Popularity -sometimes a turn off.?

[Steve McQueen]

Just perusing some girls on AW as you do, looking for a meet this week. I seem at the moment  to shy away just recently from girls who seem to knock up numerous meets in a very short period. I appreciate that they must be popular and very good but it seems to put me off the ‘ conveyor belt’ types. Probably being over sensitive and should just accept that some are popular this year but not next. Anybody else feel this way?

[PJMaguffy]

Yes I feel much the same, if I see someone just tend to think about our time together and not think about her seeing anyone else, never talk about other punters it'll mess with your head.

Seems there are a lot of girls out there so just need to find your fit,

[cueball]

I've never worried about how many punters a lass sees.

Popularity is a good thing imo, plenty of good reviews ups (not guarantee) the chances of a good punt.

[Musttryit]

Totally agree with you both. One in particular I go to and she is always busy. When other Punters describe whats gone on
it can mess your head up if your not careful. You need to remind yourself, they are all in it to make a living and the more
regular clients they have the, the money is foremost. 

[chrishornx]

I've never worried about how many punters a lass sees.

Popularity is a good thing imo, plenty of good reviews ups (not guarantee) the chances of a good punt.

it is a fine mix between 'popular' for a reasoned and well worth a visit  and 'over hyped' and an inevitable let down when you get there...part of the curiosity is the 'curates egg' that the world of punting inevitably offers

[cueball]

it is a fine mix between 'popular' for a reasoned and well worth a visit  and 'over hyped' and an inevitable let down when you get there...part of the curiosity is the 'curates egg' that the world of punting inevitably offers

Imo the difference between popular and over hyped is in who does the writing and not the lass in the subject.

Once you get to know a few on here that you trust and share tastes, it's reasonably straight forward to know when over hyping bollocks is being written.

Besides that, we've all seen enough lasses to know it's always ymmv.

[Musttryit]

Im glad this topic has arisen as its played on my mind for sometime. Quality of the punts can help you choose.

[notcalledchris]

I've never worried about how many punters a lass sees.

Popularity is a good thing imo, plenty of good reviews ups (not guarantee) the chances of a good punt.

Never worried me.   You wouldn't trust a builder who wasn't busy.   If anything the fact that she fucks guys for money is a turn on.   

[Carpy]

Not a problem for me as long as you are not on a conveyor belt system and seeing the previous and next punter, and the wg is clean and fresh every time.

As said with a busy one you know you have a better chance of getting a good service.

[RadioKid]

I read a review from a punter about a well reviews girl not showering before her next puntil.  Getting changed and seeing the next customer come in.

There's no way some girls who are a like conveyer belt can shower regularly during the day, i imagine bits become really unhygienic. I don't consider myself a clean freak bit that is certainly something to think about.

[Steve McQueen]

Thanks for the responses. My conclusion is that if a girl has good positive reviews on UKP ( not AW) it really is irrelevant how many she has seen. J

[Gordon Bennett]

It does put me off a bit. I remember getting put off seeing Jade Fox a couple of years back purely by dint of the avalanche of posts and reviews on here, her stream of AW feedback and the amount of pre-punt flirting and fawning with her on UKE. I'm sure she was fantastic but I couldn't shake image of various reprobates slobbering all over her. Yes.... I know these ladies fuck all day but I don't need my nose rubbing in it, I'm a delicate and sensitive soul you see.

[Wooderz]

It does put me off a bit. I remember getting put off seeing Jade Fox a couple of years back purely by dint of the avalanche of posts and reviews on here, her stream of AW feedback and the amount of pre-punt flirting and fawning with her on UKE. I'm sure she was fantastic but I couldn't shake image of various reprobates slobbering all over her. Yes.... I know these ladies fuck all day but I don't need my nose rubbing in it, I'm a delicate and sensitive soul you see.

Aye.. I am put off a fair bit by 3 digit AW fb scores and anyone who is banging dozens weekly will in my view lack a certain ability t o relate individually to a client .. But sometimes one isn't fussed as long as she has great tits.. 

[NigelF]

Just perusing some girls on AW as you do, looking for a meet this week. I seem at the moment  to shy away just recently from girls who seem to knock up numerous meets in a very short period. I appreciate that they must be popular and very good but it seems to put me off the ‘ conveyor belt’ types. Probably being over sensitive and should just accept that some are popular this year but not next. Anybody else feel this way?

I don't think that's a particularly accurate gauge of how popular they actually are but even if it was, personally, I wouldn't care (I don't view it as a negative or a positive).

I think having a lot of AW feedback in a very short period is mainly a reflection of how much AW feedback she wants to generate and how much availability she has/how often she's been working. There is obviously a correlation between how many punters she sees and her AW feedback but the feedback generated is mostly under her control, e.g. she might insist on booking requests, promptly leave positive feedback after a meet in the hope of reciprocation and send follow up emails asking for feedback if the punter doesn't leave any etc.

To use examples based on WGs that UKP members have seen, here's a girl who has 107 AW feedback (almost all of it for escort meets):
External Link/Members Only
Yet she has no reviews on here and not even a single post from someone who's seen her (despite me and others asking for info).

Here's another escort who has 106 feedback (all for escort meets):
External Link/Members Only
Yet she has 18 reviews on here, including 2 neutrals and 14 negatives! Given how many people have seen her despite the prior negatives on here, one can only imagine how many punters have actually seen her. Also note that her AW feedback is exclusively positive except for one negative and one neutral (plus a couple of "feedback only").

Even if a WG has been working quite a lot/been highly available, it doesn't mean she operates a conveyor belt or that she'll seem tired. In my experience, there is no noticeable correlation between having lots of AW feedback in a short period and operating a conveyor belt. The only way to tell that is from either reviews on here or of course seeing her for yourself (and to a lesser extent judging her comms but of course that's no guarantee).

Thanks for the responses. My conclusion is that if a girl has good positive reviews on UKP ( not AW) it really is irrelevant how many she has seen. J

Definitely a conclusion I agree with.

[threechilliman]

To use examples based on WGs that UKP members have seen, here's a girl who has 107 AW feedback (almost all of it for escort meets):
External Link/Members Only
Yet she has no reviews on here and not even a single post from someone who's seen her (despite me and others asking for info).

Here's another escort who has 106 feedback (all for escort meets):
External Link/Members Only
Yet she has 18 reviews on here, including 2 neutrals and 14 negatives! Given how many people have seen her despite the prior negatives on here, one can only imagine how many punters have actually seen her. Also note that her AW feedback is exclusively positive except for one negative and one neutral (plus a couple of "feedback only").

One is almost twice the price of the other which may have something to do with it.