Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: ParisB on Mumsnet helping wives catch their husbands  (Read 163060 times)

Offline Daffodil

The way I read pabulums post was that he was just saying it was no wonder she has reacted like that... NOT that it was ok to do so.

and you are absolutely correct in saying that nowhere did he say "it was OK to threaten active UKP members on twitter" - that was a ridiculous accusation.

Perhaps if you were one of the members she was threatening to out you'd see it differently  :rolleyes:

For me he justified her response and didn't condemn it. So no, he didn't explicitly say she is right to do it, but he did the next best thing.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
lex has been around for a while, I'll overlook a minor disagreement and not let that shitstirrer pubelum create any serious division.

Offline Sailormack

Perhaps we should get back to the subject of Paris as per the title.

Feel free to start a "Lex is fluffy fuckface cunt" thread elsewhere if you like.  :D

Your wish is granted Sir.  :hi:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=25424.0


Offline a10

In pabulum's post he mentioned violence being threatened against ParisB. Where was that? Did I miss it? I don't remember it being mentioned anywhere.

The only threat of violence I've seen has been in ParisB's twitter posts.

Offline Daffodil

In pabulum's post he mentioned violence being threatened against ParisB. Where was that? Did I miss it? I don't remember it being mentioned anywhere.

The only threat of violence I've seen has been in ParisB's twitter posts.

I also haven't seen it.

I think I read somewhere that her actions could lead to violence against her, but nobody threatened her as far as I've seen.

Offline vorian

In pabulum's post he mentioned violence being threatened against ParisB. Where was that? Did I miss it? I don't remember it being mentioned anywhere.

The only threat of violence I've seen has been in ParisB's twitter posts.

I've just had a look he does not use the word "Violence" just threats. It has been mentioned that she should be outed herself or other sanctions, false bookings feedback etc. I do not personally believe that is the right thing to do as imho two wrongs do not make a right. As regards to my attempts to have her AW profile taken down, my complaint to AW is related to their own T&C of course I very much doubt they will follow this themselves but that won't stop me trying.

I too have not seen any threats of violence to ParisB, but like Daff I can recall the suggestion that her actions may have put herself in danger as a disgruntled punter who may have been found out by his Mumsnet using wife may blame ParisB rightly or wrongly for helping his wife. I do not condone violence under any circumstance and such threats should be dealt with by the police.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 01:43:13 PM by vorian »
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline a10

...I think I read somewhere that her actions could lead to violence against her...

So the usual fluffy pro$$ie loving bullshit trotted out to remove posts a skank doesn't agree with?  :dash:

Fair enough. I don't condone the threat of violence, obviously. But a lie on pabulum's behalf is another reason to be banned. When we signed up to UKP we agreed to NIK and Admin's terms. There is free speech (more than PN or AW!) but within those terms.

That's the way I see it  :hi:

Offline Sailormack

So the consensus is that ParisB thinks that it is fine to out a punter and potentially destroy his marriage/life, but she would like to be isolated and protected from any consequences because she has a vagina.  :hi:

Deluded bitch  :wackogirl:

Offline Sailormack

Furthermore, I would advocate that this topic is stickied until ParisB takes her place as the first convicted into the Hall of Shame. :hi:

Offline vorian

So the consensus is that ParisB thinks that it is fine to out a punter and potentially destroy his marriage/life, but she would like to be isolated and protected from any consequences because she has a vagina.  :hi:

Deluded bitch  :wackogirl:

The scary thing is I think some people have forgotten the overwhelming evidence that exists in the first place. Even if they accept the evidence they then argue that what she has done is no big deal. Then even if they accept it is a big deal they think her punishment far outweighs what she deserves for her actions.

They then ignore her silence on the matter and the veiled threats she made on Twitter are acceptable as she has been pushed into it.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Sailormack

The scary thing is I think some people have forgotten the overwhelming evidence that exists in the first place. Even if they accept the evidence they then argue that what she has done is no big deal. Then even if they accept it is a big deal they think her punishment far outweighs what she deserves for her actions.

They then ignore her silence on the matter and the veiled threats she made on Twitter are acceptable as she has been pushed into it.

Yes and perhaps as previously pointed out, those punters who choose to defend/support her may well change their tune if they find themselves in the divorce court with their arse hanging out of a pair of leather chaps while the soon to be ex missus sharpens up the dildo  :scare:

Offline vorian

Yes and perhaps as previously pointed out, those punters who choose to defend/support her may well change their tune if they find themselves in the divorce court with their arse hanging out of a pair of leather chaps while the soon to be ex missus sharpens up the dildo  :scare:

I do see your point Salior but I think it is important to keep in mind the people who want to cause division amongst UKP members are the same as the one's who support ParisB and her actions. I personally trust Adam and Nik to do what they think is right as far as banning people go and of course they will give their own opinions as they see fit. I am not a great believer in the whole "Fluffy" thing as it seems a bit too ill defined to me personally. People will have differing views about many subject and I would rather be able to raise questions and ask for people to explain and justify their opinions that keeps the debate "On-Topic" as much as it can be. 
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

Just noticed ParisB is advertising on Twitter that she is now available for direct and phone chats via her AW profile. Read into that as you wish. 
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline mattylondon

Lest you feel you are on your own on this lex, I agree with everything you have said.

Those who respond with pointless oaths and insults directed at you do not advance their case one jot - but it says a lot about their mentality.

I did not agree with everything pabulum said, but he made some valid points. He made it crystal clear that he condemned ParisB's behaviour, and you are absolutely correct in saying that nowhere did he say "it was OK to threaten active UKP members on twitter" - that was a ridiculous accusation.
 
There was no justification for banning him as far as I can see - unless free speech on UKP means that you are free to say whatever you like - so long as you agree with everyone else and toe the party line. Brilliant.

 
And I suspect that you won't be too far behind him, if you keep up some of the fluffy and pro prossie bollocks I've read you post. Ultimately, you'll hang yourself. They all do.  :hi:

I wonder whose side you're really on? Are you on the side of the customer or the service provider? Sure, you make the odd condemnation but I see through the facade. Think you're quite clever, don't you? Not enough to fool the likes of me.

So what parts do you disagree with him on then? There was every justification for banning him. He has 'form'. UKP, just like every other forum , of every kind, is no democracy.

Pabulum justified her Twitter actions tacitly, by saying 'who can blame her'. It's there in black and white. Don't try to be clever because it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 05:49:31 PM by mattylondon »

Offline GeeWiz

I agree with SirPhilipXX.

Back to the topic, using Twitter to hint at outing punters seems an odd way to defend herself against the initial Mumsnet allegations.  Shooting yourself in the foot.

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,972
Just noticed ParisB is advertising on Twitter that she is now available for direct and phone chats via her AW profile. Read into that as you wish.

Another way of making money.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Just noticed ParisB is advertising on Twitter that she is now available for direct and phone chats via her AW profile. Read into that as you wish.

quite a few escorts have that as they use it between bookings to top up the earnings and keep a healthy balance to pay for AW

Offline Jimmyredcab

In pabulum's post he mentioned violence being threatened against ParisB. Where was that? Did I miss it? I don't remember it being mentioned anywhere.

The only threat of violence I've seen has been in ParisB's twitter posts.

No threat of violence would be allowed on this forum, that applies to punters and pro$$ies.  :hi:

Offline mattylondon

So Paris "wasn't me my sister did it" has now been posting tweets directly threatening to out punters??? It just gets worse!! Why didn't she just stick to her original lie
I am even more disgusted than I already was.
Exactly. Kinda gave the game away about her true intentions.  :D

But wait. Perhaps Paris B's sister tweeted them, Paris noticed her account had been 'hacked' and she swiftly deleted them.  :rolleyes:


Offline vorian

quite a few escorts have that as they use it between bookings to top up the earnings and keep a healthy balance to pay for AW

You are of course right however looking back it seems it is the first time she has advertised this on twitter, so  it might mean that's she is having to change her work pattern for some reason.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline mattylondon

No threat of violence would be allowed on this forum, that applies to punters and pro$$ies.  :hi:
These so-called 'threats of violence' are simply a smokescreen and distraction. There's very rarely any concrete evidence to back them up, even if it does happen. Violence happens against punters too, even if women are more vulnerable and are exposed to the greater risk.

In my experience of speaking with prossies who have genuinely been outed, 9 times out of 10, it's another prossie who has done the outing, rather than a punter. Your average punter doesn't give a fuck what their real name is, even if like me, they know many personal details. I'm interested in getting my rocks off, not on learning their bloody life story. Punter's tend to respect a prossie's privacy because they respect their own and have a great deal to lose. Only those who are public knowledge through pictures and so on, feel that they have nothing to lose and behave like Paris B. 
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 06:48:07 PM by mattylondon »

Offline mattylondon

Paris B should perhaps keep her trap shut for a while. Lie low and let this blow (no pun intended) over!

A money obsessed and attention seeking whore, if ever I read one. She should take some time out to sort out those awful tits and reflect.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 06:50:53 PM by mattylondon »

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
While I wouldn't like to appease her, I think it's time to bring this thread to an end, otherwise it'll carry on for months, taking activity away from other threads.

I'll add a link to this thread when I introduce the Hall of Shame, and re-open it if anything new happens.

Offline vorian

Just to let you know "Pariswatch" has uncovered her changing her profile name to "Miss.P". So I guess she must be doing very well for herself with all the "Danger Punters"

https://www.adultwork.com/358631 or https://www.adultwork.com/Miss%2EP
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account


4 review(s) found for Paris B linked to in above post (2 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
It is hardly surprising really after everything that has gone on as the hole her friends have dug her by the few porkies they have been telling has got a little bit too big when I last looked two days ago so I imagine it is probably much bigger by now as they seem fixated on making things so much worse for her
With friends like that who needs enemies




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)