Author Topic: xox_Amelia_xox - Manchester City Centre (on tour) - TS REVIEW  (Read 6591 times)


3 review(s) for AmeliaLaRouge (0 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by NigelF]

Offline NigelF

Link: External Link/Members Only

This WG combines two of my favourite perversions: TS escorts and lactating escorts!

Price: £120 for 1 hour.

Location: Cheap hotel close to Piccadilly Gardens (not one that's very commonly used amongst escorts although I have been there at least once before).

Looks: Her pictures on AW are flattering and misleading. The main 3 photos currently on her profile are the worst offenders, clearly airbrushed/filtered. Even the ones in her public gallery are flattering and cleverly posed. I am partly to blame for not following my own rule though. The rule is to assume that she looks like her worst photo - the this applies to all escorts but particularly to TS escorts. In this case, she looked even worse than her worst photo, particularly in terms of being a little larger in the stomach area and noticeably chubbier in the face. She'd also looked like she recently had a bout of acne.

I'd say she looked somewhat feminine and is passable when dressed up. Her hair was dyed red and was slightly below shoulder length, I though it looked nice. She had a bit of noticeable belly but not too much out of proportion (although not in proportion either). So in terms of size, the large end of 12 might be right but I'd guess 14, in part due her height and partly due to her chest measurement which gives the game away - she claims to be 38C (in the text of her profile). I think that chest circumference (38") is right but the claimed cup size (C) is likely wrong. When wearing her padded bra they look like Cs but in reality she only has B cups. They're natural (hormone induced) and B cup is still pretty good going for a TS.

Her arse has a decent amount of meat to it but it does look quite flat, particularly when she's standing up. A final negative that I only noticed when kissing and  being up close was that she has some minor/sparse but still noticeable prickly bread stubble. Overall, I was definitely disappointed with her appearance. I was very close to walking but I couldn't be arsed.

Service: I asked beforehand about her lactation and also the likelihood of her being able to get hard and cum. To her credit, she tempered expectations by only promising a few drops of boob juice and stating that cumming was "very much a maybe". I wasn't too fussed and appreciated the honesty.

Onto the punt, in terms of kissing she was fine with FK and possibly more but for various reasons, including partly whatever the flavour of vaping product she was using, I didn't test that out out much/fully. I'm not sure what the flavour was but it wasn't a daft sweet one nor was it neutral/odorless or tobacco-like (assuming such "flavours" exist), the closest thing I can say was probably weed although that itself is rather far off. At a couple of points during the punt she went to take a drag. Fortunately she refrained from doing it during sex but she was desperate for it once we'd finished.

She was lactating but only managed to get a couple of drops from each tit. In terms of flavour the low quantity probably didn't help and I presume it's also not "full breast milk", just part of it (as breast milk varies in composition depending on hormones - just like in various stages after a woman has given birth). It just tasted watery (like skimmed cow's milk).

OWO was good in terms of technique and depth although there was only a fleeting moment or two of DT although I didn't ask for more. She was overly keen to move on to sex and seemed reluctant at performing more OWO so I agreed to move on. Onto anal sex, which was enjoyed in a variety of positions and she was enthusiastic.

At no point in the punt did her cock stir but I didn't make much effort and she certainly discouraged me from giving her any oral. She also mentioned the fact that I was the 3rd punter of the day, presumably to drop a hint. For reference, this punt was only early afternoon. However I'm well aware that one needs to book earlier for that sort of stuff (unless you get lucky due to them not being busy).

Had a massage to end things which was a of a typical escort variety, i.e. mostly naff but OK. I did get my full time.

Overall: There were multiple stages (both well beforehand and at the start) where I could and possibly should have bailed on this punt. I went ahead and even though I was disappointed with her appearance, I was satisfied with her service. As such, while I certainly won't be bothering again, I really can't complain much so I think a neutral is fair.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2019, 12:54:17 am by NigelF »

Offline standardpostage

I like your rule of assuming they look like their worst photo.
Interesting review. Cheers.
They used to say that "a picture is worth a thousand words" I don't think it applies on adultwork  :)
« Last Edit: March 21, 2019, 11:00:35 am by standardpostage »

Offline NigelF

Forgot to include the Birchplace link: External Link/Members Only

I also forgot to comment on her age. She claims to be 26 (on AW) and that seemed about right to me.

Offline JUICEGORGER

Succinct, articulate and humorous review. Thank you.

Offline Taggart

Apologies for being late to comment on this FR, been away with very limited net access.

Amelia has been on my HL for a time, as I have wanted to meet a passive TS or one who was bottom only, but with the proviso she looked quite feminine.

Having looked at Amelia's photos, I thought they showed an increasing degree of feminanity and were quite convincing, so it was disappointing for the OP to comment about the photoshopping. I had felt they showed how natural she'd progressed in her transition. SHows how wrong you can be.

While enjoying the OP's report (and full marks for venturing that way), I was also disappointed by the stubble comment and the vaping. Added to which her cock was off limits (whether that's something you want to try or not) as jerking her was something I might have done in the throws of passion!! Might have liked touching another hard cock....   So if it's a no go zone, why brag on your profile you've a 7in girly cock? Anyway, she's off the list now.

I'd also had another feminine looking TS from Kent on the old HL, but she's now added 'no kissing' to her profile narrative, so that's another one deleted. So it's becoming harder (pun not intended) to find a passive, feminine, convincing TS to break my duck.

Maybe stick cis girls instead?



Offline NigelF

Having very recently seen this WG in the tours section of AW (she'll be touring Manchester again very soon), has reminded me to update this review. It isn't totally necessary given her more recent reviews (both negative) but I feel compelled to do so for completeness/accuracy.

I'd say she looked somewhat feminine and is passable when dressed up.

This is true but it's also still a bit generous. Yes, somewhat feminine but still leaning masculine overall. If you passed her in the street you probably wouldn't notice but if you actually paid attention to her you'd very likely be at least suspicious that she wasn't "all woman".

I think I was being a bit fluffy because she told me some sop stories about her transition, e.g. being bullied and having to have loads of vocal coaching sessions etc.

Onto the punt, in terms of kissing she was fine with FK and possibly more but for various reasons, including partly whatever the flavour of vaping product she was using, I didn't test that out out much/fully.

Another reason for this was that the state of her teeth and gums weren't great. Both visually (very yellow/stained teeth) and based on what she said to me. I think I made a passing comment about the strong mouthwash she had in the bathroom (I think Corsodyl) and she said she used it because she sometimes had bleeding gums and she wanted to protect herself given that she did OWO.

Now this is a wise precaution and even if she didn't do anything, the risks from OWO to myself at least, are still extremely low and that's in the unlikely event that she even has something.

Nonetheless she either told me directly she had gum disease or I figured it out based on the fact that bleeding gums is a key symptom. Now I appreciate there are different levels and it's not particularly uncommon either but even if it's only mild, it's still very off-putting. She didn't have bad breath though but presumably the mouthwash helped in that regard.

The reason I failed to mention this in the review was that I think I accidentally said something to her that could have easily revealed my identity. Hence I didn't want her to be able to identify me from the review. In my experience it's very difficult to provide adequate detail without making it obvious who you are, especially when posting shortly after the punt, which is important to do if it's not a positive.

Overall: There were multiple stages (both well beforehand and at the start) where I could and possibly should have bailed on this punt. I went ahead and even though I was disappointed with her appearance, I was satisfied with her service. As such, while I certainly won't be bothering again, I really can't complain much so I think a neutral is fair.

I should've bailed/walked. I can complain, I should've done so a bit more in the review and rated it a negative. Given my subsequent reflections on the punt and what I've just said, I'm changing this review to a negative as I think that's actually the most fair rating.