I'm not excusing what she did, but the fact is, she has not directly outed anyone, so people should only blog/post what they know to be the truth.
Anyway, anyone find it ironic that mumsnet have a Charlies Angels logo, but the real detectives are on UKP
I've always respected your opinions, but let's not split hairs. Paris B has indirectly assisted women in helping them to gather evidence against their husbands. That is enough for me.
Let's cut out the crap. Let's look at the evidence.
Paris B has admitted to being a member of MN on both SAAFE and UKP. She has admitted that she was the poster Charlearose on MN. She also posted on SAAFE that she had not one, but multiple accounts on MN
. One account was used for regular posting (Charlearose), the other accounts were used to deliberately troll the forum
. The poster Charlearose openly offered her assistance in helping to catch out husbands. This poster had also admitted to helping out others wives in the past. These are all indisputable FACTS. http://www.saafe.info/main/index.php?topic=10344.msg82427#msg82427https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=359004;topic=24595.75;last_msg=360579
Paris B has been openly hostile towards not only MN as a forum, but also the women who post on there. This is a widespread view amongst many prossies too. So why would somebody so hostile towards that place have a regular account for normal posting? I find this very odd. http://www.saafe.info/main/index.php?topic=10344.msg82427#msg82427
Her 'explanation' is that her sister somehow got hold of her login credentials. How? I find it strange that this sister, who is supposedly a junkie, couldn't get hold of her AW credentials too? If Paris B is such a know it all about AW and has her own website too, why is her sister turning tricks on the streets and not the main beneficiary of her advice? Surely her sister would have her own AW account and website. Why would she need to exclusively work the streets?
I think that Paris B has a split personality. I think the post below post betrays her real thoughts about men. She posts hostility towards MN, but also makes some anti male comments. My interpretation is that she is essentially saying that some men will 'fuck you over' anyway. Therefore, she'd rather get 'something out of it or at least avoid being fucked over by them mentally and remain single. Therefore, I think she has a motive there to try and help fuck these men over. I've corrected some of the grammar but will link the original posts below.I've met plenty of women that are like the OP on the Mumsnet thread. Emotionally fucked up, can't function in relationships and so on. They need counselling because of men or people in their lives and they aren't prostitutes. Often they're professional women, with well paid jobs and careers. You don't need to be a hooker to be fucked by men or fucked by anyone. It's just that we get paid for it personally. I'd rather be fucked by a man physically with or without the cash, than be fucked by a man emotionally and mentally. http://www.saafe.info/main/index.php?topic=6794.msg65816#msg65816
She was caught red handed. It would've been better for her to admit it. She tried fighting a rear guard action and initially played for time, by sending PMs to Adam and Daff. She expected her 'exclusive' PMs, citing 'personal reasons', to do the trick. But she underestimated both Adam, Daff and the members here. I believe she thought Adam and Daff being 'in the know', who be enough. When this didn't work, she had to openly post what she'd told them privately. When nobody in their right mind believed any of this bullshit, including Adam, she was banned.