Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Petite Nadia X, Archway aw:5095249  (Read 1247 times)


6 review(s) for Petite Nadia X (1 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by theoldmaggot]

Offline Mr.funbags

Good afternoon Gents,

External Link/Members Only

First time review here as I've finally mustered up the courage to punt and review.

So looking through AW I decided to finally get my toe wet by seeing someone I liked the look of and decided on Nadia based on a previous review and my weakness for slavic genes. Happened two-three weeks ago.

Tried to arrange a 30min incall the night before but only got a reply on the day so a dash to London in the morning. So I would say comms are good but prob only during their working hours.

Got to the location and directions for where to go specifically were messaged. It's a small block of flats with a semi hidden entrance.

Appearence : she does look exactly like the pics on AW, fake boobs, quite tall (maybe 5' 8) I think with heels. She's slim with blonde hair, typical polish facial features, little bit of an arse but nothing to tell the booty thread lol had makeup on and a nice set of lingerie.

Service: now here is where it wasn't so good. First punt for me I admit but from what I've read of the adventures you guys have had I was seriously short changed in time and service. Nadia tried her best to avoid most contact with me from kissing to touching. Now I'm not God's gift in the looks department but I'm not massively overweight or an ogre in my humble opinion lol so I'm assuming that's her usual M.o? She was very smiley throughout but because of the lack of contact there really was no connection (the best way I can describe it).
HOWEVER she did perform OWO (after a little huff and making me shower before) and her OWO was pretty good, it was wet, she gagged and went down nearly to the base. She did the whole swirling her tongue and head thing and used her hands minimally. She briefly rubbed her body against me but I would say she was strategically positioning herself so she didn't have to lay in an 'intimate' way with me. She stopped after a while but I asked her to continue for a couple minutes. I felt at this point that due to my inexperience at punting that I wasn't stern enough in asking what I wanted and I think she knew as she took control and said 'sex'.. Doggy? Lol I went along with the suggestion, she rubbered me up and assumed the position. She did let me pick up the pace after starting slow, a few porno moans and with all the adrenaline in my system I pretty much filled the rubber lol albeit in a short amount of time. This was roughly 10mins now and she moved away, disposed of the rubber and started chatting in her broken English. I'd say her English is passable for a light conversation but with help lol I tried to initiate a second round of fun but she started putting on her lingerie so I knew that was playtime over. I didn't wanna push as I took this as a Learning experience and thought next time I'd be more assertive. Cheery goodbye and I was out just before the 30mins.

So in summary, hot body, good enough face and a good blowjob but more like (from what I've read from you guys) a general romainian service.

Would I reccomend? Maybe for someone who is more assertive, she seems as if she liked you she would fuck your brains out, just not me lol

Any questions/suggestions fire away and sorry if the review doesn't read as well or as interesting as the more seasoned reviewers. I really enjoy reading your adventures guys and will try and give back.

On to the next one.

Offline arkenciel

Thx for the review, her service standards were quite inconsistent based on my observation. Since the profile had now been swapped could you confirm if you had seen the ‘new’ Nadia or the old brunette?

Offline Mr.funbags

From reading Ronnie's review again (the reason I chose Nadia in the first place.. Which by the way still makes me jealous lol) I can only assume its the 'new' Nadia as this WG's performance was nothing like waht happened to Ronnie.. Hence the jealousy  :dash:

Offline JocksyRider

From reading Ronnie's review again (the reason I chose Nadia in the first place.. Which by the way still makes me jealous lol) I can only assume its the 'new' Nadia as this WG's performance was nothing like waht happened to Ronnie.. Hence the jealousy  :dash:

I saw the previous Nadia, but didn’t review as profile got swapped, she was fairly attractive but definitely not a stunner, slim curvy body with some rubbish tats, kissing wasn’t great as she was a smoker but she gave quite possibly the best BJ I’ve had, full DT with lot of variation, no gagging, only disappointment was she only took first few spurts in her mouth, the rest went on my stomach, but I would have gone back just for the BJ, really was special  :angelgirl:

Offline Global_Punter

I'm not claiming to be a pro lol but looking at her features and reading the review this lady is Romanian not polish.

My travels with-in continetal Europe especially Germany has shown that Romanians sometimes pretend to be from other countries - reason being that they know most punters avoid them.

I once plunged with a pretty gem that told me she was from Colombia, I was totally sold until when I overheard her speaking Romanian to another SP  :lol: after that incident she clearly avoided me & I returned the favour.

Having said that I've had fun with a lot of Romanian SP's enough to pass a biometric check or get a Romanian visa if you checked my Junior for loyalty stamps  :sarcastic:

Offline PatMacGroin

Thanks for the review. Hope you have better luck with your next outing.

I do have a few questions, if you don't mind:

- The blonde currently shown on the profile pics looks hot, particularly those shower shots. Would you say the WG you saw is the same woman shown in these photo's saved below? (I wasn't sure if you were referring to the old AW photo's in your OP comments)

- Did you notice any tattoo's on her?

- How much did you pay?

- Was there any discussion of any extra charges? For any of the services received or even those she shied away from providing E.g. FK, OWO, (CIM or Facials even though they're not listed on her profile)
« Last Edit: April 22, 2019, 02:27:29 am by PatMacGroin »


Offline Global_Punter

Profile Details Captured for future reference:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

+447508017096

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Banging body though, I'd go for a shorter session instead with her, that way you don't regret it - if you like getting your monies worth
« Last Edit: April 22, 2019, 02:34:11 am by Global_Punter »

Offline Mr.funbags

Thanks for the review. Hope you have better luck with your next outing.

I do have a few questions, if you don't mind:

- The blonde currently shown on the profile pics looks hot, particularly those shower shots. Would you say the WG you saw is the same woman shown in these photo's saved below? (I wasn't sure if you were referring to the old AW photo's in your OP comments)

- Did you notice any tattoo's on her?

- How much did you pay?

- Was there any discussion of any extra charges? For any of the services received or even those she shied away from providing E.g. FK, OWO, (CIM or Facials even though they're not listed on her profile)

Hey Pat let's see there was no discussions on extras and anal/facials arnt my thing... Yet lol so didn't ask but as per my review I didn't really push for anything above what she was offering so I couldn't tell you 100%. To the other punter she was definitely Polish as she got a little excited in response to my rudimentary polish and started this diatribe which I couldn't follow lol it is definitely her from the aw pics though. Didn't notice any tattoos. I paid the advertised rate for the hh which I think is £70.

Offline PatMacGroin

Hey Pat let's see there was no discussions on extras and anal/facials arnt my thing... Yet lol so didn't ask but as per my review I didn't really push for anything above what she was offering so I couldn't tell you 100%. To the other punter she was definitely Polish as she got a little excited in response to my rudimentary polish and started this diatribe which I couldn't follow lol it is definitely her from the aw pics though. Didn't notice any tattoos. I paid the advertised rate for the hh which I think is £70.

Thanks for the reply.

P.S. I asked about the tattoo because the profile photo of her in khakki shorts appears to have been photo-shopped to obscure her foot. I'd imagine that's to cover a tattoo. If so it's usually for one of these reasons:
- Most probably to protect her identity.
- To make it harder to recognise her from a previous profile.
- Possibly to hide where she has pinched the photo's from, if they are not of her. Although they don't show up on a TinEye search.
If anyone else takes another chance on her it might be something to look out for, particularly if it reveals any previous reviews for her.