Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: ParisB on Mumsnet helping wives catch their husbands  (Read 163071 times)

Offline Taggart

I hear there's a massive sink hole just appeared in Bristol......... :D

Offline Hellraiser

Someone needs to post a warning ON her feedback as well, so that when other punters think about booking her on Adultwork, they willl see the warning when they check her feedback.

It is very easy to do. Either create a new account, or use an existing account and book her from, say 8:00pm to 9:00pm (any time will do). Use fake details for the booking form. After 9:00pm, you will be able to leave her only neutral feedback. Write in there:

'WARNING: She reports clients to wives! See UK Punting Forum for more info'

She will be able to leave you a negative feedback in return, but it will be worth it, if only to save other punters from having their lives destroyed by this utter cunt of a whore.

Offline vorian

Someone needs to post a warning ON her feedback as well, so that when other punters think about booking her on Adultwork, they willl see the warning when they check her feedback.

It is very easy to do. Either create a new account, or use an existing account and book her from, say 8:00pm to 9:00pm (any time will do). Use fake details for the booking form. After 9:00pm, you will be able to leave her only neutral feedback. Write in there:

'WARNING: She reports clients to wives! See UK Punting Forum for more info'

She will be able to leave you a negative feedback in return, but it will be worth it, if only to save other punters from having their lives destroyed by this utter cunt of a whore.

Good idea Expat10, go for it and let us know if she tries to leave you any negative feedback.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Daffodil

The sister story is bollocks in my opinion.

So everything that was posted on MN was Paris except for the posts that bring her into disrepute and those were by her druggy sister? Bullshit.

This sister that nobody has ever seen and who just happens to not be on AW and advertises solely in the newspaper and on the street? Bullshit.

Paris didn't notice somebody had posted in her name on MN? Bullshit.

Paris didn't log out? She always appears to log out of UKP, where the default is to keep you logged in. So bullshit.

Paris lied immediately when posting on this thread (regarding when the posts on MN were deleted) and then expects us to believe anything else she says? Bullshit.

ParisB's reputation is in tatters and all punters would be advised not to see this absolute low-life.

Agreed, there are so many holes in that story it is untrue. I see that the title of the thread has changed too which is a very good idea, we need to be warning punters about WGs like this.

Offline vorian

The sister story is bollocks in my opinion.

So everything that was posted on MN was Paris except for the posts that bring her into disrepute and those were by her druggy sister? Bullshit.

This sister that nobody has ever seen and who just happens to not be on AW and advertises solely in the newspaper and on the street? Bullshit.

Paris didn't notice somebody had posted in her name on MN? Bullshit.

Paris didn't log out? She always appears to log out of UKP, where the default is to keep you logged in. So bullshit.

Paris lied immediately when posting on this thread (regarding when the posts on MN were deleted) and then expects us to believe anything else she says? Bullshit.

ParisB's reputation is in tatters and all punters would be advised not to see this absolute low-life.

Spot on, and thank you Daffodil for being the OP with this thread and thanks to whoever it was that PM'ed Adam with the evidence. :thumbsup:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline CoolTiger

The sister story is bollocks in my opinion.

So everything that was posted on MN was Paris except for the posts that bring her into disrepute and those were by her druggy sister? Bullshit.

This sister that nobody has ever seen and who just happens to not be on AW and advertises solely in the newspaper and on the street? Bullshit.

Paris didn't notice somebody had posted in her name on MN? Bullshit.

Paris didn't log out? She always appears to log out of UKP, where the default is to keep you logged in. So bullshit.

Paris lied immediately when posting on this thread (regarding when the posts on MN were deleted) and then expects us to believe anything else she says? Bullshit.

ParisB's reputation is in tatters and all punters would be advised not to see this absolute low-life.

Well said. I also queried these 2, and even went as far as as questioning what prevented her sister to access UKP and also post on here as well??

Offline CoolTiger

Will someone on SAAFE raise the issue about biting the hand that feeds you??

Offline vorian

Will someone on SAAFE raise the issue about biting the hand that feeds you??

Nothing yet, be interesting to see if ParisB puts anything in her blog about this issue.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Will someone on SAAFE raise the issue about biting the hand that feeds you??

I doubt it however this thread regardless of what is or what is not true should serve as a warning to other women in the job to never allow anyone regardless of who they are, be it, Mum, partner, sister or best friend, access to any details.  To ensure their passwords are never given to anyone and that only they have access to their PC or Laptop by setting it to autolock everytime they close it so a password is needed to start it again. If you have to allow access start up a new user and only allow them to use that. They should also ensure no details are kept on a phone incase it gets lost or stolen.

If you have to keep clients details as in what they like etc then keep it in a separate folder on your laptop that is always kept locked.

Allowing access to any of these details can not only ruin your business it can ruin other peoples lives

Offline Daffodil

I doubt it however this thread regardless of what is or what is not true should serve as a warning to other women in the job to never allow anyone regardless of who they are, be it, Mum, partner, sister or best friend, access to any details.  To ensure their passwords are never given to anyone and that only they have access to their PC or Laptop by setting it to autolock everytime they close it so a password is needed to start it again. If you have to allow access start up a new user and only allow them to use that. They should also ensure no details are kept on a phone incase it gets lost or stolen.

If you have to keep clients details as in what they like etc then keep it in a separate folder on your laptop that is always kept locked.

Allowing access to any of these details can not only ruin your business it can ruin other peoples lives

 :dash: :dash:

That is not the issue here. Nobody accessed her account. She posted what she did.

Offline vorian

I doubt it however this thread regardless of what is or what is not true should serve as a warning to other women in the job to never allow anyone regardless of who they are, be it, Mum, partner, sister or best friend, access to any details.  To ensure their passwords are never given to anyone and that only they have access to their PC or Laptop by setting it to autolock everytime they close it so a password is needed to start it again. If you have to allow access start up a new user and only allow them to use that. They should also ensure no details are kept on a phone incase it gets lost or stolen.

If you have to keep clients details as in what they like etc then keep it in a separate folder on your laptop that is always kept locked.

Allowing access to any of these details can not only ruin your business it can ruin other peoples lives

To be fair Dani I would have thought you would have seen through her excuses, which she had five hours to make up, the truth imho is she did this and got caught out. Why she did it I don't know, I'm guessing it is the tendency people have to follow the crowd for acceptance.

The morale if there is any is for a WG to keep her working and personal aspects separate. If she wanted to go on MN and talk about dogs thats fine but why go on MN and use her prossie experience against punters. What would happen if someone came on UKP and started to talk about dogs and trying to sell or buy dogs they would get told to fuck off sharpish.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
I doubt it however this thread regardless of what is or what is not true should serve as a warning to other women in the job to never allow anyone regardless of who they are, be it, Mum, partner, sister or best friend, access to any details.  To ensure their passwords are never given to anyone and that only they have access to their PC or Laptop by setting it to autolock everytime they close it so a password is needed to start it again. If you have to allow access start up a new user and only allow them to use that. They should also ensure no details are kept on a phone incase it gets lost or stolen.

If you have to keep clients details as in what they like etc then keep it in a separate folder on your laptop that is always kept locked.

Allowing access to any of these details can not only ruin your business it can ruin other peoples lives

This is basic stuff yet it's surprising how many people are lax. I even have personal stuff protected.

I haven't a clue what the real story is but I was wondering if she had a funny time 18 months ago and thought she'd play devils advocate. This isn't like Paris's usual online persona at all and I don't like it one bit.

Offline SirFrank

Who in their right mind would want to punt with her now. If I thought for one minute the girl I was meeting did not take my privacy seriously they wouldn't get my business. As others have said she's bitten the hand that feeds. Vorian has kindly posted on the south west board to warn punters. It could well be game over for her now and tbh it's no more than she deserves. What a complete disgrace
Banning reason: Shitstirring against admin on behalf of banned member

Offline vorian

This is basic stuff yet it's surprising how many people are lax. I even have personal stuff protected.

I haven't a clue what the real story is but I was wondering if she had a funny time 18 months ago and thought she'd play devils advocate. This isn't like Paris's usual online persona at all and I don't like it one bit.

The real story is one of two options,

One: ParisB posted on MN offering help as a AW user to out punters to their wives and partners. Cardinal rule broken.

Or

Two: She knowingly allowed her drug addict sister to use her computers and accounts, perhaps including AW/Email etc and to pose as her, potentially outing punters to their wives and partners. Cardinal rule broken.

I personally think it was the former but neverless the latter is no excuse.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Daffodil

Funny how it's the prossies who are erring on the side of believing the lying scumbag  :rolleyes:

LOTM will no doubt be next.

Offline a10

This is basic stuff yet it's surprising how many people are lax. I even have personal stuff protected.

That isn't the issue here. There was no one accessing her info. It was her.

I haven't a clue what the real story is but I was wondering if she had a funny time 18 months ago and thought she'd play devils advocate.

Read the whole thread. There's your fucking clue  :dash:  How the fuck is advising women how to catch their other halves punting playing devils advocate?!?! Keep the ridiculous pro$$ie backing for SAAFE! Paris B betrayed every punter she's seen and cannot be trusted one ioata. She wasn't particularly nice about other WGs either.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2014, 07:29:08 PM by a10 »

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,972
Funny how it's the prossies who are erring on the side of believing the lying scumbag  :rolleyes:


I'M not! My posts have been wondering what the fuck a successful, respected, long-term prossie thought she stood to gain by helping women to out their cheating partners. Why shit on your business like that?

BUT. I do agree with Strawberry in the sense that this is NOT like the "ParisB" persona that we all know - so was she having an 'episode'? Or Have we all just been fooled all this time?

Offline vorian

I'M not! My posts have been wondering what the fuck a successful, respected, long-term prossie thought she stood to gain by helping women to out their cheating partners. Why shit on your business like that?

BUT. I do agree with Strawberry in the sense that this is NOT like the "ParisB" persona that we all know - so was she having an 'episode'? Or Have we all just been fooled all this time?

I would take a guess that she has a ParisB persona which was for work and here. However she got sucked into the whole sisterhood Mumsnet thing and her escort persona slipped and her persona became a "Sister" against dirty cheating men.

That was her choice but she then decided to use her inside knowledge as a WG to help expose these men. Of course she never thought she would be caught or her working persona would have kicked in with self preservation. It was this use of inside knowledge that I personally find so offensive.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Well, if Paris WAS telling the truth: then an extremely dangerous prossie is still out there.  One who has quite possibly wrecked Paris' carreer, has certainly wrecked the lives of an unknown number of punters,  and is using the cash she gets to feed a drug habit.  And who probably now has her own Adultwork account.

So, Paris... who is it?

You don't owe her any loyalty under these circumstances.

Offline SirFrank

Whatever the rationale it's at best a serious error in judgement and at worse vindictive. Either way she has probably committed career suicide
Banning reason: Shitstirring against admin on behalf of banned member

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
I'M not! My posts have been wondering what the fuck a successful, respected, long-term prossie thought she stood to gain by helping women to out their cheating partners. Why shit on your business like that?

BUT. I do agree with Strawberry in the sense that this is NOT like the "ParisB" persona that we all know - so was she having an 'episode'? Or Have we all just been fooled all this time?

And neither am I.

I don't know what to believe from either of the 2 explanations given, and in fact my post implied my underlying thinking being that it was Paris herself posting but I just don't know.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
And neither am I.

I don't know what to believe from either of the 2 explanations given, and in fact my post implied my underlying thinking being that it was Paris herself posting but I just don't know.

The point is none of us can know for certain although the posts do read like Paris writing style which is very unfortunate if it was her sister however I do not think it was as when I got a pms from Mumsnet I get an email to my email address telling me about them and more than one person on that thread had said they have pmd her so she would have had email notifications and if she knew she had not posted on there would have logged on to find out what they were about and would have known straight away.

I also don't believe what someone else said about perhaps she got carried away with the mumsnetters as the few prossies I know on there tend to get annoyed more than anything by their attitudes towards us and would rather peel off our own eyelids than help any of them,  I have been barred twice just for being a prossie and putting my voice across and the way they treat those in this job would give none of us any reason to try and help them as they either really dislike us or they pity us for being so abused :dash:

Offline AnthG

I simply have no reason to have done something like that but yes I can totally imagine my sister doing it because she's in a different world to the rest of us most of the time  I think she would have enjoyed doing it even.

Reading her post and particularly the line I have quoted, if you take it as I have, she is suggesting she doesn't even know it was her sister. She is just guessing it was her.

Today she is on tour in Birmingham so she is not home right now. So you would think she has phoned up her sister and asked - did you do this. If not then how long has she known? And what is she saying, she hasn't yet phoned her sister to ask this or she has phoned her and her sister has denied it?

Her sister is hardly going to say, yep sis I posted in your name revealing details of clients, as any sane person would know that is something that will get her immediately chucked out of the flat. She would have (if this is true) swore blind it weren't her to Paris.

And if she had done this, then Paris would have posted, "I phoned her and my sister admitted doing this to me"

So therefore Paris is a pretty poor sister to then publicly post this accusation about hers. And to then say 'I think she did it and would enjoy it'

So either way.

1. Paris did this and she is thus a terrible person.

Or

2. Paris did not do this and from the way she has treat and accused her sister with no proof (by her own admission in her post) she is a terrible person.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2014, 08:00:04 PM by AnthG »

Offline vorian

The point is none of us can know for certain although the posts do read like Paris writing style which is very unfortunate if it was her sister however I do not think it was as when I got a pms from Mumsnet I get an email to my email address telling me about them and more than one person on that thread had said they have pmd her so she would have had email notifications and if she knew she had not posted on there would have logged on to find out what they were about and would have known straight away.

I also don't believe what someone else said about perhaps she got carried away with the mumsnetters as the few prossies I know on there tend to get annoyed more than anything by their attitudes towards us and would rather peel off our own eyelids than help any of them,  I have been barred twice just for being a prossie and putting my voice across and the way they treat those in this job would give none of us any reason to try and help them as they either really dislike us or they pity us for being so abused :dash:

She never openly posted as a WG, she talked about dogs more than anything. However took the opportunity to enter the debate about wives catching out husbands in a almost evangelical way. She could have just stayed silent but chose to offer her inside knowledge (Again she did not say she was a prossie at this point) to help, a desperate need for acceptance seems to be a motivating factor here.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)