Sugar Babies
Shemales
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Elsa Sweet London  (Read 5350 times)

password02

  • Guest
« on: February 09, 2014, 12:06:25 am »
I am attracted to this girl last few weeks but cannot find any reviews - External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She has been on AW for nearly 6 years and first AW FB was in 2008 so not sure why nothing here on UKP - seems she is 24 now so started when she was 18 - She is at my very top end price of £160 ph and her profiles says that she sees only a 'couple' of clients a week - however she does look very nice in her gallery eben though the pics are photo shopped.

Can any UKP member help out as I would love to visit and do a UKP review for Elsa sweet in London

Thanks in advance  :hi:

Offline xsw21

« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2014, 12:10:13 am »
I read that panel was interested in her, but I don’t know if he saw her  :unknown:

she does look very sexy  :yahoo:

password02

  • Guest
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2014, 12:17:15 am »
Could not find any reviews on UKP so assumed never got round to her - she does look the business in her profile pics

Offline Pace10

« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2014, 12:41:56 am »
I had some interest in her a few years ago when she had unblurred face pictures on her profile. I then bought access to her PG (sadly I didn't save those photos) and I must say I was pretty disappointed with her face in those pictures. She looked quite a bit older and not nearly as attractive as her profile pictures or what you can make out of her blurred pictures in her profile now. Looks are of course subjective though.

Before buying her PG I had emailed her asking if she was available for 2 hours at X O'clock at a specific date. I got a reply saying something like: "I might be". Now what the hell should I make out of that? I never bothered to reply to that silly email but for all I know her coms may be excellent with others now.

Festisio

  • Guest
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2014, 01:02:38 am »
Last time I posted face pics for a prossie loads of fluffies complained and reported them to be removed - so I advise saving them quickly before Admin removes.

Clearly photoshopped massively, she will look very different in the flesh no doubt.

Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 01:03:59 am by Festisio »

password02

  • Guest
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2014, 01:05:16 am »
I had something similar a few days ago when I sent her a email - it was after midnight and she replied next days saying

 'Next time do not send me emails so late at night'

Interesting about the face picture - she is expensive at £160 ph so I would want a stunning WG at least a 9/10 min - I have seen Michelle Indi in London E4 also Ms Madlin Moon and I would put both looks as a Excellent as stunning and a 10/10 -

Pace 10 are you saying that she is not even in the same class of looks as Michelle or Madlin?

Offline Pace10

« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2014, 01:06:11 am »
Ok that was definitely not the pictures I saw when I bought access to her PG a few years ago. In these pics she looks fabulous like her blurred pics imo. The pictures I saw a few years ago was maybe a 7/10, due to her body. Face wise she was for me a 5. Face pictures posted in this thread now is a 9-10 for me just to put it into perspective.

By the way; what kind of bullshit reply is don't email so late? Surely a late email won't ruin her sleep and she can just reply properly the day after.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 01:08:51 am by Pace10 »

Festisio

  • Guest
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2014, 01:08:05 am »
Agreed she does appear to be pretty even taking account of the airbrushing, and I tried to book her once but it didn't go ahead, not sure why think it was just that she wasn't working that day.  Definitely seems the kind of prossie you need to book in advance, which is fine for me.

She's also one of the few prossies who I believe when she says she only sees a few people per week.

Would be good to hear feedback from someone who has seen her.

password02

  • Guest
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2014, 01:09:00 am »
Thanks for the pics    Festisio - Yes agreed photo shopped however not sure how she looks like in real life - Pace 10 said when he saw her face pics a few years ago he was disappointed

alan501

  • Guest
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2014, 11:40:22 am »
I saw Elsa in 2008 when she was part of the Hot Collection agency, and it was a very good punt indeed.
She was studying for her a-levels (no pun intended!). Age wise looked 20-22, very pretty, but not quite like the pics and her body was in very good nick. Very deep French kisser, deep oral, and sex was as passionate as I'd had to that point. CIM was offered and taken. She even rimmed me! Which was an unexpected surprise.
Saw her again a few months later and was pretty much a repeat of the first meeting.
Last time I saw her was 2010, service and attitude was the same, but she seemed to have lost a bit of weight, which made her boobs a bit droopy/saggy.
Reason I haven't been back since, is I'm normally an impulse punter and rarely go to those escorts that haven't got a phone number showing, where you have to go through email tennis before getting your end away. (Exceptions being Miya Rai and Kristen DD)

sir_david

  • Guest
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2014, 09:49:54 pm »

Yep, saw her in October 2010 (see her Rating on me), was £170/hour then, now £160.
I made no memorable notes for myself at the time other than her boobs being a bit “unfit” (as “alan501”) so was obviously not greatly impressed.
Seem to remember that she was very pleasant, pretty, sexually very active (!) great attitude and good company but, yes, the photo’s have been seriously glamourised.
83 Ratings in 6 years and no Field Reports since December 2012 = ?

Stefanie, Katalina, Emily, Amelya, Sweet Leeloo and Michelle are more naturally ‘stunning’.

password02

  • Guest
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2014, 10:23:36 pm »
Cheers for the comments guys - it seems that at £160 ph she may be a bit too expensive for me - I rather have an hour with the latest cisso conquest then the heavily photoshopped Elsa sweet - and save myself a £10.

Now have serious thoughts on even keeping her on my HL!!!!

Offline Horneylee

« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2014, 11:28:28 am »
Sir David do you have links to these ladies you recommend?

sir_david

  • Guest
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2014, 12:59:13 pm »

dawsonuk

  • Guest
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2014, 06:46:09 pm »
Lindsay Love? Have had an eye on her for a while, but seen various dubious reports etc. Would you recommend her?

sir_david

  • Guest
« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2014, 09:33:35 pm »
Quote from: dawsonuk on February 10, 2014, 06:46:09 pm
Lindsay Love? Have had an eye on her for a while, but seen various dubious reports etc. Would you recommend her?

Photo’s are completely accurate, tall, slim, lovely figure.
Age probably 24 – 26 now.
Saw her in August 2012 and her rate hasn’t changed from £100.
English was a serious struggle which makes her quite shy to start with and, in action, she can be a little abrupt if she doesn’t understand you.
By her own admission, a passionate kisser and once warmed up, is quite demanding in a cheeky sort of way (!) and the sex was intense. Don’t get into a conversation!
If she is still at SW6 7S_ , then the entrance is far from discreet – up an external staircase, on the end of a building, in full view of the estate!
I think there may be some mixed reviews here (can’t be bothered to find them) and poss. someone mentioned ‘biting’?!?
On balance, I would definitely recommend – go for it, but not necessarily the £1600 Valentine Day Special!
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 09:35:56 pm by sir_david »

password02

  • Guest
« Reply #16 on: February 10, 2014, 09:54:30 pm »
Any links for this bitting girl?

sir_david

  • Guest
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2014, 10:41:52 pm »
Quote from: password02 on February 10, 2014, 09:54:30 pm
Any links for this bitting girl?

Senior Moment!
Sure I've seen it somewhere?
May have dreamed it?
But I didn't feel threatened by Lindsay!
This new Site Review access facility is brilliant!

Offline boomting_

« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2014, 04:04:45 am »
She looks hot but what does she really look like?

The first 3 pictures, her face appears to be wider and fuller than the rest of the pictures... And her boobs and body seem to be larger than the other pictures.

Due to my own personal preference I like the look of her in the later pictures (not picture 1,2,3)

Decent positive reviews on her aw page with some good field reports too.

Her attitude seems to stink going by the way she responded to emails and texts, ' maybe available?' Like wtf, you either are or you're not. Maybe she's one of those wags who think they are just so great, and so in high demand that they can act any way she wants.... A big ego or big headed or the snobby type.

Don't think I'd take a chance with her, due to her pricing and her attitude...
but would love to hear of any more, up to date encounters anyone has had with her...

I'm not convinced
« Last Edit: February 11, 2014, 04:06:38 am by boomting_ »

Offline King Nuts

« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2014, 06:14:01 pm »
Quote from: Pace10 on February 09, 2014, 01:06:11 am
Ok that was definitely not the pictures I saw when I bought access to her PG a few years ago. In these pics she looks fabulous like her blurred pics imo. The pictures I saw a few years ago was maybe a 7/10, due to her body. Face wise she was for me a 5. Face pictures posted in this thread now is a 9-10 for me just to put it into perspective.

By the way; what kind of bullshit reply is don't email so late? Surely a late email won't ruin her sleep and she can just reply properly the day after.

Yeah, and what's with the 'suspenders worn OVER the knickers' deal?

For that reason alone, I'll not be investing.

sir_david

  • Guest
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2014, 06:28:40 pm »
Quote from: King Nuts on February 11, 2014, 06:14:01 pm
Yeah, and what's with the 'suspenders worn OVER the knickers' deal?

For that reason alone, I'll not be investing.

When I arrived, she wasn't wearing EITHER so it wasn't a problem!

Offline tantric talents

« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2016, 01:49:32 pm »
Hey Guys,
decided to bump this as I saw her at the weekend.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84885.0
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »