Amelia- London Outcall

[shooter]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Met as the rsult of a RB that I had open

A bit of the usual email traffic and meet was agreed for the next day. 

So, texted to confirm in morning and 30 mins later she said ok, what was the address again.  Usual prossie organisation again – so sent that over all good. 
Texted room number when checked in and then get a text back to say,

“Whats the name the room is booked in Babes?”   
“Why do you need that, not comfortable giving that info”
“Just so I can call and check you are genuine” 
“Well, it’s a Travelodge and they don’t have phones in the room, or a reception. I can meet you outside if you are worried”
“Ok, usually I wouldn’t do that for security reasons but you sound nice” 
Alarm bells are beginning to ring

At the booked time, radio silence, then 10 mins later she texts she is here.

The girl
She is a scouser, as per photos but probably pushing 40.  A great bod with lovely full tits but botox lips.

I head down and just as I’m coming out of the lift, she is waiting by them

“So they do have a reception” is the first thing she says.  I explain the concept of budget hotels.  She doesn’t seem happy, but we go to the room.

In the room she says “Oh you are right, there aren’t any phones. I do like to call for, you know (pause) erm, security, what do other girls do?” I explain its normally more straightforward.

So once we have established that the modus operandi of budget hotels does mean that the rooms do not have mini bars or telephones, she takes off her jacket:

“So, how long is it for babes?”

“Er, as per the bid, 1 hour” 
She picks up the cash that I left out on the table, which is obviously her fee:

“And what did we agree on fee wise?” 
I told her (think the rules on UKP are that we shouldn’t state if its lower than the RB amount?)

“Oh and what about some extra, for you know, travelling?”

Along with the explanation of budget hotels I know have to explain budget prossying  – which as any experienced punter will know is not easy.  I explain that she bid an amount and we agreed on it, but if she didn’t want to go ahead, then fine, I’d be happy for her to leave with no cash.   

Amazingly, she had a change of heart  and said she would stay and said she would like to use the bathroom to “freshen up”.

Returns after a few minutes in bathroom. Sniffing. A lot.    Her nose seemed to be very itchy.    Somehow she seemed a bit more alert. Perhaps it was the aircon in the room…

Bit more sniffing and sits on bed and asks “What do you like to do then?” I question I personally hate. But, I explain it was on the bid and emails – relaxed GFE, DFK oral etc not into PSE, just take our time…

So after a bit of DFK (weird with the botox lips, like kissing a tyre) she strips off (great lingerie) and says
“Why don’t I give you a nice blow job here in front of the mirror.”

 Don’t refuse and its decent enough, and good view in the mirror. Too much spitting and fake moaning though.
We get naked and onto bed, she gives a decent sensual massage. Her nose is still troubling her though. 

On with the mac into missionary, not particularly tight but really nice body, lovely tits and she is very petite. Few fake moans, slip to doggie and unload into mac.
She removes the condom and says “Oh no”  I think “shit has it spit?”, but no,
“I cant believe that -  I’ve come on.”  Condom has blood on it, not loads but some. 

At that point I lost interest and told her to leave. To be fair, she said she was happy to stay and said she would give me a massage and a blow job and was apologetic. I said don’t worry and she left.

I was willing to give her benefit of the doubt, but looked on AW next day and she had her green light on and was working. And the following two days. Maybe offering only oral, but maybe not.

Summary:
The hassle over the name/calling the hotel/the fee meant the punt didn’t get off to the best start. Felt like I was being scammed.
She clearly developed nasal passage irritation after the bathroom visit.
Puntwise, action was ok, but think she is more PSE and dom than GFE. The period thing happens, but cant be sure if I was scammed on that. She is hot looking and will tick lots of boxes for some, but not for me.

After she left I went to the Hotel reception to get the aircon looked at and they explained the concept of budget hotels and that they don’t have aircon.  Cant think of what is was troubling her nose….

[shagbambi]

Great review.  Looks like I dodged a bullet when she bid on a RB of mine.  Looked good on paper, though I saw somebody else...

[londonpunter1]

Great review.  Looks like I dodged a bullet when she bid on a RB of mine.  Looked good on paper, though I saw somebody else...

I'll second that. I accepted a RB from her, but due to a mix up with emails, I went with plan B instead.....bullet dodged

[ilovekungfu]

On the blacklist. Thanks for this review

[shooter]

Great review.  Looks like I dodged a bullet when she bid on a RB of mine.  Looked good on paper, though I saw somebody else...

  Glad review is helpful  - she does look good and she matches the pics in person although she is a lot older and had a fair bit of work done on the lips and fake tan.  Just a shame about the scamming, and nasal irritation 

[petermisc]

I rarely use outcalls to hotels these days, but back when I did it was usual practice to be asked for the name that the room was booked under, so that the girl could call back on the room phone to check that you were genuine, or in case the girl was stopped at reception (have had this happen on a couple of occasions).  Refusing to give the name that the room is booked under would be treated as suspicious.

[shooter]

I rarely use outcalls to hotels these days, but back when I did it was usual practice to be asked for the name that the room was booked under, so that the girl could call back on the room phone to check that you were genuine, or in case the girl was stopped at reception (have had this happen on a couple of occasions).  Refusing to give the name that the room is booked under would be treated as suspicious.

Back in the day there wasnt social media and therefore it was much easier to remain annoymous.   There is little chance of being stopped at reception (it has never happended on any outcalls I have booked in last 10 years).  Plus, I offered to meet her outside anyway.

Also, genuine AW feedback for punters should help WGs sift out timewasters.

[petermisc]

The hassle over the name/calling the hotel/the fee meant the punt didn’t get off to the best start. Felt like I was being scammed.

There is no reason to feel scammed because an escort wants your name and to call your hotel room.  This is fairly standard practice.  I could point you at any number of agency web-sites that state this, but perhaps the best is:
External Link/Members Only

You may never have had an escort stopped at reception, but I can assure you that it does happen.  I have had it happen several times, last time at the infamous Ibis Euston!  I suspect that it very much depends how late at night the escort arrives.  Most central London hotels close their doors late at night, to deter vagrants, and either require you to use your key-card or to contact reception to get in.

Outcalls are significantly more risky than incalls for the escort.  They will want to be sure that they will be both a) safe and b) paid.

For outcalls to hotels, escorts are particularly prone to two types of scam:
1) the guy who books an escort, and gives the wrong room number, for a laugh
2) the guy who says he will meet outside the hotel, so that he can check the girl out, but then fails to make contact.

You both refusing to give your name, and saying that it was not possible to call your hotel room, agreeing only to meet outside the hotel, would have raised a large warning sign.  Then when she turns up she finds out that you misled her about the hotel not having a reception.  I would not have been at all surprised if the girl was then on edge, and who could blame her if she then took something to calm her nerves.

[shooter]

There is no reason to feel scammed because an escort wants your name and to call your hotel room. 

What a load of bollocks. 
You weren’t there, pal,  and you are making a right load of old assumptions in defence of a scamming prossie, which makes you a fluffy cunt in my book. 

So, I’ll bite:

The scam was mostly down to her trying to ask for more cash to “cover travel” when she had got the fucking tube.  We had confirmed her bid amount over email quite a few times. Plus working on her period (and continuing to work for the next two days – that’s a fucking scammer at play 

You may never have had an escort stopped at reception, but I can assure you that it does happen.  I have had it happen several times, last time at the infamous Ibis Euston!  I suspect that it very much depends how late at night the escort arrives.  Most central London hotels close their doors late at night, to deter vagrants, and either require you to use your key-card or to contact reception to get in.

Well she must have been a right dopey cow to have got stopped there.  That was the easiest hotel to work and punt from back in the day. Did you rush down and scoop her up in your arms and pay her extra for the inconvenience?  Id have told her to sling her hook, the dopey bitch. 

Outcalls are significantly more risky than incalls for the escort.  They will want to be sure that they will be both a) safe and b) paid.

For outcalls to hotels, escorts are particularly prone to two types of scam:
1) the guy who books an escort, and gives the wrong room number, for a laugh
2) the guy who says he will meet outside the hotel, so that he can check the girl out, but then fails to make contact.

You both refusing to give your name, and saying that it was not possible to call your hotel room, agreeing only to meet outside the hotel, would have raised a large warning sign.  Then when she turns up she finds out that you misled her about the hotel not having a reception.

Jesus H Christ,  you have to have been living in a fucking hole in the ground if you aint heard of budget hotels with no phones in the room. I stayed at a Marriot that had taken them out recently. It wasn’t like she was meeting a new punter with zero feedback.  And I didn’t “mislead” her, I said they don’t have a reception for calls and there are no phones in the room, but Im happy to meet you outside or at the station if you like.  Which she was happy with, coz like most prossies, she wanted the cash (and thought she could scam a few extra notes out of a soppy old cunt, but luckily I aint the soppy one here. 

I would not have been at all surprised if the girl was then on edge, and who could blame her if she then took something to calm her nerves.

Well, good for you, pal. 

But two things:
1.   If you want to give a prossie your name and let her find you on social media, good fucking luck with that, let us all know how it goes
2.   You sound such a caring type, why don’t you book her and see how you get on, she might even let you have a sniff of the powder, but she'll probably charge you extra 

[oinki]

Never been asked for name when doing outcall bookings, in this day of age this would be suspicious as a punter. I would not give a shit about the wg nor desperate enough to expose myself. If she wanted security she could do incalls instead.

[shooter]

Never been asked for name when doing outcall bookings, in this day of age this would be suspicious as a punter. I would not give a shit about the wg nor desperate enough to expose myself. If she wanted security she could do incalls instead.

Excellent point. Glad to hear that Im not the only one that has never been asked this even tho OP claims is "standard practice"....

[EnglishRebecca121]

the "party packages " offering party favours gives her sniffing away lol

[londonpunter1]

I do quite a few outcalls when staying in hotels. I always tell the WG what name the room is booked under without being asked first, it potentially saves any awkwardness if she is questioned (none of them have ever called the room to check), but then I have nothing to hide, and no one will ever find me on facebook / instagram etc as I'm not on it.

[shagbambi]

I am primarily an outcall punter, with girls visiting me at my hotel room. I have never given my name. This is for both agencies and independents within the UK and across Europe. I have never had an issue.

A punter is entitled to privacy and anonymity, just as a WG is.  Would a punter not be considered odd if they asked for a girl’s real name to protect themselves from theft and possible blackmail?  So why do you consider it normal/correct to give yours? In a world of rabid feminists, puratanical hr policies and the me too movement you are setting yourself up for a lot of possible risk. What if your name is stored on a database or email that is hacked at some point in the future and your circumstances have changed and your ananymity is now important you? Such a scenario is not as far fetched as you may believe.

[EnglishRebecca121]

whilst i dont condone asking for a name for the room i remember one time i got stopped by security on the way to clients room asking what room im going to , and who im visiting, i knew the room but not his name so made one up. clearly the wrong one as the took me downstairs whislt they called his room to ask if he was expecting me. thankfuly he came down and got me but if i ever do outcalls i now insist the client meets me outside!!!

[petermisc]

What a load of bollocks. 
You weren’t there, pal,  and you are making a right load of old assumptions in defence of a scamming prossie, which makes you a fluffy cunt in my book. 

You are quite right in that I wasn't there, and neither have I ever seen this girl.  My comments were based purely on what you yourself said. 

It was you that said that the punt had got off to a bad start in part because she had asked for your name, which you felt was a sign that she might be scamming you.  I was not defending her, I was merely pointing out that it is not uncommon to be asked for your surname when booking an outcall.  There is plenty of advice to independents to do that, such as the link I attached (did you bother reading it?).

There are also plenty of agency web-sites that explain this, such as the following extract:
Why do I have to give my surname when booking an outcall to my hotel? – Any escort or escort agency will tell you bad stories that have happened to them in the past when arranging outcalls. Some members of the public with very low intelligence levels and even lower levels of a sense of humour have too much time on their hands and think it is somehow amusing to make a fake outcall. This can involve sending the escort miles away, only to find that the booking was a hoax. Others like to try and play pranks on their friends and send an escort to their friends’ home or hotel room (often with their wives or partners present) and think it is a great laugh. It’s not!!! Apart from all the time and money that the escort will have invested to fulfill the appointment, it’s just not funny for someone to have to try and talk their way out of an incriminating situation. If you are staying in a hotel and want to book an escort, the receptionist may ask you for your surname or the name in which the room is booked under. Some hotel receptionists and switchboard staff will only put the call through to the room if they have this information which is quite reasonable if you don’t want to receive calls from undesirable sources.

If you book an outcall then don't be surprised if you are asked for your surname.  Of course, it is up to you if you don't want to give it, and I can well understand that people have reservations about doing so. 

In my experience, most of the bad punts have been where a girl has come without knowing my name.  After all, it is a good sign that the girl is more concerned with the money than her safety, and so is unlikely to be too concerned about you.  Your recent experience would seem to support this.

[shagbambi]

Peter, as the paying party you control the transaction. Your room number is enough for the agency to be able to call you via the hotel reception.  They will accept just this when you refuse to give your surname. They still want the business. They are pimps after all.

Sprouting agency website bollocks verbatim and Don’t put these links up  hooker 101 guidelines as gospel is plain stupid.  You may be naturally submissive (power to you) and do what you are told but it’s not in YOUR interests or those of any punter. Do not try normalise what is in nobodies interest.
 
Below is a current link showing you how your privacy is being compromised by agencies. 
  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=171600.0   

[Belgarion]

Jesus, Mary and Joseph. You have the patience of a saint, after the million and one questions, I would have told her to forget it.

[shooter]

I am primarily an outcall punter, with girls visiting me at my hotel room. I have never given my name. This is for both agencies and independents within the UK and across Europe. I have never had an issue.

A punter is entitled to privacy and anonymity, just as a WG is.  Would a punter not be considered odd if they asked for a girl’s real name to protect themselves from theft and possible blackmail?  So why do you consider it normal/correct to give yours? In a world of rabid feminists, puratanical hr policies and the me too movement you are setting yourself up for a lot of possible risk. What if your name is stored on a database or email that is hacked at some point in the future and your circumstances have changed and your ananymity is now important you? Such a scenario is not as far fetched as you may believe.

Exactly - not too far fetched, you can also see the scenario of "I found my girlfriends phone and worked out she has been escorting and now I have your name and number and found you on social media..." 

Too risky, end of story. As Rebecca says, meet outside shoudl be sufficient (as should 10+ years of feedback) 

[finn5555]

She has bid on my RB i am wondering if her nose problem as been sorted