Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Mia GEA  (Read 11500 times)

This review has not been indexed yet.

Offline Ali Katt

The opposite to a pedo, is gerontophile.
I actually didn't know this.  :thumbsup: I was going from one extreme to the other, to point out the absurdity of the statement.

Offline Barry Shipton

No great loss that TheHun has gone - two faced git with a disgraceful attitude to other punters. His snotty attitude should have had him banned long ago - well established members like Horizontal Pleasures come on with reasonable requests and he came in acting like some self appointed admin, slagged off everyone but never came up with any helpful suggestions.

I don't always agree with James999 but he was spot on with this one, and TheHun who was quite happy to slag off women he didn't know had the bloody cheek to say James was doing that just because he questions it when a punter gets short changed.
 

Offline Happy99

To be fair James999 is also a massive long-time troll on here and should have been banned long ago. He has almost 7,000 posts and not one review or genuine input on any girls been to see!! Just generally pops up anywhere on the forum to have a go at people or trash threads. Specialises in pasting massive pictures of cartoons into threads and dragging people into childish tit for tat arguments. Also very very quick to make extremely harsh comments on any females who come on the forum. Issues perhaps?

PS. i wont be making any further comment on this or getting dragged into the aforesaid tit for tat type junk, so see ya.

Offline vorian

To be fair James999 is also a massive long-time troll on here and should have been banned long ago. He has almost 7,000 posts and not one review or genuine input on any girls been to see!! Just generally pops up anywhere on the forum to have a go at people or trash threads. Specialises in pasting massive pictures of cartoons into threads and dragging people into childish tit for tat arguments. Also very very quick to make extremely harsh comments on any females who come on the forum. Issues perhaps?

PS. i wont be making any further comment on this or getting dragged into the aforesaid tit for tat type junk, so see ya.

He is UKP's Catfish and every forum needs a Catfish nipping at the fins to keep everyone on their toes. He is not designed to be liked or agreed with,  he is designed to chase and bite or the flesh of the forum will become mushy and bland.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline 616

The Hun must've been on the waccy baccy last weekend. He was snide to Horizontal Pleasures and Barry Shipton and being a smart Alec gobshite got the better of him,  he then shot himself in the foot and was rightly binned by admin.

I think the UKP admin(s) should be more vigilant regarding posts made here. As someone elsewhere said, we call this punting but wives and girlfriends, when they find out out their OH is shagging hookers call it something totally different. It's fun to us and a big joke but there's the outside world's perception of UKP members as being repulsive inadequates who HAVE to pay for sex, who seem to have Neanderthal attitudes towards prostitutes/women and regular traffic here from Mumsnet prudes (or horny/curious married women), the gutter press and of course, Inspector Knacker (and enterprising pimp psychopaths looking for fresh meat to ponce off).

The tone on UKP is generally set pretty low. Some people on here seem to have real problems with women in general, going by comments left by WGs even on the Off Topic forum. Amy on SAAFE steps in from time to time to tell WGs not to criticise punters on threads there. I've never seen the same happen here. It's like schoolboy bravado on UKP a lot of the time. However, UK Punting is never going hit the mainstream anytime soon so that doesn't matter too much. On the other hand, there's nothing to stop a journalist on some Murdoch rag selecting a punters and WGs on here and making them famous for a few weeks for entirely prurient reasons just to sell a few more copies for a day or two.

I'm saying that soon UKP will become a former shadow of itself, like SAAFE and auto-censored have become and that'd be shame - if I hadn't found AW, SAAFE then UK Punting in that order last summer and gotten clued up about modern punting, I might have found myself in a sticky situation or two with no idea what to do or how to get out of them, so Kudos to Nik and Adam. I think people should reign in their tendencies to be dicks and be a bit more mindful of what they post in future.

I like UKP a lot, I read EVERYTHING on it and find it all very titillating and entertaining. I suppose it'll be fun reading an expose on UKP most prolific punters long in the Mail On Sunday or The Sun On Sunday in six months time as long as you're not the one with your picture in the paper....

Hogan

I like UKP a lot, I read EVERYTHING on it and find it all very titillating and entertaining. I suppose it'll be fun reading an expose on UKP most prolific punters long in the Mail On Sunday or The Sun On Sunday in six months time as long as you're not the one with your picture in the paper....

Scaremonger  :crazy:


Offline 616

Apologies for the repetition in my post there (and hitting send too quickly in quoting Hogan). We should all be careful what we post now. I'm not married, not got any kids, or much family left so I couldn't care less.


Offline vorian

Apologies for the repetition in my post there (and hitting send too quickly in quoting Hogan). We should all be careful what we post now. I'm not married, not got any kids, or much family left so I couldn't care less.

We should always be careful with what we post online thats a given but I really can't see any newspaper taking the time to expose punters on here they would have little to gain and could open a Pandoras box,  i'm sure plenty of journalists have punted in the past.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Apologies for the repetition in my post there (and hitting send too quickly in quoting Hogan). We should all be careful what we post now. I'm not married, not got any kids, or much family left so I couldn't care less.

The media wouldn't be interested in punters unless they are politician, etc.

I'm saying that soon UKP will become a former shadow of itself, like SAAFE and auto-censored have become and that'd be shame

Many before you have also said the same, but during that time this site has only grown.
If this site was moderated differently as you hint it should be, then it would die as you predict. The reason P/N has declined as you note is because they did exactly that with their moderating and censorship, so we created this site to be free.

Offline Tjkooker

Its amazing when all the fluffy lil bunnys like innit/barry crawl out from their bolt holes to have a go when someone they dislike is banned. Grow some balls and challenge them while they are here. Not only that they(innit) sign off saying "wont reply not getting involved". By commenting you are involved.  Just spineless, still shouldn't expect any better from the likes of you.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Wasn't there a story of a NOTW journalist and his female partner posted on the internet quite a few years back who had went to either a swingers party or an organised party to do a shock/horror story, wrote it up that they had witnessed people having sex, but made their excuses and left wthout taking part in any of the proceedings due to the moral outrage and yet somehow photos of them managing to get over their outrage and involvingthemselves a bit more were posted by some of the girls? Must do a search to try to find them, wonder if it was Piers Moron, hope it was Rebekah Brooks.

Offline Barry Shipton

Its amazing when all the fluffy lil bunnys like innit/barry crawl out from their bolt holes to have a go when someone they dislike is banned. Grow some balls and challenge them while they are here. Not only that they(innit) sign off saying "wont reply not getting involved". By commenting you are involved.  Just spineless, still shouldn't expect any better from the likes of you.
Thanks TJ but I use my balls for punting not pointless scrapping on Internet forums. No point in arguments - much better if we just try and help each other with worthwhile advice if we can and agree  that we all disagree  some time.
Best save your venom for the targets in  the police, government and other places that would close down or criminalise our hobby.

Offline Glader

Thanks TJ but I use my balls for punting not pointless scrapping on Internet forums. No point in arguments - much better if we just try and help each other with worthwhile advice if we can and agree  that we all disagree  some time.

+1 on that quote.

Issue is...while we all try to remain discreet and anonymous "Punters wont go down on each other" while paid companions will. Some punters will always have a soft spot for others and provide favoritism in one way or another.

My mate who told me about this site had saw mia ONCE .
 Lets just say he wasn't impressed with her one bit.
I'm not going to embarrass the girl since she is on the thread.
But I was in hysterics with what he told me,


My mate who told me about this site had saw mia ONCE .
 Lets just say he wasn't impressed with her one bit.
I'm not going to embarrass the girl since she is on the thread.
But I was in hysterics with what he told me,

pointless mentioning it then.

Offline vorian

Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Yes probably was no point.
The girl is on the thread
She's got a negative anyway.
No point embarrassing her more.


Offline Tjkooker

Your gona struggle on here fella. Most of us don't have time for fluffies. Your heading there fast reading your review and recent posts it may already be too late
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Whats fuffies?
Ive said a few times im new to this so I don't know what the appropriate social etiquette is. Finding ma feet.
I can assure you im no softie, I can  hud my own with banter with the best of them
but my mammie brought me up to treat people with respect until they are a cunt to you then it's fine to slaughter them right back.

Aye I might show a bit emotions with my other posts. But been a hard time so it has.
 But is it not a hard time for aw cunt in their own way.
Thanks TJ For the advice I respect it and ill keep it in mind for nxt time




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)