I have read negatives a lot more positive than this. Too bad as she looks pretty decent
Isn't it strange how if she was genuinely Indian but with the exact same looks she could easily double her prices?
I'm afraid I have my own mechanism for categorisation. Positive is that generally good can come of this or there's the real deal here overall. Neutral is you decide which people are indeed doing. For me around negative I'm mostly concerned with danger or serious infractions, things that might not just be annoyances some might merely sigh and put up with. Saying that, the discretion thing is very borderline, that really is important.
For me a definite negative would also be like a lot I've read, wrong girl and substitute wasn't even up to spec, girl was massively under the influence of something, stealing money, etc.
I don't think it matters too much as it's at least not positive which really would be misleading but also because because try as hard as we might for consistency punters all have their own tastes as well as standards and thresholds so reviews should always be read and impart enough information to let people decide for themselves. If in doubt put neutral and let people decide for themselves based on testimony.
Maybe some guy really likes maximum sized girls, goes to see one that's large only to find she's even larger than expected and pleasantly surprised so they leave a positive review. If I failed to read that personally liking buxom but not morbidly obese ladies then go based on the positive then I might have the shock of my life.
Although I have my own personal standards I do consider the audience which is why I put this as neutral because I know for many people it'll be a no go but I don't want to decide for everyone either.
On the hard breasts side I wonder if anyone else knows about that. Maybe it's because she was pregnant not long ago? I heard that can cause large engorged sensitive breasts as though full of gravel. I guess it's a bit of a curse as mammoth mammaries are lovely but not so much if rather than soft all crunchy and weird. Though perhaps I've gotten it all wrong. Perhaps I should have tried milking the cow? It wasn't all bad, she milked me good enough.
There's a mistake in my original review: "but the worst I've seen either.", not the worst.
That was talking about the placement though of the building, the behaviour or rather people and coordination honestly was probably around the worst I've seen for discretion (but not the worst imaginable).