Sofia Rose: Average looking, probably early 40’s rather than 38 as profile states (but we all know prossies don’t tell the truth about their age) Blond hair, slim wearing a short dress.
So not a looker, older than her stated age (I agree with you, it happens all the time) - Her profile lists her dress size as :
Dress Size: 12
That doesn't qualify as 'slim' in my book andy & at 5'9 she sounds like more of a big unit ? This isn't much of a recommendation!!

Her limited pictures (one)

mean taking a look at her PG - Nah I'll pass but thanks for taking the time to post a review, regardless of my interpretation of her profile & no offence meant

Looking at her other reviews there seems to be some conflict as to how other punters describe her - BD says :
Looks - MILF, says she's 40 and probably is, longish honey blond hair, tall as me (5'10) in heels, wearing a bra and sort of arse length top, nice legs! Maybe 6/10 looks wise. Some stretch marks and tits obviously been suckled on. Nice arse, quite meaty.
So stretch marks, used & abused breasts & a big arse ?
My learned whoremastering collegue

Derrick says :
Slim body. I’d say size 10ish, but I’m crap at sizes. Facially nice with longish blond hair.
Clothes were removed to reveal a nice trim body with well proportioned tits with perky nips.
And further backs his review up with a response about her tits :
Tits definitely not droopy. Quite a nice handful with perky nips. Facially good. Didn't need a paper bag 
Right! Fess up - who's telling the truth ? D were you just a little bit fluffy in your review ? It's not a problem but I've fucked a few MILFS, unless their gym bunnies or had a boob job - their tits were ruined.
No offence to any parties here, just seeking clarification - Cheers
