Sugar Babies

Author Topic: Ria.x - (£250ph, 20 yo) - Earl's Court, London  (Read 2002 times)


2 review(s) for Ria.x (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by puntingpumping1920]

Offline User176

External Link/Members Only

Price:
£250 for 60 minutes.

Location:
Her flat is a few minutes' walk from Earl's Court underground. It's quite a walk up to her flat. Modern and well-furnished. Clean and modern bathroom. Her flat was slightly messy (wine bottles lying around from a party) but she had cleaned the floors, bathroom, and bedroom. She also has a roommate sleeping on the sofa in the living room, but the roommate (Ria told me she was a fellow prossie) wasn't a bother. Overall, a decent flat.

Comms:
This was a bit of a last-minute punt. Saw her available today on AW and wanted to try out a younger WG. She responded to my text almost immediately and the meeting was set very quickly. Excellent pre-punt comms.

The punt:
I texted her a few minutes away and was given instructions. Walked up the stairs to find that she opened the door as I was approaching. Greeted with a smile and a kiss.

Was offered a drink but I declined.
Shower. Offered a fresh, clean towel.
Banter and FK.
OW. (Note: she does not offer OWO)
More banter and FK.
CG.
Cuddling, more banter and FK.
Asked for a 2nd round of OW, but she declined as "there wasn't enough time left". She then told me I had to go in a couple of minutes as she had friends coming over. But she was somehow extremely friendly and bubbly and disarmed every bit of apprehension in my body.
Shower, kiss, and then left.
I checked my phone and realized I spent only 50 minutes in her apartment. Considering that some 10-15 minutes were taken away by showering and changing, I spent only 35-40 minutes with her.

The WG:
Was barefoot, wore a short dress. No bra; a small, delightfully pink pair of panties.
Profile claims age 20 and seems accurate.
Profile says 5'9, but she seems closer to 5'10 or 5'11. Decent face -- large, stunning eyes and eyebrows. Small but very soft, quick lips. Light brown hair.
Large hands and feet -- she is tall.
No tattoos. Soft skin.
Profile says EE tits, but closer to D-cup. Medium-to-large, soft, meaty boobs. Large areolas.
Incredibly fit and very skinny. Profile says size 6 and is probably accurate. Abs are evident from every angle and looks great during CG. Decent bum and lovely, long legs. Clearly a gym-goer.
Clean-shaven pussy.
She claims to be a professional model and IMO, I think she definitely has the body of one.

FK -- superb. She's great at using her lips.

Oral -- decent. This is dependent on personal preference, of course -- but I get the sense that she is very active and assertive. Some WGs like to start with a soft lick or two; she is not one of them. Quick, vigorous head movement right off the bat, occasional hand motion, large gulps, a lot of tongue pressure. I wished for a bit more variation in movement.

Sex -- decent. As with oral, quick and vigorous CG. I ran out of breath much earlier than she did. She is decent at responding to emotional cues, but there is not as much variation in bodily and hip movement than I would have liked. Slightly too robotic.

Personality-wise, she is a decent conversationalist, with little to no awkward moments until the end. She is English and has a lovely accent. She is assertive and you feel as if she is in control of the flow of the punt -- perhaps that is her typical personality. Or maybe she can sense one's nervousness. Or both. She is friendly and sweet -- if her praise is fake, she delivers it in a much less "artificial" manner than most non-English WGs.

Conclusion:
She is extremely attractive, young, fit and bubbly. All good qualities for a WG, especially if one is leaning towards a GFE. But I didn't click with her (not really her fault), and there a few reasons why her presentation lacks the finesse that some older, more reviewed WGs have.

1) Her CG and OW are decent but not superb. 
2) The presence of a 3rd party in her flat.
3) No OWO? OWO is not stated on her profile, so I did not feel cheated in any way, but still...it's a shame.

All of these are very minor issues. The fourth is a bigger one.

4) 35-40 minutes of actual contact for a one-hour booking? Telling me I have to go in a couple of minutes? Talk about killing the vibe.

These four reasons would usually warrant a weak-to-moderate Positive, but combine those reasons with the fact that she charges £250 per hour lowers the value proposition of this punt to the point where a "high Neutral" is a more appropiate rating.


Offline LLPunting

Thanks for TOFTT  :drinks:

Not even a low Neutral, she was both shorting you on time and wasting it with chatter.  She offers limited service both quality and quantity.  Her techniques smack of make you cum as fast as possible.  All add up to bollocks from a performance perspective.  She may look great but you can do (much) better for 200.
It would be interesting to see if a more dominant punter gets a better ride or a fight with her 3rd party presence.

Offline DaVINCI

Thanks for the review  :thumbsup: although there was someone else in the flat and OW this was apparent prior to the meeting. But to cut your booked time would have been a solid Negative but your meeting / your review.

Offline rushpanda

Good TOFTT OP and thanks for the intel. I was going to take a chance with her later this week - now, shes swiftly off the HL.

I echo LLP's perspective - this sounds more like a negative. At a £250pp SP, that hour should be solely about pleasing you, whoever you are and she clearly fell well short of the mark.

Upon reading her profile again - it does sounds more on the pretentious side, rather than someone who is about providing an attentive service.
Banned reason: Multiple accounts (Jatp, Thejazman_1, jatpmc, rushpanda)
Banned by:

Offline Stephan200210

It never ceases to amaze me how a SP can think she is somehow "winning" by cutting time by 5 - 10 minutes, say. Those minutes cost her nothing (at least at these rates when not booked back to back). Better to let the client stay OVER an extra 10 minutes. Punter feels like he got a "great deal" and girl much more likely to get a positive review - assuming all else good. Those ten minutes have cost this girl what could have been a Positive and cost her bookings. Frankly an expensive ten minutes for her!

Offline LLPunting

It never ceases to amaze me how a SP can think she is somehow "winning" by cutting time by 5 - 10 minutes, say. Those minutes cost her nothing (at least at these rates when not booked back to back). Better to let the client stay OVER an extra 10 minutes. Punter feels like he got a "great deal" and girl much more likely to get a positive review - assuming all else good. Those ten minutes have cost this girl what could have been a Positive and cost her bookings. Frankly an expensive ten minutes for her!

Business nous is less valued in this industry because 4 chumps a day is still a grand for doing very little, especially how she's doing it.  If she doesn't want to see many clients then she can be pretty shitty and just fleece the uninitiated.  Only when you're working in an industry where the clients are all well informed do you see service being well practiced.  This is the mind-set of a opportunistic short-termer.  A seasoned career pro like many of the forum darlings perform at a much higher par.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2019, 01:29:03 pm by LLPunting »

Offline tergil

Very expensive for limited services and only one pop

Offline king tarzan

i had her on the list for foreseeable future..
certainly not now....
is a crafty calculating piece of shit....
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac