Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: SKYLAR... Welshbunnies ... Cardiff  (Read 2053 times)

Offline Proton

Did an on the spur of the moment outcall booking about ten days ago and Skylar was happy and available for an 7pm/9pm. Arrived ten minutes early in her own car, dressed in jeans & brown tee shirt and with a Parka jacket and she removed her shoes inside of the front door without asking. Spent about ten minutes chatting and her "Does & Don't" I was asked if I was told by agency that she was very new to escorting and would not do "OWO"under any circumstances, I replied I wasn't told anything. Skylar certainly appeared to be quite nervous, until I said it was not a big issue with me, then we agreed to head upstairs. I like slim feminine forms and she certainly was really that, still sounding nervous she asked to sit on the bed whilst undressing. Skylar is very cuddly and enthusiast at normal kissing and nicely tactical at "HR" and "OW" that went on for a reasonable time and finished with no condom and HR over me, I was concerned regarding her nervousness still, so did not push for anything that may upset her, as she told me I was only her fourth client. So after a shower we ended up having a very long warm cuddle under the sheets for an hour chatting about her previous life issues, with more kissing and fondling each other.

 I would say Skylar is naturally a really polite young novice to the world of escorting, but not taking anything away from a friendly pleasant two hours with a difference.
         Yes! I truly enjoyed my time with Skylar, as she was a very relaxing comforting experience to behold for a change.

External Link/Members Only

  I TYPE MY REVIEWS ONTO MY COMPUTER FIRST BEFORE POSTING ON UKP, I WAS IN TWO MINDS TO POST THIS AFTER SEEING  "iverthickone" REVIEW..
              I can understand his reaction, but this review of mine is as I saw it, meeting with a NERVOUS young lady in the strange new world of escorting. :rose: :rose:
   


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
You are easily please.

2 hour booking and you only got ow and a hand job, and that's a positive?

vw

  • Guest
Clippety clop.  :sarcastic:

Agree stt  seems very easily pleased,  that's not new news though.   
« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 07:37:04 pm by vw »

Offline Proton

 I know .... I think she is truly nervous and a real novice to escorting..  Skylar was constantly being polite and tried to please me in her own way..
  So for me it was much nearer to Positive than Neutral..  :drinks:

  Just noticed a few reviews down another Skylar from "  ilikethemooon"   it sound a bit like my encounter and summed up as THE GIRL NEXT DOOR type
« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 07:39:13 pm by Proton »

vw

  • Guest
I know .... I think she is truly nervous and a real novice to escorting..  Skylar was constantly being polite and tried to please me in her own way..
  So for me it was much nearer to Positive than Neutral..  :drinks:

Should she not be on apprentice wages while being amateur/novice like.


Offline Proton

Should she not be on apprentice wages while being amateur/novice like.

   YES! but even young apprentices get a lot more wages theses days for learning on the job  ;)

Offline Medic1983

.. I mean it's not as if she doesn't know the world she has entered right? If she does only offer this shitty service then surely it should be told from the get go.

According to that ilikethemoon she has already seen to 15 guys and probably more since - also enthusiastic? Not sure I believe that review now after reading these 2 latest

Offline clevertrevor

£300 and you you didn't even fuk her?

Offline Dan Dastardly

You must be a rich man Proton to speculate about £300 on a  virtual novice.

Offline iverthickone

Proton's views are clearly his, but for me she is in the wrong line of work in truth. 

I want to be a professional footballer, but no one is gonna play for me to play I can assure you!

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
All this has done for me is establish that I can ignore Protons reviews. If this type of shit booking is all it takes to get a positive then I have no interest in anything else he has to say.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
All this has done for me is establish that I can ignore Protons reviews. If this type of shit booking is all it takes to get a positive then I have no interest in anything else he has to say.

i must say doesnt bode well he reviewed me then lol
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline dumbo25

Thanks for the review Proton. Two different reviews each having their own views on the services provided by the SP.  :thumbsup:

StevenJ

  • Guest
In an ideal world it should be a negative like iverthickone's review as she took your money but provided nothing or any sort of service she can't be that nervous or naive to sex for sure.  :scare:


Mr P you are starting to get fluffy again from what I have read on this review and some of your previous reviews and then the comments from the other posters on this forum.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 05:40:37 am by StevenJ »

Offline SO595

nicely tactical at "HR" and "OW"

Sounds like she had a tactical approach to penetration too, from Iver's review.  :lol:
Banned reason: Idiot who won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bonio

If I am honest, I don't tend to put too much effort into Proton's reviews (no offence intended, just an observation). I am sure some of them are valid but when everyone is beautiful etc I am not sure what would constitute a negative. A kick in the bollocks followed by the theft of your wallet perhaps?

On the flip side, he has posted this knowing the flak would come and stands by the positive, so fair play to him. Additionally a negative may be difficult to post if the outcall is to your home (vague assumption on my part that it was home rather than a hotel).

But a positive from Proton. whoever the girl is, isn't worth anything to me.

vw

  • Guest
All this has done for me is establish that I can ignore Protons reviews. If this type of shit booking is all it takes to get a positive then I have no interest in anything else he has to say.

I thought that was established long ago before his ban.   :sarcastic:

Also thought you had tolerance to fluff.

I completely agree with you.

I've managed to build up a tolerance to the fluffiness over the years though so it doesn't annoy me as much as it used to  :lol:
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 10:17:48 am by vw »

Offline welshguyforyou

I'm sure any girl no matter how young or pretty would like to be paid top dollar to act naive and be wanked over- to me its pretty much utter bullshit to be a positive when the services offered are not provided.

A neutral at best for me, I'd say thanks for the review, but from me thanks for the warning.

Offline Mil 34

Well I am astounded to read this review as a positive.
I think the old saying about a fool and his money are easily parted, but to post a positive about a £300 wank is just pure fluffy ness.

Offline Proton

I write the truth as it happens there in front of me, if I did anything else what is the point of having a good useful site like UKP  :unknown:
 When I read all your reviews on here, I work on the assumption you believe in what you write, the truth and nothing else.  :thumbsup:
 My reviews cant change much in content about any "SP" as I love slim fit females  ;)
   :rose: That's including the amasing "English Rebecca" no matter what she thinks about me :rose:


SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
I thought that was established long ago before his ban.   :sarcastic:

Also thought you had tolerance to fluff.

My tolerance only goes so far, he's found the limit  :lol: :lol:

Offline welshguyforyou

I write the truth as it happens there in front of me, if I did anything else what is the point of having a good useful site like UKP  :unknown:
 When I read all your reviews on here, I work on the assumption you believe in what you write, the truth and nothing else.  :thumbsup:
 My reviews cant change much in content about any "SP" as I love slim fit females  ;)
   :rose: That's including the amasing "English Rebecca" no matter what she thinks about me :rose:

Doesn't disguise the fact the services offered were not provided and that was what you paid for- if shes advertising laying in bed, talking and you wank over her because shes too new or inexperienced then fair enough- that's what you paid for, but you settled for what was on offer once the hard earned was handed over and you received a very polite negative in my eyes at best.

In fact what she did was probably great for her, imagine how many others she sees and fibs them off with this kind of turd

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
   :rose: That's including the amasing "English Rebecca" no matter what she thinks about me :rose:

Well that's a bit stalkery  :scare:

Offline Mil 34

You can write what you want, but if you honestly think £300 for two wanks is positive then your going to get ripped apart and questioned over your motives.
With all the subterfuge with agencies that have gone on in the past , there is going to be an element of doubt in everyone’s mind.
You have done nothing to help the issue with your positive. 
Sucking up to ENGLISH Rebecca like your last post just confirms your a fluffy to me, therefore your next reviews will be ignored. That is, if you write one.
Most people who get questioned on here throw out their dummies and don’t post again.
Fair respect is given to the ones who do
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 10:51:09 am by Mil 34 »

vw

  • Guest
I write the truth as it happens there in front of me, if I did anything else what is the point of having a good useful site like UKP  :unknown:
 When I read all your reviews on here, I work on the assumption you believe in what you write, the truth and nothing else.  :thumbsup:
 My reviews cant change much in content about any "SP" as I love slim fit females  ;)
   :rose: That's including the amasing "English Rebecca" no matter what she thinks about me :rose:

Like the truth that you were not rattle or Kumar?

Until busted.

Husq used to post about the truth lots
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 10:57:35 am by vw »

Offline Proton

 Not going back to that bull shit period with you, as you and other know very well, I was shafted by you & other sharks back then  :vomit:

  MOVE ON with life, it's much too short   :hi:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
Not going back to that bull shit period with you, as you and other know very well, I was shafted by you & other sharks back then  :vomit:

  MOVE ON with life, it's much too short   :hi:

No, you were shafted by yourself for being a fluffy and a tout, you are slipping back into the same behaviour now.

Offline Medic1983

What constitutes as a fairly new escort into this business?
Ilikethemooon wrote in his review she was new in the first few days of December...

'Saw this lovely girl on sunday and as her profile says she is a fresh faced 18. Very toned, nice pert tits and a pretty face. She has only been working 2 weeks and had seen about 15 guys totalwhen i saw her.'

Now Proton guy mentioned in his post that that she had only seen to 4 guys? 4 guys when? That particular day? Week?

I think this skylar is talking through her ass, telling each punter a different story and playing that bullshit card of being nervous.

Offline Medic1983

Sorry meant January not December

vw

  • Guest
Not going back to that bull shit period with you, as you and other know very well, I was shafted by you & other sharks back then  :vomit:

  MOVE ON with life, it's much too short   :hi:

Shafted? you were a liar that denied being here before until admin busted you.   :bomb:

Anyone booking on the back of your reviews certainly needs a checkup from the neck up. 
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 11:14:14 am by vw »

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
TBF if anyone knows of Proton's history he's pretty much happy go lucky in life. Thing is in this case I don't know what he wanted in this booking.  :unknown: If he was after full service, and all he had was 2 HR, and OW, then I'd probably warrant a neutral.

However, if it was just down to the pleasure and time and company from whatever he could obtain with an amateur/novice escort (cuddles, kisses, a bit of fun and pleasure), then I can understand the positive.

What I do not understand is, Iverthickone and Proton had very similar experiences - but I like the moon had the full works (including RO & sex) - something is not adding up with the first review... 🤔

Offline Grumpy Pumpy

SL, you are right.

Whilst we have been focusing (understandably) on the difference in interpretation between Iver and Proton's reviews, we've not commented on the difference in service between the first review of her (by a previously unknown punter) and the latter two.

Certainly seems fishy

Offline iverthickone

Yes, would totally agree there, and it is that review that led me to book.

Obviously likethemoon struck it lucky that day, perhaps she remembered the lube, or he brought his own, given he slid into her!

Offline SO595

Obviously likethemoon struck it lucky that day

Or his review is bullshit  :unknown:
Banned reason: Idiot who won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline iverthickone

Or his review is bullshit  :unknown:

Yes, that was the other possibility I was trying to imply!  :unknown:

Offline SO595

Yes, that was the other possibility I was trying to imply!  :unknown:

 :lol:

That's always going to be a suspicion with a new reviewer, especially with an agency SP.  Hopefully he'll contribute some more reviews to give us confidence.
Banned reason: Idiot who won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Proton

 Good morning one & all.. :hi:
 
 I have given my review a lot of thought over the last 24 hours, what I wrote is correct as it happened between Skylar & me..
  Yet as I did say Yesterday a neutral should have been selected of course, certainly not a negative in my situation.
   I was not aware until checking the P,N,N. can be retrospectively corrected, I hope I have understood that correctly  :unknown:
  I would appreciate some help to resolve this matter, as I see overnight some members may be around today and able to the reflect a NEUTRAL

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
Good morning one & all.. :hi:
 
 I have given my review a lot of thought over the last 24 hours, what I wrote is correct as it happened between Skylar & me..
  Yet as I did say Yesterday a neutral should have been selected of course, certainly not a negative in my situation.
   I was not aware until checking the P,N,N. can be retrospectively corrected, I hope I have understood that correctly  :unknown:
  I would appreciate some help to resolve this matter, as I see overnight some members may be around today and able to the reflect a NEUTRAL

Changed for you.

Offline Proton

 Bloody hell, that was quickly done, very much appreciate your assistance  "StT"
 I was just about to turn computer off before it blows up as I must replace the cooling fan on the CPU.
 Saw this and thought it amusing, thanks again.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Doombar

Thanks for posting a review about her Proton.  I had her on my radar and thanks to you I will wait a while - to see if her service improves.  I hope so as she looks cute.

You shouldn't feel the need to change your review rating because of pressure from other punters.  If you considered it POSITIVE then you should leave it as such.  One punter's pos is another's neg - you just need to rate it is you found it.  People who tell you otherwise are just dicks.  The real value is always in the detail of the review not the rating - in that regard you have made a good contribution to this forum since you joined  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: January 11, 2019, 10:07:13 pm by Doombar »

Offline Proton

Thanks for your comments. Yes I would agree with your statement "Doombar" being pressured into changing anything, thou it was not changed due any collective suggestions.
  I was truthly considering the Neutral before I posted it originally, I went ahead posted it off accepting the meeting based on her clear"does&dont" within ten minutes of coming into my house.

  Skylar is a lovely warm cuddly true novice at being an escort, she certainly wanted to please me within her limits. :angelgirl:
 Maybe if I was told by the agency in advance as they should have apparently, things may have been different who knows.  :unknown:
  Anyway I am happy with the contents of my review and certain the NEUTRAL is correct with maybe a tiny little + added  :cool:
  It would be wonderful to think Skylar will be more relaxed soon and enjoy her time with clients  ;)

Offline iverthickone

Thanks for your comments. Yes I would agree with your statement "Doombar" being pressured into changing anything, thou it was not changed due any collective suggestions.
  I was truthly considering the Neutral before I posted it originally, I went ahead posted it off accepting the meeting based on her clear"does&dont" within ten minutes of coming into my house.

  Skylar is a lovely warm cuddly true novice at being an escort, she certainly wanted to please me within her limits. :angelgirl:
 Maybe if I was told by the agency in advance as they should have apparently, things may have been different who knows.  :unknown:
  Anyway I am happy with the contents of my review and certain the NEUTRAL is correct with maybe a tiny little + added  :cool:
  It would be wonderful to think Skylar will be more relaxed soon and enjoy her time with clients  ;)

And was able to take a cock up her pussy! 😁

Offline Proton

   :P :D  Well something like that was attempted  :cool:  :dance:
 Onwards & Upwards ..
 About an amusing time at BLACK WIER to write up & post  :drinks: