Lest you feel you are on your own on this lex, I agree with everything you have said.
Those who respond with pointless oaths and insults directed at you do not advance their case one jot - but it says a lot about their mentality.
I did not agree with everything pabulum said, but he made some valid points. He made it crystal clear that he condemned ParisB's behaviour, and you are absolutely correct in saying that nowhere did he say "it was OK to threaten active UKP members on twitter" - that was a ridiculous accusation.
There was no justification for banning him as far as I can see - unless free speech on UKP means that you are free to say whatever you like - so long as you agree with everyone else and toe the party line. Brilliant.
And I suspect that you won't be too far behind him, if you keep up some of the fluffy and pro prossie bollocks I've read you post. Ultimately, you'll hang yourself. They all do.
I wonder whose side you're really on? Are you on the side of the customer or the service provider? Sure, you make the odd condemnation but I see through the facade. Think you're quite clever, don't you? Not enough to fool the likes of me.
So what parts do you disagree with him on then? There was every justification for banning him. He has 'form'. UKP, just like every other forum , of every kind, is no democracy.
Pabulum justified her Twitter actions tacitly, by saying 'who can blame her'. It's there in black and white. Don't try to be clever because it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.