Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: ParisB on Mumsnet helping wives catch their husbands  (Read 163089 times)

Offline ladyofthemansion

I always imagined him to look like a God!

Offline Steve2

he was kinda stooped over and looked creepy, it was a brief encounter, and was 13 years  ago, I do remeber he was wearing a long black leather coat

Doesn't sound anything like the Galahad I met several times

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline vorian

Excuse me but the ParisB issue is very serious as is the outing of anyone.

So why are we the members of the forum helping to expose Galahad, who may be married for all that I know.

 :dash:

I assumed they were joking about his appearance but to be fair you are right, he might be a lowlife but he is a punter as well  :unknown:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Steve2

Why would you think he is a lowlife?

Offline vorian

Why would you think he is a lowlife?

He pretends to stand in the interest of punters but in reality will allow selective censorship on his site to protect the interests of prossies. It is the hypocrisy that makes him a lowlife in my opinion. 
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

Doesn't sound anything like the Galahad I met several times

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

I thought you had told me you had met him, as has Jimmy if i recall correctly, neither of you mentioned he looked in anyway strange. ;)

Offline vorian

I thought you had told me you had met him, as has Jimmy if i recall correctly, neither of you mentioned he looked in anyway strange. ;)

Maybe the prossy lied to CBF and it was not Galahad he saw, not that a prossy would ever lie or exaggerate to a punter of course.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline mh

Maybe the prossy lied to CBF and it was not Galahad he saw, not that a prossy would ever lie or exaggerate to a punter of course.

Or the mystery hunch-backed punter was just claiming to be Galahad to get a free ride?

Offline Daffodil

Excuse me but the ParisB issue is very serious as is the outing of anyone.

So why are we the members of the forum helping to expose Galahad, who may be married for all that I know.

I know he runs a forum that does not perform well in Punters interest but he is still an individual and if a preceding post is correct he has been named as a punter.

 :dash:

I agree entirely.

Excuse me but the ParisB issue is very serious as is the outing of anyone.

So why are we the members of the forum helping to expose Galahad, who may be married for all that I know.

I know he runs a forum that does not perform well in Punters interest but he is still an individual and if a preceding post is correct he has been named as a punter.

 :dash:

Corus - I sincerely hope you are NOT aiming this post at me, who cut and pasted a drawing of a fictional character from a humourous storyline.
Also, where in the posts you mention is any shard of evidence as to the identity of the person you mention? Evidence that could incriminate him to those known to him?

Offline Tailpipe

He pretends to stand in the interest of punters but in reality will allow selective censorship on his site to protect the interests of prossies. It is the hypocrisy that makes him a lowlife in my opinion.

Not sure where it says "in the interest of punters"

http://www.auto-censored.com/forum/index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=boardrules

Think its mission statement is "discussing all aspects of the London and UK prostitution scene, in a polite and civilized manner"

Think Nik started UK with Adam because the very reason was it did not put punters First
But did it ever say it would I suppose is the question



Offline smiths

Excuse me but the ParisB issue is very serious as is the outing of anyone.

So why are we the members of the forum helping to expose Galahad, who may be married for all that I know.

I know he runs a forum that does not perform well in Punters interest but he is still an individual and if a preceding post is correct he has been named as a punter.

 :dash:

Just saw this, i agree CB. :hi:

Online Corus Boy


Corus - I sincerely hope you are NOT aiming this post at me, who cut and pasted a drawing of a fictional character from a humourous storyline.
Also, where in the posts you mention is any shard of evidence as to the identity of the person you mention? Evidence that could incriminate him to those known to him?


Hi Rudolph, I was not aiming at any individual but more a collective responsibility as the thread develops.  That is why I wrote;

"...So why are we the members of the forum helping to expose Galahad, who may be married for all that I know..."

I added the last few words because although Galahad runs the board and if he has a wife and family who know of his association with the industry, they may not know that he is a punter!

PS I thought the cartoon was good, add the reputed cloth cap and it might be Mr McCoy  :cool:
« Last Edit: February 26, 2014, 03:46:57 PM by Corus Boy »

Hi Rudolph, I was not aiming at any individual but more a collective responsibility as the thread develops.  That is why I wrote;

"...So why are we the members of the forum helping to expose Galahad, who may be married for all that I know..."

I added the last few words because although Galahad runs the board and if he has a wife and family who know of his association with the industry, they may not know that he is a punter!

PS I thought the cartoon was good, add the reputed cloth cap and it might be Mr McCoy  :cool:

Now there's someone who needs outing, mainly for his taste, or lack of it!

Offline Tailpipe

Just saw this, i agree CB. :hi:


Exposure for its sack can not be condoned in any way , its the first rule of punting on both sides , punter and WG and should be taken as such without question.

I understand this thread grows daily as the Golden rule has been broken. 

When you start digging some of the mud will stick. Smiths you rightly bang on about the need for distance from real life and disclosure of info
and should be a bedrock of this forum in my view.  If its a pimp or there is danger to a person then its becomes a different story.

The internet persona which does gives licence to thrill for many which is a shame , also enables the experienced punter to guide others without disclosure of any kind
which is where UKP comes into its own.


Offline smiths

Now there's someone who needs outing, mainly for his taste, or lack of it!

McCoy outed himself years and years ago and is very proud to say publicly he is a punter, even appearing on various discussion programmes. Of course his game is to travel the country looking for as many freebies off WGs he can get with the promise of a good write-up in his guide in return. Not a bad way to combine punting with making money in my view. A few WGs have told me he was odious but a few others said he was ok. :hi:

Offline smiths


Exposure for its sack can not be condoned in any way , its the first rule of punting on both sides , punter and WG and should be taken as such without question.

I understand this thread grows daily as the Golden rule has been broken. 

When you start digging some of the mud will stick. Smiths you rightly bang on about the need for distance from real life and disclosure of info
and should be a bedrock of this forum in my view.  If its a pimp or there is danger to a person then its becomes a different story.

The internet persona which does gives licence to thrill for many which is a shame , also enables the experienced punter to guide others without disclosure of any kind
which is where UKP comes into its own.

Good post and absolutely right as i see it. I am always discreet when punting in and around a WGs premises and expect discretion back in return BUT i dont take that for granted so have my cover story that has variations to it that i tell WGs so they never hear the truth about me. ;)

Offline cornbeefinspector

Galahad is single, the last I heard he was involved with some redhead Prossie

now can we bring this thread back to Parisb and her stupidity

Tony Montana


now can we bring this thread back to Parisb and her stupidity

Hasn't everything on the subject been said by now?

Offline Tailpipe

Hasn't everything on the subject been said by now?

It would seem that its all been said many times over.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
he was kinda stooped over and looked creepy, it was a brief encounter, and was 13 years  ago, I do remeber he was wearing a long black leather coat

to his credit, he did pay for the service and left on time, and didn't take advantage of his postion,aslo the girl told me he could not get fully erect  :yahoo: but that is only hearsay

I suspected long ago you were a banned member, having looked at your account deeper it looks like I was right in my suspicions.
Bye bye.

Is there mileage in calling a 'time out' on this thread now, all angles have been covered and re-covered?  :timeout

 :lol: another one bites the dust.  makes me wonder about the sti thread :unknown:

Offline potato

I'm surprised it hasn't made the papers, maybe someone should post a link to this thread to all the daily's / regionals and see if any of them want to run with it?

Offline smiths

:lol: another one bites the dust.  makes me wonder about the sti thread :unknown:

Absolutely, when a poster gets banned for being a returner i dont believe anything they have posted. Not saying it was all lies but i dont know what was and what wasnt of course. ;)




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)