Author Topic: English Phoebe - Nottingham  (Read 2264 times)


32 review(s) for EnglishPhoebeX (25 positive, 2 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Pheobe has been an on and off regular for years and I have reviewed her several times before for various reasons including change of location (Derby to Nottingham) and because of using different services - roleplay and submissive.  My last review was over a year ago (Sept 17) so this one is within the rules but I felt starting with a disclosure about earlier reviews helps the reader put this in context.

I took advantage of the March offer of an hour's incall for £100 to see her at her place.

As mentioned I have used her submissive services and had many good experiences with that, however I think that we have pushed that to the limit and will not be doing them again, or at least not for some time.  So I decided to change pace and have a gentle GFE with her fussing over me building to a good shag at the end.

Clearly I think Pheobe is an attractive woman otherwise I would not keep going back for more, however this is subjective.  To cover the basics she is the woman in the pictures and the age seems about right.  Worth noting that she is quite tall - even after all the meetings I have had with her it still slightly surprised me to to looking level when snogging!

Unlike many WGs she is actually slightly thinner than most of the photos as she has lost weight recently.

She does like pets and I have seen the full range over the years, including a snake, cats and a dog.  There were none in sight when I was there although I was told that the dog was in the kitchen.  Certainly the bedroom was a pet free zone.

Comms were good.

We quickly got naked and much playing around following, good kissing and generally getting me aroused.  I will not bore with details but she knows what I like and delivered.  There was plenty of OWO and unusually for me I decided to try some oral myself.  All good fun.

I covered up and she jumped on top giving me a good chance to admire and play with her boobs.  She then suggested doggy and I responded enthusiastically.   Her bum is just how I like them and it was not long before I was finished.

A short chat on the bed and I left on the hour.  As I get older I find that I appreciate a few minutes lying naked with an attractive young woman, just so I can reflect on what a lucky dirty old bastard I am.

Offline HailWood

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,962
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
Nice one RK!

Is that the sound of sausages that I hear getting warmed up ? :D

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
Nice one RK!

Is that the sound of sausages that I hear getting warmed up ? :D

i suspect they are starting to sizzle.  :drinks:

Offline Belgarion

Thanks for providing context behind the review. People can make up their minds that way as the review reads like an advert.

 :hi:

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
Thanks for providing context behind the review. People can make up their minds that way as the review reads like an advert.

 :hi:

Not sure how you write a clear positive review without it sounding like an advert? If you had a good time you are going to say that?  Perhaps the only difference here is that I addressed the pet issue simply because it has been raised as an issue before so it seems like useful information for punters.  As someone who is not that keen on pets and actively dislikes dogs it certainly is for me.

I remember when I flagged that Tanya was back it was reported as an advert whereas I thought it was useful information for punters, the string of positive reviews that followed suggested that I was right. (And Admin ignored the report.)

Anyhow I get less uptight about such things now, I shag plenty of WGs and I review when and who I want to, subject to site rules and Admin’s views.

Happy punting.  :hi:

Offline Belgarion

Not sure how you write a clear positive review without it sounding like an advert? If you had a good time you are going to say that?  Perhaps the only difference here is that I addressed the pet issue simply because it has been raised as an issue before so it seems like useful information for punters.  As someone who is not that keen on pets and actively dislikes dogs it certainly is for me.

I remember when I flagged that Tanya was back it was reported as an advert whereas I thought it was useful information for punters, the string of positive reviews that followed suggested that I was right. (And Admin ignored the report.)

Anyhow I get less uptight about such things now, I shag plenty of WGs and I review when and who I want to, subject to site rules and Admin’s views.

Happy punting.  :hi:

Positive reviews generally are an advertisement of sorts, I agree.

You went to great lengths to clarify a few things and present information far more focused on the "SP and her accommodation" than the quality of services.

Not looking to pick a fight or anything but it reads like you are doing a mate a favour.

 :hi: