BlueEyedGirl - Lordswood in Chatham, Kent

[DildoMeLee]

External Link/Members Only

Went to see this wg after a lil research and see her face picture on this forum.

Location: Loads of parking on a main road, easy to find.

Comms: Good, I had a problem booking through AW so called to book a time, not a problem.

Her: Tidy little wg, short and pretty. Listed as dress size 12 but I suspect more 14/16. I wouldnt go as far as to use the word fat but she is plump. I liked it

Meet: I didnt get everything I wanted but that was my own fault, I have a bit of a routine that involves facesitting and the like but I got carried away, Long story short, started with a bit of mish, bit of doggy, and finished with her on top. In hindsight I should of had a tactical rub out before I went because I was all done with half my time to spare.
£60 for 30mins.
Lovely eyes, good meet, does what it says on the tin. Profile is not always up so maybe book in advance maybe if you plan your meets unlike me. I was just lucky on the day, should change my name to ShortNoticeLee.

Had the chit chat while slowly getting dressed in the hope I might be recharged in time but no, little fella was done.
Clearly a family home with pictures of hubby and kids everywhere, I asked if he knew she did this in the daytime and apparently he does. All seemed good and well, went on my merry way.

Will be back.

[DrConners]

You say you saw her in Lordswood as per the review header - Lordswood Southampton ?

She lists her location as :

Town:    Chatham, Maidstone, Gravesend, Gillingham
County:    Kent

Just seeking clarification 

Uninspiring pictures on her profile would put me off plus a list of other things but cheers for the review 

[DildoMeLee]

Lordswood in Chatham

I agree the profile could be more attractive.

[DrConners]

Lordswood in Chatham

I agree the profile could be more attractive.

Thanks for the clarification - I apologise for my assumption, I'll add that to the review title if you don't mind so other Hampshire punters don't ask stupid questions like me 

 

[DildoMeLee]

Thanks, it didnt cross my mind more than one Lordswood exists 

[massageseeker1977]

Yes, cant say the profile does her any favours

Based on those pictures there is no way she is a 12

Happy you had a good time but for me, I would say that "Im out"

[Fuzzyduck]

Cheers for the review, OP. I think you're being overly kind in your description. 5'0" + size 14/16 = fat.

[DrConners]

Cheers for the review, OP. I think you're being overly kind in your description. 5'0" + size 14/16 = fat.

      

[CockMonster]

Cheers for the review, OP. I think you're being overly kind in your description. 5'0" + size 14/16 = fat.

This is the crux of my issues with OP - posting all glowing positive reviews but the details are that she's using fake pics (B&S territory for sure), lying about nationality, and I've seen some other [positive] posts mentioning in passing things that would be deal breakers for me.  Maybe OP is enjoying himself but then he may have ridiculously low standards that even the shit SPs manage to meet to make a neutral at best a positive...

Also note for OP - you're using the same name on here as you are on Adultwork for your reviews - general consensus is for safety that you use completely different names and vary who you review for anonymity.  When I signed up this piece of advice was IN LARGE BOLD TYPE before making a profile here on UKP.  You may want to change your name for safety's sake mate...

[DildoMeLee]

This is the crux of my issues with OP - posting all glowing positive reviews but the details are that she's using fake pics (B&S territory for sure), lying about nationality, and I've seen some other [positive] posts mentioning in passing things that would be deal breakers for me.  Maybe OP is enjoying himself but then he may have ridiculously low standards that even the shit SPs manage to meet to make a neutral at best a positive...

Also note for OP - you're using the same name on here as you are on Adultwork for your reviews - general consensus is for safety that you use completely different names and vary who you review for anonymity.  When I signed up this piece of advice was IN LARGE BOLD TYPE before making a profile here on UKP.  You may want to change your name for safety's sake mate...

First of all I'm not the dildomelee from AW, I have a different name on here, Dildo Melee was a popular meme from about 10 years ago, from memory it was the melee weapon in one of the GTA games I think, It was funny in its day.

2ndly.. It was a positive punt for me, I went and fucked a plump little cute bird with no problems and like I said, its what it says on the tin! Because something is a deal breaker for you its might not for me. If she says 12 and is a 14, I can let that go. If it said dress size 8 and turned out to be 14 I'd probably have something to moan about.

Negative reviews should be for thing like time wasters or like you say fake pictures, not because its not your preference!

/Off soap box, have a good friday

[DildoMeLee]

This is the crux of my issues with OP - posting all glowing positive reviews but the details are that she's using fake pics (B&S territory for sure), lying about nationality,

I've reread this and its got my back up again.. can you explain this part of your post?
Ive not said shes using fake pictures or nationality errors? what is B&S territory?

[James999]

Her crap profile makes it clear she's trying to hide what she's really like 

[DildoMeLee]

Her crap profile makes it clear she's trying to hide what she's really like 

I agree the profile is pants but is that what qualifies for a negative around here? She is hiding her identity is the way I saw it. Maybe I'm to naive to do reviews :/

[James999]

Your review your rating, just making the point that she has clearly gone to a lot of effort to create such crap pictures, it's easier to take clear pictures with modern equipment than the badly cropped images she's created and used on her profile, she's made a massive effort to hide what she's like (and it's not about identity, that's a red herring)

[DildoMeLee]

I started my review saying I did a small amount of research, and went to see her based on her face picture, clear to see on this forum, albeit you need to add 8years.. I guess a lot can change in that time :/ I'm not sure I would of gone without that picture.

Just waiting on Cooks reply as I'm missing something?! I dont understand.. I come to do a review from yesterday but I'll hold out for now!

[James999]

I get the feeling that you are taking the comments personally, when in reality most are directed at the pro$$ie / her profile, you shouldn't feel the need to try and justify her / her actions, or your view of her, but the reality is she's clearly a short fat older woman 

[DrConners]

I think your getting all bent out of shape for no reason, each to their own. You saw her & had a good time & let us know - Cheers.

As others have said & I agree her profile pictures are rubbish - and by your own words say she's 'plump'

I went and fucked a plump little cute bird with no problems and like I said, its what it says on the tin! Because something is a deal breaker for you its might not for me. If she says 12 and is a 14, I can let that go. If it said dress size 8 and turned out to be 14 I'd probably have something to moan about.

One mans 'plump' is another mans 'fat'.

Negative reviews should be for thing like time wasters or like you say fake pictures, not because its not your preference!

This is true but it's two very different set of circumstances, time wasting, fake pictures & B&S - instant negative - but based upon your description she wouldn't be the sort of WG I'd book, because of our differing preferences.

Hardly surprising that on an open forum you might get a little banter about your choices.

Just waiting on Cooks reply as I'm missing something?! I dont understand.. I come to do a review from yesterday but I'll hold out for now!

Threatening to take your football home is a little on the childish side to say the least - Man up bud 

[DildoMeLee]

Threatening to take your football home is a little on the childish side to say the least - Man up bud 

This is not the case, I'm simply waiting for what I'd done wrong, accusation about fake pictures and nationality, no point doing more reviews if I'm getting something like that wrong without knowing it!?

The rest I agree with, I've no need to defend her or her profile. I had a good time and I personally enjoy this sort of punt over the pornstar type and the fakeness of some of the more expensive types and guess I was trying to defend that, nonetheless, Manning up!

What is B&S?

[Veritas]

OP, your tastes are certainly eclectic and v different to my own.  I’ve only seen one of your reviewed SP’s and your outright negative was a strong positive for me.  The others I would rather cut off my own arms than pay to see just to find out whether we would agree but it is your tastes, your punt, your opinion etc.  Wouldn’t get too defensive if people query aspects of reviews - anomalies such as size or the transparency of photos add to other intel they may have gathered from other reviews, UKE etc so it is the SP they are raising queries about rather than necessarily doubting you personally.

B&S - bait and switch.  Using decent photos of someone else to reel punters in and a different vision greets us when the door opens.  Deserves an immediate negative in most people’s view.  Equally bad in many punter’s books is using massively unrepresentative or altered photos as we can’t see what we’ll be getting but everyone generally accepts pics will be flattering.

[DrConners]

What is B&S?

Bait & switch, where you see a profile, make a booking but a different WG is at the location or turns up.

Sorry, Veritas beat me to it !!

[DildoMeLee]

Oh k thanks, I'm luck enough to not have encountered that yet. Cheers

[DildoMeLee]

OP, your tastes are certainly eclectic and v different to my own.  I’ve only seen one of your reviewed SP’s and your outright negative was a strong positive for me.

Maybe I was suckered into a B&S here because she has nothing but good reviews apart from me >.< She was the reason I made this account just to warn people..weird!

[newpunter9871]

I saw the SP back in June 2010 - she was a plump little sex kitten back then.

Most of the photos are the same or similar to her profile back then. She is not slim but she had a good natural set of boobs and gave one of the best services I have had. She was a young MILF with a young family back then. Not gone back due to location and size - everyone has a difference preference.

[CockMonster]

I need to go ahead and give a very embarrassing and awkward, but truly felt apology to OP.

Somehow I've massively fucked up (can only guess multiple tabs in browser) and my comment up there was posted thinking I was posting on another review where I was giving feedback to another reviewer whose reviews seem to be quite fluffy and not informative.

DildoMeLee - apologies for being a 100% douche nozzle, my comments up there were in relation to another thread/reviewer - so disregard everything I said.

[DildoMeLee]

I need to go ahead and give a very embarrassing and awkward, but truly felt apology to OP.

Somehow I've massively fucked up (can only guess multiple tabs in browser) and my comment up there was posted thinking I was posting on another review where I was giving feedback to another reviewer whose reviews seem to be quite fluffy and not informative.

DildoMeLee - apologies for being a 100% douche nozzle, my comments up there were in relation to another thread/reviewer - so disregard everything I said.

Thanks, I appreciate the comment 
(That clears up alot of worries I had, mostly the fact there was a dildomelee on AW people thought was me, I couldn't find him mind).

[CockMonster]

Thanks, I appreciate the comment 
(That clears up alot of worries I had, mostly the fact there was a dildomelee on AW people thought was me, I couldn't find him mind).

Sorry once again bud, totally my bad