Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: SexxyGabby - Glasgow Tour  (Read 5267 times)


63 review(s) for SexxyGabby (54 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline BG27

External Link/Members Only

I know Gabby has a fair number of fans and is well reviewed which is why I’ve persevered to try and see her on her last three tours without success.

Initially tried to organise via Adultwork, replies were very slow, eventually she told me to text her as she would get the message faster, this didn’t really speed anything up. Some texts went unanswered, when she did answer I’d get very short usually one word answers. Undeterred I eventually agreed a late evening booking in Glasgow. I texted an hour before the agreed time, no reply. Tried to call with 45mins to go to the agreed time. No reply, gave up.


G-StarGlasgow

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

I know Gabby has a fair number of fans and is well reviewed which is why I’ve persevered to try and see her on her last three tours without success.

Initially tried to organise via Adultwork, replies were very slow, eventually she told me to text her as she would get the message faster, this didn’t really speed anything up. Some texts went unanswered, when she did answer I’d get very short usually one word answers. Undeterred I eventually agreed a late evening booking in Glasgow. I texted an hour before the agreed time, no reply. Tried to call with 45mins to go to the agreed time. No reply, gave up.

Are reviews allowed if the meeting didn't actually go ahead?  Might have been better to add this as a footnote to her most recent review?

Shit that happened to you though  :hi:

Offline Jock D

Are reviews allowed if the meeting didn't actually go ahead?  Might have been better to add this as a footnote to her most recent review?

Shit that happened to you though  :hi:

If a booking has been agreed/arranged...as it was in this case...then it warrants a Negative review. :hi:

G-StarGlasgow

  • Guest
If a booking has been agreed/arranged...as it was in this case...then it warrants a Negative review. :hi:

I stand corrected.  Cheers for clearing that up.  Was always under the impression it had to have taken place  :hi:

Offline Placebo88

Doesn't read like a verified stand-up by the escort to me. As much the punter called at the wrong time and then prematurely thought the worst and backed out. The escort might have him down for a time waster. 60 or 45 minutes before she could have been in another booking with her phone off. Get to the postcode area and then call 5-10 minutes before your booking time ie. when your call is expected. Presuming the postcode had been given.

Offline Matrix

Doesn't read like a verified stand-up by the escort to me. As much the punter called at the wrong time and then prematurely thought the worst and backed out. The escort might have him down for a time waster. 60 or 45 minutes before she could have been in another booking with her phone off. Get to the postcode area and then call 5-10 minutes before your booking time ie. when your call is expected. Presuming the postcode had been given.

Thank you very much for coming to the Scottish section, for the first time, to stick up for the poor damsel.

Read the rules, Gawain.

Offline Gunner1

I had the exact same issue. Told me when available tried confirming times and she would say ‘not available then’ but not tell me when she was available, also a few texts with 1 worded replies  :dash:

Never bothered after that. Shame because she is right up my street - Obviously very busy.

Offline J_H

Thank you very much for coming to the Scottish section, for the first time, to stick up for the poor damsel.

Read the rules, Gawain.

'Gawain' - very good, I like that!

Offline Placebo88

Thank you very much for coming to the Scottish section, for the first time, to stick up for the poor damsel.

Read the rules, Gawain.

Nothing to do with the rules. You should try reading the review and then thinking about what you have read. From what is written it is unclear who messed up here. The answer to that depends on whether he had already been given the postcode or not. If he already had it then he messed up. If she agreed to a booking and then never bothered giving it to him then she did.

« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 06:18:20 pm by Placebo88 »

Offline Matrix

Nothing to do with the rules. You should try reading the review and then thinking about what you have read. From what is written it is unclear who messed up here. The answer to that depends on whether he had already been given the postcode or not. If he already had it then he messed up. If she agreed to a booking and then never bothered giving it to him then she did.

Aye, ok then.  :rolleyes:

External Link/Members Only

I know Gabby has a fair number of fans and is well reviewed which is why I’ve persevered to try and see her on her last three tours without success.

Initially tried to organise via Adultwork, replies were very slow, eventually she told me to text her as she would get the message faster, this didn’t really speed anything up. Some texts went unanswered, when she did answer I’d get very short usually one word answers. Undeterred I eventually agreed a late evening booking in Glasgow. I texted an hour before the agreed time, no reply. Tried to call with 45mins to go to the agreed time. No reply, gave up.



Quote
- Reviews

* A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the service provider had accepted the initial booking.
* Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.
* Positive reviews can only be placed in the 12 months after the punt.
* Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel.
* Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider).
* Only one review thread per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Do not post the same review in multiple regions.
* Past or current sex workers or anyone related to a sex worker (e.g. boyfriend) may not review any other sex worker.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 06:36:26 pm by Matrix »

Offline DickDiver

Doesn't read like a verified stand-up by the escort to me. As much the punter called at the wrong time and then prematurely thought the worst and backed out. The escort might have him down for a time waster. 60 or 45 minutes before she could have been in another booking with her phone off. Get to the postcode area and then call 5-10 minutes before your booking time ie. when your call is expected. Presuming the postcode had been given.

Clippety-clop, clippety-clop.

Offline garybs

I had the exact same issue. Told me when available tried confirming times and she would say ‘not available then’ but not tell me when she was available, also a few texts with 1 worded replies  :dash:

Never bothered after that. Shame because she is right up my street - Obviously very busy.
Had some issues too, booked & agreed a time. She then asked to push it back 30/45 mins (can't remember exact times now) so decided to leave it after that

Offline Picti

Doesn't read like a verified stand-up by the escort to me. As much the punter called at the wrong time and then prematurely thought the worst and backed out. The escort might have him down for a time waster. 60 or 45 minutes before she could have been in another booking with her phone off. Get to the postcode area and then call 5-10 minutes before your booking time ie. when your call is expected. Presuming the postcode had been given.

I wouldn't leave the house to drive to a punt without confirmation it was happening, so contact an hour (or more) in advance on the day is routine. It's bad enough having time wasted without the inconvenience of a wasted journey too.

A sex worker is responsible for managing and organising her time. If she had a prior booking as you assume, then she should've either confirmed beforehand or given the OP a specific contact time.

If the booking was mutually agreed then she's at fault in this case.

Offline ecosse1984

I had similar last year. Booked weeks in advance, had messages during week leading up to the saturday morning meet. Then nothing, wouldn't confirm the night before or that morning.  Just a pure pain in the arse
 Get the feeling she's double booking or something.

moosehead69

  • Guest
I wouldn't leave the house to drive to a punt without confirmation it was happening, so contact an hour (or more) in advance on the day is routine. It's bad enough having time wasted without the inconvenience of a wasted journey too.

A sex worker is responsible for managing and organising her time. If she had a prior booking as you assume, then she should've either confirmed beforehand or given the OP a specific contact time.

If the booking was mutually agreed then she's at fault in this case.

Agreed. All SP have their own way of taking bookings and confirming them. Some are far more organised and professional than others.

If I book in advance the SP typically want me to confirm on the morning of the booking and there’s a deadline time for that so they can offer it to another if need be. Then a text from me to say I’m on the way nearer the appointment. If a punter fails to do this, the SP is well within her right to offer it to another, but from these comments, I don’t think that’s what’s happening here.

Most SP I meet do this now and it’s far more organised.

If I book on the day, I ask for the address there and then, and call a couple mins before my apptime for the flat number. I also ask them to text me anything else I should, and some have a helpful bit of advice like, parking here is best, or there’s free parking on X street.

This is pretty basic stuff. Sounds like she needs to improve her diary management skills significantly. The language barrier has fuck all to do with poor organisation skills, although that’s been mentioned a few times as causing some communication difficulties; another thing that would put me off.

Offline Jock D

Sounds like she needs to improve her diary management skills significantly. The language barrier has fuck all to do with poor organisation skills, although that’s been mentioned a few times as causing some communication difficulties; another thing that would put me off.

She has far more important things to do...like taking endless selfies for all her adoring fans :angelgirl: :dancegirl: :bomb:

moosehead69

  • Guest
She has far more important things to do...like taking endless selfies for all her adoring fans :angelgirl: :dancegirl: :bomb:

 :D  :D  :D

Offline Don Quixote

She has far more important things to do...like taking endless selfies for all her adoring fans :angelgirl: :dancegirl: :bomb:
Aye, with her knack for self-promotion she'd make a fortune selling her shite as toothpaste.

moosehead69

  • Guest
Never got the appeal of her. I don’t find her attractive enough to pay, and I’ve said that before. But thought I’d take a gander through her reviews to see if I was missing something spectacular on offer.

There’s a worrying trend of people mentioning that she asked for reviews. If an SP asked me for a review that would put me off reviewing her. Maybe another area of her ‘self-promotion’ Repertoire!

But it does explain the unusually  high number of reviews in such a quick timeline. I’ve long suspected SP Who hve too many of similar behaviour.

But a comment from one guy stood out to me. She made remarks about his lazy eye, his scars and weight. WTF? Even the most insensitive cunts know that’s bang out of order.

The wee dumpy, Plain Jane,  self promoting, attention seeker won’t be getting my dollar, that’s for sure.

Offline mrwhite

But a comment from one guy stood out to me. She made remarks about his lazy eye, his scars and weight.

That could be a description of me lol!  Although no hooker has ever commented on those things to my face... unlike my ex-wife!!

Offline Phoenix85

Had much the same experience as the OP...
Initial coms were fine, fairly quick to read and respond.
Date, time and even outfit agreed weeks in advance... then complete radio silence... read my attempts to confirm in the days leading up but wouldn't reply. Not sure theres really any point trying again as I'm evidently not the only one to experience this.

Offline Happyjose

Had much the same experience as the OP...
Initial coms were fine, fairly quick to read and respond.
Date, time and even outfit agreed weeks in advance... then complete radio silence... read my attempts to confirm in the days leading up but wouldn't reply. Not sure theres really any point trying again as I'm evidently not the only one to experience this.

You could post a negative review


Offline Courtney

Banned reason: Multiple accounts (moosehead69, G-StarGlasgow) + Sharing IP with "Gabriella" on UKE

I'm far from convinced we know the full truth here, much like mooseman et al.  It's possible we'll never know what fully happened.

...talking to himself? What a weird oddball! :scare: :wacko: :crazy:

"G-Star" ....Gabriella's BF/Pimp?? :scare:

Offline Happyjose

Banned reason: Multiple accounts (moosehead69, G-StarGlasgow) + Sharing IP with "Gabriella" on UKE

...talking to himself? What a weird oddball! :scare: :wacko: :crazy:

"G-Star" ....Gabriella's BF/Pimp?? :scare:

Much of mooseheads posts read like a prossie trying to manipulate others

.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 12:21:34 pm by Happyjose »

vw

  • Guest
Much of mooseheads posts read like a prossie trying to manipulate others

.

Seems to be the case , the g-starglasgow has that unhinged gabriella's writing style.   :crazy: :crazy:
« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 12:26:19 pm by vw »

Offline Matrix

Not the only suspicious behaviour on this thread.  It makes you wonder.

Offline BG27

Well this escalated, just to be clear an exact time was agreed by text, I texted an hour before which is generally standard procedure and I also hadn't been provided with an address. With no address and no further reply I had to scrap it.

Offline Belgarion

Banned reason: Multiple accounts (moosehead69, G-StarGlasgow) + Sharing IP with "Gabriella" on UKE

...talking to himself? What a weird oddball! :scare: :wacko: :crazy:

"G-Star" ....Gabriella's BF/Pimp?? :scare:

Interesting.

Offline Courtney

Much of mooseheads posts read like a prossie trying to manipulate others

.

Yip, they do.

Never got the appeal of her. I don’t find her attractive enough to pay, and I’ve said that before.
The wee dumpy, Plain Jane,  self promoting, attention seeker won’t be getting my dollar, that’s for sure.

...something jealous pro$$ie there. :unknown: :scare:
« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 01:51:04 pm by Courtney »

Offline DickDiver

Seems to be the case , the g-starglasgow has that unhinged gabriella's writing style.   :crazy: :crazy:

You're right! Never spotted that before - the patronising overuse of big words mixed in with awkward colloquialisms. No wonder her many retirements have failed - she is obsessed with the scene.

Offline Belgarion

You're right! Never spotted that before - the patronising overuse of big words mixed in with awkward colloquialisms. No wonder her many retirements have failed - she is obsessed with the scene.

How many times has she retired now? We had a couple of run ins on UKE and I put her down in a special category

Offline geezer_breezer

Moosehead's review of Gabriella can now be read in a different light:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84927.0


Offline Grenadier36

Moosehead's review of Gabriella can now be read in a different light:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84927.0
A parade of the banned in that thread FFS!

Offline Courtney

Moosehead's review of Gabriella can now be read in a different light:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84927.0

Yeah, it’s creepy. :scare: ....notice the “G” ..... G-Star. :bomb:

On the morning of the meet G texted to check and confirm booking and both times was invited into flat st arranged time..

my opinion G is one of the better Scottish girls who repeatedly gives a great service and encourages exploration of any hidden fantasies you have ...


A parade of the banned in that thread FFS!

....they were all the dodgy over obsessive fluff brigade. :crazy:

Offline Jock D

Moosehead's review of Gabriella can now be read in a different light:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84927.0

Aye, the same applies to all of his/her posts.

The G-star character wasn't really on my radar...but annoyingly, I did think Moosehead was a genuine punter :blush:




Offline Matrix

Wonder when she'll turn up on UKE and try to make out like a saint.

We should maybe give her a few ideas for excuses.

"I'm being stalked and constantly threatened by someone who access to my ip address" For starters.

"My Cockatoo is in hospital and it pure wusnae me, by the way, honest"

vw

  • Guest
We should maybe give her a few ideas for excuses.

"I'm being stalked and constantly threatened by someone who access to my ip address" For starters.

"My Cockatoo is in hospital and it pure wusnae me, by the way, honest"

Did she kick the cockatoo in the head?   :sarcastic:

Offline Matrix

Did she kick the cockatoo in the head?   :sarcastic:

I'm not sure, but I heard that she likes a cockatoo!

vw

  • Guest
I'm not sure, but I heard that she likes a cockatoo!

Mayve the cockatoo was bullying her mate.   :sarcastic:

Offline Grenadier36

Did she kick the cockatoo in the head?   :sarcastic:
Or give it the kettle treatment