Is a WG refusing to send a facepic a dealbreaker for you?

[Andre 3000]

Was reading in another thread about a WG who didn't want to send a face pic because of a stalker. I do a lot of RB's and have found the women that bid seem a lot more open to sending a recent face pic. I now can't meet a WG unless they send me one first. I even request just a normal non nude pic.

So does anyone else on here insist on a face pic or two before a potential meet.

[password02]

On my recent RB's last year I had about 5 accepted of which I got 3 face pics - all good and I have never had a bed punt on my RB in London- Agree some WG's do seem to be a little more relaxed with sending you a face shot. However no a deal breaker for me as I tend to study FB on UKP as well as speaking to the WG before agreeing the RB

[vorian]

Unless I have a recommendation from a very well respected (personal choice of how I characterise this) UKP member. Then no face picture for me is a deal breakers from the start as imho a lack of a picture on a profile alway flags up concerns regarding how the wg views her job and how focused on providing excellent customer service in a professional manner she will be.

[smiths]

Was reading in another thread about a WG who didn't want to send a face pic because of a stalker. I do a lot of RB's and have found the women that bid seem a lot more open to sending a recent face pic. I now can't meet a WG unless they send me one first. I even request just a normal non nude pic.

So does anyone else on here insist on a face pic or two before a potential meet.

I have zero interest in RBs as i punt according to what i already know i am prepared to pay, but i dont insist on seeing a WGs face pics. If i did i would of missed out on many good WGs over the years. Obviously seeing one is better than not but i am prepared to turn up and see the WG and walking if i dont fancy her, then ringing my plan B option.

[MidlandsEscortxo]

Personally I wouldn't send a face pic to someone over the phone, you never know who is on the other end... also find people who ask are often time wasters, but that's just personal experience. I do have a face pic in private gallery though as it's less likely someone I know will see it

[vorian]

Personally I wouldn't send a face pic to someone over the phone, you never know who is on the other end... also find people who ask are often time wasters, but that's just personal experience. I do have a face pic in private gallery though as it's less likely someone I know will see it

Isn't that a bit dishonest then as you accept that your picture is available to the public so anyone realistically can out you as such but only for the price of a PG. I would have more respect if you had no face pictures at all as opposed to one that had to be paid for. Why do you not have a face picture on your free gallery the general feedback from punters would indicate you would receive more bookings if you did.

[MidlandsEscortxo]

Isn't that a bit dishonest then as you accept that your picture is available to the public so anyone realistically can out you as such but only for the price of a PG. I would have more respect if you had no face pictures at all as opposed to one that had to be paid for. Why do you not have a face picture on your free gallery the general feedback from punters would indicate you would receive more bookings if you did.

Maybe I'm wrong I don't know but the way I see it is if a friend suspected me of being a WG or a friend was using AW to look for a girl the chances of them finding my profile and buying my private gallery is very slim, as opposed to them browsing and me being top search and they can see my face. Never looked at it from the point you've just made but that's how I think of it.

[smiths]

Personally I wouldn't send a face pic to someone over the phone, you never know who is on the other end... also find people who ask are often time wasters, but that's just personal experience. I do have a face pic in private gallery though as it's less likely someone I know will see it

Always makes me chuckle. So you will sell your privacy to any Tom, Dick or Harry who is prepared to pay for a face pic while not being prepared to offer one for free. Pure greed as i see it. I would rather cut my cock off than pay one penny for something that should be either offered free or not on offer at all. Obviously i appreciate some punters view things entirely differently.

[vorian]

Maybe I'm wrong I don't know but the way I see it is if a friend suspected me of being a WG or a friend was using AW to look for a girl the chances of them finding my profile and buying my private gallery is very slim, as opposed to them browsing and me being top search and they can see my face. Never looked at it from the point you've just made but that's how I think of it.

Fair enough so don't put the face picture on your front page but put it in the free gallery.  That way a random search won't show up but interested punters can see without feeling cheated.

[password02]

I have zero interest in RBs as i punt according to what i already know i am prepared to pay, but i dont insist on seeing a WGs face pics. If i did i would of missed out on many good WGs over the years. Obviously seeing one is better than not but i am prepared to turn up and see the WG and walking if i dont fancy her, then ringing my plan B option.

Agree with your last statement about not being a deal breaker as I would have also missed out on a few Gems last 12 months

[smiths]

Isn't that a bit dishonest then as you accept that your picture is available to the public so anyone realistically can out you as such but only for the price of a PG. I would have more respect if you had no face pictures at all as opposed to one that had to be paid for. Why do you not have a face picture on your free gallery the general feedback from punters would indicate you would receive more bookings if you did.

As i just posted its pure greed on her part, prepared to sell her privacy for a price. In reality she or no WG has ANY idea who might get hold of her face pic.

[MidlandsEscortxo]

Fair enough so don't put the face picture on your front page but put it in the free gallery.  That way a random search won't show up but interested punters can see without feeling cheated.

As I said that increases the chances of someone recognising me, either way wether I have a pic on my PG or not if someone dosnt pay or does it hardly affects them does it... no  one is going to pay JUST for a face pic

[vorian]

As I said that increases the chances of someone recognising me, either way wether I have a pic on my PG or not if someone dosnt pay or does it hardly affects them does it... no  one is going to pay JUST for a face pic

Yes it most definitely does, punters like to see a face picture before booking it is very near the top of the list for many many punters when it comes to how they make a choice and yes some will pay to see one face picture if they are serious about booking.  PG are not just about wank material but a way of advertising as well. Some punters will not pay on principle alone.  I agree with what your saying about a face pic on main page coming up on the listing but there are ten of thousands on AW profile so if one of your friends was to find your free gallery face picture then them must have a pretty good idea of what you do anyway so a PG picture would not stop them if they are determined enough.  The only people you are putting off with a face picture in your PG as opposed to a face picture hidden in your free gallery are real punters who wish to book you.

[Sailormack]

I was under the impression that prostitutes were strong, independent, and proud members of the sisterhood.

It would appear that I was mistaken 

[password02]

Theres a thread on this recently with the other side - External Link/Members Only

Some interesting views but none of them actually get it - If you do show your face and it is a nice pretty face you will get more bookings!!

[MidlandsEscortxo]

Theres a thread on this recently with the other side - External Link/Members Only

Some interesting views but none of them actually get it - If you do show your face and it is a nice pretty face you will get more bookings!!

In some ways you are absolutely right, maybe I might take this on board for when working in towns not close to my home, but I've always done pretty alright considering, might do a little experiment to see

[vorian]

In some ways you are absolutely right, maybe I might take this on board for when working in towns not close to my home, but I've always done pretty alright considering, might do a little experiment to see

Never does any harm in trying to improve your business.  I do understand you have a choice and a right to reveal or not to reveal on your profile and I respect that but please bear in mind it is your window on advertising and your contact point to punters. The more honest you are about what you do as a job the more bookings you will get. KristenDD is a good example of that recently a well respected and reviewed wg who has basically now a blank profile in case her new boyfriend finds out. Her profile is now utterly pointless and I cannot see how she will ever get a new punter from it.

[Daffodil]

I don't think there is any reason not t provide a face picture. It doesn't prove anything. As far as I can tell there is only one type of picture that would be very difficult to explain and that is the verification picture.

[Gordo987]

I have certainly cancelled a punt for this reason, and would do so again. 

[MidlandsEscortxo]

Never does any harm in trying to improve your business.  I do understand you have a choice and a right to reveal or not to reveal on your profile and I respect that but please bear in mind it is your window on advertising and your contact point to punters. The more honest you are about what you do as a job the more bookings you will get. KristenDD is a good example of that recently a well respected and reviewed wg who has basically now a blank profile in case her new boyfriend finds out. Her profile is now utterly pointless and I cannot see how she will ever get a new punter from it.

Surely if so well respected and reviewed then she will have many regulars? Also working for a parlour is great advertisement as they will have met her. But I do agree

[MidlandsEscortxo]

I don't think there is any reason not t provide a face picture. It doesn't prove anything. As far as I can tell there is only one type of picture that would be very difficult to explain and that is the verification picture.

All depends on discretion of a girl, I'm just very aware of my social standing where I live, but might change never know

[Taggart]

Unless I have a recommendation from a very well respected (personal choice of how I characterise this) UKP member. Then no face picture for me is a deal breakers from the start as imho a lack of a picture on a profile alway flags up concerns regarding how the wg views her job and how focused on providing excellent customer service in a professional manner she will be.

+1

Back in 2005/6 I took a punt on a punt where there was no face pic, and while not a dog, she was no way what I'd have picked facially.

So as Vorian says, unless it's a good trusted punter, then it's a no.  Same applies to WGs whose profile show a selection of body parts where you cant make out the size or shape, as I hate BBWs.

[James999]

I'm just very aware of my social standing where I live,

Social standing? you suck old mens cocks for cash

[Daffodil]

All depends on discretion of a girl, I'm just very aware of my social standing where I live, but might change never know

That's nonsense, you have a pic readily available. As smiths says, you're just after the credits.

If you have an email address for escorting that's not linked to you then you can send the picture from that. If it ends up going to somebody who wants to out you then you just say that somebody has stolen your picture 

[MidlandsEscortxo]

Social standing? you suck old mens cocks for cash

You pay women to shag them? ... I didn't realise we were playing the 'who has better morals' game

[Andre 3000]

So as Vorian says, unless it's a good trusted punter, then it's a no.  Same applies to WGs whose profile show a selection of body parts where you cant make out the size or shape, as I hate BBWs.

Yeah that one does wind me up if you're a BBW don't hide your bod. I don't mind a cute BBW every now and then but if the WG is hiding her gut taking pics that only showcase her lying down so her tits look bigger and more fuller or all the other silly tricks she's off my HL.

[nomeansno]

He wasn't the one claiming to have a "social standing" to be fair.

[TeasingTanya24]

being a wg myself i completely agree with this girl if a customer is really that bothered he will pay the PG price too see the face its more like nosey timewasters who ask for them continually buying th pg too see it proves a genuine customer or i know it does too me and on moral standings i sell my pussy too pay my bills may aswell sell my face too

[vorian]

being a wg myself i completely agree with this girl if a customer is really that bothered he will pay the PG price too see the face its more like nosey timewasters who ask for them continually buying th pg too see it proves a genuine customer or i know it does too me and on moral standings i sell my pussy too pay my bills may aswell sell my face too

Your choice but you can't quantify how many booking you are losing due to your policy  The general feedback on this forum is many punters will pass on a profile is no free face and body picture is available.

[TeasingTanya24]

so in that case me as many wgs i know would rather pass on that business than take a risk what if my tutor from uni was on there looking for a girl and he found my facepicture i could be kicked off my course (as has been proved and happened too a wg in lincoln) were as im pretty sure by my body pics he wouldnt no who i was and certainly couldnt prove it!

[vorian]

so in that case me as many wgs i know would rather pass on that business than take a risk what if my tutor from uni was on there looking for a girl and he found my facepicture i could be kicked off my course (as has been proved and happened too a wg in lincoln) were as im pretty sure by my body pics he wouldnt no who i was and certainly couldnt prove it!

And that's your choice but you would be happy to task this risk if you were getting paid through a PG.

So PG/Income is OK to take the risk
But
Escorting/Income not OK to take the risk

What I object to is the willingness to take the risk for PG income but not to entice real punters. If a wg refuses to show any face pictures Free or PG then fine it is her choice. This dishonest half arsed measure and delusion regarding PG that I don't like.

[TeasingTanya24]

simple dont like it dont punt with them girls

yes ofcourse id take the risk if someone was willing too pay like i take the risk that someone should murder me half way through fucking my cunt as there willing too pay no difference....

[finn5555]

being a wg myself i completely agree with this girl if a customer is really that bothered he will pay the PG price too see the face its more like nosey timewasters who ask for them continually buying th pg too see it proves a genuine customer or i know it does too me and on moral standings i sell my pussy too pay my bills may aswell sell my face too

Trouble with most pro$$ies is greed. If I want to see a face pic I don't see why I should pay to view a PG for the pleasure. If the pro$$ie wants me to buy her services she should send a face pic when requested. It's like buying a Ferrari you want to view it but wouldn't pay for the pleasure when the actual price is that high 
Saying that I don't always ask for face pics before booking but more often than not I will if it's a RB...

[TeasingTanya24]

if you sent me a face picture id happily send you one but im guessing you wouldnt be so willing 

[finn5555]

if you sent me a face picture id happily send you one but im guessing you wouldnt be so willing 

No your right I wouldn't send you one. Unless you were paying me of course 

[TeasingTanya24]

exactly so you arent willing too give up your discretion but were expected too....... i think its very nieve too think girls should show there faces completely allowing every tom dick and harry too know there private life

[finn5555]

exactly so you arent willing too give up your discretion but were expected too....... i think its very nieve too think girls should show there faces completely allowing every tom dick and harry too know there private life

You need to remember who the client is here  you earn good tax free money so a face pic when requested is the least you can do 

[TeasingTanya24]

sorry didnt no you were the tax man and new my history im actually one off the minority who bother too pay tax as you never know when it will come round too bite you on the arse also yes your the one paying im the one offering you my body so the least you can do is bother too wash very much same scenario..........expectations and reality can be two very different things

[Melfort212]

so in that case me as many wgs i know would rather pass on that business than take a risk what if my tutor from uni was on there looking for a girl and he found my facepicture i could be kicked off my course (as has been proved and happened too a wg in lincoln) were as im pretty sure by my body pics he wouldnt no who i was and certainly couldnt prove it!

If you weren't having meetings on the uni campus though, what grounds do the uni have to kick you off your course? As escorting is not illegal I can't see what they could use, it's your own personal time afterall.

[finn5555]

sorry didnt no you were the tax man and new my history im actually one off the minority who bother too pay tax as you never know when it will come round too bite you on the arse also yes your the one paying im the one offering you my body so the least you can do is bother too wash very much same scenario..........expectations and reality can be two very different things

You pay tax..... You are in the minority but somehow I think you are telling porkies 
And what has washing got to do with face pics 

[Melfort212]

You need to remember who the client is here  you earn good tax free money so a face pic when requested is the least you can do 

I agree with the WG here, many do not want people they know to find them escorting, so face pics are a no no and that's fine by me.

[finn5555]

I agree with the WG here, many do not want people they know to find them escorting, so face pics are a no no and that's fine by me.

That's your choice, I'm not saying pro$$ies have to send them just don't expect guys who want to see them to book them 

[TeasingTanya24]

because as part off a degree you take on a role they see it as seriously as drug dealing ect which i completely agree with you it shouldnt matter but it does tut

[finn5555]

because as part off a degree you take on a role they see it as seriously as drug dealing ect which i completely agree with you it shouldnt matter but it does tut

Are you pissed or talking of drugs high  that statement makes no sense whatsoever 

[TeasingTanya24]

that was meant too say " being part off the uni taking part in a degree" shoot me for not checking my post before posting

[finn5555]

that was meant too say " being part off the uni taking part in a degree" shoot me for not checking my post before posting

Ahhhh your educated sorry didn't realise 

[SirPhilipXX]

I don't think there is any reason not to provide a face picture. It doesn't prove anything. As far as I can tell there is only one type of picture that would be very difficult to explain and that is the verification picture.

I agree, but I can see why a WG might not want it as her profile pic in case it was seen by chance by someone who knew her in civvy land.

I don't mind if the WG's face pic is in her private gallery so long as she is not charging more than 1 credit for access.

[vorian]

I agree, but I can see why a WG might not want it as her profile pic in case it was seen by chance by someone who knew her in civvy land.

I don't mind if the WG's face pic is in her private gallery so long as she is not charging more than 1 credit for access.

My point is if a prossy wants guaranteed privacy, fine her choice, then don't have a face picture in the PG as her privacy does have a price of one or two credits, that is greedy and unprofessional as having a free face picture would lead to more escort bookings. You can't have it both ways.

[smiths]

simple dont like it dont punt with them girls

yes ofcourse id take the risk if someone was willing too pay like i take the risk that someone should murder me half way through fucking my cunt as there willing too pay no difference....

Where you say of course you would take the risk, you might but some WGs who really dont want people they know to know they are WGs wont as i know from talking to some WGs over the years. They wouldnt chance it even by PG. You have NO idea who might buy a PG picture or who they might show that to.

Personally this selling your privacy for a price when the WG has said she doesnt want people she knows to knows she is a WG just shows the utter greed of such WGs in my view.

[smiths]

if you sent me a face picture id happily send you one but im guessing you wouldnt be so willing 

Thats got fuck all to do with it, YOUR the one selling the service, what i look like has nothing to do with it unless you state no ugly punters welcome. I have read this crap from WGs before, including a few that arent joking, they actually insist on seeing a punters face pic before taking a booking off them. Clearly they view punting the same as internet dating.