Author Topic: BritishSadieLondon TOFTT  (Read 3334 times)


2 review(s) for BritishSadieLondon (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Cupid Stuntz]

Offline Rock4ages

External Link/Members Only
Okay so this one is a 'low' Neutral bordering a Negative  :timeout:.
My maiden review so go easy .

Having had Sadie on my hotlist for a little while , Over the festive period before the year was out . I decided to take a plunge and Book her finally I have seen her on her on the Pawg thread .

Comms: Good 9/10 - handled by Sadie Herself I messaged on a Wednesday . She replied first thing on Thursday morning as she only works Thursdays to Sundays. She has studying commitments and is a genuine part Timer . She prefers whats apps communications. kept me up to date with her journey to the location and arrived earlier . She's super organised and punctual .

Venue: Good 9/10 - I booked it so can't slate it . It was a central London hotel I booked a few hours in the day for the Deed as she only outcalls

Looks: below average 5/10 - This was where the punt started going down hill . She is a really friendly girl and is eager to please but she is simply not a size 8 ! thats a Huge lie . She is really cleaver with the angles she take pictures from and editing cause she is not even a 10 or a 12 . 14 and  16 is more her actually size . looking back on her photo she never stands straight and doesn't show her gut in photos . She wears body suits but her gut is still very much noticeable .She has a super pretty face and a pretty smile but she is a few dress sizes bigger than advertised . It is the girl in the photo just with extra pounds . She's taller than  5'4 i would say she's 5'6. nice Boobs but a really huge behind  . I  like  a nice butt unfortunately hers is a lot bigger than the photos. Whist talking she did say one or two people had made comments about her not being proportionate to her photos . I should have cancelled then and there but  thought with her pretty face and from behind i would need to simply fantasise about the Sadie from her profile which had been on my H/L for so long .:dash:.

Service: 6.5/10  . She is a pleaser , there is no doubting that . She is open to most requests and puts so much extra effort. I think she felt slightly bad about the photo shopped photos she really put a shift in .She has a wide array of outfit and clothes . She does kiss DFK which is nice cause facially she's pretty . Her owo was average at best . She is new to escorting and I guess has a bit of practicing to do yet . She is quite tight but like i mentioned is eager to please and will try different positions too without complaining. She is submissive and likes people to take charge. So decided to pound doggie, so that i could visual the girl from her profile photos to help me reach completion . After shag i said she could get ready and go as i made an excuse . she leaves after 1.40mins of a 2hour booking . she is cleaver as she only allows a 2 hour minimum booking for £350

Would I return? NO - She is a really nice girl , eager to please with a pretty face but simply when you expect a size 8 and get a size 14 . it leaves a bad feeling regardless how friendly and Enthusiastic she seems to make up for her indisgretions . At 350 for 2 hours i expect a lot more. Anyone looking to take the risk she is super friendly but expect much bigger than advertised . i would ask for a one hour break clause if she disappoints you

Happy punting and ask away any questions you might have. Peace.

Offline Meursault

Thanks OP. I did consider her, but am glad I saw someone else now.
Why not be honest? I guess too few people walk or send girls away, so they continue to rely on illusion.

Online Stealthmode

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,176
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 78
Thanks for the review. For me, taking the cost into account, this would be a negative. she fatfished you.

Obviously its your review, so rate how you see fit. But not walking encourages this kind of practise. If punters walked as soon as they realised that the pictures are not a good representative of how they look now, then this will force them to update their pics. Hopefully🙏🏾

I dont know how experienced you are, but I’ve learned from other UKP members that booking long meets with unreviewed WGs is risky.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2019, 11:46:21 am by Stealthmode »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Perennial Question (variant): Is she aworthy Bubble Butt thread entrant?
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Cheers for the detailed review and in-tell
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,132
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
« Last Edit: January 29, 2019, 12:18:41 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Rock4ages

Great detective work Peter  :hi: , the slimming black is the most accurate photo  . Had I seen that picture before hand , It is difficult to claim being a size 8 like her profile says with that photo in circulation :dash:

She only sees people  Thursdays - Sunday so imagine she ll be back on Wednesday . I knew I should have walked but I was letting my general make all the important decisions plus she said she was open to trying A levels beforehand  . She did bring a butt plug to the meet but later said it was not her thing which was fair enough as she doesn't  advertise that on her profile thats why i didn't mention it as a negative in my review .

Offline Rock4ages

Predictable its A Thursday and Catfish's profile is back up  :manhater: :dash:

Vinnyxxy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Strange evening. I tried booking this WG called ‘Harley TeenDream’, then soon after got a text from Britishsadielondon (above) saying that I’d booked a meeting with her. Of course, being confused, I replied saying sorry - I booked another girl. She said it was Harley on Sadie’s phone, then shortly after replied on her actual number. Long story short, reluctantly send a 50% deposit (I’m new to AW and don’t have feedback which was used as a justification for this). Time goes by - she sends, a few messages “waiting for cab”, “10” away, then completely blanks and blocks me. Complete waste of £100. I know I deserve this for my ignorance, but all I can say is AVOID. 

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,306
  • Likes: 181
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Strange evening. I tried booking this WG called ‘Harley TeenDream’, then soon after got a text from Britishsadielondon (above) saying that I’d booked a meeting with her. Of course, being confused, I replied saying sorry - I booked another girl. She said it was Harley on Sadie’s phone, then shortly after replied on her actual number. Long story short, reluctantly send a 50% deposit (I’m new to AW and don’t have feedback which was used as a justification for this). Time goes by - she sends, a few messages “waiting for cab”, “10” away, then completely blanks and blocks me. Complete waste of £100. I know I deserve this for my ignorance, but all I can say is AVOID.

Thanks for the warning but this should be posted as a completely separate NEGATIVE review.  Please report your posting to the moderator and ask for it to be moved to it's own review thread.

Shame you had to make such a costly mistake.  Suggest you read through the threads here about the dos and don'ts before trying again.  Read widely and thoroughly before you look at another SP and head for the ATM.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2019, 02:02:25 am by LLPunting »

Offline PLeisure

Strange evening. I tried booking this WG called ‘Harley TeenDream’, then soon after got a text from Britishsadielondon (above) saying that I’d booked a meeting with her. Of course, being confused, I replied saying sorry - I booked another girl. She said it was Harley on Sadie’s phone, then shortly after replied on her actual number. Long story short, reluctantly send a 50% deposit (I’m new to AW and don’t have feedback which was used as a justification for this). Time goes by - she sends, a few messages “waiting for cab”, “10” away, then completely blanks and blocks me. Complete waste of £100. I know I deserve this for my ignorance, but all I can say is AVOID.
Sorry to hear of this, Vinn   :angry: :thumbsdown:
- as LLP has recommended, it's helpful to other punters that you post your own review so no-one else gets fleeced   :timeout:

If you're new to punting, have a good read through this, which is full of valuable advice compiled by very experienced service users:
External Link/Members Only

Hope the next one is better  :hi:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,326
  • Likes: 720
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Thanks for the warning but this should be posted as a completely separate NEGATIVE review.  Please report your posting to the moderator and ask for it to be moved to it's own review thread.

Shame you had to make such a costly mistake.  Suggest you read through the threads here about the dos and don'ts before trying again.  Read widely and thoroughly before you look at another SP and head for the ATM.

We need to know who it was he booked, preferably with a link, before it can be moved. What title do we give it??

If OP clarifies it can then be moved as a review if he so wishes.    :hi: