can ask questions of her on it.  A pathetic attempt at humour on her behalf as I said she will try to keep her head down and ignore this problem hoping it will go away.as she cannot post on here anymore why doesn't she post on SAAFE or on her blog say sorry , explain herself and then move on.

Why not,  because she does not want anyone reading the evidence on UKP which will damn her, hence the reason she complained about Dani's AW blog and had it removed which did mention UKP.  She is obviously a clever woman and no doubt we will see more blog entries from her about how beastly people have been to her and how she is being made ill over the stress.

My apologies I miss the second blog down before posting, so she is trying to make out and focus attention on threats of violence and outing her to her family etc. I assume this is to try and distract attention and gain sympathy.

I cannot recall a single threat of violence against her on this thread, a couple of suggestions to out her, for the record and I have already posted this I do not believe that anyone should out anyone else, that is wrong pure and simple imho.

So she is keeping copies of posts for possible future action well good luck with that one Paris, I am sure Adam will be quaking in his boots. Also James has posted even further evidence of her guilt this morning regarding posts she made. I have no doubt in my mind that ParisB posted on Munsnet and the story of a sister is a lie pure and simple. So now she is trying to create fear amongst posters by threatening "Further action" please keep posting on your blog Paris, I dare you to mention UKP and this link on your blog if you are so confident of the truth of your story and your innocence.

[vorian]

...and the thread has been deleted - boy that was quick!

I never had a problem with PN before but to see they are condoning ParisB's behaviour by covering up any mention of it is disgraceful.

Can you recall roughly what it said Lex, I expect nothing else from PN, they must be reading this thread, so know the overwhelming evidence ( James), so they are deleting threads not based on truth or accuracy but because the thread does not toe the party line, yes UKP is rough and ready and sometime may be OTT, people do get banned but not comments and threads are never deleted to my knowledge.

[cornbeefinspector]

I think there is a good chance that tyt is her sister, and from what we can see about tyt she knows her way around the internet, so why if it was her that made the posts did she not open her own MN account to make the posts,that way  it would be much easier to help the poor women on mn, and not have to use her sisters (paris) account

imho if paria had come here and put her hands up and said sorry, she wouls be in a much better place, we all make mistakes

[mattylondon]

I'm not excusing what she did, but the fact is, she has not directly outed anyone, so people should only blog/post what they know to be the truth.

Anyway, anyone find it ironic that mumsnet have a Charlies Angels logo, but the real detectives are on UKP 

I've always respected your opinions, but let's not split hairs. Paris B has indirectly assisted women in helping them to gather evidence against their husbands. That is enough for me.

Let's cut out the crap. Let's look at the evidence. 

Paris B has admitted to being a member of MN on both SAAFE and UKP. She has admitted that she was the poster Charlearose on MN. She also posted on SAAFE that she had not one, but multiple accounts on MN. One account was used for regular posting (Charlearose), the other accounts were used to deliberately troll the forum. The poster Charlearose openly offered her assistance in helping to catch out husbands. This poster had also admitted to helping out others wives in the past.

These are all indisputable FACTS.

External Link/Members Only

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=359004;topic=24595.75;last_msg=360579

Paris B has been openly hostile towards not only MN as a forum, but also the women who post on there. This is a widespread view amongst many prossies too. So why would somebody so hostile towards that place have a regular account for normal posting? I find this very odd.

External Link/Members Only

Her 'explanation' is that her sister somehow got hold of her login credentials. How? I find it strange that this sister, who is supposedly a junkie, couldn't get hold of her AW credentials too? If Paris B is such a know it all about AW and has her own website too, why is her sister turning tricks on the streets and not the main beneficiary of her advice? Surely her sister would have her own AW account and website. Why would she need to exclusively work the streets?

I think that Paris B has a split personality. I think the post below post betrays her real thoughts about men. She posts hostility towards MN, but also makes some anti male comments. My interpretation is that she is essentially saying that some men will 'fuck you over' anyway. Therefore, she'd rather get 'something out of it or at least avoid being fucked over by them mentally and remain single. Therefore, I think she has a motive there to try and help fuck these men over. I've corrected some of the grammar but will link the original posts below.

I've met plenty of women that are like the OP on the Mumsnet thread. Emotionally fucked up, can't function in relationships and so on. They need counselling because of men or people in their lives and they aren't prostitutes. Often they're professional women, with well paid jobs and careers. You don't need to be a hooker to be fucked by men or fucked by anyone. It's just that we get paid for it personally. I'd rather be fucked by a man physically with or without the cash, than be fucked by a man emotionally and mentally.

External Link/Members Only

She was caught red handed. It would've been better for her to admit it. She tried fighting a rear guard action and initially played for time, by sending PMs to Adam and Daff. She expected her 'exclusive' PMs, citing 'personal reasons', to do the trick. But she underestimated both Adam, Daff and the members here. I believe she thought Adam and Daff being 'in the know', who be enough. When this didn't work, she had to openly post what she'd told them privately. When nobody in their right mind believed any of this bullshit, including Adam, she was banned. 

[vorian]

I suppose it is a good sign that someone is trying to raise the subject on %%% and making an attempt (Be is very weak) on SAAFE.

 

[SirFrank]

My apologies I miss the second blog down before posting, so she is trying to make out and focus attention on threats of violence and outing her to her family etc. I assume this is to try and distract attention and gain sympathy.

I cannot recall a single threat of violence against her on this thread, a couple of suggestions to out her, for the record and I have already posted this I do not believe that anyone should out anyone else, that is wrong pure and simple imho.

So she is keeping copies of posts for possible future action well good luck with that one Paris, I am sure Adam will be quaking in his boots. Also James has posted even further evidence of her guilt this morning regarding posts she made. I have no doubt in my mind that ParisB posted on Munsnet and the story of a sister is a lie pure and simple. So now she is trying to create fear amongst posters by threatening "Further action" please keep posting on your blog Paris, I dare you to mention UKP and this link on your blog if you are so confident of the truth of your story and your innocence.

By and large any punter or WG needs to think very carefully about taking any formal action if they value their privacy. Such claims are also like threatening to send children to bed if they don't behave. If they don't behave you have to send them to bed or they quickly realise your threats are meaningless. I'd be very interested to know how this has affected work on her current UK tour

[vorian]

By and large any punter or WG needs to think very carefully about taking any formal action if they value their privacy. Such claims are also like threatening to send children to bed if they don't behave. If they don't behave you have to send them to bed or they quickly realise your threats are meaningless. I'd be very interested to know how this has affected work on her current UK tour

As would I SirFrank, but no way to ever know, I do think the fact she has changed her profile age is a good indicator, I am guessing this is an attempt to broaden her appeal to searchers. Thus one can assume she has only done this in response to a reduced number of regular bookings.

[mattylondon]

She must be getting desperate to knock years off her profile age,  business slowing down is it Paris.

How can she be 27 if she has a child of 20?! Fuck me, they start young in Bristol! 

She is resorting to the old tactic of saying that she's been threatened, in order to gain sympathy. It is purely deflection and a tactic often employed on %%% by prossies. When prossies didn't like a post on %%%, they'd also turn on the water works and run to the moderators, threatening to quit the forum because they felt 'threatened', ffs? It was used against me several times.

I have to be honest and say that if she was outed by somebody, whilst I don't condone it, I'd have no sympathy towards her and it would serve her right. As well she should be worried. She should've thought about that before being a vindictive bitch by helping wives to out their husbands.

Fuck her. I don't care if she is outed. She's made her bed now she has to lie in it. 

[cornbeefinspector]

How can she be 27 if she has a child of 20?! Fuck me, they start young in Bristol! 

She is resorting to the old tactic of saying that she's been threatened, in order to gain sympathy. It is purely deflection and a tactic often employed on %%% by prossies. When prossies didn't like a post on %%%, they'd also turn on the water works and run to the moderators, threatening to quit the forum because they felt 'threatened', ffs? It was used against me several times.

I have to be honest and say that if she was outed by somebody, whilst I don't condone it, I'd have no sympathy towards her and it would serve her right. As well she should be worried. She should've thought about that before being a vindictive bitch by helping wives to out their husbands.

Fuck her. I don't care if she is outed. She's made her bed now she has to lie in it. 

thats interesting her having a daughter of 20 and tyt is about that age, so maybe tyt is her daughter, and she is the druggie sister

also she admits to have multiable logins on MN so i suspect she also has here as well, so someone needs to look at bristolp to see if thats also her as its the reverse of her name parisb , I'm sure she  would think her self very smart using  her own name in reverse  to troll this board !!!!!