More relevant to link old profile to this and future reviews
I very much disagree for pretty much the same reason as you:
since no one can book her from old profile anyway.
That's right so when trying to find reviews, no one will be searching for her old profile, they'll search for her current profile. When they do that, it will say there's only 1 review for her and obviously the list of reviews that appear will be totally incomplete (i.e. missing her 14 previous reviews). The same applies when people post her link, the review tally that automatically appears below the post will be totally incomplete and therefore misleading.
Only indexing her old profile to this and future reviews is reliant on all punters on here noticing that an old profile has been indexed and that has more associated reviews but there will be plenty of punters who either don't notice or don't even know. Also, every time a new review is posted it's reliant on one of the helpers or admin (the people who can index) noticing/remembering that the WG has an old profile, going back to find it and doing the indexing. That may well not happen quickly (therefore misleading the punters who click on the review before it's fully indexed) or it may not even happen at all. For example, I came across this review for a WG who appeared to only have 3 reviews but actually had a whopping total of 42:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=227362.msg2313455#msg2313455(Note that the number I state (42) appears higher than the current 40 because that was back when reviews from banned members counted)
For literally many months before that review was posted it seemed like she only had 2 reviews (even though she actually had 41) because no one had indexed her current profile to her old reviews or even her old profile to her new reviews.
Making sure a WG's current profile is indexed to her old reviews also ensures that when a WG with no new reviews (but some old ones) is searched for - her reviews all appear. For example, this WG has had a new profile since September 2018 but hasn't had any subsequent reviews:
External Link/Members OnlyIf I didn't index that profile to her old reviews (under an old profile called Busty Leanne) then for months people wouldn't know she had any reviews (unless I was to create a new topic telling people, which would've been more effort).
As such, I've gone ahead and indexed Francesca's current profile to all her previous reviews. It didn't take long and even though it wasn't the "easy" option now, it makes all her future reviews easier/quicker to index.
When doing that I also noticed that I'd forgotten (and evidentally all the other helpers either did too or didn't know) to index her reviews from when she worked at La Maison so she actually has 16 previous reviews.