Popular media on UKEscorting.com

Author Topic: An Example Of The Growing Influence Of UKP  (Read 1795 times)

Offline vorian

On my morning SAAFE look around came across the below thread.

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Reading between the lines it is obvious they are talking about UKP and the newbie prossies understand the importance a good or bad review can directly have on the amount of work they receive. Great feeling to know the power this forum which puts the punter first now has.

Btw, I think it is wrong for a wg to ask a punter for a review,  imho all reviews should be independently made.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online AnthG

I have not seen the girls profile but reading the OPs post in that thread

Quote
Would you all agree that it is really wrong to contact a punter by PM on a punting site or texting his punting phone to ask  to ask him to put in a good work for you on the site where he found your profile?   I am really struggling to raise and activate my profile which is about a month old and I need some action, he said he had a brilliant time and my observation was that he wasn't just being polite, but it still seems somewhow  WRONG to ask......but boy I could use some help.x

From what she is describing my guess is more so the issue she is facing is not the one she thinks it is. It is that as she is relatively new to AW punters are just not believing she is a real person and thinking she is a PG scammer and thus avoiding her. This is the problem new profiles have on AW not really the one she describes. And the problem is she has not twigged onto that yet and she is thinking she needs good words said about her instead.

The thing is a review about a girl on AW does two things. It says if she is worth a meet or not. But it also confirms she is a real person to see and not either a PG scammer, or a bunch of thugs pretending to be a girl to rob you.

And due to there there will be things she can do herself to get people to trust she is a real person.

Is it just me who thinks this as it seems odd why I am the only person who thinks this way. As it seems pretty obvious to me this is the real issue at play here. As all the responses were along the lines of the morals of "should I ask him for that review or not".

Offline akauya

On my morning SAAFE look around came across the below thread.

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Reading between the lines it is obvious they are talking about UKP and the newbie prossies understand the importance a good or bad review can directly have on the amount of work they receive. Great feeling to know the power this forum which puts the punter first now has.

Btw, I think it is wrong for a wg to ask a punter for a review,  imho all reviews should be independently made.

Is it really UKP they are talking about? Can't be arse to read the whole thread properly - the colours piss me off. However what I get from a quick skim, aside from asking punters to tout for them, and what they are not saying is that they are feeling the competition from EE girls getting tougher. Don't know where this particular prossie works but if we find out and we do a search on AW of her area I'm sure it will be flooded by EE girls. Probably better looking, and cheaper too. That may be why she's thinking of asking a punter to tout for her.

What English or rather British girls should do is capitalise on the fact that they are Brits AND offering a mind blowing service at very reasonable prices. Not what they do at the moment charge exorbitant prices just because they are Brits and still give an average service.

A few generalisations there but I'm sure you get my meaning.


Offline vorian

The prossies on SAAFE are not allowed to use the terms UKP or UK Punting the Elite mods hate us after all. Reading between the lines I am fairly confident on the whole they are talking about UKP.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online AnthG

The prossies on SAAFE are not allowed to use the terms UKP or UK Punting the Elite mods hate us after all. Reading between the lines I am fairly confident on the whole they are talking about UKP.
They also aren't allowed to have any discussions of Adultwork profiles, or have reviews for them, on [banned-site-auto-censor].

Its highly unlikely the OP has in her first month setup a website for herself. So she is most likely talking about an AW profile.

The thing is a review about a girl on AW does two things. It says if she is worth a meet or not. But it also confirms she is a real person to see and not either a PG scammer, or a bunch of thugs pretending to be a girl to rob you.

Has anyone ever heard of this actually happening ?

Offline akauya

The prossies on SAAFE are not allowed to use the terms UKP or UK Punting the Elite mods hate us after all. Reading between the lines I am fairly confident on the whole they are talking about UKP.

OK thanks - I didn't know that. As I said I don't read SAAFE much. Sounds like they have the same stupid policy as [banned-site-auto-censor] where they are not allowed to say Adultwork and UKP then.


Offline vorian

OK thanks - I didn't know that. As I said I don't read SAAFE much. Sounds like they have the same stupid policy as [banned-site-auto-censor] where they are not allowed to say Adultwork and UKP then.

Just scarred of the truth I guess. I don't agree on the whole with female members on UKP doesn't work out 99.9% of the time but at least they aren't banned like men are from SAAFE and I hope some wgs may lurk now and then to see the truth about what punters really want.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline akauya

Just scarred of the truth I guess. I don't agree on the whole with female members on UKP doesn't work out 99.9% of the time but at least they aren't banned like men are from SAAFE and I hope some wgs may lurk now and then to see the truth about what punters really want.

Exactly, as proved by the prossie who was asking what kind of photos punters like - we saved her £500 in photographers and photoshopping fees :)


Offline vorian

Exactly, as proved by the prossie who was asking what kind of photos punters like - we saved her £500 in photographers and photoshopping fees :)

Ah yes I remember that well,  so we are not all women hating,  bitter cunts after all. Maybe the prossy Elites on SAAFE should remember that.  I'm sure they all told her to spend the money on the photos.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

Has anyone ever heard of this actually happening ?

Not without a prossy enticing you in first,  very rare but can happen.  Normally when the prossy is a druggy.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Ali Katt

I think a lot of escorts don't want to be reviewed and if they are they are they prefer high-fiving and less detail about the ins and outs. Such as this unfunny thread - fckin fuming.
[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Online Sailormack

I think a lot of escorts don't want to be reviewed and if they are they are they prefer high-fiving and less detail about the ins and outs. Such as this unfunny thread - fckin fuming.
[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Yes.

And if they just post accurate photos we can see if their"size" appeals or not.

No need for numbers  :unknown:

Online AnthG

I think a lot of escorts don't want to be reviewed and if they are they are they prefer high-fiving and less detail about the ins and outs. Such as this unfunny thread - fckin fuming.
[[Link hidden, login to view]]
The thing that grates me about that thread is this post

Quote from: Amy
men generally tend to have a fixed idea of what people who correspond to different dress sizes look like without taking anything sensible like height, build and physical shape/fitness into account; you could line up six different size twelve women who would look nothing alike at all in terms of size and shape and it's really irrelevant (and that's before getting started on the differences shop-to-shop).

This is said like its our fault. I have still to this day no clue about womens dress sizes and I have read numerous websites to understand them. I am not ashamed to admit that at all. Same goes to a lesser extent to bra sizes. This is a size convention clearly created and propagated by women that have no baring on common-sense.

I can bet absolutely if I found Amys website and AW profile it will say she is a size 10/12/14 or whatever. If she wants to be true she should say I am a size 36 waist like men do with their dressings which actually makes sense as size 38 means 38 inches circumference.

Online CoolTiger

The thing that grates me about that thread is this post

I have still to this day no clue about womens dress sizes and I have read numerous websites to understand them. I am not ashamed to admit that at all. Same goes to a lesser extent to bra sizes. This is a size convention clearly created and propagated by women that have no baring on common-sense.


I have same problem. Which is why, I refrain form mentioning sizes in any posts.

Offline vorian

I can bet absolutely if I found Amys website and AW profile it will say she is a size 10/12/14 or whatever. If she wants to be true she should say I am a size 36 waist like men do with their dressings which actually makes sense as size 38 means 38 inches circumference.

Anth to find Amys website just go onto the SAAFE thread under her name is a little blue round planet (I think) click on it and it will take you to her website and yes it is exactly as you would expect. It works for all the prossies who link their AW profile or personal website to SAAFE.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline akauya

I have same problem. Which is why, I refrain form mentioning sizes in any posts.

I struggle past size 14. My fuck buddy is a size 8, wifey size 10. So I'm OK with that and guessing sizes 12, 14 but beyond that I have no clue.

Having said that... I don't really mind what size women are. What matters to me is whether I find them sexy enough to want to fuck them. I know some men are hung up on certain sizes and obviously some women certainly are which is unfortunate in my opinion.


Offline vorian

Having a quick read of the latest posts on this SAAFE I can conclude that they are definitely talking about UKP for sure. Strange how many on SAAFE seem more worried about personal comments about being fat etc. Than they are about having good reviews about the work they do. Can I surmise from this that heavy users on SAAFE are on average more insecure about what they do as a job than the prossies who rarely use SAAFE.  :unknown:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline akauya

Fuck it Vorian you got me into reading SAAFE now  :dash:


I found this one funny...

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Eating pussy for an hour solid??? The guy mus breathe through his ears :D

OK anyone going to own up? Who is it?

Offline vorian

Fuck it Vorian you got me into reading SAAFE now  :dash:


I found this one funny...

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Eating pussy for an hour solid??? The guy mus breathe through his ears :D

OK anyone going to own up? Who is it?

An hour, I'm bad but not that bad 45, 50 minutes tops  :D
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Theres an easy way to work out if they are talking about UKP (the biggest punting site in the UK). One states she had had a review stating she is fat, so if the review is on here then its us surely.

Just found the review in the scotland review section, so it would seem to confirm that it is UKP.

Offline Jimmyredcab



Btw, I think it is wrong for a wg to ask a punter for a review,  imho all reviews should be independently made.

I can't see the problem, as long as the review is totally accurate and honest.     :unknown: :unknown:

Offline vorian

I can't see the problem, as long as the review is totally accurate and honest.     :unknown: :unknown:

Welcome back Jimmy,  not been the same without you posting.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jimmyredcab

Welcome back Jimmy.

I do have a life outside of UKPunting, hard to believe I know.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com