Seeking arrangement - Rules change

[Kev40ish]

I've advocated this.  I found being a member of the thread hugely instructive and helpful.  But it's a lot of work for admin to manage.

I totally agree, it gives you a lot of information, apart from the few willy wavers, but that’s quite entertaining when it was allowed..

Personally if it’s too much work for admin to manage I’m sure there are members on there, that are happy to validate genuine members of SA.. they just need to set up a female profile that prospective members can message to show they are members.  Old admin didn’t have the time or the patients to do it..

If people can show they are genuine members then they should be granted access..

[Mallow841]

And uni students aren't aware of the consequences if they're found out as accepting payment for sex even if it's via a site holding itself out as as not condoning that?

If they aren't they should be.

I agree.

[nightbot]

No, they probably aren't.  And whether they should be or not is beside the point. These girls have not decided to become escorts - whether you class them as such is beside the point.  They have decided to become sugar babies.  Maybe they hope to find one guy who will treat them to nice presents and evenings out and give them some spending money. Maybe they like the idea of an older guy... maybe all sorts of reasons motivated them. Sure - It's a stepping stone to transactional sex.  But they didn't sign up to be escorts.  Us arguing semantics about what constitutes escorting doesn't change the fact they they don't think that's what they are.  Doesn't matter whether you are technically right or wrong, it's completely different in their minds and I can say for certain that many of them would be horrified to find themselves being discussed here.  Whereas escorts invite reviews and most know about this site.  Massive difference.

I agree.
The fact that for a lot of girls there's an emotional element in it with some level of committment wrt. texting and socialising rather than just paid sex and many even using their real names/identity means they are different from escorts. An escort would love a positive review here as she's running a business and a positive review brings business, SA on the other hand these girls aren't really running a business. We can argue semantics but in her mind you aren't paying her for her time but rather the payment is an allowance to help them out. This is evident from the fact that there are no hard time restrictions and you can even get free sex.

Ofcourse there are several girls who are basically doing the exact same thing as an escort without calling themselves one (and even in those cases there's a lot of crossovers with dating due to texting). But there are also a lot of girls who don't do that and are actual sugar babies but know the score that allowance = sex. In the end I think these girls would be quite horrified to find themselves being discussed so publicly. With that said I do support open warnings about scammers and maybe some open discussion on girls who are known escorts. But talking about how English student Becca from Uni of Manchester sucks a mean dick for £250 overnight openly seems a bit much.

Lastly, I don't see a point in posting about girls who want online only/platonic only stuff as that's something that you as an SA member should be able to clear up when speaking to the girl herself personally. And more importantly, these girls would likely be the ones who'd be the most shocked/affected finding themselves being discussed on a punter's forum because these girls are the least similar to a WG out of any type of girl on SA.

[tynetunnel]

I totally agree, it gives you a lot of information, apart from the few willy wavers, but that’s quite entertaining when it was allowed..

Personally if it’s too much work for admin to manage I’m sure there are members on there, that are happy to validate genuine members of SA.. they just need to set up a female profile that prospective members can message to show they are members.  Old admin didn’t have the time or the patients to do it..

If people can show they are genuine members then they should be granted access..

I’m happy to do this 

[Kev40ish]

I’m happy to do this 

Admin it’s over to you; if your happy for them to self manage access to the closed thread in this way..

It’s up to them to manage the thread, as obviously you have many other things to worry about..

As like any other thread they always have the report button if they are concerned about a particular member..

[Flunt]

Surely the only reason Seeking started on here was because punters found it as an alternative resource for paid sexual encounters? The proposed new warnings threads are to warn punters away from SBs who are being cast in a negative light because they don't want paid for sexual encounters... 

I'm easily confused! You're either opening the discussion up relating to women who are being paid for sex (prostitutes), the whole theme of the website; or you're highlighting the opposite (non prostitutes) because they're being classed as time wasters and they are the least connected to this forum?

[Flunt]

I’m happy to do this 

I'm not sure I would want to identify my Seeking profile to anyone on here. Potentially you would have access to where I live, my age and a photograph and if you really wanted to be sneaky, it wouldn't take much to get a phone number from me! 

[Kev40ish]

I'm not sure I would want to identify my Seeking profile to anyone on here. Potentially you would have access to where I live, my age and a photograph and if you really wanted to be sneaky, it wouldn't take much to get a phone number from me! 

Then presumably you wouldn’t want access to the closed thread. Someone has to validate your a member of SA. It’s a simple message to a female, with your user name on here. hide your photo, change your age. It’s obviously easy to work out rough locations from reviews..

If your stupid enough to give your phone number when all they want is your user name, you deserve all you get...

So not really giving anything away. I’m sure he’s not going to ask you for a meet..

[Mallow841]

Surely the only reason Seeking started on here was because punters found it as an alternative resource for paid sexual encounters? The proposed new warnings threads are to warn punters away from SBs who are being cast in a negative light because they don't want paid for sexual encounters... 

I'm easily confused! You're either opening the discussion up relating to women who are being paid for sex (prostitutes), the whole theme of the website; or you're highlighting the opposite (non prostitutes) because they're being classed as time wasters and they are the least connected to this forum?

I agree with this.

By fact, if you are giving someone cash in exchange for sex it is prostitution. Whether these women would be mortified if they are discussed on here or not is irrelevant as they are already being discussed in here albeit privately. That doesn’t mean they can’t find out.

The difference is being discussed privately and publicly. Privately it of course is more discrete, but is open to abuse, people could be lying, exaggerating or fabricating stories.

They could do that publicly also, but with the thought that someone could be reading what they’re saying, less likely so in my opinion.

As you said, Seeking is an alternative to AW, both are website where you can get paid sex, so why shouldn’t it be discussed on here? It’s up the the people who are in charge to decide whether they’d like it public or private really.

This site is for sex buyers so how the sex sellers view it or view themselves being discussed on here is not important in my view.

[NigelF]

One thing I feel quite strongly is that there is most of the girls I have meet on seeking are not what I would class as sex workers.  They don't see themselves as sex workers.  And that distinction is important as it is an entirely different thing to review a working girl who advertises herself as such as opposed to sharing details of a student who has tried out seeking and had a few arrangements as a bit of fun to help with her bills.

What they see themselves as/their delusions/backward rationalisations are irrelevant to the actual reality, even if they (and the punter) feels like they're being paid for something else and the sex/sexual activity is just some sort of bonus or only a small part of it. They are sex workers, they're just more fussy about who they see, may take longer to dish it out and take payment in a wider variety of ways than just cash (bills being paid, gifts, travel, meals etc). According to definitions used in academia and the media, even just selling pics (as well as videos, webcamming etc) is a form of sex work.

Only those who don't do anything remotely sex-related aren't sex workers but even then you don't what they've done with other guys. Nonetheless, it's definitely a sliding scale, with a fairly large difference between the like of AW and Seeking and on the very bottom end of the scale you could even apply some of the above to "civvies" (most notably those who would refuse to pay for their share of a date) but at least they weren't advertising themselves on a site like Seeking, as such it still seems reasonable that links to seeking profiles are fair game but anything outside of that isn't.

You have to prove it.  If she challenges you in court about what you accuse her of here are you going to provide proof in court?

The burden of proof is on her which is well before he has to start defending himself, in which case I'm sure he'd be able to come up with something much more thorough (as opposed to something on here which he thought about for 30 seconds) but it wouldn't get to that anyway.

If she challenges you in court about what you accuse her of here are you going to provide proof in court?

The same could be said about many "slanderous" posts on here. If a girl wants to start legal proceedings she's welcome to but she wouldn't get very far with it, not least because she wouldn't even know who to accuse (assuming the poster wasn't daft enough to be revealing but even then she'd have a tough job proving that it was posted by the person she says it was and that's it's actually had an effect on her/her reputation etc).

[LLPunting]

Surely the only reason Seeking started on here was because punters found it as an alternative resource for paid sexual encounters? The proposed new warnings threads are to warn punters away from SBs who are being cast in a negative light because they don't want paid for sexual encounters... 

Probably why OldAdmin managed access to discussion behind a walled garden, he didn't indescriminately class the girls there as prostitutes.

I'm easily confused! You're either opening the discussion up relating to women who are being paid for sex (prostitutes), the whole theme of the website; or you're highlighting the opposite (non prostitutes) because they're being classed as time wasters and they are the least connected to this forum?

Again, the distinction is whether the girl is a self-advertised prostitute or a woman who is screening her contacts with (prolonged) discussion before meeting and agreeing to a paid encounter.  Up to the point she accepts cash for sex she isn't a prostitute she's just a tease.

[LLPunting]

What they see themselves as/their delusions/backward rationalisations are irrelevant to the actual reality, even if they (and the punter) feels like they're being paid for something else and the sex/sexual activity is just some sort of bonus or only a small part of it. They are sex workers, they're just more fussy about who they see, may take longer to dish it out and take payment in a wider variety of ways than just cash (bills being paid, gifts, travel, meals etc). According to definitions used in academia and the media, even just selling pics (as well as videos, webcamming etc) is a form of sex work.

But this is a site about prostitutes not all sex-workers.

The burden of proof is on her which is well before he has to start defending himself, in which case I'm sure he'd be able to come up with something much more thorough (as opposed to something on here which he thought about for 30 seconds) but it wouldn't get to that anyway.

The only proof she may have been soliciting is in punter's chat app.  Fine if he does keep it but he'd have to show it to the coppers to proves she's lying.

The same could be said about many "slanderous" posts on here. If a girl wants to start legal proceedings she's welcome to but she wouldn't get very far with it, not least because she wouldn't even know who to accuse (assuming the poster wasn't daft enough to be revealing but even then she'd have a tough job proving that it was posted by the person she says it was and that's it's actually had an effect on her/her reputation etc).

She'd have a list of her contacts in Seeking, she may be able to whittle down suspects based on details in the disputed post here, suspect Seeking details could be subpoenaed and the identities revealed.
Agree it's a case of he said she said but if some twat here posts an accusation because she cried off at the meeting before any payment made...

[hungrypunt]

Either these girls are getting paid for sex, in which case they're whores and ripe for discussion in open forum.
Or they're not, in which case they're not valid for discussion either in open forum or the walled garden
Whether they think they're whores is irrelevant - if they're taking money for sex then they are sex workers. Probably do some of them good to face the reality and stop kidding themselves.
However it sounds to me from whats been said that the SA thread contains discussions of girls who are not sex workers - and that seems out of order. If they're not shagging for cash surely they should be off-topic?

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. but My opinion on yours Scutty atm is u seem to have an agenda that anyone that posts about girls..blokes..meets on SA is bollocks and should be treated with contempt.
Well you couldnt be more wrong as far as i see. The info in the many threads here that have been seen in the locked thread and the open posts just as any other international forums and threads is valuable to me and others who follow aw and sa. This forum and any other forum cam be full of shite from anyone
but the posts i have seen that you make about them who are involved in sa  are assumptions and antagonising for what reason ? god knows. But im sure i seen a post sayin u was a member of sa ? what happened ? didnt work out ?
 Live and let live....cant find a KISS emoji

[NightKid]

We can argue semantics but in her mind you aren't paying her for her time

I believe in their mind that's exactly what they think you're paying for actually ... it's the whole "you're paying for my time and anything else that happens is between 2 consenting adults" thing and also probably why some on there want payment for socials.

[Flunt]

Then presumably you wouldn’t want access to the closed thread. Someone has to validate your a member of SA. It’s a simple message to a female, with your user name on here. hide your photo, change your age. It’s obviously easy to work out rough locations from reviews..

If your stupid enough to give your phone number when all they want is your user name, you deserve all you get...

So not really giving anything away. I’m sure he’s not going to ask you for a meet..

Nope, don't want access to the SA thread, been there and done that, the amount of bullshit on there far outweighed the occasional snippet of useful information.

The point I was making is that if I new your SA identity I could make a fake female profile and view your account, when you're active, maybe send you a message and try to make an arrangement...

[Flunt]

Probably why OldAdmin managed access to discussion behind a walled garden, he didn't indescriminately class the girls there as prostitutes.

Again, the distinction is whether the girl is a self-advertised prostitute or a woman who is screening her contacts with (prolonged) discussion before meeting and agreeing to a paid encounter.  Up to the point she accepts cash for sex she isn't a prostitute she's just a tease.

It's a fine line to distinguish the advertisers on SA and AW, I would guess the average punter is looking for those willing to offer PPM? If this was a forum on Seeking then the activities of many would be seriously frowned upon with mass a banning from Seeking. The difference is that this is a punting site, men looking to pay for sex, and not a Seeking site with all the fluffy bollocks and love stories sold in the media.

My guess is that OldAdmin kept the Seeking thread out of the public domain was for punter discretion, especially those who were arranging home visits. The main difference between AW and SA is the amount of punters an SB sees, their main selling point, the disadvantage of that is, how easy it would be to identify the punter by the woman scorned.

[datwabbit]

I wish Brandon was here. His hype has led to the site becoming what it is. He's sold women a vision and it's attracted scammers and escorts-in-waiting and unrealistic expectations all round. We are here because of the changes in SA.

[advent2016]

Like many I've dipped in into SA SB SD AM and similar sites to find an occasional though regular full night / full week provider. I found a couple, one 20s and another 30s who met my needs and have led me to other good providers.
I did find a lot of scammers, platonic only, complete nutters etc until I watched a some videos  that showed how it worked and then it was easier.

I don't currently use any subscription services as I only want a whole week at year end.

[bushman]

Like many I've dipped in into SA SB SD AM and similar sites to find an occasional though regular full night / full week provider. I found a couple, one 20s and another 30s who met my needs and have led me to other good providers.
I did find a lot of scammers, platonic only, complete nutters etc until I watched a some videos  that showed how it worked and then it was easier.

I don't currently use any subscription services as I only want a whole week at year end.

You seen videos on how it works? Like in SA tutorials? Link?

[advent2016]

I think it was a documentary involving a business man and his use of such. I can't remember the actuals, but I think it was on Discord sex but can't remember the channel.  I don't want to break rules posting a full url, so just search Discord for Sex, SA howtos.

[Sexoplatonic]

I had heard that membership to dedicated forum was open if I could get someone to recommend me?

[daviemac]

I had heard that membership to dedicated forum was open if I could get someone to recommend me?

You heard wrong. Membership is closed.

[datwabbit]

I had heard that membership to dedicated forum was open if I could get someone to recommend me?

there's regional threads now sharing scammers and time wasters.

[TPreston]

While easy to me to justify to walled garden when I have access, I think it's only fair to these girls personally

The majority of women on there do not see themselves as sex workers - most join with the intention to meet ONE regular guy for help/support/spoiling. It's sex work but they are not marketing themselves to meet multiple guys for paid encounters. The reality of a girl meeting just one regular guy is unlikely but the girls don't join knowing this.

Men and women are guilty of deluding themselves about why both parties are doing this. However i think there is a moral line about sharing someone's details. Lots of posters here have pointed this out.

Most girls on there would be mortified to find themselves being discussed on an open forum (and most would feel similar about the walled garden discussing them). The walled garden of a few hundred members means the girls themselves are much less likely to be 'outted' and other implications.

Girls who scam and steal are fair game to be talked  about in the open (though some scammers will often be men with catfish photos).

I personally have 'wily waved' about experiences. Using the thread as a blog almost at times - I'd like to think some of the highs and lows shared helped some other punters with their exoereinces as little tips and methods to maximise my experience and minimise costs are shared as I post about my meets.

SA themselves have 100% monitored these boards, gained access to the walled thread and then once removed tried to regain access (old admin posted about a Nevada based sugar daddy trying to gain access after he removed a suspected mole). They even mentioned using a forum in a " you're banned" email to one user

[tynetunnel]

I had heard that membership to dedicated forum was open if I could get someone to recommend me?

Who would recommend you after one solitary post, which itself is about getting access?   

[DeanoDeano]

Who would recommend you after one solitary post, which itself is about getting access?   

 

 

[datwabbit]

Who would recommend you after one solitary post, which itself is about getting access?   

Hadn't realised. Took 5 months to ask that question.

[martini2429]

Hadn't realised. Took 5 months to ask that question.

Probably a deep thinker 

 

[lovespike]

I've been ignoring all chats about seeking up till now as I wasn't on it nor did I care for it but I have finally joined and paid for the premium service. My question is where do we go to discuss and share info now that the old seeking thread is no longer open to new members?

I see there are local regional threads popping up but the discussion only appears to be about scammers (which is good). As a newbie to seeking and wanting to get my moneys worth on this subscription I would appreciate access to a thread with good information and discussion about what other members experiences have been like so I can learn the ropes so to speak.

[scutty brown]

I've been ignoring all chats about seeking up till now as I wasn't on it nor did I care for it but I have finally joined and paid for the premium service. My question is where do we go to discuss and share info now that the old seeking thread is no longer open to new members?

I see there are local regional threads popping up but the discussion only appears to be about scammers (which is good). As a newbie to seeking and wanting to get my moneys worth on this subscription I would appreciate access to a thread with good information and discussion about what other members experiences have been like so I can learn the ropes so to speak.

Create a thread

[daviemac]

I've been ignoring all chats about seeking up till now as I wasn't on it nor did I care for it but I have finally joined and paid for the premium service. My question is where do we go to discuss and share info now that the old seeking thread is no longer open to new members?

I see there are local regional threads popping up but the discussion only appears to be about scammers (which is good). As a newbie to seeking and wanting to get my moneys worth on this subscription I would appreciate access to a thread with good information and discussion about what other members experiences have been like so I can learn the ropes so to speak.

I think you have answered your own question there. Also bare in mind SA is only part of the forum and members discussing SA are expected to contribute to the main forum as well, a thing you don't seem to have done a lot of in nearly 8 years on membership.

[datwabbit]

I've been ignoring all chats about seeking up till now as I wasn't on it nor did I care for it but I have finally joined and paid for the premium service. My question is where do we go to discuss and share info now that the old seeking thread is no longer open to new members?

I see there are local regional threads popping up but the discussion only appears to be about scammers (which is good). As a newbie to seeking and wanting to get my moneys worth on this subscription I would appreciate access to a thread with good information and discussion about what other members experiences have been like so I can learn the ropes so to speak.

Depends on what you want to know?

You don't give them money before meeting them - unless it's for an Uber. They could be scammers.
You get them onto Kik or WhatsApp or text asap because your subscription is counting down.

Everything else depends on your personality and banter.

[NightKid]

I've been ignoring all chats about seeking up till now as I wasn't on it nor did I care for it but I have finally joined and paid for the premium service. My question is where do we go to discuss and share info now that the old seeking thread is no longer open to new members?

I see there are local regional threads popping up but the discussion only appears to be about scammers (which is good). As a newbie to seeking and wanting to get my moneys worth on this subscription I would appreciate access to a thread with good information and discussion about what other members experiences have been like so I can learn the ropes so to speak.

As has been said, the regional threads are likely your best bet so why not post whatever questions you may have there? Even if you were to gain access to it, the closed thread is far too bloated at this point to be of much use to a newbie IMO plus it's dominated by a clique of users who mostly live their forum lives on there and have no reason to share their info with you considering you haven't exactly contributed much yourself ... just sayin'. 

[lovespike]

As has been said, the regional threads are likely your best bet so why not post whatever questions you may have there? Even if you were to gain access to it, the closed thread is far too bloated at this point to be of much use to a newbie IMO plus it's dominated by a clique of users who mostly live their forum lives on there and have no reason to share their info with you considering you haven't exactly contributed much yourself ... just sayin'. 

Fair point, although in my defense I'm not so much of a serial punter as I was back in the days of the original punternet forum where I posted a lot more on. By the time that got closed down I moved fully over to here to post what not, but I was also in a committed relationship that limited my mongering ways by then. I have chipped in with the odd bit of info on the odd occasions I have seen someone new in the UK, like a lass up in Manchester a few months ago who I would have written a review but for the fact her profile went down not long after. I chipped in a mini review when someone made a thread asking about her.

Back on topic, after a week of going on seeking, I've noticed that it's like being in a parallel universe to most dating sites, where I'm the one getting inundated with messages out of the blue. Not only that, but I'm starting to get fussy and not bothering with some of them as they either aren't MCOT, come across as deluded, or just look like a plain scam.

Having messaged some of them they seem to have very unrealistic expectations, such as expecting money for photos and videos or just plain chatting, no actual meet up or contact. WTF? Please don't tell me there are some sad bastards on there willing to give in to these demands? It's a buyers market and we're the ones doing the buying!

[datwabbit]

Fair point, although in my defense I'm not so much of a serial punter as I was back in the days of the original punternet forum where I posted a lot more on. By the time that got closed down I moved fully over to here to post what not, but I was also in a committed relationship that limited my mongering ways by then. I have chipped in with the odd bit of info on the odd occasions I have seen someone new in the UK, like a lass up in Manchester a few months ago who I would have written a review but for the fact her profile went down not long after. I chipped in a mini review when someone made a thread asking about her.

Back on topic, after a week of going on seeking, I've noticed that it's like being in a parallel universe to most dating sites, where I'm the one getting inundated with messages out of the blue. Not only that, but I'm starting to get fussy and not bothering with some of them as they either aren't MCOT, come across as deluded, or just look like a plain scam.

Having messaged some of them they seem to have very unrealistic expectations, such as expecting money for photos and videos or just plain chatting, no actual meet up or contact. WTF? Please don't tell me there are some sad bastards on there willing to give in to these demands? It's a buyers market and we're the ones doing the buying!

SA has matured. A lot of SB's realise that they have nothing to lose for these demands. They're not paying for their profile. They can pop on and off. There's articles about becoming a wealthy sugar baby and you don't have to have sex with an older guy - and a lot don't see themselves as escorts so that is an appealing idea.

I wonder if there's a group of SD's who want to get something for their £70 and agree to these offers.

[itk]

I had access before but it ceased when the rules of access changed,  I had regulars and didn't need it.  What I remember of it was many posters try to be 'one up' on others and claiming to have freebies and others just leaching and moaning about the cost.

I don't think a closed thread on a forum such as this is a good idea, it creates cliques and eventually undermines the main forum.

+1.

[finn5555]

A prossie told me she gets more money off SA than she does booking via AW as she just digs her heels in until some mug comes up with what she want  she is £150 an hour on AW where she is expected to fuck for the duration whereas she charges over £500 per meet on SA and still only fucks for around an hour 

The site was good once

[cambsguy]

Am already guessing the answer... but anyone got onto SA having been banned. I had an old account which I had met before but wanted a fresh one so set one up. But after it was approved it was deleted. Went and deleted my old one and reset it- deleted again.

Email from their support was pretty short and permanently banned! Now I have a VPN and could easily join again but I guess the picture will be spotted and if I pay, then they would twig there?

[datwabbit]

Am already guessing the answer... but anyone got onto SA having been banned. I had an old account which I had met before but wanted a fresh one so set one up. But after it was approved it was deleted. Went and deleted my old one and reset it- deleted again.

Email from their support was pretty short and permanently banned! Now I have a VPN and could easily join again but I guess the picture will be spotted and if I pay, then they would twig there?

Try new email, name, photos. Wait on the subscription to see if you're banned again.

[datwabbit]

The site was good once

+1

[kurnlittle]

Am already guessing the answer... but anyone got onto SA having been banned. I had an old account which I had met before but wanted a fresh one so set one up. But after it was approved it was deleted. Went and deleted my old one and reset it- deleted again.

Email from their support was pretty short and permanently banned! Now I have a VPN and could easily join again but I guess the picture will be spotted and if I pay, then they would twig there?

Could you not set up new profile use a new g mail address. With that gmail address set up go and buy play store vouchers from a super market and load it to your new gmail account. Then on SA app on an android phone pay using play st/google pay that should work. Don't blame me if it does not!

[Chris1990mcr]

I’ve been finding seeking incredible completely different experience it’s amazing how many girls that would cost £1000/1500 for overnight will meet for £150/£200.
Some real genuine instagram model types with like 100k followers on there aswell, met a stacked girl from Leeds who I thought was too good to be true turned out to be entirely legit.

Great site, happy to share a bit of info tips etc.

[mgkerx]

Hi
I am now enjoying the various, cheeky and outrageous demands for money after a couple of messages on SA ie no PPM meets only demands for urgent money trnx
So far I have had
1.I can't pay my rent this month can you help its only £1,000?
2.My mobile phone bill bill is due can you please  pay £200
3.Please send me £100 to prove you are genuine
4.£500 for some naughty pics
No no and no, I only pay for a 1-2-1 meets and there are 1,000;s of free pics if you know where to look; Nb please share any outrageous cash demands you have received and is anyone actually sending cash for these vacuous requests?
Cheers
Mike

[GingerNuts]

Hi
I am now enjoying the various, cheeky and outrageous demands for money after a couple of messages on SA ie no PPM meets only demands for urgent money trnx
So far I have had
1.I can't pay my rent this month can you help its only £1,000?
2.My mobile phone bill bill is due can you please  pay £200
3.Please send me £100 to prove you are genuine
4.£500 for some naughty pics
No no and no, I only pay for a 1-2-1 meets and there are 1,000;s of free pics if you know where to look; Nb please share any outrageous cash demands you have received and is anyone actually sending cash for these vacuous requests?
Cheers
Mike

That's three noes. Which one did you say yes to?

[mgkerx]

Haha none although have paid £20 for pics (to help her out) from a girl I had already met for an intimate 1-2-1

[Chris1990mcr]

Haha none although have paid £20 for pics (to help her out) from a girl I had already met for an intimate 1-2-1

Not a chance I would do that. 

One thing that puts me off is when the girls proper keen to meet really fast. Always feel I’m about to get set up and robbed or something.  Maybe paranoid who knows

[stampjones]

Hi
I am now enjoying the various, cheeky and outrageous demands for money after a couple of messages on SA ie no PPM meets only demands for urgent money trnx
So far I have had
1.I can't pay my rent this month can you help its only £1,000?
2.My mobile phone bill bill is due can you please  pay £200
3.Please send me £100 to prove you are genuine
4.£500 for some naughty pics
No no and no, I only pay for a 1-2-1 meets and there are 1,000;s of free pics if you know where to look; Nb please share any outrageous cash demands you have received and is anyone actually sending cash for these vacuous requests?
Cheers
Mike

Im seeing that too. It seems a lot worse just now than previous times Ive been on. Everyone trying to make cash for xmas and thinking its easier to scsm someone than earn it

[mgkerx]

Im seeing that too. It seems a lot worse just now than previous times Ive been on. Everyone trying to make cash for xmas and thinking its easier to scsm someone than earn it

Agreed I suppose its a numbers game ie send out 100's of "Need cash urgently" requests some mug might pay

[Home Alone]

Hi
I am now enjoying the various, cheeky and outrageous demands for money after a couple of messages on SA ie no PPM meets only demands for urgent money trnx
So far I have had
1.I can't pay my rent this month can you help its only £1,000?
2.My mobile phone bill bill is due can you please  pay £200
3.Please send me £100 to prove you are genuine
4.£500 for some naughty pics
No no and no, I only pay for a 1-2-1 meets and there are 1,000;s of free pics if you know where to look; Nb please share any outrageous cash demands you have received and is anyone actually sending cash for these vacuous requests?
Cheers
Mike

I wouldn't do SA; but if I did, each of those requests would receive a "4 cough"😉😆 reply. Or is that against the spirit of SA?!😉

[tynetunnel]

I wouldn't do SA; but if I did, each of those requests would receive a "4 cough"😉😆 reply. Or is that against the spirit of SA?!😉

I think generally that’s the response that all of us give!