Author Topic: Sensual Samantha 777 (Edinburgh)  (Read 4237 times)


15 review(s) for Sensual Samantha 777 (13 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Primark in a Marks & Spencer’s bag
(External Link/Members Only)
Sensual Samantha 777

Negative — Nothing harsh implied — just didn’t really enjoy it enough to say I liked it. Not been around much — on an extended break — so thought I’d add more than the couple of lines that’s more my style. I know many would like it more fluffy,... but there you go.

I don’t usually go for ‘milfs’ (grannyshags). but the occasional perv with a mummy machine can be ok — if she’s taken her valium and can use her years to advantage. I’ll get slagged for saying it, but the enthusiasm often pervading the reviews of her needs to be separated into some facts, so here goes ... “just my opinion” of course and “everybody has their own tastes” ... well here’s mine.

A massage for me is a treat — or should be. A relaxing experience for mind and body preferably with a sensuous shag or similar at a soft sigh’s notice. Something like Sweet-n-Petite used to do, or even Lucie (though Lucie only offered HJ and expensive at that).

First, the flat. Everything looked p promising. Cul-de-sac off the lower end of Easter Rd but new apartments, not at all like your average Hibs fan doorstop pissing-place. She’s ready on time, dressed nicely, invited me to the lounge, think I was offered a glass of water or something (whatever happened to cheap plonk?) and a bit of touchy-feely chat before my internal clock told her get her arse in gear.

The place was warm, nice room for the massage, candles, I’m almost about to be impressed. The towel to lie on wasn’t impressive but excusable seeing all the warm massage gel that was coming up.

Then the downsides. Radio FM doing continuous cringe material a la Lionel Ritchie and similar shite for an hour is not the best massage music. Get yourself a Reiki tape or something hen, or at least something a bit more sensuous than crap you used to listen to after being dumped for the third time in your younger days!

Switching off the gag reflex I laid back to enjoy a massage. Oh, ffs. She’s got some strokes ... but there are Roma cokeslags with more sensitivity to mood. The idea of creating an atmosphere to relax to went right out the sixth floor window. She seems agile enough — but continuous loud panting would make me wonder how she’s fit enough to carry a Lidl bag up the stairs. Is it real or meant to express ‘enthusiasm’. Fucking off-putting anyway. And let’s face it, she might be ‘good for her age’ if she’s well over her centennial, she’s petite, but I can’t say I thought she was attractive. Lots of class and it’s all working — working class in a posh flat. It shows in the face, a bit worse for wear, and the constant stream of rather irritatingly inane patter.

Yet I’ll admit she means well. Puts lots of effort in. All inclusive. No rush. Plenty of preparation. Works hard. Good on her for that. Just needs a granddaughter or someone to blow a wee bit of style up her arse and she’d be fine (especially if one can shut one’s eyes and think ‘attractive’).

I was going to give her a neutral because she does do a lot of stuff the cheapskate EEs don’t. Compared to a lot of the rubbish that’s out there she’s quite good. But a shortage of good massage joints is not the way to judge or say “she’s better than many”. She might put the effort in but in terms of enjoyment it was a neutral experience at best, and as I’m paying for it (100/hr), sorry hen, but no, it’s a negative. I wouldn’t return.

The attached image is not a picture of Sam. I started to put her picture up but thought there’s enough gruesome stuff you have to look at already.

The punt was a bit ...

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: January 29, 2019, 12:47:05 pm by Marmalade »

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
It's good to see you back, M.  :hi:

Offline S.X. MacHine


Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,704
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
Sardonic and insightful review Marmalade...a very entertaining read. :drinks:

Offline Name Not Found

Welcome back!

I'm confused; did you go just for a massage or a full-on shagathon? Agree about the looks - not great and a bit council, but I've always just ignored it as the shagging was good enough to distract.

Personally, I'd never got to a WG for massage unless she was prepared to show me her professional certification first. they're pretty much all shit at it.

Offline J_H

I did like 'your average Hibs fan doorstep pissing-place'!

Offline bigmike32

Good review i seen her when she was at nts as kat i gave it negative because there was no sex involved. Then saw her at one of devons parties i thought she was good. I love the milf type and thought she was pretty good looking.

Offline willie loman

Been with her a few times at the new town, and even visited her at her flat off easter rd, ive no complaints, surprised you booked her, thought  the hard bodied youth were your preference. Welcome back.

Offline Motherfooker

I notice age is not specified on her profile.

How old is the wench?

Offline Name Not Found

I'd say very late 40's, early 50's.

Offline Easygoingdude

I've debated in seeing this WG on several occasions and while she has a decent number of reviews, there has always been something that made me hesitate. This gives me closure - removed from the HL.

Cheers Marmalade and good to see you back.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
Fucking hell Marms what a shocker. "Primark in a Marks & Spencer’s bag" - that is a classic though. Good to see you're back on the joab as they say in Scotland.

Offline XLOVER71


Offline Cash up front

Interesting review, Marmalade.

Having seen her a handful of times before I joined UKP I'm kind of with Willie Loman and Name Not Found on this one - and 630 positive feedbacks on AW. You seem to be in a minority of 1.

Just my opionion.....


Offline Cash up front


Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
Interesting review, Marmalade.

Having seen her a handful of times before I joined UKP I'm kind of with Willie Loman and Name Not Found on this one - and 630 positive feedbacks on AW. You seem to be in a minority of 1.

Just my opionion.....

Positive feedback on aw is shite.

Why don't you review her?

Offline Name Not Found

- and 630 positive feedbacks on AW. You seem to be in a minority of 1.

I'm sure he's quite happy to be in a minority of one; it was his punt and his review, so I'm not sure what you're implying?

I liked her, but I can see exactly where he's coming from.

Offline Cash up front

Positive feedback on aw is shite.

Why don't you review her?


That's a hell of a lot of shite then. Haven't seen her since I joined UKP but will do when I see her next.

Offline Cash up front

I'm sure he's quite happy to be in a minority of one; it was his punt and his review, so I'm not sure what you're implying?




Merely stating a fact.

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164

Offline DickDiver


That's a hell of a lot of shite then.

That's why we come here. That's why this exists.

Offline pilgrim


That's a hell of a lot of shite then. Haven't seen her since I joined UKP but will do when I see her next.

As far as I know there is no registration requirement baring you from writing reviews relevant to WGs who you saw before joining the forum.  So feel free to do some backdated ones if they are for the good and benefit of the board members.

Offline Cash up front

That's why we come here. That's why this exists.

You have missed the irony in my comment.

Offline Cash up front

As far as I know there is no registration requirement baring you from writing reviews relevant to WGs who you saw before joining the forum.  So feel free to do some backdated ones if they are for the good and benefit of the board members.
Fair point, Pilgrim, but will wait for my next visit.

Offline Davey Dykes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,643
  • Likes: 18
  •  
  • Reviews: 110
Apparently relocating to Aberdeen, at least for a short while.

May give her a spin if I've got a window when she's up.

Offline Happyjose

As far as I know there is no registration requirement baring you from writing reviews relevant to WGs who you saw before joining the forum.  So feel free to do some backdated ones if they are for the good and benefit of the board members.

There have been some recent changes to the rules regarding reviews:

Quote
* Positive reviews can only be placed in the 12 months after the punt. No time limit on negative or neutral reviews.

Offline Cash up front

Thanks HappyJ for the update. Useful to know.

Offline Happyjose